Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes. They are trying to walk it down.
Agreed.
Not true they have continued running ads. I saw an ad prime time Sunday night on MSNBC last week end. Wasn't looking for it just watching TV and there it was. I think they have decided not to PR every thing like they were doing. Maybe they heard your complaints about fluff PR's.
The ask is .155. looks like your broker isn't doing thier job.
Placing the 200 million float and 700 million o/s as of 1/22/07 on thier website does answer the question. It would be a clear case of fraud if those numbers are not accurate as of 1/22/07 in my view. I can't imagine someone being that stupid. Issue is closed.
10 on bid 1 on ask
Yes but according to her she got the company to agree to handle the calls. I asked the question before i mentioned CKYS then I asked about CKYS.
CKYS has posted the share structure. It would be fraud if the share structure was not essentially the same as posted with the date given.
Call back you misunderstood. The TA said the company agreed to talk to the people. The TA told me it was because they don't want to handle all the investor calls. I called first and asked if she gave out share structure information on thier companies. She said it depended on the companies. The smaller ones yes the ones that generate a lot of calls she said they send them to the company. I then asked about CKYS and she said you have to call the company. Call back and verify. It is a fact.
Besides the company posted the share structure on the website.
I called the TA and asked if it was thier policy or if it came from CKYS. The TA said it was thier policy. She said the companies that bring a lot of calls they send back to the company because they don't want to talk to investors on a regular basis.
Someone should update the board info to reflect 700 million o/s and 200 million float as of 1/22.
Yes there would be no point in putting the numbers on the web site if they were false. He'd end up in jail. I have to assume they are real.
It almost has to be in cash since CKYS has stated in writing as of 1/22/07 that the o/s are 700 million and the float is 200 million. If they were paying big apple in shares we would have seen dilution but we have not.
Yes but I forget.
It is on the board information. The o/s is 299 million.
The problem I see is the post says two years and Cyberkey is doing 3 years. Unless I'm reading this wrong.
I think as long as it doesn't go past a couple weeks off the timeline then he's OK. Otherwise I think he's have to give us an update of some sort.
Yes they could come anytime soon and I wouldn't complain, but given timelines here I'd just figure on the 60 days estimate and then figure a few days late...lol As long as they come I'm happy.
If he keeps to the aproximate timeline of 60 days thenwe should see them end of Feb.
The only way the float increases from sellers is if they had restricted shares that no longer become restricted. Lets say for example you got in on the IPO. Your shares might be restricted for a year and as a result are part of the O/s but not the float. After a year when they aren't restricted if you sell them they become part of the float.
I thought he was talking about the float being tightly held but I could be wrong.
No the float is the o/s outstanding shares minus restricted shares.
If I were in his shoes I would release them ASAP.
I see. Technically the float is the O/S minus restricted shares. But I see what you are saying if the fliat was in tight hands then there would be less of a supply of shares. A/F's would take care of that.....lol
Bird, The float can't be zero then it wouldn't be a publicly traded company.
No I'm sick enough but I'm not going to sell.
I don't know all the details but I think it allows foreign investment.
No they should release UAF's first. As investors we know there can be discrepancies but we also know they will be very tight to the actual A/F's which gives us a heads up to what is coming down the pike.
I also think it is in CKYS's best interest to protect shareholder value between now and the release of the A/F's. A/F's will no doubt launch this but it is in everybody's interest to have the launch pad as high as possible before the release.
Also, unless A/F's are coming out in a few days then JP should release UAF's first since he has told many people he would. I understand delays are caused from accountants that want the numbers to be very accurate but they should still release them.
My opinion of course.
Phrenz here you go...http://www.google.com/language_tools
DOD EMALL That's great. The govt can make purchases as needed. A steady flow of revenue.
ralph if you are really serious. Call CKYS and ask them if the units are really in the St. George UTAh Sportsman's wharehouse outlet. Madmax said they said they were when he called.
CKYS IN DOD EMALL. Also units in Sportman's warehouse in St. George Utah. Looks like a trial run.
Here's DOD EMALL
https://emall6.prod.dodonline.net/general_information/supplierslist/SupplierLists.jsp?&filterBy=NoFilter&beginsWith=A
Is that a Cyberkey product in the Toronto store?
What does this post have to do with CKYS?
No you not following me. I know it is in the store already I have verified that. I am not starving for anything positive as you say. After all CKYS did post the share structure on thier website and we did see that CKYS is now on DOD EMALL!. I don't think CKYS should PR anything like this until they are ready to. They should continue to expand operations.
Don't take that personally. I just notice a lot of people lie on these boards. Just saying there are a few people here that if they told me something I would accept it without the need to verify it. Others I don't know so well so I would verify it before believing it. Of course I believed the the BS. about the commercial today.....
Of course....
Am I correct in assuming th govt purchases through that platform and that this isn't retail for govt employees?
My point is that I posted that the TA said it was thier policy not to give out info and it didn't come from the company.
Yeah...lol I think the manufacturer is happy that CKYS is marketing them so effectively even if thier shareholders aren't....
lol...I presented and shared what the TA said. Talk about turning it upside down!