Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
SMH What are you debunking? Your post makes no sense. All I said was that the quote that was posted referred to the contract mCig had with Eddick to manage NYAcres, not the contract they had with FarmOn to produce hemp/CBD. How are you debunking that?
2-29-2017 MCIG .39 and NOW .029 sad and DISGUSTING LET ALONE SICK it will never get back to these prices with out a huge rs ....watch and learn
Mcig is still headed lower. Just a little uptick today by MMs to continue the bleed next week into a disaster of a conference call and fins.
I predict the upcoming conference call will be major damage control with nothing but carrots, excuses, and empty promises to try to drive volume in order for the company to dump. Pps isn't the most important thing to mcig, right now. It takes a backseat to volume so they can dump. Any buying will be gladly met by company selling and dilution to the float.
How is MCIG going to plant and benefit from a 120 acre crop planted in March of 2019 when they terminated the agreement in October of 2018?
According to the court document
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/ViewDocument?docIndex=g/i62druXbkeeYx0ErwG0g==
Take notice that the nature of this action and the relief sought is for (i) damages resulting from the breach of Consultant Agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant Edick, dated November 29, 2017 (the "Consulting Agreement") which was terminated by Plaintiff on October 19, 2018;
You're still repeating those old debunked claims from three or more years ago. Folks check out the facts...
Mcig post #104893
Quarterly report has been filed...
3/31/2020 quarterly financial report
There was a write off for depreciation, however, it was also used to establish the initial value of the OBTX dividend at $.55/share on day one. It's still trading above that. Shareholders got a lot of benefit from the deal.
Here's proof you were wrong about the 420 cloud software being worthless...
OBITX Sells 420Cloud Software for $1.9 Million
OBITX, Inc., (OTCMKTS: OBTX) a blockchain development and consulting company, announced that it has sold its 420Cloud Social Media Platform to First Bitcoin Capital, Corp., for $1.9 million.
Jacksonville, FL, May 19, 2020 --(PR.com)-- The 420Cloud Social Media Platform has been transferred to First Bitcoin Capital, Inc., (BITCF) in exchange for $500,000 in First Bitcoin (COIN:BIT) cryptocurrency tokens and a two-year secured convertible promissory note of $1,400,000.
Michael Hawkins, OBITX CEO states, “We are pleased to have found a good home for this software, where it will provide its new owner with the necessary tools to expand their current operations. This was the final step of our transition from an advertising and social media company that dabbled in blockchain, to a development and consulting firm in blockchain technologies. The sale of this asset will free the necessary resources in time and cost that will allow us to focus on blockchain software development and partnerships/consulting with other industry leaders.”
“Our goal,” Mr. Hawkins went on to say, “is to emerge as a global leader in blockchain and cryptocurrencies, helping bring this fledgling enterprise to mainstream.”
Good work! Great Post!
Of course he did. That's part of a CEO's job description (i.e. To promote the company). He put out news about a JV that the company entered into with Bare Roots and claimed it was a positive development for the company. If he'd said nothing you'd accuse him of lack of transparency. For a pump and dump you need the other half of the equation. You need to prove that he sold shares for a personal profit. You've never been able to prove that.
Looks like they made a couple million anyway. It proves you were wrong about the 420 cloud software being worthless...
OBITX Sells 420Cloud Software for $1.9 Million
OBITX, Inc., (OTCMKTS: OBTX) a blockchain development and consulting company, announced that it has sold its 420Cloud Social Media Platform to First Bitcoin Capital, Corp., for $1.9 million.
Jacksonville, FL, May 19, 2020 --(PR.com)-- The 420Cloud Social Media Platform has been transferred to First Bitcoin Capital, Inc., (BITCF) in exchange for $500,000 in First Bitcoin (COIN:BIT) cryptocurrency tokens and a two-year secured convertible promissory note of $1,400,000.
Michael Hawkins, OBITX CEO states, “We are pleased to have found a good home for this software, where it will provide its new owner with the necessary tools to expand their current operations. This was the final step of our transition from an advertising and social media company that dabbled in blockchain, to a development and consulting firm in blockchain technologies. The sale of this asset will free the necessary resources in time and cost that will allow us to focus on blockchain software development and partnerships/consulting with other industry leaders.”
“Our goal,” Mr. Hawkins went on to say, “is to emerge as a global leader in blockchain and cryptocurrencies, helping bring this fledgling enterprise to mainstream.”
Regarding your repeated accusations...
1.) Paul Rosenberg illegally sold shares and didn't properly report the sales : False - Paul sold some of his privately owned unregistered securities in a private placement to pay off mCig debts (i.e. thus benefiting shareholders). See my mcig post #103692 for the full rebuttal...
mCig post #103692 That's an old debunked article...
All of those "missing" preferred and common shares were unregistered and sold by Paul from his personal shares during 2015 in private placements to cover mCig expenses for consultants and salaries. They were exempt from required reporting on a Form 4 as they were unregistered and sold to qualified investors. New auditors in 2016 advised him to stop this practice of paying company expenses from his personal shares and all preferred transactions have since flowed through the company's financials.
Why did Paul sell the shell to Omhe?
If your broker is doing that, it's a case for changing brokers not stocks. SMHLMAO
NY and California were the first states to be exposed to the virus. They've also had more testing. Cases are now rising in Texas and Florida while they are flat or decreasing in NY and California. Check back in about a month and see where things stand.
No! mCig had in the past, on several occasions, asked me to write articles or assist with editing press releases without any promise of compensation. Last January I was granted a one time stock award compensating me for the time I've spent advising Paul and covering the company over the past several years. There's no promise or guarantee of any further future compensation. This was disclosed in my blog article about mCig's JV with Bare Roots...
mCig's Phoenix Move, Can It Rise Again From The Ashes?
Business relationship disclosure: Going forward I will be receiving a one time grant of restricted shares of MCIG as compensation for consulting on this and prior articles and press releases. This compensation was not a precondition for writing this article but was offered before final edit. The information for the article was provided by mCig and Bare Roots management and they were provided the opportunity to review it for accuracy before publication. I also authored a press release to accompany this article.
It's pretty obvious with the volume on Friday followed by the pr on Monday. So obvious that I once again accurately called a pr on Monday.
The trades were most certainly based on leaked insider info, or am exchange if shares for cash in which the goal is to pump the stock price through third party promoters.
Paul himself had had many aliases
You just insist on publishing misinformation.
1.) Where's your proof of a pump and dump. Where's the pump? The name change is a fact. If they didn't report it or give a reason for it you'd be all over them for lack of transparency.
2.) Where's your proof that some insider trading happened on Friday. Insider's are management. When they buy or sell stock they have to file an SEC report. Where's the filing?
Debunked Again!
your correct every time he runs out of bs to post he will change the name .....pauls favorite tactic .
What does CBD and the Bare Roots JV have to do with driving the innovations needed to shape the future of robotic automation management through digital technology and decentralized blockchain solutions and where does it fit in?
JACKSONVILLE, FL, March 13, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- via NEWMEDIAWIRE -- mCig, Inc. (MCIG), an innovative biotech company focused on development and commercialization of over the counter, science-driven, botanical nutrigenetics targeting the endocannabinoid system, medical devices, and research & development, today announced execution of a Letter of Intent (LOI) reflecting the Company’s strategic partnership with NJ based, Kaplan Group d/b/a Medical Home Pharmacy (www.medicalhomepharmacy.com/,
If you do a google search on "Examples of Trump's corruption" you get 25,700,000 hits. It's so bad it requires an interactive map of government agencies to list them all. Check out the link. Just click on an agency to find out how Trump and/or his cronies have corrupted it...
Mapping Corruption: The Interactive Exhibit
"Vice President Biden is guilty of using government to go after a political opponent."
Ooooooh That sounds so nefarious. SMHLMA So what's your point? That people in high level positions in the government shouldn't be able to find out if one of the people they work with could be under investigation for security breaches? Good luck with that...
Politifact - Tom Cotton: It's 'unusual' for White House officials like Susan Rice to make unmasking requests - rated False!
Some Republicans have latched onto allegations about former National Security Adviser Susan Rice to bolster their narrative that President Barack Obama’s administration misused intelligence for political purposes.
A few media sources, most prominently Bloomberg columnist Eli Lake, have said Rice repeatedly asked to learn the names of unidentified American citizens who appeared in intelligence reports in connection to the Donald Trump campaign and transition. These reports are based on anonymous sources, and Rice has neither confirmed nor denied them.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., said Congress should investigate because if the story is true, it’s strange that someone in Rice’s White House position would request for names to be unmasked.
"You're right that it's not necessarily illegal," Cotton said in an April 4 interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper. "It is unusual, though. The White House doesn't conduct criminal investigations. The White House doesn't conduct counterintelligence investigations. The White House is a consumer of intelligence. Normally, those kind of unmasking requests would be done by the agencies responsible for those activities."
However, experts in intelligence collection and classified information told us it’s normal for someone in such a high-up national security role to make unmasking requests, and it would be hard, though not impossible, to abuse the practice for political purposes.
"It’s not unusual at all," said Joshua Rovner, chair of international politics and national security at Southern Methodist University and author of Fixing the Facts: National Security and the Politics of Intelligence.
What ‘unmasking’ is and how it works
We couldn’t find a way to quantify how often national security advisers or other White House officials make unmasking requests, but experts said it’s a routine, legitimate occurrence.
The FBI and NSA regularly produce reports for government customers. The customer could be another investigating agency, Congress, the Justice Department or the White House. If an American’s name appears in a piece of intelligence — for example, if agents intercept a conversation between two foreign nationals who mention an American friend in passing — those preparing the report generally "mask" the American’s name, replacing it with something like "U.S. Person."
The recipient of the report might decide that in order to fully understand the intelligence, they need to know the "U.S. Person’s" identity. So they make a request for the name to be unmasked, and the agency that produced the report either approves or denies the request. The NSA approved 654 requests in 2015, according to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.
It’s not just agencies conducting criminal or counterintelligence investigations that make the unmasking requests, as Cotton said. It’s anyone who consumes intelligence reports.
"The national security adviser, who is a consumer of the most selective and restricted intelligence products, would certainly be entitled to request unmasking in the course of his or her duties," said Steven Aftergood, who directs the Federation of American Scientists’ Project on Government Secrecy.
You really need to quit repeating that three year old debunked accusation. Paul's sale of unregistered securities was perfectly legal and the shares were used to reimburse mCig for expenses of the company...
The company reported on it's 2016 10-K that they had utilized Rule 506 to sell unregistered securities in private placements in compliance with SEC regulations
Since when is an executive pumping his own company a bad thing? Name an exec that doesn't! It's part of the job description. You expect him to say bad things about InMed? Companies advertise. Isn't that pumping? Get real folks! SMHL
Let me know when you find an actual law that was broken and you get a conviction. Any real judge would laugh you out of court.
Folks should note that you didn't provide a link to the source article for your post. Perhaps it's because the comments at the end of that three year old article clearly debunked the claims. SMHLMAO
LMAO You bring up a three year old accusation that was easily debunked when it was written. From my post on 02/06/2017...
mCig post # 82791
Regarding that hit piece posted today...
Readers should take this article with a very healthy grain of salt. It's built entirely on an article written by Alan Brochstein in his blog that accuses mCig of violating SEC regs by not reporting that the CEO sold some of his securities on a 4-K. After I demonstrated in his comments that there was an exception to the reporting requirements for the sale of unregistered securities in a private placement...
Rule 506 Regulation D
...he resorted to innuendo about the motivations for the sale.
1.)
"The company is being heavily promoted"
“They are trying to build investor confidence— and so, one of the easy tools a company can use is have a — let’s call it — insider buy.”
"Brochstein noted. The company had never properly disclosed a sale that Paul Rosenberg completed during the year ended April 30, 2016."
“That's the bottom line: I just feel like the company is playing a game here,”
Looks like several of us held out through all of the bashing. Wish I had all of my original shares but I had to sell some for margin calls over the past year while GWPH tanked. Nevertheless, InMed is still one of my largest investments and it's nice to see GW take off today too.
Looks like we finally got some pps movement. Up 28% +.
Good points!
Barr's covering up for Flynn just as he covered up for Roger Stone.
More than 2,000 ex-DOJ employees call for Attorney General Barr's resignation
WASHINGTON – More than 2,000 ex-employees of the Department of Justice have signed a letter calling on Attorney General William Barr to resign, writing that his handling of the Roger Stone case "openly and repeatedly flouted" the principle of equal justice under the rule of law.
The letter, published Sunday, comes after a contentious week for the Justice Department, which already faces allegations of succumbing to political pressure from President Donald Trump.
"Although there are times when political leadership appropriately weighs in on individual prosecutions, it is unheard of for the Department’s top leaders to overrule line prosecutors, who are following established policies, in order to give preferential treatment to a close associate of the President, as Attorney General Barr did in the Stone case," the letter reads.
The signatures of the former employees, who served under Democratic and Republican presidencies, were gathered by Protect Democracy, a bipartisan group that has been critical of the Trump administration.
The alumni called current DOJ employees to "report future abuses" and acknowledged that "because we have little expectation" Barr will resign, "it falls to the Department’s career officials to take appropriate action to uphold their oaths of office and defend nonpartisan, apolitical justice.”
Sounds like they'll have access to a ton of programmers. Perhaps this acquisition is based in Puerto Rico. The tax haven is for Capital Gains taxes which can be significant if you're constantly exchanging/turning over Crypto currencies.
You're the one splitting hairs. In what universe is CBD not considered an MJ product and CBD growers, extractors and medical companies not considered part of the MJ industry?
It's not clear to me whether he's talking about changing the name of mCig or Obitx since in the same sentence he's referring to acquiring a "current leader in this field"
We are already making moves in this direction, including change of jurisdiction to blockchain and tax friendly Puerto Rico, reserving a new name to match our added direction as well as negotiations under way to acquire a current leader in this field.