Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
If we see any other ticker Limited to Current changes that were enabled with an attorney letter that was submitted later than George's then there might still be an issue still, IMO.
This morning's example change had an attorney letter the same day as George's but was submitted in the morning while George's was in the afternoon.
It lists two reports along with the requirements for each report, which are slightly different.
It does not say "2 years of financials"
Here, read it: https://www.otcmarkets.com/files/OTCPinkGuidelines.docx
Notice that it also says the attorney letter must reference reports, with an "s" - plural. George's only references one year.
Read the guidelines yourself. I provided the link a couple posts ago.
Even if you think the one report covers both years, which I don't if they are being sticklers, the attorney letter only references one year, not both as required.
Read them. Two separate reports and the Attorney Letter must reference both years.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/files/OTCPinkGuidelines.docx
OTCM guidelines state 2 separate reports.
Insider selling does not portend well for the future, that's why one should care if he sold shares.
He did not list them in the filing as he would be required to do if he still had them, just as any insider is required.
Are you saying he is incompetent at putting together the filing?
Or are you saying he intentionally withheld that information? If so, why would he want to withhold that? I would think he would want everyone to know he still had them.
What facts were twisted? Be specific.
Anything for a positive spin, I guess.
That $2645 dollar volume though, ouch. At least folks aren't dumping at the moment, so there is that.
I was replying to a post that referred to "nightly" tier changes. I stayed with that lingo so as not to confuse the poor soul.
Show me a tier change that occurred on a Friday or Saturday night, as claimed.
Observing from a foreign time zone or some crap doesn't count.
That's Friday morning. It happened like 14 hours ago.
There are no Friday or Saturday night tier changes. Never have been.
It's knuckleheads playing around.
Do you really think in today's age of communicating in innumerable ways that they have to resort to silly crude signals on the tape that are recorded forever and can be analyzed and traced back to who "sent" the signals if there is any type of investigation into manipulation or wrongdoing?
And the argument that "no one would spend the commissions just to play around" does not hold water either. Big Board is commission-free for just about all the big brokers I believe and Fidelity is commission-free for OTC even.
Unless one has traveled to the future, witnessed the volume firsthand and then returned to the present one cannot possibly know for a fact what the volume will do.
But thank you for your opinion of what may happen.
One cannot possibly know that to be a fact unless one has inspected the portfolio of every single trader that has ever been interested in GVSI.
Have you in fact inspected the portfolio of every single trader that has ever been interested in GVSI?
Are you now claiming that it is difficult to open a new brokerage account?
You know people that are very interested in GVSI but refuse to open another account to take advantage of pre-Current pricing? These people know that there is supposed to be a huge increase in price and are willing to pay that extra anyway?
I never claimed to know how many have or have not bought.
I simply called out your claim to "know categorically" as being impossible to actually know. Which it is.
Unless one knows the portfolio of every single trader that is interested in GVSI one cannot possibly know for a fact how many have bought.
Are you claiming to know what is in the portfolio of every single trader that has ever expressed an interest in GVSI?
Do you have any type of proof of how many traders have not bothered to open another account?
A trader on this board described having done it just the other day.
I don't remember any traders telling tales of how they have intentionally chosen not to.
One cannot possibly know that to be "categorically false".
And it is super easy to open up another brokerage account to get in on something before a stock becomes Current. You apply, you fund it, you buy, done. Simple as that.
He's been trying filings all year but only finally got off Pink Limited to Current in December.
Look at a chart, there have been red volume bars all year - someone has been selling the entire time. Limited has some liquidity with broker availability but not as much being Current. It's quite possible getting Current has been a goal just for the ability for someone to sell easier.
Notice how nothing changed when he finally got Current? No new business announcements, nothing. If he had something up his sleeve that was just waiting for Current status this entire time then he surely would have revealed it as soon as he got the status.
But nothing...
He started this endeavor in January of 2022, perhaps getting the idea after seeing everything and it's brother moon in 2021.
It could be just really bad timing. He may have thought he could jump in while the getting was good for just about any OTC on the planet to have merger news and go into orbit no matter how lame the business. Maybe it took a little bit of time to scratch together a couple bucks and get the business registered and stuff and then finally make the leap.
But oops, 2022 was no 2021... And 2023 is turning out even worse for the OTC so far.
Maybe stuff is actually going on behind the scenes, sure. On the other hand, maybe he realized he missed the 2021 boat and other things occupy his time for now.
It was not actually verified that he owns them.
There were random anonymous internet opinion claims of emails saying he still owned them.
Not the same thing as officially verified.
Either he still has them and the filings are wrong or the filings are right and he no longer has them.
I believe actual filings over random internet opinions.
If the filings are wrong then he needs to correct them, oh and do a better job next time.
I doubt GS is intentionally sandbagging either, yet it was claimed just this morning on this very board. Right here, https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171100723 .
Check it out, very interesting claim, just this morning, on this very board. Go ahead, read it. Make note of where it originated while you're at it.
It is interesting though that some opinions are accompanied by verifiable DD while other opinions are just "Nope!" or the like, with nothing of substance actually backing them up.
Well, that was the claim. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171100723
So now the narrative is that George is intentionally drawing things out? Even while telling people that he thought it would be current when he did? So he is intentionally jerking people around, is this what I am being told?
One should ask themselves why "Adam" did not actually file the audited fins. They were just an addendum to an 8-K about a new accountant and were not even in the format that the SEC would consider "official"
But he did make a show about "releasing" them and "uploading" them
The undiscerning may not realize there is a difference, but there sure is.
Then why isn't it current yet?
One should hope that Stocktwits account isn't our dude, LOL.
Whoever "Adam" is, he has to understand by now the concerns over his identity, especially in an environment like the OTC where fraud and deceit is rife.
It should be easy to just reveal himself and demonstrate some verifiable information to instill investor confidence, but he has not.
Action or inaction by the CEO can certainly affect any chance at a multi-bag run.
Calling it inevitable is impossible to know to be true unless one has in fact traveled to the future to witness it firsthand and then returned. Otherwise that claim is just something pulled out of ones rear end.
I guess that's the sickest burn you have. Quel domage.
Old enough to laugh at internet bravado.
Your internet bravado is noted and appropriately filed in the circular cabinet designated for such.
$25,000 transfers at the same speed as $1,000.
Transferring stock has nothing to do with this. This is about opening a new account to be able to buy before going Pink Current.
The claim is that there is SOOOO much money that will be buying as as soon as PC. I think that the claim is hugely exaggerated. Anyone serious will have already opened a new account and bought already.
The only folk that are forced to be on the sidelines due to the broker issue are either not serious enough to be of any consequence or do not have enough cash to be of any consequence.
You can move cash around. It is not permanently stuck in one place.