Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Sick response man. Blew my mind
With a little help from my friends :)
1. Suffering through 2.5 billion shares is a disingenuous exaggeration. The fact is that 500 million shares were issued via this toxic note and not 2.5 billion! The more accurate analysis is that there is currently a 2 billion share dilution risk with 500 million shares already issued. This is obvious to everyone. The question is whether the Company intends to resolve this issue, or not. Based on the filings, there is reasonable evidence to suggest that it is being addressed. No one says that it's pretty, or cheap, but a resolution is possible. At the end of the day that's what matters. If they can resolve this toxic debt with as little collateral damage as possible then we will be fine. If not, then we have a problem. To summarize: No one is claiming that it has been resolved, but no ones knows whether there isn't a potential solution in place. It's painfully obvious to everyone that this is a high-risk High reward stock. Either you take the risk, or you don't. Simple.
2. We do not have a list of shareholders of record in the filings, so you have no idea what happened. I believe this is a deliberate move to make sure that manipulators and others with more nefarious intentions don't take advantage of this situation. Again, not an ideal solution, but also not something you can claim without a possible counterpoint. In other words, you're posing a leading question with a specific goal in mind.
3. Hyperbole. No evidence to support that claim.
4. Yes, that's how banks do it, that's how private lenders do it, birds do it, bees do it, even educated fleas do it. What's your point?
5. Irrelevant. He was exonerated. You'd be surprised how many so-called reputable investors and banks were caught doing much worse. Maybe you've heard of a few of them. I'm sure you have. I'd be more worried about people spending hours of their own time claiming to help other people for nothing. Get it?
6. If you know something then say something. Using generalizations does not really support your point.
7. Name/Ticker change is not relevant to the PPS at this stage. I did not say it was not relevant at all. They have an AR balance and the correct question should be if they could break down the AR for us, so we understand when to expect revenues, not if they expect revenues.
8. Again irrelevant. Classdocs was promoted in the past, but it was not as focused on GDPR as it currently is. Back then Jason was promoting another related business line, which may, or may not have been successful. It makes no difference as the current business plan is a lot different than it was in the past. Apples and oranges.
9. See response to question 7.
10. Rehashing the same arguments. Again.
Just saying the same stuff twice. We will find out tomorrow now won’t we
Sorry, not a fan of tea sandwiches and crumpets.
Maybe hokie will go with you lmao
Turn around! There’s no one there!
Hahah
Cheers!
ATTENTION:
Good question.
Better answer.
1. Because this was a less expensive and quicker solution to get to market especially considering how competitive and time sensitive GDPR is right now. Not to mention the demand for Blockchain technology. First to market is crucial in this space.
2. How do we know that didn't happen? Does NoDummy know something other people don't? Does he have any evidence to show that some of these proceeds weren't used towards buying back some of these toxic note shares? If he does, then why hasn't he given us the evidence to support this claim. Either way, I find this argumentation irrelevant as I believe (and hope) the toxic note will be resolved by other means.
3. This is called a covenant breach. It means a technical default, but the lender (note holder) will work with the borrower to resolve it since it would be counter productive to call the note at this point since it could lead to an actual default.
4. A commitment fee is not contingent on drawing upon the cash derived from this arrangement, but the risk the lender assumes by committing to a 10 mil facility that Jason can draw upon on demand. 100 million shares for a 10 million dollar commitment is roughly one percent. That's very fair considering the risk involved.
5. Robert Malin was exonerated. Conviction was reversed.
6. We're not lawyers. Jason is working on this issue, and he has explicitly stated hat he does not acknowledge it. Let the courts decide if there's even a case, which there probably isn't.
7. Not relevant at the moment. That's just a rubber toy some people like to chew on. What's more important is to finalize everything related to the note and the structure.
8. Seriously? They acquired the company in December. False narrative NoDummy!
9. This is finally a decent question.
10. Rehashing earlier points. Repetitive argumentation.
Stay clean boys!
They won’t. Doesn’t fit the agenda at play. All good! New investors are coming apparently? Institutional some may say.
With a little help from my friends :)
ATTENTION:
Good question.
Better answer.
1. Because this was a less expensive and quicker solution to get to market especially considering how competitive and time sensitive GDPR is right now. Not to mention the demand for Blockchain technology. First to market is crucial in this space.
2. How do we know that didn't happen? Does NoDummy know something other people don't? Does he have any evidence to show that some of these proceeds weren't used towards buying back some of these toxic note shares? If he does, then why hasn't he given us the evidence to support this claim. Either way, I find this argumentation irrelevant as I believe (and hope) the toxic note will be resolved by other means.
3. This is called a covenant breach. It means a technical default, but the lender (note holder) will work with the borrower to resolve it since it would be counter productive to call the note at this point since it could lead to an actual default.
4. A commitment fee is not contingent on drawing upon the cash derived from this arrangement, but the risk the lender assumes by committing to a 10 mil facility that Jason can draw upon on demand. 100 million shares for a 10 million dollar commitment is roughly one percent. That's very fair considering the risk involved.
5. Robert Malin was exonerated. Conviction was reversed.
6. We're not lawyers. Jason is working on this issue, and he has explicitly stated hat he does not acknowledge it. Let the courts decide if there's even a case, which there probably isn't.
7. Not relevant at the moment. That's just a rubber toy some people like to chew on. What's more important is to finalize everything related to the note and the structure.
8. Seriously? They acquired the company in December. False narrative NoDummy!
9. This is finally a decent question.
10. Rehashing earlier points. Repetitive argumentation.
ATTENTION:
Good question.
Better answer.
1. Because this was a less expensive and quicker solution to get to market especially considering how competitive and time sensitive GDPR is right now. Not to mention the demand for Blockchain technology. First to market is crucial in this space.
2. How do we know that didn't happen? Does NoDummy know something other people don't? Does he have any evidence to show that some of these proceeds weren't used towards buying back some of these toxic note shares? If he does, then why hasn't he given us the evidence to support this claim. Either way, I find this argumentation irrelevant as I believe (and hope) the toxic note will be resolved by other means.
3. This is called a covenant breach. It means a technical default, but the lender (note holder) will work with the borrower to resolve it since it would be counter productive to call the note at this point since it could lead to an actual default.
4. A commitment fee is not contingent on drawing upon the cash derived from this arrangement, but the risk the lender assumes by committing to a 10 mil facility that Jason can draw upon on demand. 100 million shares for a 10 million dollar commitment is roughly one percent. That's very fair considering the risk involved.
5. Robert Malin was exonerated. Conviction was reversed.
6. We're not lawyers. Jason is working on this issue, and he has explicitly stated hat he does not acknowledge it. Let the courts decide if there's even a case, which there probably isn't.
7. Not relevant at the moment. That's just a rubber toy some people like to chew on. What's more important is to finalize everything related to the note and the structure.
8. Seriously? They acquired the company in December. False narrative NoDummy!
9. This is finally a decent question.
10. Rehashing earlier points. Repetitive argumentation.
“It proves my point to everyone that these forums are garbage and have no credibility. Like social media, censorship and fake news abound. The vast majority of those questions are nonsensical, based on zero facts. Some are valid, and can be addressed by looking at the filings. I think the call will help clarify a lot of what's real and what's fake. Importantly, this call will serve as a great introduction to a new group of investors.”
It proves you are a cuck and about to get proven wrong tomorrow.
- Matt?
It proves my point to everyone that these forums are garbage and have no credibility. Like social media, censorship and fake news abound. The vast majority of those questions are nonsensical, based on zero facts. Some are valid, and can be addressed by looking at the filings. I think the call will help clarify a lot of what's real and what's fake. Importantly, this call will serve as a great introduction to a new group of investors.
- Matt?
“It proves my point to everyone that these forums are garbage and have no credibility. Like social media, censorship and fake news abound. The vast majority of those questions are nonsensical, based on zero facts. Some are valid, and can be addressed by looking at the filings. I think the call will help clarify a lot of what's real and what's fake. Importantly, this call will serve as a great introduction to a new group of investors.”
- Matt?
Lol I’m tapped...let me get a loan big brains lolol
Haha he has one post a day
Iceberg order coming in at 79. Clear as day. Looks like 15 straight 10k orders coming in on the ask and they are still rolling in.
Hurry up!!!!!!!!
Dude unlimited dilution here!
I’m closed out too! Terrible company! No meat on the bones! Fake Ceo fake company!
Insane someone would invest in this!
Also insane to be an American and say cheers so much!
Dude my favorite word is cheers!
This is the worst stock in the otc!
They even have a CC Thursday!
What pink sheet does that!?
I preferred little to no information
I like it when you go months without an update
We get them daily here.
To much communication!
IM OUT!!!
Hahah dude have you seen what their website has done over the past months?
At first it looked like a MySpace page, now it looks like a billion dollar business and they even have a help desk!
I LIKED MYSPACE WTFFFFF
Only reason a freakin invested here!!!
Who the hell is JASON
AND WHERES MY BOY TOM!
Dude seriously great point!
Was gonna join the conference call but I don’t have long distance!
Nope. God
Hey no problem man!
That’s my strategy as well. Usually when I find a stock in the trips that I like I watch it run to a penny and hold there for six months. Then when they show growth potential and start acquiring million dollar companies as a pink sheet start up I hold off and wait some more. I’ll spend all day posting about the stock but the bench is my favorite position. Uplist? Wait. Q3 consolidated revenues including a full quarter of Classidocs, wordpress, araloc, cyberark and Citrix? Wait. Show huge audited revs in Q4 after we’ve probably bought more companies and integrated new blockchain software? Wait.
Basically I’m waiting for the IPO on Nasdaq then I will buy in. Been my strategy since I started trading last week.
You know what they say no risk only rewards.
It’s really because I’m lonely and have nothing better to than post on boards I don’t own shares in. Huge pastime for me. No friends. Just boards.
No family. Just boards. No kids. Divorced. No shares. Remorse
That’s my motto and I’m sticking to it!
Hokie,
I’m new here too but after a quick search I saw that some of their clients include the following;
- Miami dolphins
- McKesson
- National Geographic
- First command
And some random company Cisco?
I tend to live under a rock so none of these companies wring a bell...probably scams
So what we secure data for animals and that dude that sang the thong song??
Give me a break. Has to be BS
It’s also located in Malvern Pa,
Right down the street from where I grew up. Terrible area called the main line. Chester county, aka the hood.
Look it up if you don’t believe me, it was rated one of the top counties in the country to live and work. One of the top? Why not THE top. No money being made there! It’s Detroit’s little cousin for Christ’s sakes.
Overall terrible acquisition. They only make 10m a year and we’ll probably double those earning when integrated with classidocs....chump change.
And then the Wordpress framework. Save me oh lord what a joke on a stick. Only exposes us to 25% of the worlds websites! Is that even worth it? We should have got both of them for free!! Will bring us no sales..in fact we might lose sales because we are even affiliated with them
And don’t get me started on Citrix and cyberark. Never heard of em. Billion dollar market caps. What’s that even mean? Why is there even a cap on it? I like my companies to be endless cash flows, don’t know why someone would cap anything. Weird! Sad!
They should uplist and just let institutions start buying it already. It’s only gonna go back to trips once that happens..
By the way I know what apostrophe you’re talking about. His PRs must be writin by his children. When there’s a misspelling I always see that as a major red flag. Basically does it for me. I’m out.
Who am I?
See what you are missing is we retains their clients and make the product better.
Maybe you missed it but within a month of acquiring the Wordpress framework they upgraded it and made it better.
They are rolling up araloc within their software. Building a data suite. You know, like the big boys do.
You might have also missed this about the article today:
Zacks Small-Cap reports are distributed to several institutional outlets, including Zacks Research Services, First-Call, Thomson-One, Reuters, The Markets, Bloomberg, and Wall Street Source.
What’s an uplist?
Am I missing something?
What conference?
Walmart’s average profit margin is 3.1%
Failing Walmart!
Brink of bankruptcy!
What am I missing?
Dude you didn’t know?
There’s no such thing as data443
It’s all an elaborate scam lmao
Soooooo he got a good deal?
Lmao
Thanks again for your continued enthusiasm and due diligence.
I base all my decisions on your posts and would hate to be lead astray!
Again I’m new here and even though I know the ceo and his core team on a first name basis, I have no idea what the potential of this company is.
What’s gdpr?
What’s blockchain?
And who the hell is Matt?
I know dude!
30k I mean are you serious!
I remember when marketing was free!
When established marketing firms wrote articles on your company for fun! Man those were the days!
I honestly can’t even believe he has to pay his workers and what now his partners want a cut too!?!?
This is seriously a joke! Any company money should be given back to the homeless and operational costs should be government funded at the very least!
The way businesses work in 2018 is so outrageous I can’t even stand it. Back in 2000 I used to own a lemonade stand and my dad bought the lemons! What’s that tell you!
Maybe your dad was and still is your “richme”
Lmao
I know dude!
30k I mean are you serious!
I remember when marketing was free!
When established marketing firms wrote articles on your company for fun! Man those were the days!
I honestly can’t even believe he has to pay his workers and what now his partners want a cut too!?!?
This is seriously a joke! Any company money should be given back to the homeless and operational costs should be government funded at the very least!
The way businesses work in 2018 is so outrageous I can’t even stand it. Back in 2000 I used to own a lemonade stand and my dad bought the lemons! What’s that tell you!
Maybe your dad was and still is your “richme”
Lmao
Hey richme I’m new here.
Can you explain what a run rate of 8-10m is?
Also what does he mean by new acquisitions in near to mid future?
Do you think we should scratch marketing? In a way i was hoping this article would include news on a share buyback, up-listing and other insider info made public from someone outside the company. Pretty upset that wasn’t included in the article.
Sick Dd Ferda. I’m new here and I appreciate your input. This is great because t shows they are expanding there marketing outreach. It also shows they have the money to do it!
Thanks for your continued support and DD even though you don’t own shares!
Us noobs tremendously appreciate it!
Wait are they changing the numbers on OTC???? Check it out...trying to figure this out