Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Exactly! Unbelievable what they are doing. You can't say there weren't any red flags. This was so obvious that it is laughable.
Of course you are right and kudos to you but what the heck will happen if you convince them all? The whole plan wouldn't make sense anymore. Following my "agenda" lol, anybody please accept the offer.
How is this voluntary if this might be the good side of the deal?
I wrote basically and that's exactly what it is. Unfortunately they left out the part what happens if you don't agree to the offer
Great PR on 141, lol.
I just ask myself if we can expect something similar here.
You betcha, imo. The restructuring is already around the corner.
They do basically a 1000 for one R/S and you can't sell, most probably not even after they diluted it again. Those guys are really to funny.
Groves and He are in mediation with spooz, this happens if both have some points. A theft or in this case defalcation, is an official delict which would go directly to court via state attorneys.
Groves and He didn't affect spooztoolz at all. A statement from the company which means, if the software was rewritten as some here are saying (no, not a single hint from the company is available to this assumption) it happened because the former version was garbage which would explain the delays and dissapointing results so far.
Where are the patents of this disruptive software and why can they use a trademark sign if it isn't granted? Haven't found anything at all but would appreciate some help!
Why are they moving into smaller space when big success is right around the corner?
Why is the retail launch not a topic anymore. The company always said they will release it latest in fall?
Why is the shareprice where it is if we already inked huge deals with the top notch companies of the business?.
Why is none of them interestet to buy the college funds for their kids for cheap?
Lol!
"If this isn't a scam. they do their very best to impersonate one."
Great words of a missing poster which is as strange as the above!
Well, we could start with the answers with
Spooz is a Nevada incorporated company
and we can end it with , No, they haven't done a single thing of whatever they ever said!
So far of course, lol
desertwolf, there is no official explanation for it but they said it was requested from bloomberg because they got to many calls from people who wanted to verify the announcement.
You have to believe it or not, there isn't another information available. I won't comment this but as for the huge deals, why would they move into smaller space right now if they have already inked them? Makes no sense to me.
lol, 16 millions today and a close at 3% percent of a cent. Yeah, we are off to the races. Like I wrote, the market doesn't lie.
You are right, I got lost in translation. Don't bother to read every post was the contrary so this was my bad.
However, I have to say yes and I answered this already. It is the market which says yes.
Imagine if it would be true that spooz is already in the near of 4-5000 screens or like some others say a company with contracts in the range of 100 million by years end and what we would then have here. All those screens have users which get impacted, heavily or it wouldn't be worth the money and effort to move to spooz. We would have at least a 100 bagger in no time. All of those users are pros from the business who would be able to get two weeks on a nice maldives spa for two with 100 bucks or with 500 bucks the college fund for the kid. And what happens? Right!
This sounds like the final pump and so the nail in the coffin it is at least more likely and I tend to go with likelyness and common sense.
I thought you don't have much time? Anyway, I don't imply that the "for a short time announced contract?" will be with the whole tradebook all over the world. So, how could I correct something which is imo absolutely right? And before you ask further, since you read every post, you have seen my opinion and answer already.
Well ditch, I can't see why you are so excited about yourself. Anyone on this board has seen those tradebook website for his own long before you did realise it. It was posted here several times before and I guess anyone who has seen the announcement looked it up for themselves.
Thank you beeej. And now we have to go back to gbahat and simply to ask why Spooz never took down those PRs from the front page of their website. He found that fact particularly curious when they took the Bloomberg one down, but not the other two outdated PRs.
It hasn't changed one bit here, whatecer comes from this company you can be almost sure that it is either outdated, a lie or has to be taken with a bit grain of salt.
Unfortunately
gbathat, if this would be a deal already and if it would be with tradebook we would be near the pennies. It doesn't matter what you are I are saying but what the market does.
No, it didn't help me because I knew this before. Where else could I have looked into tradebook? Tradebook llc, the american part had sales of 14.3 million. The rest is international and belongs to bloomberg lp or tradebook as a whole. The possible contract is so a first step into this empire and if they close it, most probably huge for the company. There is zero reason at this point to do always the same here..to make a mountain out of a mulehill.
In your dreams. Tradebook in this context is nothing than a common term for the bizz.
You can go to every financial site, even on yahoo and have a look into the business summmary of the tradebook llc. It is 14.3 million. It would have been nice but you won't believe it, I would be pleased with the llc as a first step.
No, the report is about bloomberg lp not the tradebook llc.
He left out the first lines, by accident of course
Here is the discrepancy.
Disclaimer
Silicon Alley Insider publishes news, information, gossip, rumors, conjecture, opinions, and commentary. The site includes both reported and edited content and unmoderated posts and comments containing the personal opinions of readers on a wide range of topics.
You should be skeptical of any information on Silicon Alley Insider, because it may be wrong.
Silicon Alley Insider does not routinely moderate, screen, or edit content contributed by readers. The Site and any information therein is provided without warranty of any kind, including the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for use of a particular purpose, accuracy, or non-infringement.
Silicon Alley Insider does not guarantee that the site will operate in an uninterrupted or error-free manner or is free of viruses or other harmful components. Use of information obtained from or through the Site is at your own risk. The Site is not liable for any loss or damages including, but not limited to, claims for defamation, errors, loss of data, loss of money, or interruption in availability of data arising out of the use or inability to use the Site or any links; to your placement of content on the Site; or to your reliance upon information obtained from or through the Site or through links contained on the Site.
The Site is not an intermediary, broker/dealer, investment advisor, or exchange and does not provide services as such.
Actually we did talk about the trading restrictions of this stock by a few brokerages. A stock which was for sale without a bid as it is currently the case with 141 and some wonder about it. I tend to say you missed the topic and according to ihub rules, your post is a personal attack but I'm much more generous than the one over there.
You are welcome too. There are others, even you are using most in your reply and in germany you will find just one brokerage which allows it. At least this was the case during my first buy. A short look at the chart of our two companies may help to understand the restriction. You should be glad after the whole desaster of wallstreet that a few companies still show something like responsibility.
You are welcome.
And you don't come to the conclusion that they may have serious reasons for that restriction? It has nothing to do with those more than shady companies but with the ineptness of scotttrade?
Just have a look at the financials of them at the pinks site. Any boilerroom operation would be ashamed to release such miserable documents and they both want to play with serious money, lol, really.
If we don't know the other one for a fact how could this be a complete lie?
We have several estimates from a lot of investors and even some from your faction made some guesses today here to that amounts.
But, may I ask why a small difference would make a difference?
If you follow this link, you will find the explanation posted below and you may probably be savy enough to draw some conclusions.
http://www.pinksheets.com/pink/quote/quote.jsp?symbol=XXIS#getQuote
"Designed for companies with financial reporting problems, economic distress, or in bankruptcy to make the limited information they have publicly available. The Limited Information category also includes companies that may not be troubled, but are unwilling to meet Pink OTC Markets' Guidelines for Providing Adequate Current Information. Companies in this category have posted limited financial information not older than six months through the OTC Disclosure and News Service, or have made a filing on the SEC's EDGAR system in the previous six months."
They, as well as spooz don't even correspond to the probably lowest standards in the investing world, the pinks. But since this is the best kept secret in the stock market and a once in a lifetime opportunity, just ignore this post
It is a lottery ticket with endless numbers, we are already in the range of ten billions in both stocks, lol.
Could be there are more and it could be there are less. Great question btw.
Why would someone harm spooz if he calls Bloomberg?(don't forget it is tradebooks, just a small profit center inside the empire)? Can you imagine a company which would stop a deal which would give them some advantages because they get disturbing calls? lmao
Spooz is incorporated in Nevada.
Spooz never deliverd even anything what they proudly announced
Spooz has not a single official filing
Spooz has released several or better countless progress via prs or email exchange but not a single one came true
spooz and its subsidary have diluted 10 billion yes, billion shares
spooz has an impressive record of lies and broken promises, deadlines and failures.
Spooz is ....a scam
They act like a scam, smell like a scam and.. where are the patents, trademarks and what happened to the mediation and following lawsuit against the former employees who obviousely stole nothing. What should they steal?
lmao
yes, it is a scam, at least till today
Please stop it. They will miss that chance to be ahead of competition if anyone calls them again. It is too funny what is happening around this so called company. The disruptive software isn't worth five calls a week, rofl
I have written it first here. If it is a material event, make it official and file an 8-k. Prd or not, that would follow the rules and bring in some credibility. Bloomberg couldn't and wouldn't be against a sec filing. Of course, things are very difficult when it comes to scams and or something which just isn't.. material, lol
Indeed, but tell me why the confirmation of dilution till the end of the possible amount looks so good to you? Because there isn't more? Lol, really!
You are totally wrong. The uspto site has more than 20 search functions. The application number is just one among them. It doesn't even make sense what you say because how would you see that a patent is granted for a company? If you type in google there you will find a few hundred patents for them in a heartbeat. If you use spooz, you will find an application for junkfood.
This matters a lot, not only in long lost terms of credibility but also regarding Groves and He. That point was the main reason why I tried to find something.
I didn't say they are related.
You mean I should call the company and ask for their patents while a search at the uspto which isn't google btw. didn't lead to a result. The proven liars will tell me the truth? Lol, really.
As for Bloomberg, it is very likely that the announcement is for real. As real as my conclusion out of it. A first step, probably the most important in the history of this joke of a company but another lie is already included. No revs and contracts till today!
It seems nobody is interested in spooztoolz and fractalz patents here.
They are using the tm symbol behind some names. I couldn't neither find an application or granted patent nor a trademark from them at the us patent and trademarks office uspto. Maybe someone can help me out here since spooz announced several times that it has filed a patent application with the U.S. Patent Office to protect SpoozToolz(TM)and fractalz.
As for the announcement at the website, I have seen it several times in other stocks, countless numbers to say the least where companies did just outright lie with even bigger names. A special one even abused the Homeland security lol.
Mbah abused augusta, a big company in italy till I wrote them and so on. It means nothing till we get a confirmation from bloomberg, be it by PR or through figures in the financials. Nonetheless, the tradebook llc is just a small step if you use their figures for 2007 with sales of 15 millions but could become the entry for something big. There is zero reason for some excitement because so far, we seem to have zero income and dilution is already up again.
What do you expect? Not a single one of those brokerages and their employees seem to be willing to invest serious money here and don't tell me they haven't a clue. Do you have an idea what happened with the patents?
Investigating seems to be the better idea. Btw. Has anyone found those patents at the uspto site which were prd?
Whatever, but it isn't to much to ask to get an answer to this question by mail. They just do what they ever did, to remain silent.
Investors
Please click here to download our Executive Summary.
PDF download Spooz Disclosure Statement.
PDF download Audited Financials.
PDF Download Spooz-SFB Market Systems Joint Venture
http://www.spooz.com/investors.aspx
Very likely. It is at least listed above that Deal at the web site, lol.
A perfect example to show of which kind of a company we have to talk here. They act like a scam and earned it hard to be named a scam. If the announcement of the deal was thought to inform the shareholders only, why is the JV still there?..Even in the investors section. This is clearly misleading!
Yeah right and because of those magnitude proportions all those bloomberg guys are busy to buy what they can. Lol, if anyone is able to overlook that opportunity, then these people and they do what? Right, nothing.
Nothing is wrong, it is the same scam than yesterday. As long as they don't make anything official and this means a sec filing, I won't believe a single word of what they say or write. It would be a good idea to ask the Bloomberg guys if they even know them. At least nobody can say they are buying the hell out of it.
This pump is only at the website, next to the in the meantime infamous JV PR, still listed as a fact.
It looks like a preparation and appeasement for the next round of dilution which has already started, nothing else.
"If this isn't a scam, they do their best to impersonate one."
Don't get too exited or hope for a premarket pr because so far, it is just at the website, as everything. Nothing official, no PR no 8-k because I would consider this as a material event and nothing from Bloomberg. Hopefully they know it, lol