Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Why are you beating the drums over shorts? Are you suggesting the almighty hedge fund folks would get caught with their pants down? I Can't see serious short money on this unless there was a certainty of a yes vote.
My thoughts remain on 212 million as well as the possible split decision which would be hard to predict the reactions and actions
unusually choppy trading makes me think there is an attempt to encourage volume for the rest of the week, but tea leaves will soon be more clear
It is always possible Roth somehow is supporting a base level price before reverse split. I found it interesting that maxm etc.. started at .0109 this morning
How could I help? They did not let me look over their shoulder during the convertible. I have not studied the rules as to what is allowed.
I am very confident that 45000 fold increase in shares would never have happened if investors had been huge buyers of the company. Nobody thinks about that. I may be unique, but the truth is there whether seen or not, right history buffs
I did not say there is no shorting, only who knows who or why, or that it matters one bit. Nobody knows the low or when if YES vote.
No vote without complete news, means the wild west of guessing.
Split vote would be the most interesting guessing game of all perhaps
B word, I would be scared on either a YES or NO vote. But, people continue to buy
If the misery index was multiple times higher with Delcath, Sec would notice a large event. I think it is not higher, although from inside delcath, it appears large
How many companies has Hudson Bay done similar business with? I don't know, but I assume many. My knowledge is weak on how 45,000 fold share increase stacks up.
Nobody in their right mind would support another convertible for delcath. I think a convertible would mean probable bankruptcy so the future would have to be Roth, a different animal, right?
Failure of duty is a non-starter. That would have required years ago likely to never even going public as a company. Never stopped though probably thousands of people over the years buying into this speculation.
There is a very good chance company would go bankrupt without some dilution scheme, just the way the company has always been.
As for Hudson Bay if the SEC wants to shut down, that is the business of the SEC, they don't need your help
Shorts is always over played as a topic. Nobody knows currently who would be shorting or why. It is nonsense to think warrants that can't be executed would/could be used. However, the 212 million are for sell. If you see 212 million YES on Friday, that certainly seals the deal on there being sold.
Why if NO vote would anybody dream of shorting either
Conclusion Simpson greater than zero, sum of shareholders = chaos = zero
Fundamentally $4 million may not be too high, but the company would do extraordinarily, extraordinarily well to raise $20 million, with dilution at 6 fold.
That would be essentially like jumping share count to almost 3 billion shares pre split. My old star war numbers were so conservative.
You are not a good analyst of clinical work
My assessment of value has been consistent since July bankruptcy warning. I believe Simpson when she says could be bankruptcy with little to none towards shareholders.
I have also made clear that chemosat may never be a commercial success. I believe the clinical program of two phase 3 operations is smart, but uncertain
When it comes to vote I will borrow this phrase, vote your own conscience. The tone of ihub board should be individual efforts to soften towards Simpson. The first faulty view is that Simpson does not care about shareholders, she would prefer rock solid stability. Use some commonsense is my message to all
I consider it an insult to management to not give filings and representations saying lacking b/o interest and partnership interest the time of day
I would assume bankruptcy with zero monetary value for shareholders, so an effective No would have a bad ending
an on topic post about people misrepresenting maybes as facts and the rampant extreme tolerance for saying things to excess against management
Greed is a given, stupidity is an assumption more than fact. Don't sidestep a vote NO if it was effective could mean bankruptcy. It is not even a rational debate, it is potential FACT
People voting for possible bankruptcy are the last I would consider a good source for responsibility, if any of you are new by chance, please realize that tidbit
Did you learn nothing from 6 years in Europe? Simpson is smarter about achieving success for chemosat in the long run, than all the posters here put together. Chaos equals zero every time.
People want to agree with you, so hardly a fair debate arena about what is legit
It sounds very persuasive but if the alternative is for a company to declare bankruptcy. Don't hold your breath.
And the right time to do that was maybe as early as 2011 after the RTF from FDA, not now. Even then it is all complicated, who knew Europe would drag out revenue problems this badly
Enough money likely solves any issue. Come on, a big buy out is wonderful but since I am not believer that leaves the vote. IF vote was NO on both and no buyout, patents is the least of issues. Get a grip, people
Patent, right to try are part of 10 little attempts at distraction. Time for serious waiting for Friday
What possible reason do you have for wanting the worst accusations to be true? Why do people rarely even mention phase 3?
I don't seek to be unique on this, but seem to be. Simpson is better than almost everybody believes, which would not be a great feat on her part.
The most negative posters are actually more consistent with the herd thought. Forcing buy out made since in June, but I voted for reverse split. I voted for all reverse splits, 2014, 2016, 2017, proposed 2018.
The gamble for buy out has been a very bad gamble so far. Other folks who have been long at the worst times I can't explain such a strategy. I was in during the more benign time for the stock and still managed to lose 25 percent.
If one does not state explicitly they think the company and Simpson are legit, embrace the most harsh posts, why not if you have doubts about legit
She produced warnings back as far as July in clear language. She painted a dark picture to go with reverse split vote this time as well. She owes little if any apology
each to his own script, Simpson and Delcath legit
scratch that if busts below .005, hold
The math is solid, going below $1 million market cap before offering is tough to maintain. Still about $4 million market cap.
If this busts below 50 cents if YES vote, hold but don't buy
It would not surprise if it was so unimportant at this time to delcath and to HB, the formality of the clerical involved is off their radar
I just try to put meaning to why people bought on the offering starting with the thought it is multiple large spenders that don't want over 5 percent of company for offering. Step by step, if these are smart people they know the Achilles heel for the company is raising money, and they know a big batch of money is needed to get to the phase 3 promise land
If you are not a lover of conspiracy thinking at every turn, you could always look for positives
Since the math supports multiple Indians involved, my guess is Indians would not like a convertible
Roth is a serious theory because Simpson, Dcth legit. People are blinded by reverse split story here. A perfect setup if Roth so wished, to take over ownership of this pie. At $1 offering for $20 million, they have 95 percent of common plus likely loads of great warrants
It is harder than people think to break a company like this below $1 million market cap, sometimes you have to think in market cap.
If the market cap was $1 million on day of a filled offering, probably a 75 cent per unit deal. The risk is if Roth or whoever don't like this phase 3 story. I am looking for Roth as white knight here
Folks like you predict worst case, sometimes that formula may fail you. If there are over 212 million YES votes, this crowd should halt lift their nose in the air and think why did the offering people vote for a reverse split.
The vote, no matter outcome, should give pause for thoughts
Where o where is the foresight. After the last offering as a going concern, reverse split is the only proper solution. It may or may not work. I must complain, lack of future vision possibilities, big lack here
I don't think either way there will be a calling campaign. It would have started earlier than this.
Just to keep the thoughts churning, I believe a split decision would keep the company in a positive phase for management just more of a hassle. In the short or long run, I believe and stock price says reverse split in 2018
I look at the company as a whole, I do have wishful thinking but what kind of speculator would I be to not have
Very strange ilk to look for the bad as a goal