is...retired
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The attorney letter is missing.
The dividend is monthly.
The dividend history is here:
SLVO dividend history
The ex-dividend date for this month has already passed, but anyone that owns SLVO next ex-dividend date will receive them. This month it is a piddly $.05, but it has been over $.20 earlier this year.
Sure...etrade lets you trade anything.
There are 90 Million less than 6 billion in the OS. They have already stated that they plan to sell the remaining 90M to raise some cash. This isn't conversions, but it is dilution. But it's almost not measurable in terms of percentage. Without calculating it, I'd suggest less than 1% dilution, and then the OS=AS.
Some people should think before they post. This is old news.
Today's drop was because of shareholders selling lots of shares at market. Nothing more, nothing less. When you sell at market, the price drops immediately. The bigger the sell, the lower it goes.
All one has to do is sell at a limit and let it fill over time. No affect on share price EXCEPT to prevent it from rising until it fills.
They are not BUYING shares, they are SELLING 20 B shares...
Why drum up the old buyback ghost that never happens? I've never seen even one share bought back by a stinky pinky, but they ALL talk about it. As soon as a company mentions it, it is a PUMP, because they NEVER happen.
Yeah, the fully automated OTC market computers can smell a bounce a mile away. NOT! There are no people watching these trades, and with over 10,000 OTC stocks, it would take a mountain of hired onlookers to help guide MM's to profit. NOT!
Doesn't anyone understand what automated means? It means computers, not people, people.
Bad trading is what causes the rapid price changes, not MM's. They don't care WHAT the price does, they get their commissions on buys AND sells. All they care about is that the stock remain liquid.
Remember, MM's are not TRADERS. They don't buy stocks to hold and sell at a profit. They buy when someone sells within their spread. They sell when someone buys within their spread. That's it. They are BROKERS, not TRADERS. they adjust their spread regularly. They all have different spreads. They compete against EACH OTHER not US.
That is what happens when an inexperienced trader sells a lot of shares at market. (Not with a limit.) MM's instantly drop their bid and the price shoots down.
People: NEVER BUY OR SELL WITHOUT A LIMIT unless you don't care what price you pay (buying at market makes the MM's raise the offer). If you buy 10M shares at market, then look at the tranches you get, you'll see they go up, the same way the share price goes down when you sell at market. Set a limit. Know what you'll pay and what you'll receive.
If SBC wanted to, it could purchase a clean shell and reverse merge into it. NSAV could then add it to its other holdings. That is a reasonable approach, IF SBC wants to be public. I don't think it does - it is a financial company which is probably best left private, so they don't have to report on every little financial transaction. Some things are better left unpublic.
This CEO has made no promises. Everything he has said has had wiggle words present. No way could he promise when OTCM would grant current or yield - nor could he promise anything else.
Traders that think anything a CEO says is a promise are living in a dream world. Even a valid company often misses deadlines, and we don't even have any deadlines, unless you call the SEC action a deadline, and even in that case, the ball is not in the CEO's court.
Why on earth would you think SBC would reverse merge into a holding company? That makes no sense. There are plenty of clean shells around to reverse merge into. They may wish to remain private and bypass all that expensive reporting stuff...
None of those companies were ever stinky pinkies. They went the IPO route and got valuations in the dollars. This isn't apples and oranges, it is ice cream cones and SUV's.
That's not how it works.
The data was uploaded in April. OTCM reviews and asks questions. When all the questions are satisfied, the status is updated probably to 'yield' first.
Usually these alternative-reporting stocks move to yield, awaiting the attorney letter. SEC compliant companies don't require the attorney letter. So, yes, I would expect yield first, unless the attorney letter was included in the filing bundle.
Delinquent companies almost always go to Yield first. The filings must be approved and an attorney letter must accompany or be filed after the fins. Going to yield is a good thing - it shows improvement, and imminent update to current.
I had one company similar to this one that took over 6 months to get to current. Hopefully, this won't take that long, but is has already been 4 months since April filings.
Insiders in public companies can only buy or sell that company's stock during the 30 days following filing financials. So, no the CEO is not buying OR selling any shares since the fins are not filed. That would be an SEC violation. The rest of the time between filings is called the 'quiet period'. I've been a director in a public company, and know those rules well. That is the only time I could buy/sell my stock options.
Private parties cannot buy and sell between themselves unless the shares are held privately - not in a brokerage. Just try to sell your shares at etrade to someone else. You can't do that. You can sell them, but you can't direct who will receive them.
A company can't retire stock unless it has purchased them first. A company cannot purchase its own stock without a filing announcing it, along with how many shares, and the duration of the buyback period. Buybacks are considered 'significant events' by the SEC, so a filing is necessary.
None of his statement makes sense, legally or logically.
Senators have stock too, and I doubt very much they would approve anything that substantially increased their own taxes...
Yes, a Davis Vantage Pro2. I have it displayed on an extra monitor. I have over 12 years of continuous weather data at my home.
Dividend shares are often numbered. My NSAV shares are numbered, from 2017. In Etrade, you can click an information button to disclose what they are. Mine says: 629994674NET SAVINGS LINK REST CONTRA CUSIP
A capacitor is nothing more than a battery. My weather station charges a capacitor with its solar panel. SOMETHING has to charge the battery or the capacitor. That is what has not been divulged. What is the energy source?
Thanks, but I'm not doing it for other shareholders. I'm doing it for me. I only sell into demand (when the price is rising) and I always sell at a limit, set for 60 days. It can take days for it to fill, and it can do it while I'm not looking. It's what I call 'set it and forget it' trading.
Each time I sell, I get more dollars than the last time.
I set buys up the same way - at a limit, for 60 days. Sometimes I have to adjust it if it takes off but normally, it bumps up and down, and when it drops to my buy point, it fills.
I'm not still selling. My next sell was going to be at $.15, but we didn't get there. So, I'm just waiting. Each sale for me needs to be between $50K and $100K, but selling the fewest possible while doing that.
Back when it was much lower, I was selling 5M at a time, then 1M, and now 500K. I hope to drop that to 100K as the price increases. that would be at $.50, for $50K.
I once has 225 million...about 100M now...
Apparently, you don't get it. Rechargeable batteries aren't 'born' with a full charge, and you can't use them and continue to have a full charge. And regenerative braking is recovering EXCESS energy from the kinetic energy of the car during braking. Yes, I watch e-racing.
SOMETHING has to charge those batteries, and it can NOT be the energy that CAME OUT of the batteries. Energy is LOST during the driving of the car, and THAT energy cannot be replaced without an energy source.
Thanks for the physics lesson. In order to have kinetic energy, SOMETHING had to GIVE IT that energy. In your car, it is the gas that gets the car going. It coasts due to kinetic energy. but it won't coast for a year. Kinetic energy is lost in many ways, and THAT cannot be recovered. The friction of the air alone will eventually stop it.
So, instead of attempting to teach an engineer about physics, why not question what the energy source is for this so-called car? Inquiring minds want to know THAT. I fricking guarantee what what has been said is impossible, and they have not told us yet what will power this car.
A battery is not an energy source. It is an energy STORAGE device. SOMETHING has to charge the battery, and THAT is what we need to know about.
Physical laws are never broken, because they CAN'T BE, since they are LAWS of PHYSICS. Believe what you want, yes inventions are everywhere, but THEY OBEY THE LAWS OF PHYSICS. Such inventions take ADVANTAGE of the laws, not break them. Airplanes fly because of these laws. Show me an airplane that needs no fuel or wings to fly, and I'll consider changing my position.
This isn't about inventing something that can run forever with no energy source - it is about SAYING it can be done with NO supporting information. What IS the energy source? Why is it kept secret? Why does it take a trailer behind a car to run it?
Like all other impossible ideas, it will have to be shown to be real for anyone with even a modicum of engineering/physics background to even consider it.
I learned physics in the 60's and keep learning every day. I see a lot of wild-ass ideas that are physically impossible.
Energy is energy. It can neither be created nor destroyed. THAT is the rule of physics. It CAN be converted from one form to another. In the process, SOME of that energy is lost. It is the term called 'work'. In most energy transformations, heat is given off. One the heat is given off, you can't get it back. So, no method of converting energy can be self-sustaining forever.
What does that have to do with anything. SB SAID the nft's are going to another company. All that remains is to disclose what company it is.
Yes, I know what non-fungible tokens are. They are digital ownership items built on blockchain, similar to crypto but different. Crypto coins are tradable for each other. NFT's are not tradable for other NFT's, they are unique ownership certificates for, generally, digital creations. If you buy the NFT, you 'own' it. You can sell it, but you can't trade it. Like baseball cards, except that there is only one.
Tilton is gone.
You are sadly mistaken. Brokerages are going to be PROHIBITED from trading pink stop/yield. Period. You can't SELL them if no one can BUY them. THINK ABOUT IT. At least NSAV is still current. But if you have shares in a pink stop, you may want to evaluate how long to hold them. If they get downlisted, you will simply be a bag holder, nothing else.
Yes, the filing is out. Still losing money, but somehow has a $17,000,000 'good will' asset. WTF???
There is no revenue, at all, which has been the case for the last 5 years, of which I have been a shareholder the whole time. Not a penny, yet.
The only 'money' made is from the issuance of shares, which they are now almost out of. (90M left to sell...)
It is impossible to say 'this type of recharging system will work' since they have not said what it is yet. One thing is for sure - there has to be an external energy source of some kind. Running a car on a battery uses power that cannot ever be recovered. There HAS to be a source for energy to charge the battery, and it cannot be the energy that was already lost in running the car. That is the most basic physics of all. There IS NO perpetual energy machine, and there cannot be one.
All we need to hear is how the thing is powered.
HPIL is a holding company. The NFT's will be held by one of the companies that are under the HPIL umbrella already, or a new one. Holding companies don't usually make money themselves - they take a cut of the profit of the companies they hold. That's how they work...think about it.
Since Cyernetics is off the table, for now, they are back to being a holding company, which means they need another entity to execute the NFT's.
No, if your shares are not up for sale, NO ONE can touch them. Why would anyone think that shares that are privately held in a brokerage could be 'borrowed' by MM's? They aren't AVAILABLE unless they are for sale, or held in a margin account.
And no one uses certificates any more. This isn't the 80's, you know.
That is exactly the wrong thing to do. If your shares are up for sale, they can be borrowed by MM's. They don't BUY them, they BORROW them and replace them later. You never know, but that's how it works. Yet another one that doesn't understand how Mm's work.
There is a way to lock your shares. Don't put them up for sale, and don't have them in a margin account. They can't touch those shares.
Naked shorting does not happen in the OTC. The reason? It is a fully automated market, and every single share that is traded is recorded in a database, so finding situations where shares were sold that were not bought would be as simple as having a program looking at all the trades. They do have that, you know and if any naked shorting was happening, it would stand out like a sore thumb.
EVERY SHARE is recorded as to who sold it and who bought it. So, no naked shorting in the OTC. Only an MM 'could' do it, but they would be caught almost immediately and face steep fines.
I guess most traders don't understand what 'automated' means. It means there are NO PEOPLE filling orders, and computers are not going to decide to do naked shorting on their own, to make a few partial cents on penny stocks.
Don't know what ever happened to common sense, but the wild claims I see here all the time are mostly not even possible. It reflects on the understanding of how the market even works.
You need to learn what that report is about. It is not retail, meaning us.
There is also a margin, which amounts to about $2.50 per share shorted, IF you can find a broker to do it. I don't know of ANY broker that will permit shorting of penny stocks. If you know of one, TELL US who it is. Etrade says right on their web site that it is not permitted.
But anyway, regardless of that, it makes no sense to short a stock that is under a penny. It would cost you thousands of dollars in margin to make a few 10's of dollars IF the price dropped, and ONLY if it dropped. But for the same money, you could buy the stock and make MUCH more if it went up a click or two.
Why would anyone want to short a penny stock that can drop by half or double in the same day? Sheer logic says it would be suicidal for your portfolio because you CAN'T GUESS what any sub penny stock will do in a given day.
Actually, you can short OTC stocks of $5 or higher, just not penny stocks.
No, you can't short penny stocks, period. Try it.