Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Did they say the 50 million that is restricted are in the OS?
Plus they reduced the OS by almost 40%. That is the opposite of dilution.
yes, can someone post current l2
I cant get filled either......
Thats funny!
.20 might be on the low end. With .12-.18 in divvys, MONA should trade above that.
I forgot about this also. The shares will be reduced even further. MONA really has a lot of positive objectives to restore PPS, company roots and values, and maintain them for future expansion.
The share structure reduction is HUGE. I agree the potential is shining through and MONA is delivering as previously stated in PRs. Heads should start turning now!
They are DELIVERING on their promises!
Yes .10 to .20 is in the very near future. Imagine if the float is gone too!!!!!
It is good news. Dilution is out the window. Looks like MONA is going to be the pinky of a lifetime!
We dropped over 134 million shares off the OS. Doesnt look like any dilution to me. In fact, the opposite is happening. Can you imagine what will occur if the float is gone?
Not surprising? It will be surprising when things start to take hold for MONA. It will take everyone by surprise. Heads are gonna turn.
Yes I agree.
Really so the outstanding shares of MONA are now tied to GLCCs OS? Explain.
the bid/ask would be higher if it wasnt being manipulated. They do not show the best bid and that is a fact.
The OS of MONA? You have GLCC in that math equation. That doesnt apply to the current OS of MONA now does it?
CASH DIVVY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And what is your proof of this?
I do a lot of DD on stocks and MONA by reading. One certainly cannot do it with voodoo or black magic.
Ahh well on this board, MONA, they were posting about fake dilution.
Failed? really? There is a big difference between failed and a restricted dividend.
Yes but cant they close a deal say tomorrow and not announce it for a week or two? Then, the ones who are not in, will not get the divvy.
It might be too late by then.
Perhaps, but trades have settlement days of usually 3 days. I wouldnt want to miss getting the divy by 1 or 2 days.
The issuer has identified a public company trading on Pink Sheets that will acquire PP365.Com on all stock basis. The majority of the purchase price will be paid to MONA shareholders. Our corporate advisors are currently working out the details of this which will be released shortly.
The issuer has also identified a public company trading on the Frankfurt Xetra exchange that will acquire the China Marketing Cosmetics company EEIGI on all stock basis. Unlike the USA markets where dividends must be issued from treasury in a form of restricted stock there is no such mandate in Germany. The majority of the purchase price will be paid to long term MONA shareholders. The corporate advisors are currently working out the details of this which will be released shortly. In addition work on a new website for EEIGI's proprietary line of all natural Health and Beauty Aids (HBA) is nearing completion.
Ahh well there were also posters who posted about fake dilution and even went to the extents of changing the companies PR to carry out the fake dilution even further.
I dont see any connection. Completely different scenarios.
who posted about a fake dividend?
I thought I was. It looks like you are following MONA. Are you following the discussion though? If I recall correctly, you said that by MONA releasing information on pinksheets about the cash divvies they are pumping their stock to dump more shares AKA P & D. What you provided is before the release of the info about the divvies, that updated 650M is for 6/30/08. Almost 3 months ago. That does not prove they are dumping shares after the release of the information about the cash divvy. Therefore, no proof P&D. QED
GLCC divy. I thought you were aware of that divvy?
So you are saying you want the company to say the divyys are going to be this amount, you will get it on this date, and BTW the float is gone. This kind of info is insider information, which is exactly why insiders have been buying. Didnt MONA just mention the divvys a few weeks ago. Things like this, I am assuming, usually take time. If you can merge 5 companies in one, then spin them off into their own on other exchanges within two weeks, then great; but, in reality, I dont think things can happen this fast. I know some have waited for 2 or 3 years through all the r/s and name changes, many stocks (higher exchange) do not consistently move up in price; granted by that time they are established to the point that they have few name changes or r/s; however, they all start somewhere. MONA started, learned, and is in the evolving stages to a better company. Maybe the problem is, most do not see pink sheets as long term investments; they see them as get rich quick ideas, and when that doesnt happen, one loses all interest and starts to become hindered by lack of patience. IMO MONA is the pinky stock that will change everyone's perspective and MONA will be a model for long term investing in pinks.
They put out the PRs to inform the shareholders of current and future plans of MONA. They never said anything about the PRs being the companies workforce. If they didnt provide the PRs about the companies actual workings, how would investors be able to base an idea of what the company is doing?
Really where is this proof of "dumping"
The pr didnt say did it?
Yes I will be interested to see what you find out. I am predicting some series head turning also.
LOL no. Just inquiring. I do like the idea of steel belted radial servers though.
"anybody with a fax machine" Really, could you post a link to info that explains how to do this further. I want to do some updates.
How do you know the dividends are worthless? There is a big difference between being restricted and being worthless. With that logic, I could say the dividends are worth far more than .70, they are worth $2.10 apiece.