Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Perhaps it was from his wife's suggestion that got UHLN and CG together in the first place. I always wondered why CG picked UHLN, of all companies, to deal with. There were many more attractive shells out there and CG is already expanding just fine on its own.
Yeah, I got out at 51 when alarm bells started going off in my head. Something wasn't right.
Everett D was the founder, inventor, and sole officer of FLASR. I don't think he could separate himself so easily. I also think he's the sole reason for this thing falling through. I always thought it was a bad idea to bring Dickenson on board in the first place. I don't think CG wants anything to do with him or link their name to anything he's associated with.
I do, however, think CG is talking to Sal and may bring him on board any way. The only problem here is I don't think it will involve UHLN.
Check post #16575 for CG's confirmation.
Verizon video with RAD bot in it.
Here's one of the distributors for RAD:
https://www.wesecurerobotics.com/
Cool!!! I'm always hoping for the best!
I tried to show both sides of the coin. It wasn't intended to discourage anyone but more to help them understand the full implications and complexities of reverse mergers.
5% is an assumed number which can vary in either direction.
But while you're at it, read up on how reverse mergers work and some investing strategies surrounding them:
http://finance.zacks.com/reverse-merger-mean-stocks-1096.html
http://www.clm.com/publication.cfm?ID=24
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=19587826
https://investorshub.advfn.com/Reverse-Mergers-7308/
GG's "wemakeshithappen" FB page is gone too
https://www.facebook.com/pg/wemakeshithappen/
Spot on huffandillpuff. 100% totally agree.
No, IMHO, they were responding to the news and left it up for a reasonable amount of time for all eyeballs to see it. Now they took it down and went back to business as usual. Just like Christmas decorations. Time to put it back in the box.
Since I couldn't find a market category that said "Hot Dog Joint", I had to use numbers from the most suitable market categories available. And as someone pointed out, shareholders of a shell stock rarely retain any significant amount of equity in the new entity.
Also those 15 store numbers are based on existing revenue and will increase as new locations are open to generate more income.
All that aside, hype is a very fluid factor that can't be measured so will the price run higher? Probably. But it will settle back once the hype is over and reality creeps back in. Long term, this is still a solid play but its not going to be as fast as you think unless you're looking to get in and out fast.
What site did you get that data from? I'd like to add it to my tool chest.
Okay, here is the new formula. That makes more sense now. Again I'd like to hear other opinions on how accurate or not accurate these models are.
$70,000 per store per month
$840,000 per store per 12 months
$12,600,000 for 15 stores per year
$294,000,000 for 350 stores per year
UHLN gets 6% gross profit from each franchise (5% royalties / 1% regional marketing)
Net Margin based on Soft Drink market: 12.81% (model A) or based on restaurant market: 9.20% (model B)
Divide by Shares outstanding: 315,661,186
Multiply by P/E average for industry. Soft Drink market (model A): 58.37 or restaurant market (model B): 2725.10
= share price valuation.
Multiply by .05 for UHLN shareholder value (assuming UHLN retains 5% ownership of the surviving entity)
= per share valuation
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/margin.html
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/pedata.html
For 15 stores based on the soft drink market model A
12,600,000 x .06 = $756,000
$756,000 x .1281 = $96,843.60
$96,843.60 / 315,661,186 shares = .00030679603 a share earnings
.00030679603 x 58.37 PE
= 0.0179 a share valuation
0.0179 x .05 UHLN shareholder value (assuming UHLN retains 5% ownership of the surviving entity)
= $0.0008 per share valuation
-------------------------------------------------------------------
For 15 stores based on the restaurant market model B
12,600,000 x .06 = $756,000
$756,000 x .0920 = $69,552
$69,552 / 315,661,186 shares = .00022033751 a share earnings
.00022033751 x 2725.10 PE
= $0.6004 a share valuation
0.6004 x .05 UHLN shareholder value (assuming UHLN retains 5% ownership of the surviving entity)
= $0.03 per share valuation
-------------------------------------------------------------
For 350 stores based on the soft drink market model A
$294,000,000 x .06 = $17,640,000
$17,640,000 x .1281 = $2,259,684
$2,259,684 / 315,661,186 shares = .0071 a share earnings
.0071 x 58.37 PE
= $0.4144 a share valuation
0.4144 x .05 UHLN shareholder value (assuming UHLN retains 5% ownership of the surviving entity)
= $0.02 per share valuation
-------------------------------------------------------------------
For 350 stores based on the restaurant market model B
$294,000,000 x .06 = $17,640,000
$17,640,000 x .0920 = $1,622,880
$1,622,880 / 315,661,186 shares = .02793044567 a share earnings
.0051 x 2725.10 PE
= $13.89 a share valuation
$13.89 x .05 UHLN shareholder value (assuming UHLN retains 5% ownership of the surviving entity)
= $0.69 per share valuation
Thanks! I'll make those adjustments.
I took this formula from another page and applied it to UHLN, both current and future. I'd like to hear yours and other opinions on how accurate or not accurate these models are.
$70,000 per store per month (based on your image)
$840,000 per store per 12 months
$12,600,000 for 15 stores per year
$294,000,000 for 350 stores per year
UHLN gets 6% gross profit from each franchise (5% royalties / 1% regional marketing)
Net Margin based on Soft Drink market: 12.81% (model A) or based on restaurant market: 9.20% (model B)
Divide by Shares outstanding: 58,104,336
Multiply by P/E average for industry. Soft Drink market (model A): 58.37 or restaurant market (model B): 2725.10
= share price valuation.
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/margin.html
http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/New_Home_Page/datafile/pedata.html
For 15 stores based on the soft drink market model A
12,600,000 x .06 = $756,000
$756,000 x .1281 = $96,843.60
$96,843.60 / 58104336 shares = .00166671898 a share earnings
.00166671898 x 58.37 PE
= 0.0972 a share valuation
-------------------------------------------------------------------
For 15 stores based on the restaurant market model B
12,600,000 x .06 = $756,000
$756,000 x .0920 = $69,552
$69,552 / 58104336 shares = .0011970191 a share earnings
.00166671898 x 2725.10 PE
= $3.26 a share valuation
-------------------------------------------------------------
For 350 stores based on the soft drink market model A
$294,000,000 x .06 = $17,640,000
$17,640,000 x .1281 = $225,968.40
$225,968.40 / 58104336 shares = .03889010968 a share earnings
.03889010968 x 58.37 PE
= 2.27 a share valuation
-------------------------------------------------------------------
For 350 stores based on the restaurant market model B
$294,000,000 x .06 = $17,640,000
$17,640,000 x .0920 = $1,622,880
$1,622,880 / 58104336 shares = .02793044567 a share earnings
.02793044567 x 2725.10 PE
= $76.11 a share valuation
Ugh, this is why you don't let scrapers aggregate web pages:
http://emerginggrowth.com/u-s-highland-inc-otc-pink-uhln-increases-11-84-naming-new-president-ceo/
Yeah, I'd prefer a midday announcement. I always buy more in the morning just in case.
Me too! I'm splitting my cash between this and one other. Both are going to skyrocket! Both are very near.
Let them drop. More shares for me!
I never sold. In at .004's. I'm too afraid I'll miss the announcement messing around with other plays. Plus who in their right mind would even consider selling this? This ground floor play is HUGE!
I'm new to otc so my scanners aren't as tuned as yours. I'm happy getting in at .004 to .0042.
Just increased my position. Waiting to get paid today so I can really add more!
More planned openings!!!
http://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/local/2017/03/14/hotel-retail-apartment-projects-line-viera/99141926/
http://www.starnewsonline.com/news/20170428/charlie-graingers-petsense-among-retailers-coming-to-leland
http://m.oxfordeagle.com/2017/01/06/hot-dog-restaurant-to-preserve-storefront/
http://luminanews.com/2016/08/board-votes-yes-to-hot-dog-chain-despite-concerns/
http://www.pnj.com/story/news/2016/12/19/moon-two-hotdog-places-opening-westside/95608094/
I saw that. It was one of the first places I checked for comparison. Unfortunately they have over 800 locations so we got a lot of work to do!
I travel for work and can not wait to get back down south to give them a try. Unfortunately I'll have to wait until September. I think I'll order the whole menu to taste each one!
Great gainzzz - MaxGainzzz!!!!
$$ UHLN $$
On to better things!
Here is an article listing a few restaurants with less locations than CG's 300+ proposed locations. If their prices are a precursor of things to come, hold on tight! This is the big one! Long holds only!
http://www.investopedia.com/articles/markets/012516/top-5-restaurant-penny-stocks-2016-sauc-gtim.asp
For reference to my previous post, here is required reading to explain:
http://www.penny-stock-brokers.org/mm-nite-shorting/
http://www.32trades.com/market-makers-knowing-what-youre-up-against/
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=18742
Thank you all for reading and if you don't have level II, get it.
I see a lot of bickering about this stock not going no where, no buyers, no big money, small investors. Apparently, I believe this is coming from those on cheap phone apps or without level II. The stock is rising slowly because "Big Money" is manipulating the price to get as many shares as cheaply as possible before news is announced and they can no longer contain it. Although this example is not UHLN, I watched these same Market Makers (NITE, CDEL,ETRF) in action on our stock.
This is the Market Makers putting up a block to keep the price from rising.
This is the same Market Makers buying up shares from scared investors. See how they switch sides from the bid and ask? See the amount of shares they are using to accomplish this? Big money is already here and they want YOUR shares.
Don't panic, just hold your position. Hell, even buy more. They don't do this forever and when news comes out, then it will run.
Charlie Graingers business model. Franchise Disclosure Doc:
http://my.officevp.com/library/members/officevp/rainmaker//Charlie_Graingers_FDD_V1.5.pdf
My sentiments exactly! This is my only LONG TERM otc holding. The business model is as solid as they come. Great post!
Name / Shares Held / Position Value / % of Total / Holdings / Outstanding Shares Owned / Investment Style
AMHC Managed Services / 4.3 M / $1.0 M / 31.88 / 416.47% / N/A
Engles (Deborah E) / 8.7 K / $2.9 K / 0.0637 / 1.16% / N/A
Gibbs (John D) / 8.8 M / $2.1 M / 64.84 / 847.15% / Low
Harris (Robert H) / 436.6 K / $146.2 K / 3.21 / 58.53% / N/A
Malone (Kevin G) / 1.9 K / $628.0 / 0.0138 / 0.25% / N/A
I think so. That would explain why they're taking their time getting current. All the insider data is old and outdated. They have to report all their trades to the SEC once they become current.
Holy cow! This guy saw early activity on this back in March! Check out the video!
Unless there's news. News always trumps charts. LOL
Most likely CHGR since its not taken yet.