Followers | 300 |
Posts | 13,009 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/30/2013 |
Twitter Profile: | Temporarily Unavailable |
Follow on Twitter: | Follow @ Temporarily Unavailable |
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
We all know that's not the case. And that's exactly my point. When something as simple as this is just another fabrication, there's a major problem.
Definitely nothing in the way of trades this week. It's pretty clear that there is a large stakeholder unloading and the lack of new interest is obviously killing the fun as well.
All of the fabricated hype is scaring interest away. No doubt.
••••POST OF THE WEEK••••
MUST-READ CONTENT (See below)
**Too much fabricated hype. Not enough answers**.<------
Don't be fooled.
Don't get trapped.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY.
Still no response from TRTC's "IR" firm....(?)
The big picture is framed by this penny stock's status as THE bagholder stock if the cannabis sector. Within that there's only the MASSIVE $40,000,000 DEFICIT and the obvious fact that the company isn't structured in a way that's meant to benefit common stock investors.
*UPDATE*••TRTC••DUE DILIGENCE REPORT:
Pps continues to decline precisely as our team projected when we released our exit alert at $1.39. With new toxic financing likely pending, we must admit that the situation is now worse than we anticipated. New research below.
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Things must be slow over at the 420Investor service for little 'ol .004 PZOO to be the preferred topic of discussion - on IHUB! lol
I guess it doesn't surprise anyone that things are slow considering how consistently horrible the 420Investor service's "recommendations" have panned out. That is A LOT of back to back to back losing trades!
PZOO it is then, I suppose ;)
Ouch.••LAS VEGAS PERMIT STATUS 09/24/2015••
Thanks, but I prefer official records....:
Permit Status
• Architectural Review ---- DENIED
Permit Status
• Structural Review ---- DENIED
Things aren't going all that smoothly after all. No surprise there.
This spells major delays folks.
Be careful.
http://www5.lasvegasnevada.gov/checkstatus/Details.aspx?id=563270
The 420Investor service's most "recommended" stock of all time was PHOT, which we all know was THE cannabis sector pump & dump. IN FACT, if I remember correctly (I usually do), the service recommended its subscribers vote in favor of a drastic increase to authorized shares just days before the SEC suspended the stock for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme. 420Investor subscribers who followed the "recommendations" potentially suffered 80% losses almost over night!
From the start PHOT obviously exhibited all of the tell-tale signs of a pump & dump, yet this fact was rejected by the 420Investor service. That being so, I question the service's authority to comment on PZOO insofar as its alleged status as a p&d goes. I have no opinion personally.
Just be careful folks - my grandkid is better at managing trades than the 420Investor service is.
Can we get a link? Not trying to be annoying, I just haven't been able to access the record. Thanks.
••••POST OF THE WEEK••••
MUST-READ CONTENT (See below)
I think the post below does a great job exposing a few of the reasons why TRTC is regarded as one of the absolute worst stocks for shareholders. Remember folks, TRTC is the biggest bagholder stock in the sector....accordingly, it is subject to constant fabricated hype.
Don't be fooled.
Don't get trapped.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY.
Don't expect a response to these EXTREMELY IMPORTANT questions. It's not in KSCA's best interest to do-so. That said, GREAT points...
TRTC DOWN 80% SINCE 420INVESTOR ENTRY "RECOMMENDATION":
TRTC has done nothing but plummet ever since the 420Investor service touted its entry "recommendation" at .53.
Why do all of the stocks "recommended" by the 420Investor service turn out to be the absolute worst in the sector? The service's portfolio has sustained HORRIFIC losses, and with the latest developments re TRTC, it's only getting worse.
Be careful folks. Learn to recognize obvious pump & dumps and NEVER GET TRAPPED HOLDING A BAGHOLDER STOCK.
Why do all of the stocks favored by the 420Investor service turn out to be the absolute worst in the sector?
The 420Investor "trade recommendations" routinely produce horrific losses.
79% LOSSES? Is that for real?
Why do all of the stocks favored by the 420Investor service turn out to be the absolute worst in the sector?
The 420Investor "trade recommendations" routinely produce horrific losses.
79% LOSSES? Is that for real?
•• Lower ••
420INVESTOR SERVICE FAILS YET AGAIN
Based on their "target of 4.20," I think it's safe to say the 420Investor service got a little too excited about last week's price action.
"Target of $4.20" ???? lol
Quite the professional organization they're running over there with their hyping of a technically arbitrary yet willfully superficial target of FOUR TWENTY. lol Not clever, not cool, and routinely inaccurate.
It's laughable indeed. Be careful with these 420Investor touted stocks...it's no secret that their "recommended" portfolio has consistently performed horribly (78% losses).
lol Obvious bagholder stock is obvious.
".99 in 98 days" lol Nothing like an arbitrary target with no basis in reality to get investors excited!
I remember my first stock.
NO
ONE
IS
FALLING
FOR
IT
TRTC is known for being the biggest bagholder stock in the cannabis sector. There is no one left to buy this stock because those who could be fooled by the pump & dump promo are already trapped with huge losses!
It's no secret anymore - TRTC exhibits all the tell-tale traits of a pump & dump and the market has obviously come to terms with this. BE CAREFUL!
This is unbelievable!**"BAGHOLDER STOCK EXPOSED"**
Re Nevada property "purchase":
• DEED SAYS CONSIDERATION OF *TEN DOLLARS.
• PRESS RELEASE SAYS CONSIDERATION OF *THREE HUNDRED AND FORTY-FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS.
TRTC told shareholders that $344,000 of THEIR money was spent on purchasing property that OFFICIAL RECORDS indicate they only paid TEN DOLLARS for.
http://icris.washoecounty.us/recorder/eagleweb/downloads/4490937.pdf?id=DOC815S12590.A0&parent=DOC815S12590
This is an unbelievably startling red flag, and JUST THE BEGINNING.
The fact that I'm the only one to have ever pointed this out is just more undeniable evidence proving this stock's status as THE BAGHOLDER STOCK OF THE CANNABIS SECTOR.
So hard to believe folks actually fall for this pennystock "investing" nonsense.
As we suggested after alerting the closure of our long term position at $1.39, TRTC is obviously TOXIC to shareholders.
Our level of accuracy continues to go unmatched, folks. Be wary of the fabricated hype that continues to dominate the story of this BAGHOLDER STOCK.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
lol They didn't even name this "distributor." Obvious pump & dump promo PR by TRTC's new IR firm, which is KNOWN for promoting horribly performing penny stocks.
Solid stuff!
•••UNMATCHED & VERIFIABLE ACCURACY•••
Our commitment to objective analysis and the level of accuracy we exhibit on a daily basis continues to go unmatched.
TRTC is without question the worst bagholder stock in the sector, which is why this story is dominated by a constant flow of fabricated hype.
This being so - objective analysis with respect to TRTC is both rare and critical...but that's why we're here.
•••••DON'T BE FOOLED•••••
Our long standing history of precision is well known and easily verifiable.
Look into it.
••CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY••
lol Because most publicly traded companies don't make a habit out of funneling shareholder dollars into subsidiaries that are prohibited by law from operating on a for-profit basis.
I might feel differently if I bought the stock on 9/8 at the 3 month high, but that actually happened to be our exit day...
Check out our alerts.
This one's headed lower for now.
Good luck folks!
That's it?! That giant report and THAT'S ALL that can be disputed?
lol I'm just kidding - I'm not actually surprised. We all know the report is accurate.
It's a really solid piece of work and I'm sure it has saved many-a novice investor quite a bit of money, TIME and grief. Becoming a pennystock bagholder is the ultimate investing mistake - but thankfully it's easily avoided.
The overall theme of the report isn't about whether or not TRTC gets permits...it's about whether or not it is/was a good investment (what actually matters). As far as that goes (the thing that matters), the piece was SPOT ON. No question there.
TRTC can win every permit in America, but if the company and its operations aren't structured in a way that can benefit shareholders, permits are useless. I think we all realize this, but when the subject is a bagholder stock, the focus is always on hype at the expense of reality (and $).
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
ALWAYS ON POINT
We're not bearish with respect to the company, we're bearish with respect to the stock.
See you guys again at $1.00.
Cheers.
That text is of third party origin i.e. Not from the bill itself. So again...
That statement is inaccurate. Nothing within the bill states definitively that that's the case. It is simply speculated that the absence of for-profit/not-for-profit subject matter within the bill implicitly allows for companies to generate profits. The bill does not directly legislate for-profit cannabis operations.
It will be some time before we know whether or not the bill will implicitly legislate for-profit cannabis operations.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
That statement is inaccurate. Nothing within the bill states definitively that that's the case. It is simply speculated that the absence of for-profit/not-for-profit subject matter within the bill implicitly allows for companies to generate profits. The bill does not directly legislate for-profit cannabis operations.
It will be some time before we know whether or not the bill will implicitly legislate for-profit cannabis operations.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
So in essence the only aspect of the report that is disputed is the author's suggestion that TRTC was unlikely to receive Clark County permits.
To say the suggestion was "completely wrong" is unreasonable. The author said it was unlikely, not that it absolutely wouldn't happen. Unlikely things happen all the time.
The only other issue of fact that was disputed was the statement regarding DP's alleged securities violations. The article indicates he was "charged" and makes no comment about any indictment or whether or not they are "still in business." So again, to suggest that information is wrong or inaccurate is unreasonable.
Yet again the value of that article and its overall accuracy of fact is affirmed.
Cheers.
The information within the report is as relevant now as it was the day it was published. No other comprehensive due diligence report has since been published to render the one in question obsolete.
If there is a similar, more recent report that contains equally valuable information for potential shareholders, please share...
Fact is, this information is only "dated" to a reader who is already trapped with expensive shares. To readers that are new to this story, it remains the best comprehensive report available.
••*FULL REPORT*••Must read.
Indeed - and an impressively accurate report at that. So far nothing stated as fact within the piece has been successfully disputed and the stock has since plummeted 90%.
http://theinvestorzone.com/2014/06/06/terra-tech-a-natural-born-capital-killer/
That same article, which is written by a know pump & dump promoter, also refers to PHOT as an "epic winner." PHOT was suspended by the SEC for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme and ultimately plummeted over 90%.
Not surprisingly, TRTC has also plummeted nearly 90% since that article was posted.
I agree though - TRTC exhibits all of the tell-tale traits of a pump & dump, and has cemented its status as THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
Now this is just embarrassing...
Will TRTC further soil its reputation by issuing YET ANOTHER PR indicating that it's set to begin construction!?
Let's be honest, TRTC is embarrassing... The company has released multiple PR stating the same so-called "developments" over and over without EVER following through.
See below from June. This is just laughable at this point.
Don't fall for all this pump & dump bagholder stock promo folks!
Ever since the 420Investor service touted that hilarious and arbitrary target of $4.20, this stock has done nothing but sell off.
$4.20? lol #Fail
(LINK) TRTC:An obvious nightmare for shareholders?
•NEWS•TRTC employs "serial pump & dump attorney," Thomas Puzzo:
(Full article linked below)
See also PR from last week.
Be careful folks. Red flags have really started to pile up.
Quote:
"Some stocks have an ever lasting impact from the circumstances that create it. In the case of Terra Tech, it crawled out of the great stock promotion primordial ooze. It all started with attorney Thomas Puzzo, who has set up shells for promotions over and over (see his public company involvement).
A few of his most successful pump and dump creations include: http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/PeopleFilingResults.aspx?PersonID=3041188&PersonName=THOMAS%20E.%20PUZZO
All of these promotions resulted in shareholder losses of at least 90%. Puzzo followed a similar pattern to set up the shell that eventually became TRTC (with his involvement beginning in as early as 2008).
It was originally a company called Private Secretary with the symbol PVST. And the pattern was so clear that it would be a future promotion, an internet researcher using the alias ‘nodummy’ identified it in December of 2011 with these comments: “Here is another shell to keep an eye on in the future because it follows some similar patterns with NSRS and RAYS: Private Secretary, Inc (PVST). If you see a change in CEO and a name change/acquisition done by the PVST shell then the paid promotion shouldn’t be too far behind.”
[/quote]
FULL ARTICLE: http://theinvestorzone.com/2014/06/06/terra-tech-a-natural-born-capital-killer/
Now this is just embarrassing...
Will TRTC further soil its reputation by issuing YET ANOTHER PR indicating that it's set to begin construction!?
Let's be honest, TRTC is embarrassing... The company has released multiple PR stating the same so-called "developments" over and over without EVER following through.
See below from June. This is just laughable at this point.
Don't fall for all this pump & dump bagholder stock promo folks!
IVXX - Still NOT FOR PROFIT.
TRTC's operations in California are still prohibited by law from generating and disbursing profits to shareholders.
It sounds crazy because it is.
A publicly traded not-for-profit operation. CRAZY.
Only place to find this type of utter nonsense is in penny stocks!
TRTC is THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector.
*CRITICAL* TRTC OPERATIONS IN CA COULD CEASE
Shareholders and potential investors MUST be aware of the critical issues the implementation of AB266 poses for TRTC in California.
IVXX currently operates cannabis facilities WITHOUT LICENSING in the State of California. The loophole being exploited by the company is to be remedied upon implementation of the new law.
19320. (a) Licensing authorities administering this chapter
may issue state licenses only to qualified applicants engaging in
commercial cannabis activity pursuant to this chapter. Upon the
date of implementation of regulations by the licensing authority,
no person shall engage in commercial cannabis activity without
possessing both a state license and a local permit, license, or other
authorization. A licensee shall not commence activity under the
authority of a state license until the applicant has obtained, in
addition to the state license, a license or permit from the local
jurisdiction in which he or she proposes to operate, following the
requirements of the applicable local ordinance"
Extensive selling - MMs have done a great job facilitating significant selling in the last handful of days. Got to love how they pop it 5-7% on 5k shares, only to push 100k dumploads immediately...and repeat.
It's been going on for some time now. It's quite clear that at least one significant stakeholder wants OUT ASAP. Smart, they are...
Headed lower.
CRITICAL ISSUES QUESTIONED: "7.) How is TRTC going to get around the 3 year residency requirement for all officers, when the VV family and other officers of TRTC are not CA residents, as well as IVXX being a Nevada LLC. Will AB266 affect TRTC negatively because of these requirements?
I'd like to draw attention to this specific question, as the implications are far-reaching for shareholders.
To this day, we have yet to receive a sufficient response from TRTC or its "investor relations" firm...
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
••••POST OF THE WEEK•••• "Still no response to my KSCA email. Still no call back. Below is the email sent:
MUST-READ CONTENT (See below)
I think the post below does a great job exposing a few of the reasons why TRTC is regarded as one of the absolute worst stocks for shareholders. Remember folks, TRTC is the biggest bagholder stock in the sector....accordingly, it is subject to constant fabricated hype.
Don't be fooled.
Don't get trapped.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY.
Don't expect a response to these EXTREMELY IMPORTANT questions. It's not in KSCA's best interest to do-so. That said, GREAT points...
"Hello,
I'm an investor in TRTC and have quite a few questions that I hope that you can help answer. I'd love be a larger part of TRTC, but cant wrap my head around the following questions:
1.) Why is TRTC retaining Thomas Puzzo as their lawyer? This man is associated with many past and present pump and dump schemes. Doesn't this make TRTC look like another one of his schemes?
2.) Michael James is on the board of directors part time for CFO for TRTC, while being a part time CEO for NRTI. How is this fair to TRTC? Also on this subject, Michael James has been given $500,000 bonuses time and time again without explaining to shareholders why.. This partnership is seriously affecting the investment community's outlook on TRTC.
3.) James' company has repeatedly PR'd about a partnership with NRTI for a product called Nuleif. Nuleif was PR'd by James company saying that it's available in Derek Peterson's private dispensary "Blum" in Oakland. I've stopped by the store and seen no such evidence, even the day of the PR. Since then, no one at the store seems to know what the product is, or even if it exists. Was this all a scam? Slight of hand?
4.) What happened to GrowMASS? We had funding in place to expand that, and it just disappeared into thin air.
5.) Does GrowOp make any revenue at all? Why is it still a part of TRTC if not? I see EG reports, IVXX reports, but nothing coming from selling lights and equipment via GrowOp. Is this still a part of the company?
6.) New buildout progress - We've had eyes on the ground that continue to say that construction hasn't budged on TRTC's Western Ave Dispensary location in Las Vegas. We were told we would get many updates about this, yet we haven't heard a word. Is this still happening? Whats the hold up?
7.) How is TRTC going to get around the 3 year residency requirement for all officers, when the VV family and other officers of TRTC are not CA residents, as well as IVXX being a Nevada LLC. Will AB266 affect TRTC negatively because of these requirements?
8.) Why is TRTC continuing to buy product from Blum, to repackage, and sell back to Blum and others? This seems like a way to make DP and employees large amounts of revenue through their private entity. The Shareholders don't seem to benefit here at all. How much are we paying BLUM for product? It seems a bit out of line with the interests of the shareholders here.
9.) What happened to the NB plants acquisition? We were told time and time again that it was coming, and would help EG become MUCH MUCH MUCH more profitable. Why hasnt this happened, and why haven't we received an update about it? Is this still happening?"
That's not at all how trademark law is applied. The style of font is irrelevant. See "standard character mark" - TMEP Section 807.03.
Apparently regardless of the subject matter, if content is meant to defend or promote this stock, said content is routinely marked by gross inaccuracies or blatant fabrication. It's rather sad.
When a stock is truly worth buying, there is no reason for there to be a constant flow of MADE UP NONSENSE. The facts are enough.
In the case of TRTC, fabrications DOMINATE the long perspective.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY