Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
JLT,
I am very sorry for your loss.
God bless you and your family.
John
JLT,
My reasoning is simple. The last go around there was a lot of selling into the news. When the smoke cleared I checked with the transfer agent and found that the Issued and Outstanding had doubled that month. I simply want to see if it is being set up for another sell off. If the company is for real and they experience documented growth AND get off the pinks, I will have more interest.
Best of luck,
jc
You may want to email Thompson's Financial and ask them about what shows up as "institutional buying" on that calculator. Shares other than those in the public float will show up as "institutional" buying. I suggest someone call the transfer agent for the latest numbers. Not bashing, just saying check into it if you care. I bought some last week for chits and giggles, but not holding my breath...just playing with a few shares. If it runs a little I will sell like I did after the first PR about the SpoozTools launch. As for that XKEM, the share count gives me a nose bleed....LOL. No institution will buy into that kind of on-going dilution.
Good luck.
jc
Hydrogen Fueling Stations
Press Release Source: Air Products
Air Products to Supply Equipment for Two Hydrogen Fueling Stations Designed and Constructed by Chevron Hydrogen Company
Thursday June 22, 9:27 am ET
LEHIGH VALLEY, Pa., June 22 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Air Products' (NYSE: APD - News) hydrogen fueling technology has been selected by Chevron Hydrogen Company, a division of Chevron U.S.A. Inc., for incorporation into hydrogen fueling stations to be located in Michigan and Florida. The two locations will use Air Products' Series 300 hydrogen compression, storage and dispensing technology to be integrated by Chevron into its advanced fueling station design.
ADVERTISEMENT
[0]
In Orlando, Fla. the station will be located near the Orlando Airport and will fuel a fleet of shuttle buses powered by modified internal combustion engines. At Selfridge, Mich. the station will be located on a United States Military base and will provide hydrogen for a fleet of light duty fuel cell vehicles. Both stations are expected to be operational by the end of 2006.
"This is the first hydrogen fueling equipment we have provided Chevron, and we are pleased to begin this collaborative relationship," said Dan Rabun, business development specialist for Air Products' Future Energy Solutions area. "The goal is to advance system equipment and engineering in all aspects of safety, operability, and reliability, and enhance the consumer fueling experience."
Air Products (NYSE: APD - News) serves customers in technology, energy, healthcare and industrial markets worldwide with a unique portfolio of products, services and solutions, providing atmospheric gases, process and specialty gases, performance materials and chemical intermediates. Founded in 1940, Air Products has built leading positions in key growth markets such as semiconductor materials, refinery hydrogen, home healthcare services, natural gas liquefaction, and advanced coatings and adhesives. The company is recognized for its innovative culture, operational excellence and commitment to safety and the environment and is listed in the Dow Jones Sustainability and FTSE4Good Indices. The company has annual revenues of $8.1 billion, operations in over 30 countries, and over 20,000 employees around the globe. For more information, visit http://www.airproducts.com.
***NOTE: This release may contain forward-looking statements. Actual results could vary materially, due to changes in current expectations.
Great news.
jc
Rookie4sure, here is the release about OTC.BB efforts:
http://www.up9.co.uk/Personal_Announcements_Activities_To_377.html
jc
If the production is anything like the gas put off by brewer's yeast when I make a batch of home brew, it is a lot. If you watch the little water valve bubble away on a batch of home brew you get an idea of the volume of gas a packet of yeast and three pounds of sugar and barley malt produce...it's a lot. Of course I have no idea how this compares to what the NNLX bioreactor produces. Anyone else make homemade beer? You'll know what I mean.
jc
Issued and outstanding are not changed since I checked several months back.
47,343,692
jc
I like the way they are going about moving to the BB. They are doing it with their own company rather than buying and forward merging into an OTC shell. Companies that go the shell route usually do so because their own capital share structure is in a shambles. This is the honest way to move to the BB...with an audit and a filing of YOUR OWN company...not flim-flamery and shell games.
Chart wise we are looking great. We should see a 50/200 DMA cross and the parabolic SAR should set a buy signal soon.
jc
Rocky, They can take their time and I won't mind...I wouldn't mind more time to research and maybe pick up a little more here and there. I also like the latest personnel addition...the guy who has so much experience putting together hydro-mechanical systems. He used to be involved with zero defect tolerance systems for nuclear subs. It's ironic, but I used to operate nuclear propulsion equipment on subs. One thing we did was use electrolysis to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen. Only it was the oxygen we were after for breathing purposes. We made our own air and drinking water and could theoretically stay submerged for as long as we could bring food for. Three years wwould have been possible wihout surfacing. That H-O separator was a dangerous piece of equipment. If you screwed up you could sink the boat with it. Anyhow, if they are serious about building these bioreactors on a commercial scale, they need top knotch engineering...producing and collecting hydrogen is dangerous business.
jc
Probably a lot if it produces enough hydrogen. But it has to be a whole lot more efficient than electolysis, which consumes a lot of energy. That energy must be bought. This system uses bacteria that reproduces itself I suppose. So it sure sounds like they are on to something.
jc
This is copied and pasted from the full article:
"NanoLogix’ process is based on combining the bacterial production of hydrogen with excess industrial heat."
I suppose it could mean that the waste comes from the factory at a high enough temperature already? Just a guess. Or they could mean they don't need elecrticity to produce hydrogen as you do to separate hydrogen from oxygen by electrolysis?
Any how, I sold all my shares at .47 and I am back in today based on the chart.
jc
Let's coin a new phrase:
"You Spooz...You Lose..."
JC
Filling this morning's gap.
jc
New MARTI website:
http://martiwater.com/products.php
Shares are not as available.
jc
Here is an article that makes a good case for Code Blue:
Saturday, April 01, 2006
EPA may weaken rule on water quality
Juliet Eilperin / The Washington Post
Advertisement
WASHINGTON -- The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to allow higher levels of contaminants such as arsenic in the drinking water used by small rural communities, in response to complaints that they cannot afford to comply with recently imposed limits.
The proposal would roll back a rule that went into effect earlier this year and make it permissible for water systems serving 10,000 or fewer residents to have three times the level of contaminants allowed under that regulation.
About 50 million people live in communities that would be affected by the proposed change. In the case of arsenic, the most recent EPA data suggest as many as 10 million Americans are drinking water that does not meet the new federal standards.
Benjamin Grumbles, assistant administrator for EPA's Office of Water, said the agency was trying to satisfy Congress, which instructed EPA in 1996 to take into account the fact that it costs small rural towns proportionately more to meet federal drinking water standards.
"We're taking the position both public health protection and affordability can be achieved together," Grumbles said in an interview this week. "When you're looking at small communities, oftentimes they cannot comply with the (current) standard."
But Erik Olson, a senior lawyer for the advocacy group Natural Resources Defense Council, called the move a broad attack on public health.
"It could have serious impacts on people's health, not just in small-town America," Olson said. "It is like overturning the whole apple cart on this program."
The question of how to regulate drinking water quality has roiled Washington for years. Just before leaving office, President Bill Clinton imposed a more stringent standard for arsenic, dictating that drinking water should contain no more than 10 parts per billion of the poison, which in small amounts is a known carcinogen. President Bush suspended the standard after taking office, but Congress voted to reinstate it, and in 2001, the National Academy of Sciences issued a study saying arsenic was more dangerous than the EPA had previously believed. The deadline for water systems to comply with the arsenic rule was January of this year.
The proposed revision was unveiled in early March in the Federal Register and is subject to public comment until May 1. Administration officials said the number of comments they receive will determine when it would take effect.
EPA's new proposal would permit drinking water to have arsenic levels of as much as 30 parts per billion in some communities.
Maryland has a high level of naturally occurring arsenic in its water, and its Department of the Environment has estimated that 37 water systems serving more than 26,000 people now exceed the 10-parts-per-billion arsenic limit. These include systems serving several towns as well as individual developments, mobile home parks, schools and businesses in Dorchester, Caroline, Queen Anne's, Worcester, Garrett, St. Mary's and Talbot counties.
General Manager George Hanson's Chesapeake Water Association in Lusby, Md., serves 4,000 town residents with four wells. Three of them meet the new arsenic standard, but one well has 14 parts per billion in its water. He estimated that cleaning it up would cost between $1 million and $4 million.
"It's some of the most beautiful water I've ever seen. The arsenic is the only thing that fouls the entire system," Hanson said, adding that he and other community water suppliers are hoping the new EPA proposal will offer them a way out. "They're waiting for someone to help them."
Under the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996, complying with federal drinking water standards is not supposed to cost water systems more than 2.5 percent of the median U.S. household income, which in 2004 was $44,684, per household served. That means meeting these standards should not cost more than $1,117 per household.
Under EPA's proposal, drinking water compliance could not cost more than $335 per household.
Several public officials and environmental experts said they were just starting to review the administration's plan, but some said they worry that it could lead to broad exemptions from the current federal contaminant standards cities and larger towns must also meet. Besides arsenic, other water contaminants including radon and lead pose a health threat in some communities.
James Taft, executive director of the Association of State Drinking Water Administrators, said he and others are concerned that the less stringent standard will "become the rule, rather than the exception" if larger communities press for similar relief.
Avner Vengosh, a geochemistry and hydrology professor at Duke University's Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences, said he was surprised by the administration's proposal because North Carolina officials are trying to keep arsenic levels as low as 2 parts per billion.
"It's a bit ironic you have this loosening in the EPA standard when local authorities are making it more stringent," Vengosh said, adding that many rural residents "have no clue what they have in the water."
National Rural Water Association analyst Mike Keegan, who backs the administration's proposal, said the current rule is based on what contaminant levels are economically and technically feasible, rather than what is essential to preserve public health.
The administration may face a fight on Capitol Hill over the proposal. Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., who helped write the 1996 law, said EPA's proposal, "if finalized, would allow weakened drinking water standards, not just in rural areas, but in the majority of drinking water systems in the United States."
I am on a day to day watch too.
jc
I don't think the MM's are out to beat this up, or any stock for that matter. They have to work the bid and ask in order to fill the orders in front of them every day. Manipulating the price is the only way they have to do it. Sometimes the price swings wildly and is all over the place on small transactions, but any stock during periods of low volume will be very volatile. I think EYII has held up reasonably well so far since coming off the lows in early January. And it always moves up quickly when there is a level of excitement. I always ask myself if the MM's have filled all my orders just the way I placed them. If the answer is yes, then I have nothing to gripe about. The MM's don't look after my interests and they are under no obligation to see that the price never goes below what I have paid. They just do what they have to to fill the orders they get.
The 10Q was a summary of 2005 which was a big spending year in which the Hong Kong office, the Code Blue shipping infrastructure, etc. all had to be put into place. A lot of marketing material had to be created and paid for and the Hong Kong grand opening just took place in Feb. of 2006, launching the new penetration into the Asia market. So of course it is too early to expect positive numbers out of all these new efforts.
The Code Blue filters were delivered ( at long last) during the HK grand opening and according to Jay "The final Code Blue filters are now in CEIEC's hand and off to the Chinese government for March review." In fact, I just noticed he said the FINAL filters. It makes me wonder if CEIEC has received other filters in the past that didn't cut it. We have just heard of newly designed filters that solve the flow problem. I take it he means the ones with the flow problems solved, but I am just guessing about that.
Again, investing in OTC's is a high risk business. Nevertheless, since the LOI was first anounced, nothing has materially changed. As far as I can see everything is still moving on. The only concern I would have is equity financing going forward until we see CEIEC revenues.
jc
The T/A was 300 million when I first looked at EYI. All my figuring has been based on that any how. So I don't care about it at this point.
jc
They are free trading shares and they can sell them any time now that they have filed insider planned sales documents. The value given is the estimated worth as determined by the person filing. For example Janet Carpenter intends to sell 800,000 and estimates proceeds of $40,000 which would be a nickel a share.
jc
That was the dissolving of a trust. Jay has held those shares in trust for those individuals and now he has delivered them to them.
jc
...I DID tell you the filing would be out, and viola! Since there was no notice of late filing, I was right in at least that! There will be news....just wait .
jc
Please show me where I said this filing will contain any news.
For crying out loud, it's a year end summary for 2005. There was no 2006 news in 2005. There will be news when there is something to report, that has been EYI's way. But it is totally unreasonable to look for current news in a summary of last year's activity.
I guess I was a bit sarcastic, and for that I appologize...it is uncalled for.
jc
That's rare all right...a filing for the year ending in 2005 has no news for this year...I've never seen that before. All 2005 filings are supposed to have 2006 press releases aren't they?
...amazing trains of thought exist....
jc
LOL...I said there is NO notice of late filing. So I would suggest later today that you look for the filing.
You have been hearing about the $210 Million contract "for weeks now"? You obviously have not read it.
You want the PR that lets the world know? How old are you? Do you still ride in the back and whine..."Are we there yet? Are we there yet? are we there yet?...etc. etc.? It will be out when it is out.
jc
Jakester0123,
No pump job. There is no "notice of late filing" so calm down and search EDGAR on Monday. I will bet you a bag of potato chips it will show up.
Apart from that, what other filings or news has "failed to materialize"?
jc
Nice:
SHDG -- Shine Holdings, Inc.
Com (5 Cents)
Search for Dun & Bradstreet reports on this company.
Investors are advised that Pink Sheets has not been able to contact this issuer. Please refer to the Company Notes below for company status and other important information, including the Last Known Address, where available.
If you have current contact information for this issuer, please complete the Update Company Information Form or send an email to info@pinksheets.com
Address:
Not Available
Phone: Not Available
Business Description: Not Available
State of Incorporation: CO
Officers: Not Available
Outstanding Shares: 52,639 as of 2006-03-13
Estimated Market Cap: Not Available
Current Capital Change:
shs decreased by 1 for 1000 split
Ex-Date:
Record Date:
Pay Date: 2006-03-13
Dividends:
Company Notes:
Formerly=Laz Financial Corp. to 4-94
Formerly=American Teletronics, Inc. until 3-06
Transfer Agent:
Not Available
It will be out today.
jc
JLT4738,
That's fine. No need for me to call. I have no emotion about this. I just try to do whatever the market shows me.
jc
I took a modest position yesterday based on the intra day charts. I still think they may have a viable product. I still don't like what has happened to the O/S and the free trading shares since they were published in early March.
jc
On more upside...this is scary. On the one hand looking at the chart you can't find resistance for a long way yet. On the other hand can a stock sustain a meteoric climb like this for very long? If it would just mark time and let the indicators catch their breath I would fell better. One thing I do feel great about is that this stock isn't being talked about very much anywhere. I hope that remains the case.
jc
WOW! NNLX is on a tear.
jc
One hit, believe it or not, so do I. ( Hoping this one is not a scam) And I don't believe it is. I do however want to see what the capital structure TRULY is and how quickly they sign customers. It may succeed, it may flounder...who can tell? But we will all know soon enough. I am not a naysayer, nor am I a promoter. I am on the sidelines playing the waiting game.
GL,
jc
I recieved an answer from NNLX today
I wrote:
Hello,
I am considering buying stock in your company. Could you provide me with a few answers to basic questions?
1.Is the Welches installation a test installation or is Welches helping with the cost ?
2.What is the current Issued and Outstanding?
3.Do you anticipate any splits to facilitate OTC.BB status?
4.Do you have any equity distribution financing in place right now?
Thank you for your time,
John Crom
***************************************************************
The reply:
Thanks for your interest in NNLX.
1. NNLX is underwriting all the costs for our commercial unit at Welch's.
2. We have about 50M shares outstanding.
3. We currently do not anticipate any splits.
4 We have financing proposals on the table and are always looking for better terms.
NanoLogix
***************************************************************
I like that...no beating around the bush. Straight answers to simple questions.
jc
Yes, it is important to be in the know.
jc
Well, have they? How can you know without filings or a statement to that effect from the company? You guys seem to thing this is some kind of elite forum or something, yet you all want warm and fuzzies. What you guys seem to want is a coolaid stand. I want information. I won't put a wooden nickel into this until I know what is going on. I am in no hurry. Look, I am not saying the product and company will not succeed. But I will darn well wait until the smoke clears and the shares all go wherever they go. Meanwhile, good luck to you and please use the ignore feature on me...I really don't mind.
jc
aries4747,
Yes, that is always the case when you don't have filings to look at. If you will, take a look at the issue date for 70,187,586 shares in the info you just provided. This is from the public press release and it states August 18, 2005. Now go back to the same press release and follow the link at the bottom to spooz.com. From there, surf to "news" and read the same news release as it appears on the website. Notice that the issue date for the 70,187,586 restricted shares is August 18, 2004. It matters to know which is the case because the restriction is for one year.
jc
Wallstreetman
According to a poster on the RB, "juggernuts" or something like that, he said he called the TA Thursday and was told the O/S is now 460,324,209 and the free trading shares are 229,394,850.
I have not called the TA myself and so I am basing this on what this person reports. If he is correct, you can see that between March 1, 2006 when the information you posted was released, and now, there is a sizeable increase in the Issued and Outstanding as well as the free trading shares.
I do not know this as fact because I have not called the TA.
But I will.
The guy who is concerned about me posting isn't worth me getting flustered. I have thick skin and don't care about stuff like that. He can say whatever he wants...I don't care.
jc
npoz,
Thanks. I was curious about the discrepancy in free trading shares for obvious reasons. And the person you spoke with could be entirely correct. But like I say, we can't know until there are filings for us to view. In the very long term, the total issued and outstanding does not change regardless of whether shares go into the float. The eventual valuations will be a factor of revenues and total shares, fully diluted. So the entire restricted vs. free trading shares issue is only a near term one.
That in part is why I am waiting.
jc