working
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
those changes below $ 0.0001 are anecdotal and usual in "0 BID"
trades 777 (4) and it's not the first day that happens
100 mill A/S , No O/S
moment to add more, UATG
time to buy UATG
UATG 0,0014$
too high a monthly payment
and now RS
game over
31,95$ - 41,95$? expensive and bad tv
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142220351
GOOD POST, STICKY NOTE!! ???
SWRM 0,0292$
NT is usual, here and in the whole market
recently it has been presented:
November 2017
January 2018
...
let's stop with silly things, SVTE is Pink Current Information
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/SVTE/disclosure
just a note,
20 billion is the A / S
7 billon is the O / S
therefore in "circulation" there are 7B and not 20B
although it is a high number it is "very different"
other stocks in the same O/S have had huge runs
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/sec-filings/12680821/content/html
pag 3
https://wyobiz.wy.gov/Business/FilingDetails.aspx?eFNum=160088057104104054158053146099010005113185032062
AS at otcmarkets is dated May 31, 2017,
O / S can not be greater than A / S!
you are right, friend
but sometimes ... it's hard to shut up
and lastly:
from the month of may (2017) the sentence is public,
We know all the clauses since then
let's look at our comments
and a massive download once the stock had risen to 52 cents
these two issues are the reason for the failure of buildablock
for him the "other is history"
a horror story for us
Gary's opinion does not seem to be that:
he does not think that this issue is over for the judicial issue,
Let's speak clearly, tired of hiding the words of a person who has not behaved like a "good person"
The leading implementation partner / investor was the Canadian retail clothing chest. Only after building the product and preparing for the deployment did he withdraw it on the basis that the technology was too disruptive.
...We raised some money and went to work building something that had never ben seen before. The idea was 8 years ahead of its time. Today there exist companies that flourish in the space. Clearly we were chasing the correct rabbit...
the idea, a date today is "outdated"
after two years it will be "more obsolete"
and I'm not saying it ...
But can another person take control?
example; Bartek or any other (P.P.C., D Lof)
no one else is affected by the court ruling
the problem is that ... the idea died
That's right, it was published at the time,
but, my knowledge does not respond:
What practical effects does this have?
now there is no kind of work, movement ...
and I disagree with Sam at this point:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=141621863
I am more in line with your previous comment:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133783313
Gary has terminated this project for the reasons I told you
I think that the judicial process has also influenced, (although he does not mention it)
with this case a "very precious" time was lost
and the castle "X" GDG *, MKA * has fallen
with this hope,
it seems to be our only opportunity,
SS seems good for it,
nobody likes to lose money,
therefore I imagine that they will be looking for an exit ...
will they find it ???
what seems clear is that this "business project" is finished
HITTING ASK SWRM
20 days from R/S...
?????
do we know where we come from?
a year ago this was 0.00 **
we arrived in May 2018 to 0,000 *
here we make an R / S
the price equivalence would be $ 1.19
Who has $ 0.0001 titles?
look at the board, practically nobody
many people lose a lot of money here
For this?
Reporting Status: Dark: Alternative Reporting Standard
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/sec-filings/9543029/content/html
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/BABL/disclosure
After 0,0259 blue sky
SWRM BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMM
We still waiting,
you looked, SWR * today booommm
SWRM BOOOMMMM
SWRM NEWS
that's right, more reasons to try not to lose all the money invested by them,
and they paid a very high price ...
that is my conclusion, I can be wrong:
Buildablock is a project that failed for different reasons,
The idea was 8 years before his time. Today there are companies that flourish in space, to date is a nonsense
the idea is dead and buried,
will take control another CEO with another idea
or what is more likely, a shell that will be sold
asset freeze has been lifted, and Gary has hands-free
to change business in the hands of another CEO,
... or sell the shell
In 2016, he was appointed President of Gaargle Solutions
https://ca.linkedin.com/in/gary-oberman-5478995
http://dovetail.co/dovetail-team/
therefore I think it has "ability to move"
at least to leave the company in "other hands interested"
That's right, but I do not think I intend to continue with Buildablock
according to my "inquiries" for Gary Buildablock is a "failed" project
I'm more with this solution:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=133783313
I think that the most "normal" exit here would be for people who have 50% of the OS to take control or BABL to be sold
Authorized: 500,000,000
Issued: 165,608,379
Restricted: 87,260,087
the paths of Gary and this company I think they will not go together,
Gary has acknowledged that this project has failed,
only remains:
1st a very good SS
2nd investors with a lot of money here
Why two years????
SWRM 0.020
0.022 SWRM