Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Considering AF (perhaps link was posted earlier):
https://emerginggrowth.com/stat-reporter-triples-down-on-cytodyn-otcqb-cydy-rhetoric-with-failed-cyber-bullying-tactics/
There's a possibility that a meteorite will crash through my library roof right now and kill me, but I am not worried about it because I consider it to be very, very unlikely.
I am very aware of the possibility that BP could try to shut down the advancement of leronlimab in several ways, but there is literally nothing I can do about it that I have not already done.
Most indicators from past results point to very positive future results . . .
AND that is exactly what we are waiting on now. So, when the past tells you the present is safe, why worry about the future being unsafe? Past is prologue, they say.
Most reasonable solution:
1. Profit takers
a. "um, yes, I waited to sell until the price pulled back to below 6 again"
b. "I think this is as high as it will go for a while, so I'm taking my money now - I see no future catalysts"
OR
2. Short attack again
a. Big Pharma scared spitless?
b. Big $ wanting lower entry?
OR
3. Just another day on the OTC?
I'm in agreement there!
So, on this logic, are these trades that we see going through right now (1K @ 6.05 is latest) in pre-market on an exchange that does not trade pre-market also just Market Makers monkeying with stock?
If these pre-market trades are real (but illegal?) trades, why cannot those after hours be the same?
That phrase, though . . . "prevents transmission" - that's gotta have a few heads turned and a few more spinning . . .
Monkey's running the reverse gadget? WTH?
" bi-monthly leronlimab dose completely prevented rectal transmission of Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus (SHIV) in macaques."
Yep, why else would they use them . . .?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-reproductive_sexual_behavior_in_animals#Anal_penetration
If he did, he's still a' sangin' down here!
"Other performers expected to play include Sheryl Crow, Ziggy Marley, Steve Earle and Nelson's fellow Texas-based singers Lyle Lovett, Robert Earl Keen and Kinky Friedman."
'course it is Texas, so anything can happen!
https://dailytimes.com/promotions/article_73c543aa-be0b-11ea-88fa-cf38fcca628d.html
Here in Texas we have a "Kink" - as in Kinky Friedman . . . ya may have heard of him? No?
LOL. An oldie, but goodie!
I show 650K shares at 15:13:20 (CST) @ 6.9867 and then 650K shares at 15:13:48 @ 6.0867.
I'm guessing we all know what happened now.
TDA showed 4 trades in that range around 4:14 EST. 1.3 M shares if I remember correctly.
Several very large trades showing up last couple of minutes (little late for clearing, no?).
Looks like the Patent news was well-received.
Good to hear from you! I've been here a while . . . accumulating . . .
It just depends on how much free money we get . . .
Let's say Leo gets grant funding news, when is he most likely to release it, 7:30-8:30 a.m.(EST)? Or immediately upon verification and all the CYA stuff?
Yes. Kuhn laid it out pretty well in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
I agree this is one. It would be nice if it got some legs under it shortly, but they do take time . . .
Maybe an introduction is in order? At least a quick read . . . or two
https://www.blackline.com/blog/issue-three/compliance-risk-fast-growing-company/
https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/1997/dec/malburg.html
What the average human finds when they use Google to search for information on "FFS" masks re: COVID-19:
https://www.infectioncontroltoday.com/view/cloth-masks-are-useless-against-covid-19
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-mask/art-20485449
https://www.rcreader.com/commentary/masks-dont-work-covid-a-review-of-science-relevant-to-covide-19-social-policy
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover-guidance.html
https://www.livescience.com/are-face-masks-effective-reducing-coronavirus-spread.html ('experts' have mixed answers)
Just a sample. Yeah, it's real clear . . .
Really bad idea:
RH (I trade with TDA) sent this out about TSLA - the content highlights the point I was making last night about the present value of future money in relation to CYDY and why I can see a scenario where it runs to triple digits long before 'cash-in-hand' justifies it:
I've been sharing with the family of anyone I know about or hear about who has a complicated affair with this crap to request leronlimab or another "b" drug, which I will not mention here. Maybe someone can get access to it when they really need it.
Come on approval!
I hear you . . . loud and clear. Not doubting your fundamental assumptions at all. I'm simply pointing out that in this very special case what is "reasonable" may not be the end game. It is at least possible (if not probable) that once the drug is seen to be as comprehensive as we think, the MOMO and then FOMO will propel this stock far into the land of the apparently 'unreasonable' valuation. There will be many who will think it cheap, nay, 'undervalued' at $100/share no matter what the MC is! How many trials are starting this year? NP said 10. Sequential significant sources of good news may in this case have a multiplier effect that simply cannot be estimated. Just IMHO. If this were some other random company about to release news about their latest product, say, a new robotic vacuum cleaner, I would be squarely in your camp. The environment into which this company will be releasing news is a powder keg. We already know governments and billionaires are ready to step in . . . and that is just for one indication.
As with all things, Father Time will reveal the truth. I may be wrong . . .
I think you may be overlooking the perceived "bid up" value of a drug that can put hundreds of billions (if not trillions) of dollars to use for other more pressing issues. IF these several diseases are rendered largely ineffective, not only the country gets back to work, but billions and billions of research dollars and capital can be expended elsewhere - how much is that worth for the company that is making it possible? Uncertainty and fear are palpable in our country and the world (for good reason or not), thus a company that can offer something beyond "not-just-another-'gonna-fail'-drug" may have value far beyond fundamental financials and technical charts.
The Present Value of Future Money
can be a tricky thing when a panic-demic is unfolding. I agree, fundamentally, but sometimes fundamentals go out the window (at least for a while).
Finally caught a chance to watch the interview - very little doubt (once data streams start arriving) this is a triple digit stock.
Interestingly, Huxley had to acknowledge in his 2nd edition (preface) that 70% of what he had predicted 600 years in the future had come to pass in just 16-17 years! Imagine the warp speed at which things are happening now . . . no time for the slow science of yesterday . . . science needs to speed up (see the May 2016 First Things article "Scientific Regress" - https://www.firstthings.com/article/2016/05/scientific-regress)
We need SOMA now! lol
Yessiree, it does - that was my point.
The verbiage is quite ubiquitous ... "that's YOUR opinion" in relation to any number of moral issues. And MANY people are very comfortable with morality being relative, but that inevitably leads to other components of reality being scrutinized for relativism - "why does that count as evidence?" "yes, but the XYZ Corporation funded that research, so the results were expected" . . . ad infinitum . . .
It is the curse of relativism. When it applies to morality, it eventually applies to all other areas of life, including science. There are no proofs, just your evidence and my evidence, which equates to 'that's just your view' and 'well, this is my truth.' It is an unsustainable way to live, as we are slowly realizing.