Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I called it over a year ago—and was bludgeoned and labeled a heretic. I could tell THEN from the whispers and vagaries in there releases that that they were NOT “coming correct” at this. Unless you are playing “Clue,” leave the cloak and dagger (along with all the other subterfuge) AT THE DOOR. If you wish to be taken seriously, you must be CLEAR, CONSISTENT, AND EXPLICIT. Instead they prefer sleight of hand and innuendo—and that is why our collective investment equity is now worth ZILCH.
Why are things any different now? At this time last year we were riding high, having generated massive buying interest in CELZ in the belief that the company was poised to capitalize on its potential, build serious momentum, and rise out of the OTC cesspool. Instead we absolutely CRASHED, lost ALL of the gains we realized, and virtually all of the familiar faces who were were present for the climb to .07 have LONG since disappeared.
Now we sit at 1/3 of a penny: how does one logically reconcile this with the idea of a company that is allegedly poised to generate self-sustaining revenues in the second half of 2019?! In addition, we are almost to the one-year anniversary of the end of the CaverStem clinical trial—and the last update we heard on the publication of results was that “we are working on our paper,” and that was MONTHS ago.
At this point I am struggling to see how we are much different from those who waited and hoped blindly for the second coming that would happen “any day now”—starting back around 100AD. We always talk about “logical thinking” around here, so please apply that very approach to the reconciliation of the items listed above (and others like them).
Market open or closed Friday?
We’ve been believing shizz like this for over a YEAR!!! Where is the rational basis at this point?? Today’s volume was HALF of the fairly pedestrian recent daily average volume of 11M shares...
Are we SERIOUSLY cheering about buying action that raised us ALL the way up to .0037?! What have we been reduced to???
WE drove it there (with money from ourselves and those we know): they have allowed it to crash down to NOTHING. INFURIATING
Management is allowing this stock to die. 1.5 years of their patterned behavior have finally convinced me– – and no one can convince me otherwise. There is no other rational explanation here.
Perhaps—but GLACIAL beyond comprehension
Dr. Said is licensed to practice and in good standing: so what’s your point?
“Ladies and gentlemen—we have a winner!”
It is disappointing, discouraging, and derelict for them not to have provided a MEANINGFUL update by now: months ago we heard “we’re working on our paper.” But that could mean any number of VERY different things: has the draft of the paper been submitted to a journal? Has it been accepted for publication? Is it therefore under final revision? We deserve to know!
Nope. Also did anyone else notice the slight change in purported efficacy? 1.5 years ago Gershman et. al. were writing of basically 90% effectiveness of CaverStem (and I have screenshots): the recent PR speaks of “70-80%.” Soon it will be ONE YEAR since the trial ended—almost 6 months ago they assured us that they were “working on the paper.” Lastly, we got a reversal of a two-day “buy” recommendation. All this tells me they are going NOWHERE anytime soon (which I would define as the end of 2020 at the earliest, based on their pattern of behavior to date). The saddest thing is that all this lends CREDENCE to the detractors who say this is a bad investment—and yet the company simply DOES NOT CARE.
Welcome to my world, SFT!
And the next Q is due shortly after that (on or around 8/14)—coincidence? I doubt it
Many thanks, my friend!
I have appreciated our exchanges, monte—very much. How long do they have until they risk removal from QB? I’m assuming they have to reach and maintain .01 by a certain time?
And roughly how long do you imagine that takes, monte (bear in mind that none of us thought we’d be at these levels now...)?
Oh I plan to go NOWHERE—I’m just trying to UNDERSTAND what has been going on over the last year.
Agreed—there is no “good reason.” But what is CAUSING what we’ve seen for the last year?
I know it’s oversold—but WHY in this context?!
I’m not saying that it’s impossible, monte—but if true, what is required to counteract this activity successfully? Are we doomed to this status? Many left here, but I still believe—which is precisely why I am focused so obsessively on answers and action!
So why has it steadily TANKED (more than 90% since it reached .07)—at precisely the time it should be climbing, given commercialization, anticipation of reaching self-sustaining revenues during 2019, etc? And please don’t echo the chorus of those talking about “teams of MMs working to keep it down”—unless, of course, you have proof of that.
I refuse to do that again: did it over a year ago—and you know the rest. Neither amused nor impressed
At this point I’m starting to wonder whether those who are saying it’ll take till 2025 might actually be right. That timeline is preposterous and absurd, given where we are developmentally now, BTW.
I’m so f’ing TIRED of tea leaves—a year and a half’s worth now: ready for someone to explain clearly (1) exactly what is happening to keep the PPS down and (2) what will get it out!
Two hours into session—no trades??
Can anyone clearly demonstrate how many shares Warbington owns himself vs. what he owns through CMTH? I recall reading about the latter in some filings, but to me the MOST powerful evidence comes from shares that are truly HIS. Are the CMTH shares HIS?
Totally agree, NSX: this PR felt DIFFERENT (in a good way)!
Can someone clearly and simply explain the circumstances under which a BUY COULD show up as a SELL? I’ve heard this claim made here a few times...
I’m thinking that’s his compensation, no?
Looks like someone just took a nice stake in BANT: almost $100K dropped at one pop means they saw/know something...
Yep—and the last one went from 1.03B to 1.06B=30M. I expect something in that range again this time.
The increased dilution (about 30M shares month over month) doesn’t support your premise: that’s no one’s idea of “dumping.”
(1) What is their ultimate objective?
(2) How long can they succeed?
(3) How can they be successfully counteracted?
Me too. The headline doesn’t conform with the focus of the release itself. I THINK this is an attention-grabber and will followed by full article on the trial itself. Just a guess though
Yep—yet ANOTHER reason why this stock’s PPS should NEVER have lost 95% since .07. No updates on THIS in almost a year either. UNREAL.
If they had ANY hope of growing this anytime soon (even to the fairly meager level of .10), they would—at the very least—cultivate the goodwill and eager support of us, their shareholders. The fact that they don’t—and really haven’t for quite some time now tells me that this is going NOWHERE anytime soon.
They had such a small, but mighty and loyal group of investors (who, in turn, brought more interest and money to the table): they KILLED that. Just look around
I don’t understand your meaning. Whatever it is, it’s DOWN 94 percent from .07.
Don’t tell anyone you really care to help: several of us on here did the company’s job FOR THEM last year and drove MASSIVE traffic and attention to this ticker—which directly contributed to the rise to .07. Look what that got us.