Followers | 300 |
Posts | 13,009 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 01/30/2013 |
Twitter Profile: | Temporarily Unavailable |
Follow on Twitter: | Follow @ Temporarily Unavailable |
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
lol Absurd. The question we should be asking is - what major stakeholder are the MMs helping to dump all of these millions of shares? Why don't they think TRTC is worth holding?
Folks already know this because it's been repeated 100 times, but we flip TRTC on a day trade basis only. And most recently, as indicated by our multiple alerts, we exited yesterday on gains.
Exploiting patterns via quick intraday trading is quite obviously not the same as making a long term investment, losing 80% and still adamantly claiming it was a wise investment.
Looking for .05.
Cheers.
Smart people don't baghold an obvious pump & dump for years despite consistent, horrific losses...while still insisting it is a great investment (lolWHAT?).
TRTC is a bagholder stock folks, and that's the only source of its support. No one else is interested in buying a blatantly overvalued pennystock. No getting around it.
The 420Investor service's most "recommended" stock of all time was PHOT, which we all know was THE cannabis sector pump & dump. IN FACT, if I remember correctly (I usually do), the service recommended its subscribers vote in favor of a drastic increase to authorized shares just days before the SEC suspended the stock for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme. 420Investor subscribers who followed the "recommendations" potentially suffered 80% losses almost over night!
From the start PHOT obviously exhibited all of the tell-tale signs of a pump & dump, yet this fact was rejected by the 420Investor service. That being so, I question the service's authority to comment on CANL. I have no opinion personally.
Just be careful folks - my grandkid is better at managing trades than the 420Investor service is.
There is a strong negative correlation between the amount of fabricated hype being disseminated and price per share. It's uncanny.
No one is falling for it. No real value for shareholders means no real value per share. It's that simple.
The hype phase in this sector has long passed and there's no one left who can be fooled into purchasing tremendously overvalued shares.
We're witnessing the same trajectory followed by every pump & dump that has come before TRTC as it further secures its status as THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector.
Ignore the fabricated hype and focus on sources of real objective analysis.
Our long standing history of accuracy is verifiable and continues to go unmatched. Don't take my word for it - look into it!
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
••••*MUST-READ CONTENT*••••(See below) "1.) Why is TRTC retaining Thomas Puzzo as their lawyer? This man is associated with many past and present pump and dump schemes. Doesn't this make TRTC look like another one of his schemes?
The questions quoted below illustrate many of the core problems underlying TRTC's struggle to attract and retain investors.
Too much fabricated hype.
Not enough answers.
Don't be fooled.
Don't get trapped.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY.
Still no response from TRTC's "IR" firm....(?) WHY NOT?
Posts indicating these questions have been "asked and answered" are just more of the same fabricated untruths that have sadly become commonplace. Don't take my word for it - Look into it!
2.) Michael James is on the board of directors part time for CFO for TRTC, while being a part time CEO for NRTI. How is this fair to TRTC? Also on this subject, Michael James has been given $500,000 bonuses time and time again without explaining to shareholders why.. This partnership is seriously affecting the investment community's outlook on TRTC.
3.) James' company has repeatedly PR'd about a partnership with NRTI for a product called Nuleif. Nuleif was PR'd by James company saying that it's available in Derek Peterson's private dispensary "Blum" in Oakland. I've stopped by the store and seen no such evidence, even the day of the PR. Since then, no one at the store seems to know what the product is, or even if it exists. Was this all a scam? Slight of hand?
4.) What happened to GrowMASS? We had funding in place to expand that, and it just disappeared into thin air.
5.) Does GrowOp make any revenue at all? Why is it still a part of TRTC if not? I see EG reports, IVXX reports, but nothing coming from selling lights and equipment via GrowOp. Is this still a part of the company?
6.) New buildout progress - We've had eyes on the ground that continue to say that construction hasn't budged on TRTC's Western Ave Dispensary location in Las Vegas. We were told we would get many updates about this, yet we haven't heard a word. Is this still happening? Whats the hold up?
7.) How is TRTC going to get around the 3 year residency requirement for all officers, when the VV family and other officers of TRTC are not CA residents, as well as IVXX being a Nevada LLC. Will AB266 affect TRTC negatively because of these requirements?
8.) Why is TRTC continuing to buy product from Blum, to repackage, and sell back to Blum and others? This seems like a way to make DP and employees large amounts of revenue through their private entity. The Shareholders don't seem to benefit here at all. How much are we paying BLUM for product? It seems a bit out of line with the interests of the shareholders here.
9.) What happened to the NB plants acquisition? We were told time and time again that it was coming, and would help EG become MUCH MUCH MUCH more profitable. Why hasnt this happened, and why haven't we received an update about it? Is this still happening?"
Cool. We can post links to things all day but the statement was still dead wrong.
TRTC is a bagholder stock folks. Don't be fooled.
This statement is COMPLETELY INACCURATE:
Less than 72 hours , Governor Brown signs AB 266 , which INHO will change California law to a "for Profit" state regarding Marijuana sales. It will go into effect Jan 2016, which is:
TRTC isn't set up in a way that can benefit shareholders. No value for shareholders = No value per share. It's simple.
There is no new interest here. TRTC is a bagholder stock; i.e. The majority of investors are down 50-80%. This not only limits what little momentum the stock can generate, but it also makes TRTC the subject of constant fabricated hype. Be careful.
Don't be fooled.
Don't get trapped.
Consume information wisely.
Indeed.
Nice trading here today.
I have no idea what that means. Haven't been following.
There is literally zero factual basis for this comment.
"Down to a dime now, but the good news is it is mainly due to investors who were forced to cover other short positions in the overall market downturn and needed cash to do so, and has nothing to do with TRTC fundamentals."
Down 30% on the month. Should close over .10 to salvage the chart, otherwise that imminent next step down is coming sooner rather than later.
Be wary of the fabricated hype, folks.
Don't be fooled.
Don't get trapped.
Consume information wisely.
Big block selldown right on cue.
Technicals. See our alerts from earlier today. The same setup we've hit time and time again.
+10% flip was on point. Volume death is the exit signal.
Congrats traders!
ALWAYS TAKE PROFITS
No $2.40 break today?
MMs doing what they can to drum up volume. Putting it through day trading screens is always good for a couple 100k boost to volume. Technicals can only take it so far. Without momentum the stock will eventually drop again, leaving heavier resistance at .10-.105.
For traders, watch for volume death north of .10. This will signal the exit. If volume sustains, we'll hold for the +10%.
FABRICATED HYPE
We all know TRTC is in no position to commence NV operations by January 2016, much less generate profits (lol).
Be careful folks.
No value for shareholders = No value per share.
Simple.
The rest is all fabricated hype.
Be wary of the AM pop & drop folks. MMs have to let it up to facilitate all the selling, which appears to be a significant stakeholder liquidating before it's too late.
Also, be VERY aware of the constant supply of fabricated hype surrounding this stock. It's a shame, but the reality nontheless.
Don't be fooled.
Don't get trapped.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY.
There is a strong negative correlation between the amount of fabricated hype being disseminated and price per share. It's uncanny.
No one is falling for it. No real value for shareholders means no real value per share. It's that simple.
The hype phase in this sector has long passed and there's no one left who can be fooled into purchasing tremendously overvalued shares.
We're witnessing the same trajectory followed by every pump & dump that has come before TRTC as it further secures its status as THE bagholder stock of the cannabis sector.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
••••MUST-READ CONTENT•••• (See below) "1.) Why is TRTC retaining Thomas Puzzo as their lawyer? This man is associated with many past and present pump and dump schemes. Doesn't this make TRTC look like another one of his schemes?
The questions quoted below illustrate many of the core problems underlying TRTC's struggle to attract and retain investors.
Too much fabricated hype.
Not enough answers.
Don't be fooled.
Don't get trapped.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY.
Still no response from TRTC's "IR" firm....(?) WHY NOT?
2.) Michael James is on the board of directors part time for CFO for TRTC, while being a part time CEO for NRTI. How is this fair to TRTC? Also on this subject, Michael James has been given $500,000 bonuses time and time again without explaining to shareholders why.. This partnership is seriously affecting the investment community's outlook on TRTC.
3.) James' company has repeatedly PR'd about a partnership with NRTI for a product called Nuleif. Nuleif was PR'd by James company saying that it's available in Derek Peterson's private dispensary "Blum" in Oakland. I've stopped by the store and seen no such evidence, even the day of the PR. Since then, no one at the store seems to know what the product is, or even if it exists. Was this all a scam? Slight of hand?
4.) What happened to GrowMASS? We had funding in place to expand that, and it just disappeared into thin air.
5.) Does GrowOp make any revenue at all? Why is it still a part of TRTC if not? I see EG reports, IVXX reports, but nothing coming from selling lights and equipment via GrowOp. Is this still a part of the company?
6.) New buildout progress - We've had eyes on the ground that continue to say that construction hasn't budged on TRTC's Western Ave Dispensary location in Las Vegas. We were told we would get many updates about this, yet we haven't heard a word. Is this still happening? Whats the hold up?
7.) How is TRTC going to get around the 3 year residency requirement for all officers, when the VV family and other officers of TRTC are not CA residents, as well as IVXX being a Nevada LLC. Will AB266 affect TRTC negatively because of these requirements?
8.) Why is TRTC continuing to buy product from Blum, to repackage, and sell back to Blum and others? This seems like a way to make DP and employees large amounts of revenue through their private entity. The Shareholders don't seem to benefit here at all. How much are we paying BLUM for product? It seems a bit out of line with the interests of the shareholders here.
9.) What happened to the NB plants acquisition? We were told time and time again that it was coming, and would help EG become MUCH MUCH MUCH more profitable. Why hasnt this happened, and why haven't we received an update about it? Is this still happening?"
Green week? Nope.
TRTC closed down significantly on the week, and continues to trade precisely according to our projections.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
I don't think PZOO has done anything as egregious as the 420Investor service has by marketing a paid service as a tool for investors to avoid losing money in the cannabis sector, only to make the absolute worst "trade recommendations" humanly possible, resulting in all time LOSSES OF 82%!
Last I checked, PZOO never marketed itself as a good investment, but the 420Investor service most certainly did.
None of that matters if the company isn't structured in a way that can benefit shareholders.
The hype phase is long behind us, further dilution is pending and the stock is already tremendously overvalued. That said - there's no good reason for the stock to make and sustain gains.
Really simple stuff when it comes down to it...
I made no indication with respect to fraud.
PZOO trades less than $20k a day. WHO CARES? lol
No problem.
If they were more transparent, there's no way they'd have investors.
The 420Investor service's "trade recommendations" have resulted in 82% losses since inception, so NDEV isn't alone. I haven't heard much about this stock in a long time and I don't believe many follow it...so I don't think anyone's surprised.
TRTC Insider buys are only made when the stock is plummeting and there is a dilutive stakeholder dumping millions. The folks at TRTC are under pressure from those stakeholders to do what they can to avoid killing pps, so when insider buys are timed in a way that looks like a promotional effort, people recognize it. Unfortunately this is all TRTC has ever done. They don't call it a pump & dump for nothing.
We all know that is dead wrong...but if TRTC can't manage to break .10 in the typical Friday flip fashion, it will be a pretty pitiful sign.
lol This stock typically trades under $20k volume a day. Who cares?
The 420Investor service's most "recommended" stock of all time was PHOT, which we all know was THE cannabis sector pump & dump. IN FACT, if I remember correctly (I usually do), the service recommended its subscribers vote in favor of a drastic increase to authorized shares just days before the SEC suspended the stock for allegations related to a pump & dump scheme. 420Investor subscribers who followed the "recommendations" potentially suffered 80% losses almost over night!
From the start PHOT obviously exhibited all of the tell-tale signs of a pump & dump, yet this fact was rejected by the 420Investor service. That being so, I question the service's authority to comment on PZOO insofar as its alleged status as a p&d goes. I have no opinion personally.
Just be careful folks - my grandkid is better at managing trades than the 420Investor service is.
Not at all. TRTC is still extremely overvalued and the company has barely even begun diluting the stock in the grand scheme of things. They have no money to fund any of these grand plans, which obviously screams carnage for shareholders.
Be careful folks.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
I've collected a reasonably sized position of free shares from trading this over the years so I'd prefer the 420Investor service not even mention it. I think GWPH may test $70s regardless...but we all know what happens when 420Investor touts a stock - it PLUMMETS.
The 420Investor service's "trade recommendations" have resulted in 82% LOSSES since its inception. This is far worse than any similar "investment service" I've ever witnessed in all of my years.
My grandchild could manage a portfolio with more success. I'm sure of it!
*****NEW RED FLAGS EXPOSED******
Re Nevada property "purchase":
• DEED SAYS CONSIDERATION OF *TEN DOLLARS.
• PRESS RELEASE SAYS CONSIDERATION OF *THREE HUNDRED AND FORTY-FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS.
TRTC told shareholders that $344,000 of THEIR money was spent on purchasing property that OFFICIAL RECORDS indicate they only paid TEN DOLLARS for.
http://icris.washoecounty.us/recorder/eagleweb/downloads/4490937.pdf?id=DOC815S12590.A0&parent=DOC815S12590
This is an unbelievably startling red flag, and JUST THE BEGINNING.
WHY HAS TRTC FAILED TO COMMENT ON THIS?!
As we suggested after alerting the closure of our long term position at $1.39, TRTC is obviously TOXIC to shareholders.
Our level of accuracy continues to go unmatched, folks. Be wary of the fabricated hype.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
This looks like it may test $70s. Still quite a bit overvalued.
I'm amazed by how little sense this makes. So in July the bonus had a value of 490,000. HE cashed out at 49,000...... so we the share holders technically saved 450,000 dollars....and his bonus now is meaningless.
••MASSIVE INSIDER DUMPING••
It's no secret folks. This one's headed for .05.
*****NEW RED FLAGS EXPOSED******
Re Nevada property "purchase":
• DEED SAYS CONSIDERATION OF *TEN DOLLARS.
• PRESS RELEASE SAYS CONSIDERATION OF *THREE HUNDRED AND FORTY-FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS.
TRTC told shareholders that $344,000 of THEIR money was spent on purchasing property that OFFICIAL RECORDS indicate they only paid TEN DOLLARS for.
http://icris.washoecounty.us/recorder/eagleweb/downloads/4490937.pdf?id=DOC815S12590.A0&parent=DOC815S12590
This is an unbelievably startling red flag, and JUST THE BEGINNING.
As we suggested after alerting the closure of our long term position at $1.39, TRTC is obviously TOXIC to shareholders.
Our level of accuracy continues to go unmatched, folks. Be wary of the fabricated hype.
CONSUME INFORMATION WISELY
In the past insiders have posted buys when there is carnage. This is a typical move made in an effort to slow the selling. Look at the recent insider buys. They have all occurred in scenarios like this and pps always continued to plummet.
Don't be fooled.
Don't get trapped.
Consume information wisely.