Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I never said I was o.k. with it. Obviously, I am not. It needs to be changed and yesterday was not soon enough for me.
That being said, there is a great deal of money to be made here.
I do want that.
Agreed. And I don't think he would give timelines that he did not expect to meet.
I don't see it that way. I just see it as example of news that shared on a more accessible platform for all would have been a better choice. I don't believe any subterfuge took place.
If you are trying to make the point that this very good news would have been better disseminated on another platform, you will get not get an argument from me. But let's not lose our heads here.
Relax. I can see a hundred loopholes through your claim. Small matter to be fixed. And it should be.
I don't see any of it as insider information either. There is no encouragement to "Get in now, or miss the boat."
What constitutes an approved platform is the real question here. And I believe it will be brought to their attention today. It is what we all want.
Very important to get those approved platforms in operation - I believe it is from Greg.
He addressed it to all. I am assuming with the understanding that it would be posted here and on Twitter.
It is not illegal as he chose to address all. It is a question of etiquette really. Something on their website would have been more appropriate and a heads-up on Twitter directing you there is my preference.
It is a p/r. And he addresses all. I don't agree with the way it was handled but I do not see anything illegal about it.
Thanks, N.B.
Actions do speak louder than words. O.K. I agree. I think we are due for a show.
I am in total agreement that this will be big.
I want to share in that journey, along with all my fellow shareholders.
If something material changes, I want to know why. Not from one of my fellow shareholders but from people in a position of authority and accountability.
Authority and accountability.
Again, you are making my point. The information needs to come directly from corporate. The old, I know what he or she said but this is what they meant in hindsight is really hard to pull off once something is committed to print.
and the significance of this is?
That is my point, Mr. Pug. Wouldn't have to call and ask if the information had already been published. I am not disagreeing with your position, I am suggesting we make it a universal one.
But they knew they were departing before the news was announced. Did they have new people step right into their positions? These are the kinds of questions I am referring to. We need a news release.
I disagree. This significant drop in price is directly related to a fall in shareholder confidence. It would come to a halt with the release of pertinent information. The information is there, so why not release it?
And did you send these thoughts to the company and ask for clarification or that they be corroborated by someone in authority?
The issue of parking lots and buildings is moot. They never made any claims to fame on those things. Let's stick to why we bought into the company in the first place.
And they aren't updating the investor's page, why?
Right now a platform is needed for the updates by the company. If they have a problem with twitter, why aren't they updating the investors page? And the amount of time spent in personal exchanges is huge compared to the investment of effort it would take to update their page. There must be a source, accessible to all equally, without prejudice or favor, to find information.
A clear and concise response to the filing and the increase in the O/S count is needed. Needed from management.
Me, look away, people are literally off their seats here, laughing at that one. No. We need a communication from corporate as to where things stand. And they can skip the, soon, stay-tuned, right around the corner, explosive growth rhetoric. Basically, what I am asking is, "What have you got now?"
But they haven't chosen to do that. I don't know why and unless you are a fly on the wall, you don't know either. It is not my preference. But the key possessive pronoun here is, my.
That isn't true. What would be true is to say that they didn't make a request to go against the normal protocol for where they are on the tier of reporting companies.
I am not looking for any argument. All I am asking for is an even playing field for all of the investors. One that is open to inquiry in an environment that is free from an antagonistic response when someone doesn't like the tone. Everyone who has any skin in the game should be heard. Doesn't matter whether I agree with them or not.
None of the fundamentals have changed.
The holes here are from the doubt created by missing deadlines and what appears to be the dissemination of pertinent information that may be done in a way that favors one investor over another.
Not good.
Let's get back to the business at hand, please.
Nothing exists in a vacuum. There is absolutely no justifiable reason for the twitter account not to be in use.
Nothing has changed in the fundamentals
The noise goes both ways.
Is it as great as I thought. No. Is it as bad as some are trying to make it seem? No.
Money to be made here. Be smart about it.
Again, what did you and Greg discuss that makes that such a good buy?
Doog, are these "core" investors staying because of their private conversations with Greg. I don't like that. I would like to know what they know and then the question becomes, why don't I?
I think all of us could use a little dazzle right now, too. So, how about sharing it with everybody? I want to know what you know from Greg that would lead you to buy and additional three million shares.
I sent an email requesting that the twitter page be opened. I think everyone should do the same. One source, less confusion, less contentiousness. Nothing really has changed other than information is becoming clouded by so much input on nuances in wording. Greg has a responsibility to look after the shareholders interests. A start to that would be by opening up communication in a public forum. I don't want to have to call any I/R. I want to see it published for all so that each shareholder, or potential investor, can view it in the time frame that works best for them. No one is doing you any favors by using your money to further their gains. We are in it for the icing on the cake. I don't need a tax write-off.
I don't know why, but every time I look at this stock, the words, "The Little Engine that could..." come to mind. So I purchased 43 million shares. Because I believe not only can they do it, they will.
Announcements that pertain to the activity of the company and actions that may affect shareholders should be shared on a platform that is actually recognized as legit. And that wouldn't be a chat room. If I am not mistaken, twitter has been recognized as such.
Or, if the information was presented in a timely and efficient manner in which people could respond with well-thought out and responsive questions, none of these tête-à-têtes would be necessary. Think of how much time that would save.
Twitter, for all.
Let's see that on Twitter.