Hey, think of how I feel! He passed me over for a screaming CAPLOCK QUEEN! geez...

Rosetta stone comment from a couple of months ago - holy crap, I HAVE been here a long time!

Posted by: cindyyoohoo
In reply to: None

Date:8/31/2006 1:07:57 PM
Post #of 133351

HEY! HSMers! Have you heard from "TUT" lately? I think he is trying to decipher that ROSETTA STONE that CVSU has posted on their website - under MISSION STATEMENT. I think that is where the 10K results are hidden. It might take awhile though - since it's all greek (and Egyptian) to me! Did you all figure out what this means
-------> .
Someone is just messing with you - just like that CMED poster. Did you listen to that radio broadcast he pumped??? Useless info.
Keep grasping. More Hieroglyphs coming!

Whoa! You are GOOD! OK now..

OMG! When this movie is followed up with a book - it has to be a picture book!

Check this one out...
http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=23025636

Something unexpected happened. Click back on your browser and try again.

If this happens again, send a PM to Meatloaf describing what you were trying to do when the error occured.


I was searching my own posts for a past comment I made on the Rosetta stone that is on the CSHD website. Maybe I am NOT suppose to decipher it?

It's the 10K - it just needs to be deciphered...they still haven't figured it out...

He should be the one praying - praying he won't be sued.

speaking of SNICKERS - looks like the shareholders committee has a priority for a compensation committee. That must be where those shares Dimension mentioned would come from. Pay them in shares. the gift that keeps on giving. That ought to piss a few more loyal longs off - not being included. Yup give that guy Dogman some compensation for protecting those 500,000 shares - before the 6:1 distribution - he owns. tsk tsk

You think anyone will notice if the 10Q doesn't come out on Monday? They shouldn't care about such things. They have VERY IMPORTANT things to tend to - the committee is now the backbone of the company. Too bad none of them have the spine to ask when the heck the amended 10ka is coming out, or when the 10Q will be out. they are busy making a parade float for there protest march in December in Washington DC.

Dear Shareholders,

I would like to first apologize for the amount of time it took me to get this update out and for only allowing 20 people to be on the conference call. I will do my best to update you on the recent events and subject of the call.

I will be appointing temporary members for the board of the shareholders committee for a period of 30 days as urgent matters that need our attention must be handled. Unfortunately, we do not have time for a vote on these people. Mr. Harris has given me this authority to do so. After this temporary period, we will have a democratic vote for the board of the committee. The reason we do not have time to vote the board in is we are working with the company to validate the list of shareholders that have sent me their information against the NOBO list, as these people will be the only ones allowed to vote. That means that you will have to know your certificate number to be on the shareholders committee. We will allow each and every person who wants to be on the shareholders committee to be added. The web page will be updated shortly to allow people to enter their information. We will need name, address, phone number, email address, certificate number on your shares, and number of shares. We will only accept entries for a short period of time. This will come out in an official PR from the company.

Topics from the meeting are as follows:

1.

The Shareholders Committee will appoint the members of the Nominating Committee. The Board of the Shareholders Committee will review the resume of each candidate and interview the candidates. Once we make the selections of who we feel are the best candidates based on our due diligence, we will put out a proxy vote to the Shareholders Committee.


2.

The Shareholders Committee will appoint the members of the Compensation Committee in the exact manner as the Nominating Committee.


3.

The Shareholders Committee will appoint the members of the Review Committee in the exact manner as the Nominating Committee.


Mr. Harris stated that nothing has changed from the original business plan of CSHD to include what he stated in his Press Releases. He was very confident in everything that he stated. He said that the appointment of the Nominating and Compensation Committee is our top priority and time is of the essence.

I look forward in leading the Shareholders in my role as the appointed Chairman of the Shareholders Committee. I understand that many people are upset in the fact that they were not included in the conference call. I apologize for the limited number of people who were able to attend, but the business that was discussed was very important and did not need to be slowed with 1000 people asking Mr. Harris questions, as his time is very limited. We intend to PR the member of the Board of the Shareholders Committee very soon. The web site will be our meeting place to view information You will be required to have a secure login that we will provide to the members of the Shareholders Committee. I pray that you understand the reasons that we must go to these lengths to protect the shareholders from people entering false information. Mr. Harris stated that the Shareholders Committee is very powerful and will be the backbone of the company. We will be able to basically appoint the people we want to lead the ship. I am very confident in our shareholder base, as I have met so many intelligent people since we started this journey. I ask that everyone pray for me and the board, as we do our best to do what is in the best interest of the shareholders of CSHD and for Mr. Harris as he leads us into battle.

Sincerely

James Gee

Chairman CSHD Shareholders Committee

I'm waiting fo rthe shareholders committee meeting to be over and the "minutes" to be posted. dogman just said that would happen tonight. Although I have a feeling the minutes will no be publicly posted.

Here's some guy jerking the HSMers around...LOL!

Originally Posted by TNTrader
True.. There has been quite a bit of shareholder committee chatter here in this closed society. To bad the entire world doesnt come here to get what should be public information about a publicly traded company. That would increase the number of available interested parties beyond the private cheerleading squad that resides on this thread. I see that one of the primary rules for consideration for membership knowingly,willingly and deliberately excludes from consideration any member invested through a fund or private equity group and precludes application by any money manager,fund manager or institutional trader that may be interested or desire to represent their clients. Since most charters do not allow the positions to be made public,nor the clients names and addressses, you exclude most if not all non-individual accounts from representation and limit the committee to what is most likely a group that does not have the financial ability to dedicate the time and money such a position requires. This has already been mentioned as a potential problem on this board.

I wonder what the reaction will be when the institutional and professional groups,the list was much touted here, find that they have been excluded from having a voice and are being represented by fiat(and non-publicly) by amateurs when they have every expectation of of equal rights under the SEC rules.

Good Luck

And Rufus.. Hire a blasted attorney!!! If you cant afford one, ask. But do it quickly.



Originally Posted by TNTrader
So,in your opinion, this officially announced emergency meeting of the shareholder committee is to establish a procedure for setting up a shareholder committee? Wow.

I would have expected that the SEC and GTC regulations would have already established a procedure for that but what the heck. Not following the rules has gotten CSHD this far, maybe one more tweak will do the job of getting this company on the right track.

Some BBQ pics - in the stables I guess because it was raining...

http://www.hotstockmarket.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44655&page=713

Here's a typical exchange from earlier when the meeting was being set up to exclude some longs...

TexasMoney
HSM Regular

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 292



OK - Here, explain to me how this is a bash? Show me where I'm wrong.

I share in others disgust with this company. Here we are under SEC investigation for erroneous press releases and what do we do? Issue another erroneous press release! And, before you folks hammer me about this press release NOT be erroneous lets review the definition:

not correct; not in conformity with fact or truth; "an incorrect calculation"; "the report in the paper is wrong"; "your information is wrong"; "the clock showed the wrong time"; "found themselves on the wrong road"; "based on the wrong assumptions.

This isn’t even funny anymore. You cannot issue a press release that says: “CSHD would also like to call an emergency meeting of the shareholders committee via teleconference November 18, 2006 at 5:00 PM” and then not do that. I signed up for the shareholder committee just like hundreds of other people.

Understand that I’m NOT, NOT so pissed about being excluded from this purported “meeting”. What pisses me off is that these IDIOTS keep pushing out errenous press release in direct violation of the SEC injunction putting MY investment at risk. CARELESS, RECKLESS, INEXCUSABLE!


Quote:
Originally Posted by phil
stfu and go get a beer until the notes come out. you are really starting to unravel. Better yet why not head over to all_stocks and bash there a while the the rest of us can get a break from you.

Oh believe me, there are already signs of rebellion as I posted earlier...from the hardcore longs realizing they were not the real "chosen ones". Kinda sad actually. they were loyal yet not gettiing the same treatment. Believe it or not a few that lashed out in the beginning on how it was being handled were actually apologizing for their behavior later. How sick is that!

shareholders like this might fit that description:

Today, 07:30 PM   #6520
jesuspower1
HSM Addict

___________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by dplin2001
I guess the mystery meeting is a popularity contest. I think it should have been for those who have the most at stake. You can't develope a shareholder committee based on someones screen name. The company has to have a proxy for all shareholders to vote on. Do any of you really know the people invited to the mystery meeting? 
_____________________


JesusP response:
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,197



I wasn't going to comment on this, but this is too much! Don't be rediculous!

Those that are on the call have been asked to be based on a few factors: trust, attitude toward the company, their understanding, willingness, among other things!

So get off the pity party and be thankful that you are a part of the company's shareholder base!

His wife Amy might object!

Dimension, do you remember the conversation with Simon that addressed the Shareholders committee? Something was said about the rights or losing their voting rights or something like that if you were a committee member. Rufus brushed it off. It had something to do with BBAN trying to do the same thing.

Yes I believe it was Mr. Harris idea for the shareholders committee. that was when he was CEO BEFORE Mike gave him the boot. I am sure Dogman was insisting on some say in the goings on with the company. Obviously when Mike temporarily took back the reins and Dogman wanted to continue with the shareholder idea he pushed it to the back burner. Mike had said there was not anything in the Charter that allowed it and it was too much to deal ( voting and proxies) with at the time.
Anthony are you aware of Dogman's position about NOT wanting the 6:1 share distribution? do you agree with that position?

Well considering Dogman holds certificate #3 (or 5?) for Fronthaul, I would guess it was Mike's doing. Might have pressured Rufus. do you remember when Dogman was "pushing" the issue for Rufus to cash in a coupon on one of the bonds to satisfy the SEC and Rufus resisted - he said it was some violation of the bond contract.
Yeah, I might buy 1 share AND ask for my Certificate! I think it would be worth the money - even paying more in commission and the price of a cert just to "reframe" it! Good idea! do you think if we pass the word we could MOVE this stock on Monday? hey, maybe we should wait to see if Rufus can cough up the 10Q first!

I wish I could read her name. someone on SI did a whole skit about her being the Basher Woman that attacked Rufus. I chuckled and wondered if it was the TxPrincess!

That is Paula Alexander - Mike's wife.
I believe in a few postings at HSM Mike mentioned having the hots for some Stargate babe!

definitely a "pretty face"!

I did hear a rumor he had an attorney!
Notes from the CC with the "select" group - Dogman, JesusPower, TUT and a few others should be posted on the HSM board "soon". apparently a "court reporter" hsmer took notes. we shall see.

James Gee/Dogman is chairman - handselected by Rufus. Only seems fair that a PIPE with 500,000 shares should continue to lead the following.
Remember SaltyDog - he was in total disagreement with Dogman about the 6:1 - dogman doesn't want it to happen, and SaltyDog said he and his froup would file a class action if it didn't happen...should get interesting - when there is this type of conflict of interest. Will Dogman push for his agenda?
Remember how Mike told Dogman the shareholders committee was on the back burner, not in the charter as Rufus had stated and would have to be voted on and proxies sent out - seems like Dogman shoved that one aside.. just to get a stab at being the leader. someoe already mentioned that the shareholders group would need financing...teehee

http://www.rufusvssec.com/DFWmeet/pages/DSCF0392_JPG.htm
click home

That's weird you mentioned that - because their was a question asked on Simon about that - I'll have to go back and checkmy notes - it referenced something about rights - something about BBAN actually, when they ried to do the same thing. Maybe Dimension remembers...but something specific was mentioned and Rufus in his usual fashion just blew it off as no problem. Maybe Dogman/James Gee is the best man for the job! Not to mention James already talked about the need to send out proxies and the long process that was needed to make it happen - this was the first step, I believe he said.

I started some DD - check this out -

http://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/petn4-493.htm

crap Fireopal! that is a bad link!!

Re: legality of shareholder's committee:
Today, 10:11 PM   #6974
fireopal
HSM Addict

 

 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,577



__________________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by head22
Well,the fact is...someone right now is representing shareholders. The pr said shareholders committee. I don't recall ever seeing a proxy or having the ability to vote for this representation. I saw posts on this thread talking about nominations but I never saw a formal process take place. Someone else mentioned having a 10% share holdings makes it legal. That may be true, but I am pretty confident that there is a formal process to take place to make this happen. I never saw it. To me, that sounds questionable. Risky. Like we need more risks at this point. And while I may be speculating, it is about my own investment. I'd like to know someone thought this thru before they moved on it, thats all.
________________________

the concerns of some here are good ones and i located the following info soon after committee discussions began here....do know there are formal procedures for electing a chairperson and committee etc.... and it definitely does look as if sec has some rules, but as many of us know, cshd along with a couple of members in this thread tend to wanna dismiss relevant information and/or encourages others to ignore relevant information posted by some of our members...in any event - didn't really dig too deep into sec but had this book marked as a starting point for those that may be interested...

Request for Rulemaking Concerning Shareholder Communications
http://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions/p....htm#P59_14432
__________________

Rufus' mom is on at HSM

sorry about the time - it must be a cookie malfunction...

Today, 09:44 PM   #6911
ALady in the House
HSM Newbie

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 36



------------------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukester
Just a warning to watch your language...there is ALady in the House.

Hello Mrs. Harris.
-------------------------
Good Evening, Everyone I hope that all is well.

did anyone catch that secret password for the paltalk room that bbmine accidently posted? she thought she was pm -ing someone. Looks like it is time to change that password! LOL!!! Never know who might be sneaking in for a listen - some aliases look alike - wink wink

Wait, wouldn't it be better to have 20/20 hindsight? What time do I need to be in for that?

Wait, wouldn't it be better to have 20/20 hindsight? What time do I need to be in for that?

Now that would be cool! not to mention make me rich!!!

Bermuda is considered offshore right - LOL! Guess what time it is in Bermuda right now? the same time showing up on the HSM clock - how funny is that! I need to logoff and logon to see if it changes.

go figure! something didn't reset!

Today, 09:14 PM   #6855
H82Luz
HSM Regular

 

 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 332



almost half left pal talk... 111 down to 68... guess the conf call is over.

Hey SERFY! why am I seeing posts that are on Bermuda time for the HSM board???? Lacy isn't... Was that a cookie thing? I copied and pasted it - did the cookie forget to set the HSM clock back from last month? Maybe I will shut it down and start again and see if it restarts with the correct time! teehee. either that or I am in some type of time warp...

Go get one of the latest - this is rather curious - maybe they are deleting posts - like THAT one! Are you capturing from the full version??

I'm not sharing my bounty with anyone!!! Find your own crime!

OK I am stumped - I just copied this one:

Today, 08:34 PM   #6732
jthakus
HSM Addict

 

 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,980




Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasMoney
This is what I'm talking about. "I vouched for you". Wow! Jesuspower1 has annointed you Holy enough to be informed. This is sophmoric!

why am I not surprised to see a post of this nature from you...is there a trend...definitely there is one
__________________

Not exactly MY report - it will be a report as seen through the eyes of a HSMer...

Well, I kinda had my eye on this Bounty Hunter job...


Bounty Program at the SEC

The SEC is authorized to pay a bounty to a person who provides information that leads to the recovery of a civil penalty from those who violate the insider trading laws. With some exceptions, the SEC is permitted to award a bounty from the civil penalties actually recovered from violators. The total amount of the bounty may not exceed ten percent of the penalty.

The SEC has sole discretion whether to pay a bounty, the amount of the payment, and to whom the payment would be made. The SEC is not authorized to pay bounties for information about other violations of the securities laws.

For more information, read about the bounty program.
http://www.sec.gov/answers/bounty.htm