Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You don't have to apologize haha. I was just saying he liked a post about Microsoft buying out a startup. Maybe we've gotten an offer from Microsoft? We most likely have. I think Tommy is taking in the contracts, to demand a higher buyout price from them.
When did I imply we were going to get $100 mill? I think we will get more as well, but I would be perfectly happy with $100 mill. If we can get contracts worth $100 mill + we could probably get a $300-500 mill buyout
Chuck brooks just liked an article on Twitter that says Microsoft bought a cybersecurity startup for $100 mill... hmmmm
That's great news!
It would take about 6 months of no news to get this stock down to .0001, nice try buddy. Hope you bought your shares because this is the bottom. Perhaps we could get a dip to 5's for a couple seconds but not much will be for sale there. GLTY
Guys, the SEWP contract is way more important than people think. I feel like people think we're going to just get one big contract from this and it's done, but that isn't how it works. It's going to be used for multiple contracts, it' acts as a vehicle to all government agencies. So let's say the first contract we get through SEWP is $60 million for DHS, and it goes really well - there will be several more contracts like that coming in for different agencies. And there are over 220 government agencies. Lets just say we get our email software into 50 of those agencies, that's about $3 billion in contracts
Which tweet?
From who? I see tweets from 8h ago
Been very busy the whole day, did I miss anything? Haha
Financials could really hit any day now. And they're going to show those contracts $$
I think he was saying that the two posters don't TS clearance. It's very obvious that Tom has TS clearance, he also has TSC clearance as well
You're misinterpreting. What happened was that two bvtk posters on twitter said they were blocked by SEWP twitter. Im not sure why but they were probably nonstop tweeting/messaging them
I know it was just two posters from twitter who got blocked haha
It's for Bravatek, but i3 is used as our reseller for SEWP
Exactly, endless potential
Guys, the SEWP contract is way more important than people think. I feel like people think we're going to just get one big contract from this and it's done, but that isn't how it works. It's going to be used for multiple contracts, it' acts as a vehicle to all government agencies. So let's say the first contract we get through SEWP is $60 million for DHS, and it goes really well - there will be several more contracts like that coming in for different agencies. And there are over 220 government agencies. Lets just say we get our email software into 50 of those agencies, that's about $3 billion in contracts
I think you're on to something ;)
I can see that haha
You're welcome
Here is a link to the patent application http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2017/0063869.html
What did you ask?
Only the strong survive
Nope, because the CEO stated several times no desire for an rs
Thank you, you're welcome
I will sir!
Our Director, Chuck Brooks, was appointed to work directly with Tom Bossert for the Trump Administration, DHS cyber Security . Link : http://www.logiccentralonline.com/new-cyber-frontier/ncf-dc03/
Our CEO was also the Chief Commercialization Officer there, and works with the White House on a daily basis still. I can bet our product is going to be used there. Encrypt One has around $75 mill in revenue potential for the DHS alone according to the company. And they said there are over 220 agencies, which means if Ecrypt One is deployed in all agencies, we will have billions in revenue
CEO of Bravatek has turned around and sold 4 business, and made people lots of money. Early in his career, he was appointed Senior Director of Newport Corp, and ran 6/7 divisions, leading to its ultimate buyout for $850 million. He was also appointed COO of Zyvex Corp by Jim Von Ehr (the CEO). Check out who Jim Von Ehr is if you don't already know him. He also runs a $2 billion Tech consulting firm, Cellucci Associates, which has raised over $5 billion over the last few years. The list goes on forever, chief commercialization officer under 2 presidents etc. Our Director Chuck Brooks, was ranked #2 in the top 5 tech voices on LinkedIn, and awarded the 2017 cyber security marketer of the year. Recently he was appointed to work for the Trump Administration, and to work Directly with Tom Bossert. We have Top Notch management, nasdaq/NYSE quality. $25 million in signed contracts already, and they took over this company only a couple years ago. Do your DD, because there's a lot more $$
Don't forget we have received multiple buyout offers for Ecrypt one and Bravatek as a whole. The money Cellucci and other board members receive from a buyout will come from the value of the shares they own. I am sure they know what to do from here. The OS is not a problem at all on my opinion. Trust management, they have a lot of experienced, especially the CEO... I'm sure he is trying to make the most he can off this company, and that will come through stock appreciation
In 2016 alone, almost $400 billion was spent on Tech giants acquiring small and midsize tech companies
Pay attention to the tweets . $40- 60 million in potential annual revenue from Ecrypt one at the DHS. And there are over 200 agencies. Let's say we deploy into half of those agencies - $4-6 billion in annual revenue. If we deploy into all agencies $8-12 billion in annual revenue. And this is if the market potential for Ecrypt One is $40-60 million for each agency. It could be more or less for each
BVTK should realistically be trading at .01-.10 with the contracts we already have in place. When financials are released, and more contracts are signed, I believe we will be trading .15-.20 +
Our Director, Chuck Brooks, was appointed to work directly with Tom Bossert for the Trump Administration, DHS cyber Security . Link : http://www.logiccentralonline.com/new-cyber-frontier/ncf-dc03/
Our CEO was also the Chief Commercialization Officer there, and works with the White House on a daily basis still. I can bet our product is going to be used there. Encrypt One has around $75 mill in revenue potential for the DHS alone according to the company. And they said there are over 220 agencies, which means if Ecrypt One is deployed in all agencies, we will have billions in revenue
CEO of Bravatek has turned around and sold 4 business, and made people lots of money. Early in his career, he was appointed Senior Director of Newport Corp, and ran 6/7 divisions, leading to its ultimate buyout for $850 million. He was also appointed COO of Zyvex Corp by Jim Von Ehr (the CEO). Check out who Jim Von Ehr is if you don't already know him. He also runs a $2 billion Tech consulting firm, Cellucci Associates, which has raised over $5 billion over the last few years. The list goes on forever, chief commercialization officer under 2 presidents etc. Our Director Chuck Brooks, was ranked #2 in the top 5 tech voices on LinkedIn, and awarded the 2017 cyber security marketer of the year. Recently he was appointed to work for the Trump Administration, and to work Directly with Tom Bossert. We have Top Notch management, nasdaq/NYSE quality. $25 million in signed contracts already, and they took over this company only a couple years ago. Do your DD, because there's a lot more $$
BVTK should realistically be trading at .01-.10 with the contracts we already have in place. When financials are released, and more contracts are signed, I believe we will be trading .15-.20 +
Don't forget we have received multiple buyout offers for Ecrypt one and Bravatek as a whole. The money Cellucci and other board members receive from a buyout will come from the value of the shares they own. I am sure they know what to do from here. The OS is not a problem at all on my opinion. Trust management, they have a lot of experienced, especially the CEO... I'm sure he is trying to make the most he can off this company, and that will come through stock appreciation
Pay attention to the tweets . $40- 60 million in potential annual revenue from Ecrypt one at the DHS. And there are over 200 agencies. Let's say we deploy into half of those agencies - $4-6 billion in annual revenue. If we deploy into all agencies $8-12 billion in annual revenue. And this is if the market potential for Ecrypt One is $40-60 million for each agency. It could be more or less for each
In 2016 alone, almost $400 billion was spent on Tech giants acquiring small and midsize tech companies
Think about it like this, this stock could easily run to .20-.30 with the OS here. Now once we get to .20/.30, they could rs the stock to meet meet requirements for Nasdaq, and reduce the OS. And from there, institutional investors will load the Sh*t out of it. These are the cases in which it is a positive. But that most likely won't happen. I think they will either sell Viking and use proceeds to buy back and reduce shares, or be bought out as a whole