I own PSTI but rarely post anymore
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You know this for a fact or are you just guessing? Do also happen to know if the laywers are getting paid in shares or where else the money might be coming from?
For those who have just discovered XXIS this past week, you might want to read the first three thousand posts to get a better feel for how management works. They are trying to build a buisness and they will do it on their timeable (it has taken us since November until just last week to get any kind of share structure and the moaning on that issue is probably half of those 3000 posts). The impression I also get is that the managerment is looking for investors and will not be catering to cries for news or PR's as they view those cries as coming from flippers and momo. So if the long standing Mods can't pressure to company to put out info, please don't bother asking for news or PR's on this board.
Any updates on the EX-Dividend date?
What would you think of them buying additional IP companies like BRST and or NNPP?
There is a lot of talk about the mistakes of last fall and where to place the blame for the small settlement. It seems to me that if BRST does not have the resources to afford their own laywers, then they should consider other options such as selling out to someone who does have the resources and the motivation (Dish networks comes to mind). Another option is for several of these smallcap IP companies to merge together and use the combined resources to hire their own decent laywer team (PTSC, NNPP are a couple that come to mind).
Good research. So it looks like all the ranting by some about a huge NSS position was just bologna.
Stock is alive but this board is dead.
"i will see you in my next miserable life"
I would not count on that as I don't plan on my next life being miserable. You must be going to a different place. I do hope you change your mind.
_________________________________________________________
See www.lordhelp.us for more details.
I wonder if they will work with brokers who accept autotrade? I tried a highly rated autotrade service once but it was not loosing my money fast enough so I quit the program and bought Spooz instead. Might as well laugh, it's only money. I do hope to get the last laugh someday.
Well if they are indeed gone, I would want to say thanks because:
1) They brought XXIS exposure to many more investors (just one 275% day gets attention around the world - not just on a message board).
2) The price is now more than double then when they arrived. Which also seems to have stopped the downward price spiral.
3) They have brought much needed volume.
4) They changed the dynamic of the dialog and I for one enjoyed the postive, fresh air, change.
If they are gone, thanks again and come back any time.
I draw the folloing conclusions and they make sense to me so sorry if you just don't get it:
1) Look at the management bio's.
Are lining their pockets or are they building a company?
If you don't trust the management then you should not be a shareholder.
2) If you trust management and trust that they do have the inside information and with that knowledge decided to spend all the extra time and money to set-up another company just maximize the software, then you can have some confidence that SWARM is something special.
Others have their reasons to come to different conclusions. JMHO
My thinking is that if 141 is successful using Spooz SWARM, then Spoooz will be able to sell more SWARM licenses. With a proven sucessful track record, they won't be selling it as cheap next time. What would 5 or 6 SWARM licenses at 5 million each do for SPZI stock?
"Spooz/SPZI has 6 times as many OS shares as 141 Capital.
Can Spooz possibly make 6 times the net profit of 141 ?"
The funny thing is that no credible negative info on SPZI has emerged since any of these posts were made. In fact we have had some nice PR updates with audited financials and XXIS filing share information that confirm that progress is being made...
Posted by: alimother77
In reply to: richbefore30 who wrote msg# 47509
Date:4/16/2008 1:42:26 PM
Post #of 48322
well it is all about me thats the truth...i dont care if any one els makes money..as long as i can be rich who cares about the rest....jmo
Posted by: alimother77
In reply to: mullimatt who wrote msg# 47621
Date:4/18/2008 1:52:32 PM
Post #of 48322
lets hope it goes down so every one here can averge down...jmo
Posted by: alimother77
In reply to: thebermellon who wrote msg# 47007
Date:4/9/2008 4:10:08 PM
Post #of 48322
iam going to buy as many shares as i can get when it goes down to .0001 because first of all i can buy 1m shares for $100 and secend of all it cant go any lower than that...JMO
Posted by: alimother77
In reply to: None
Date:4/9/2008 6:08:03 PM
Post #of 48322
any one here would buy my shares at .003? and i will buy them back at .0003 next week?JMO
Posted by: alimother77
In reply to: None
Date:4/14/2008 10:22:10 PM
Post #of 48319
i hope when spooz hit $5 thees guys will still be here,I THINK SPOOZ WILL BE WORH $10B,,,JMO.....p.s i just had few beers
Posted by: alimother77
In reply to: Sled Dog who wrote msg# 47102
Date:4/10/2008 2:16:23 PM
Post #of 48321
HEY PAUL...take the aske down to .001 and i will hit the order for 15m shares....
Posted by: alimother77
In reply to: goat31 who wrote msg# 47338
Date:4/12/2008 6:43:02 PM
Post #of 48322
for all the spoozers this year is going to be huge we are going to see spzi get up there with the big dogs,i am thinking some where in the .5 rang so be ready to be rich....JMO,SO IF YOU DONT BELEVE IN IT DONT BUY IT...
Ok thanks for your opinion on it. It has a pretty short history with the current owners and the old shell stockholders should have been shaken out from the reverse merger. I know MOMO crowd is involved at the moment but fundamentals are just starting to be known so it might surprise you. At what price would you say it is "out of quicksand"?
Would you please post your take on XXIS chart?
Thanks
Thanks for your contributions and work on the board and I wish you the best on all your endevors. I must admit that I thought that ARAY would head to new lows after the report but after the initial swoon, it seems to be coming right back. Only thing I can think of is a well known investor advocate is coming in or a buyout? This stock has been an expensive lesson in why I should follow my own trading rules.
_________________________________________________________
XXIS, MTRE & BRST are stocks to buy & hold right now.
Looks like the clock is ticking on this one...
From the IV board:
CDN Patent Infringement Case
Two-Way Media's Patent Suit Against Akamai, Limelight, AT&T - 04-23-08
http://seekingalpha.com/article/73613-two-way-media-s-patent-suit-against-akamai-limelight-at-t?source=yahoo
On April 11th, Colorado based Two-Way Media filed suit against Akamai (AKAM), Limelight Networks (LLNW) and AT&T (T) over a series of patents entitled "multicasting method and apparatus". (patent description below) While this is just one of many patent suits taking place in the content delivery sector, there are a few unique details about this one to watch. For starters, Two-Way Media first filed suit against AOL and after a successful Markman ruling in their favor, AOL settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. That by itself does not mean anything as it may have been easier for AOL to settle rather than pay legal costs, but the fact they settled after a ruling is a bad sign.
Even more interesting in my eyes is that the main patent, number 5778187 was filed in 1996 and was licensed by Two-Way Media to Cable & Wireless in the early days of the content delivery market. For those that remember, Sandpiper and Digital Island were some of the original CDNs that were acquired by Cable & Wireless. There is no way to know if Cable & Wireless licensed the patents because they felt they were valid or not, but the fact another CDN even licensed it makes this suit even more interesting.
Some may wonder why other CDNs are not mentioned in the suit and my guess is that it's the same reason most suits like this only name those showing a lot of revenue. Until a company is doing a certain level of revenue, there is no reason to really go after them. But you can expect that as more CDNs see revenue growth and the content delivery industry turns into a multi-billion dollar market over the years, CDNs are going to be inundated with patent suits. It's also interesting to note that once again, Level 3 seems to have a very clear strategy with regards to CDN patents and has no exposure to this patent either. Level 3 is covered under the original Cable & Wireless licensing deal with Two-Way Media through Level 3's acquisition of the SAVVIS content delivery business, which included their intellectual property.
Other CDNs aside from Level 3 could be in the cross hairs of companies like Two-Way Media, but at this time it's too early to know exactly who Two-Way Media and other patent holders may go after. And for those who say that some CDNs have no concern as they have made public statements saying they are not worried, what do you think they are going to say? No CDN is going to come out and tell Wall Street or investors, yes, this patent worries us. So unless a company comes out and address a specific patent and provides details as to why they feel they are not infringing, you really can't believe the corporate line of "we're not worried", unless of course you are Level 3.
Patent Abstract
A scalable architecture is disclosed for delivery of real-time information over a communications network. Embedded into the architecture is a control mechanism that provides for the management and administration of users who are to receive the real-time information. In the preferred embodiment, the information being delivered is high-quality audio. However, it could also be video, graphics, text or any other type of information that can be transmitted over a digital network. Preferably, there are multiple channels of information available simultaneously to be delivered to users, each channel consisting of an independent stream of information. A user chooses to tune in or tune out a particular channel, but does not choose the time at which the channel distributes its information. Advantageously, interactive (two-way) information can be incorporated into the system, multiple streams of information can be integrated for delivery to a user, and certain portions of the information being delivered can be tailored to the individual user.
Here is what BRST has in regards to multicasting.
6. Does Burstware® Multicast?
We plan to leverage Burstware®'s advanced buffer management technology to provide a superior multicast solution. Specifically, Burstware® will enable users to review content that was previously transmitted. Other multicast products only allow users to view content as it is transmitted. Burstware® will allow users to view previously transmitted content out of their local cache, thereby providing some of the benefits of video-on-demand (VOD) while still retaining the efficient bandwidth utilization of multicasting.
http://www.burst.com/new/css/faq/main.htm
Short covering and momentum should keep the uptrend until the earnings report. Then it is up to ARAY to deliver the goods. At least the expectation bar is much lower this time so maybe they can stumble over it.
First we need the share count and then it would be up to the company to monitor the price/volume and inform shareholders if naked short selling is a problem. Speculation on NSS is not prudent without knowing the share count and I consider calling for certs on a pinksheet a big red flag. I have heard that if "everyone" put in a GTC order to sell at a very high price that it is supposed to keep the brokers from lending the shares but I don't know if it actually works.
Post #of 48175
"Wasn't this supposed to start...
A VERY,VERY,VERY LONG TIME AGO???"
YES... IN A GALAXY FAR FAR AWAY.
(Obi Won says to Luke):
"What I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
____________________________
Sorry, I could not resist.
So why don't you post over there??? Why are they above your wrath? They did a blindside RS so why don't you give them grief? Is it easier for you to slam a company you don't own? If we don't have a 10K in two quaters then come back and save us. The truth comes out.
This is one of the most promising long-term investments I own. But I am always concerned when there is a build-up of expectations to an event because often we won't hear anything from the event and then the pps suffers for a while. I could be wrong but I have seen it happen many times before. The "Seasonal" players (combined with the newsletter players) did wonders for the pps but they seem to be gone. Looking forward to FDA approval (looks like Jags date was closer than anyone elses).
Hey Doc, Thanks for all the great work you do here. Can I borrow your copy of the report? I 'll get it right back to you. LOL
You missed a couple of key words in your misquote - ".001 or more". The obvious implication is that they cannot currently be selling any new shares as long as the price remains under .001 but they could make nice gifts as stock options.
Hey we can agree on something...
"remember the stock and the company operate at a disconnect many times."
Correct me if I am wrong but par value is at .001 so any shares the company sold had to be at .001 or more. If they needed to sell more don't you think they would be pumping it up?
What a gift to be able to price all the new employee stock options at this level for tax purposes. No wonder Paul is keeping quiet. The true value of the company should be evident in the next few months. Right now it is priced as a total washout. As I have said before, look at the market cap vs the opportunity and read the bio's of those involved. Very risky but if sucessful could be very, very, very rewarding.
Just my speculation of course.
If they are venturing into the futures market, they should check out SpoozToolz. Could be a good match for both companies.
CCWW needs to reflect new symbol change to MTRE
Thanks for doing that. The part I was referring to is the sig that shows under every post "Don't Drink It, just Sip It....then move on to the next play". Cause I would say you have drank the kool-aid on this one... LOL
Barely. Say Chevy, would you consider adding an exception to your sig file (something like "Except MTRE - Hold on tight to this one). As our Mod, new people might look at it and get the impression that this stock is just another quick hit and run pinky without looking deeper.
What broker are you using? I was thinking of switching to Interactive Broker. Anyone else using them for sub-penny trades?
MTRE - 1:1 Dividend shares to be issued in 3rds over 180 days. Just came out of 1:150 R/S BUT AS also reduced AND insiders own 72% common holding through the reverse. Lots of great DD on the MTRE board. Very very thin float.
The MTRE shares have got to be in a tight squeeze. I had just a few of my shares in a $2+ GTC sell and somebody bought 5 shares 1 @ @ $2.45 and 4 @ $3.50 this morning. But it also never showed in the sales log.
I am not concerned about those who held through the R/S but if the volume dries up, they might be able to walk it down on small trades trying to create a panic. Lack of new buyers is my main concern but hopefully those who waited until after the R/S will see the price hold and buy in while they can still get the dividend shares. Follow the money (72% inside ownership in the same boat as us).
I actually prefer the close at .0045 because we really want this to trade higher after the R/S. Watch for an attempt to walk it down in the next few days and if they can't walk it down then we should see an explosive upswing.
I learned of Spooz through ihub but wished I hadn't found it so soon ;(
I have my own thoughts on some of the speculation that has gone on:
1) It appears to me that an individual or a group of individuals sold their large position(s) and a chain-reaction happened that dropped the price to the current level. They probably expected more from the launch and bailed when it appeared not to bolster the stock price (it is a stinky pinky until proven otherwise, so I do not fault them). Because of delays, Spooz may have had to issue some shares to cover overhead but this is better than toxic financing. For the number of shares, SPZI actually trades very thin for the dollar volume (which brings me to my second point).
2) Everyone seems to think that those who are testing Spooztoolz Pro would be interested in buying the stock if they liked the product but I would speculate that the caliber of trader currently testing it would not want to waste their time because SPZI is not liquid enought to take a meaningful position. It is similar to Warren Buffet not wasting time with small companies even though he sees great promise an potential.
3) The quiet period. Everytime another company name is mentioned, that poor company has to field questions from hundreds of individuals doing their own DD and this has become a hinderance to Spooz so they went stealth.
If I had not looked at the bios of those involved and past accomplishments, my thoughts would be more skeptical toward Spooz. I have a considerable loss on paper right now but I still have hope that the company will produce good results and I will be rewared for holding.
Just my opinions of course.
Cool & thanks again - I have never seen so many people demanding a Rerverse Split before LOL. I know all the reasons and that is why I am on board but it still seems a little wierd.
You are so lucky you did not find this stock earlier (like when it was at $3.67). I have been watching it since I exited and I don't know if this is the bottom yet but it looks to me like $.10 is a good place to start a position IMHO. I still wish they would enhance the flavor with Stevia and get rid of the artificial sweetener.
"Most digital film production is done entirely in raw to maintain quality and then compressed for distribution."
You cannot compare loss-less with any lossy format and as I stated earlier mass distrubution is via DVD or Blu-Ray. TMMI is not claiming loss-less compression so MPEG-2, MEPG-4 and several others compression schemes are valid comparisons. Lossy compressions (no matter how good visually) will have trouble gaining acceptance in the high end productions. ENG and EFP markets are already using lossy compression.
Is this Panasonic technology in the same market space that TMMI will attempt to compete against:
It still is not adding up in my mind.
your quote:
"the maximum file size that can be used by the 32 bit version is 2GB which equals about 9 seconds of 1280x960 raw video"
I have a digital camera that also records video on a 32bit chip and it records 20 minutes 30 fps at 848 x 480 with sound and the quality is quite excellent even when played back on a 50 inch plasma. Even though your file size is bigger (lets say 4x bigger for simplicity), 9 seconds does not seem like much of an accomplishment to me as far as compression is concerned.
That too bad because those "tiny little videos" are where compression is needed the most and anyone that had a solution to improve their quality would have a really high demand product. This was the market that made the most sense to target for high-compression with software decoding as it is easy to add a software decoder to a computer and everyone wants better looking "tiny little videos".
As far as DVD's, it is amazing the amount of time and manual effort that is spent on a theatrical release to carefully compress each scene trying to get the best quality with the bandwith available. The slower moving scenes are compressed more so they can use less compression on the action scenes. But most DVD's are decoded in a hardware DVD player that is not easy to change the codec.
But now we have blu-ray and even with HD, compression is not as big of a concern as it once was and again the machines are usually fixed and not able to change their codecs.
Cable and Sat. already have Digital and HD solutions so I am having a hard time seeing how TMMI will be able to make anyone abandon their current hardware and software solutions anytime in the near future even if TruDef proves usable.
The desktop HD video editor market is in need of a solution but I suspect that the main benefits of high compression would be lost when set up so that individual frames could be edited.
You can call me stupid but my dumb guess is that it will be almost impossible to get JV partners without audited financials. If they can get JV partners interested, they will pay less than market price and almost certainly the PPS will drop and if it is a convertible, then it will really drop hard.
This is a story stock so you might get lucky and someone will run the price up and allow you to exit. By the way, how was it that TMMI was able to purchase such a highly desirable product such as TruDef? Why didn't Digital Focus sell TruDef to Sony or Microsoft or some other deep pocket tech company?