Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
It is COMPLETELY unacceptable for us to allow ourselves to be conditioned to “set and forget” until 2025–they need to start showing signs of life, growth, and movement NOW!!!
I, for one, would like to know the basis for this. I’m deeply invested for over a year, but not gonna spend one more dime until their actions result in the kind of increased PPS that something which purports to do what they claim should ALREADY be commanding. It’s just that simple.
Serious question: where does one find the source of MM’s shares through the research you refer to?
If you can prove to me the number of shares that Medistem principals had prior to the RS (the only way to have an apples/apples comparison), then I’d be willing to reconsider my statement. In the meantime, I’ll maintain that principals with only 1-3M shares aren’t gonna diminish their stake through RS
ONE may have 70M (Warbington I’d guess) but at least 2 others have 1-3M
RS not likely for several reasons—most obvious being that a couple principals (including Dickerson) only have 1-2 million shares (verifiable from public filings): why would they destroy their own positions? They wouldn’t.
How long until delisting. I thought it was 60 or 90 days under .01. THIS is the cost of managements silence and inaction. PERIOD
A whopping $7500 investment? (Eyeroll)
Approaching ONE YEAR since clinical trial conclusion. Let that sink in for a minute. The fact that I am a long-term investor here (now approaching 1.5 years) does NOT preclude me from thinking, questioning, and criticizing. When the leadership of firms I invest in doesn’t meet expectations, I let them know about (and let everyone else know about it) until they visibly change course: my investments don’t manage me, I MANAGE THEM.
Proof of this assertion?
70M shares traded in first 5 mins?! More share-printing?
Perhaps it has been—I haven’t been on here much in the last week (lots going on with work, school, and family). I’d be happy to read and think about the explanation—which I presume exists here, unless you were being completely snarky (instead of just being partly so).
Excellent information, monte. Thanks for the education! And I agree about the dilution being fairly minor (I noticed a slight rise from 1.03B to 1.06B=30M: if, as I THINK you are saying, these figures are updated monthly, then this would amount to about 136K per trading session in a month with 22 sessions). So far, so good.
HOWEVER, WHERE then is the selling volume coming from??? We all know it’s not coming from insiders, and it’s almost SURELY not coming from noteholders (their warrants tend to be good for something over .015, as I recall—so WHY would they sell NOW? They wouldn’t). So, the question stands (and needs to be answered)...
Define appropriate levels of patience. 1.5 years for this to show clear and compelling signs that it is all we think it is through steady growth in PPS is not unreasonable to expect: the exact OPPOSITE of that has occurred at precisely the time when it SHOULD be occurring (given commercialization, explicit plans to expand to many sites worldwide, and the company’s own declaration that it expects to be generating self-sustaining revenues THIS YEAR). So how, then, do you analyze and explain what has occurred (and continues to occur) in this specific context?
What happens on July 2, monte?
Amen!
+100
+1
I agree with all this—and always have. However, IF you truly have something that can create a seismic shift in this equation, WHY would you dawdle and stay silent?! Someone may say, “but CELZ doesn’t yet have the capacity to handle a tsunami of demand that come.” And to that I would respond that, IF what they have is indeed BOTH revolutionary AND truly proprietary, then you would want to FILL the customer pipeline, get folks scheduled, committed, talking to others about their UPCOMING procedure, etc. What’s the worst “problem” that could happen in this scenario—have huge wait-lists of scheduled and committed customers that you would QUICKLY burn through—given that the procedure takes one hour tops. I’d GLADLY accept that “problem.”
Devil’s advocate: let’s assume for the sake of intelligent that entrenched interests really were threatened by CELZ—why wouldn’t they just buy all the shares of the company NOW and then “bury the problem” somewhere in an obscure subbasement? It does not appear that this is occurring, and from this we can conclude....
For sure they do WHAT? Who is “they” and WHAT do “they do”?
BTW—I’ve read and loved globalresearch.ca for twenty years
Ha! If there’s something real here, “the enemy” ALREADY KNOWS ABOUT IT. How ignorant and naive do we seriously think these MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR competitors and their high-paid analysts and advisors are?!
They surely have LEGIONS of people exploring and examining EVERY nook and cranny of EVERYTHING that has ANYTHING to do with their business environment. Wouldn’t you if in there shoes?
Therefore, the idea that we’re gonna keep something truly significant “quiet” and “sneak up on them” is preposterous and absurd.
I don’t understand your question/meaning. In basic terms MY meaning: if you have something REAL and want to be taken as legitimate, YOU must tell YOUR story YOURSELF. Do NOT consign YOUR fate and fortune to the inept (or malfeasant) hands of others. This is not rocket science!
By contrast, when you FAIL to do what I’m describing, you get what we’ve gotten for the last year plus. Point of fact: there is NO REASON it should take a YEAR to publish the results of the clinical study with the “paper that we are working on”—are they translating the paper into hieroglyphics or something. WTF?!
And this is only the MOST obvious example of several things that they could fix PERMANENTLY AND SO EASILY.
Last point: it is NOT an option to BOTH do nothing about the things I’m describing AND complain about people “sabotaging” your efforts behind the scenes. Bottom line: they need to DO something to contend, compete, and change the narrative quickly and dramatically—or STFU, close their doors, and sink COMPLETELY into the irrelevant oblivion toward which they have been heading for most of the last year. These are the options.
I will believe it when I see it—until then it is what it appears to be and I will discuss it as such. Simple fix for CELZ: TAKE CONTROL OF THE NARRATIVE!
What exactly do you mean by “a dedicated group swimming upstream”? Please PM me if necessary
“Set a budget to keep this down-hence the company secrecy and more”
What does alleged activity by pharma have to do with secrecy and silence of CELZ??
I was doing this math A YEAR AGO: why are they SO SLOW on the uptake?! Fair question
The only words that ANYONE needs to highlight are short, simple, and sweet: PPS
Weren’t we supposed to be at/near .20 last December or shortly thereafter? EVERYONE’S investment is being ANNIHILATED—including theirs—by this lifeless PPS. Of all people, they (who are barely being compensated) should WANT the PPS to go and stay UP! Can someone PLEASE, for the love of all that is holy, explain their perverse and counterintuitive logic to me?!
+100!!!
I’ve emailed them several times—they don’t respond. For the record, I’m not some know-nothing yahoo—I have multiple graduate degrees, including an MBA: not that this means anything other than that they should be able to discern the caliber of people they are dealing with (which they clearly could based on my emails).
They are not interested in input, advice, help, or feedback: “they got this.” Pride goeth before the fall...
How long has AS been 14B? That seems like an enormous number (which I hope they never come close to teaching).
Some dilution continues: OS rose from 1.03B to 1.06B (30M shares) in the last week or so (according to my TDA).
We were WELL on our way to that kinda level (.25) this time last year—and then whatever happened (or didn’t happen) to ANNIHILATE our PPS—in spite of TREMENDOUS positives with revenues and loss reductions—occurred.
I think SFT is referring to fact that posted open today was .0059. I’m not sure how that works either: my TDA shows .0059 as the open, but that doesn’t show up on today’s CHART...
As I’ve said before, it POSSIBLE that they might sell just the CaverStem brand and use that money to finance the full commercialization of Femcelz (which I have long believed is the REAL sleeping giant financially: EVERYONE knows and talks about ED, but the seriously prevalent and underaddressed issue of female sexual dysfunction is finally being spotlighted), along with the ultimate rollouts of Amniostem, SpineStem, etc. Bottom line: the separation of CaverStem as its own entity around one year ago is, I suspect, a central piece logically and HARDLY a meaningless coincidence...
Alas this is the only place where I engage in communication about our common equity. The fact that answers are not forthcoming in ANY public forum is itself highly troubling.
AGAIN: We need an EXPLANATION of what is happening so counterintuitive to ANY rational expectations, based on being in commercialization, proving dramatic increases in y/y revenues in the last Q filing, along with HUGE reduction in losses: these factors alone—as is CURRENTLY—should have the PPS going BONKERS RIGHT NOW. THAT disconnect requires analysis and explanation.
AGAIN: We need an EXPLANATION of what is happening so counterintuitive to ANY rational expectations, based on being in commercialization, proving dramatic increases in y/y revenues in the last Q filing, along with HUGE reduction in losses: these factors alone—as is CURRENTLY—should have the PPS going BONKERS RIGHT NOW. THAT disconnect requires analysis and explanation.
We need an EXPLANATION of what is happening so counterintuitive to ANY rational expectations, based on being in commercialization, proving dramatic increases in y/y revenues in the last Q filing, along with HUGE reduction in losses: these factors alone—as is CURRENTLY—should have the PPS going BONKERS RIGHT NOW. THAT disconnect requires analysis and explanation.
I agree with your last paragraph
It’s more than a little odd that folks offer no substantive rationale other than “keep buying”: in context that advice, not surprisingly, falls more than a little flat on the ears. It’s WAY past time for answers...
While I believe in the essence of what you continue to say (obviously—I’m locked in now for a year and a half), I’m curious how you essentially ignore the obvious and quite counterintuitive (and more so with each passing week) destruction of our PPS, the almost complete irrelevance of positive business and fiscal developments on our PPS (which continues to plummet), and the fact that the catalysts which you assert we need to wait “just a little longer” until they have an effect on our PPS were present, in their basic essence, A YEAR AGO—and yet they STILL have not had their anticipated effect. Then there is the rather narcissistic notion that “MMs and other boogeymen are keeping our PPS down”: that strikes me as balderdash. Out of how many THOUSANDS of OTC stocks that exist, they’re gonna pick OURS out for sustained and intensive attention (and lock their money up in ours so that they can “hold it down,” when all they really care about is making money off buy/sell transactions, and probably couldn’t give two rips about our stock specifically)? I have always respected your input and analysis, and I hope that you will respond to my points above and refute them with documentable facts and the same “logical thinking” that you always (and rightly) advocate. It’s past time for answers to the timeless question once posed by the great Vince Lombardi: “What in the h3!! is going ON out there?!”