I usually have a lot to say. I just know when to keep it to myself.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
GBBM: 2.80 (a/h Friday too and rerelease this AM) Gigabeam announces orders for deployment of co's wireless technology for U.S. metro market (GGBM) 2.80 : Co announces that it has received purchase orders for 24 additional WiFiber links from One Velocity, a telecom provider for the Western U.S.S. metro market (GGBM) 2.80 : Co announces that it has received purchase orders for 24 additional WiFiber links from One Velocity, a telecom provider for the Western U.S.
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/070720/20070720005649.html?.v=1
Shares Outstanding6: 6.55M
Float: 3.59M
RPM (24.30): NYSE: RPM Inc beats by $0.05; guides FY08 revs above consensus (RPM) 24.30 : Reports Q4 (May) earnings of $0.65 per share, $0.05 better than the Reuters Estimates consensus of $0.60; revenues rose 10.6% year/year to $1.01 bln vs the $0.98 bln consensus. Co issues upside guidance for FY08, sees FY08 revenue growth of 8%, which equates to roughly $3.61 bln vs. $3.54 bln consensus.
have you seen any disclaimers for the pay? I was going to look for it- but if you have it, do tell....
"Professional" promotion Services for OEGY:
........to sum up the beginning of the end here...
initiated again on the following dates (new contracts) :
06/21 06/22-wallstreetanalystreport
06/20 and 06/29 and 07/02-liquidstockreport.com
07/03 and 07/05- Stock Market Alerts
Courtesy of Ihubs "Dump the Pump" board.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=9311
Well, you might want to look at our M-F stuff. The weekends we just talk. lol
Take care, GDog
Thank you joker. I am leaving your post tonight and you're welcome to post your picks here- just in the proper manner-
and be prepared to discuss it if we have questions.
An apology goes a long way with me.
lady*b
Serf and I started in the same week. He's been himself the whole time...............i think...........lol
By the way, Welcome to Fat Cats. Pinks to Blue -
any question welcome here. :)
Yes, the topic started yesterday and somebody posted an example today.
It goes on from there.....
Q and A board: http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21441506
Posted by: IRISHBULL
In reply to: lady*b who wrote msg# 94126 Date:7/21/2007 11:43:39 AM
Post #of 94184
Very interesting bridge, I always thought about that myself..
As to the member marks, they've been heavily manipulated by a few here. Some posted their member mark link along with some rubbish to fool people into clicking on the link and some even sent their member mark link out in mass emails. I seen one persons MM go up over 50 in one day with little to no posts..
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21441506
--------------------------------
Posted by: mimurray
In reply to: None Date:7/22/2007 4:38:28 PM
Post #of 94184
Is placing a link in the Favorite Links portion of your profile that gives you a member mark against the rules, or is it just a really CHEEZY desperado thing to do???????
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/profile.asp?User=72773
lol, what if it showed how many people have you on iggy?
that would be funny. lolololol
Have you been following the discussion on the q and a board?
Some folks are using that link in their favorites. Some are emailing it or tucking it in a graphic.
I think we could do away with the marks, personally.
Click on the link below. The indicators can be changed below the chart. Create the chart how YOU want it.
When you're done, right click on the chart and go to "properties". The url will be listed in there.
Then we'll try it again if you want.
http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=MMRSF
Spam: Do not post the same or similar message on more than TWO boards. More than that is considered spam. Spam posts will be removed and repeated and/or egregious offenses may result in suspension of your posting privileges.
JOKER, do you not seeeeee this note to the right before you hit "submit post"?
Which board should I find you on?
Posts by jokerwild477 Board
Date/Time
EMAN.....Keep your eyes on it tomorrow and next FAT CATS
7/22/2007 9:41:19 PM
EMAN....$1.50 NOW....$2.00 by wednsday MAYBE A double by BB's Penny Haven
7/22/2007 2:19:02 PM
did you climb on board...? Bagman's charts, watchlists, scans and etc.
7/21/2007 12:46:22 PM
EMAN ... this one going to break out The Lotto Pick Project (LOTTO)
7/21/2007 12:45:29 PM
EMAN ... this one going to break out BB's Penny Haven
7/21/2007 12:44:51 PM
i've been yelling at you guys for a Bagman's charts, watchlists, scans and etc.
7/21/2007 12:37:26 PM
hard to get filled GS Carbon Corp. (GSCR)
7/20/2007 10:07:59 AM
ungagged the TA and tell them to GS Carbon Corp. (GSCR)
7/20/2007 10:06:38 AM
EMAN ...Shakkkking the tree ...$1.36 x BB's Penny Haven
7/19/2007 2:20:44 PM
EMAN...$1.49 X $1.50...$1.50 there it is BB's Penny Haven
7/19/2007 2:02:21 PM
EMAN...$1.49 X $1.50...$1.50 there it is The Lotto Pick Project (LOTTO)
7/19/2007 2:02:00 PM
EMAN....$1.46 X $1.48, Buck fitty here we come...eom The Lotto Pick Project (LOTTO)
7/19/2007 1:48:13 PM
EMAN....$1.46 X $1.48, Buck fitty here we come...eom BB's Penny Haven
7/19/2007 1:47:36 PM
EMAN....$1.44 X$1.45 The Lotto Pick Project (LOTTO)
7/19/2007 12:38:24 PM
EMAN....$1.44 X $1.45 BB's Penny Haven
7/19/2007 12:32:41 PM
I have a question for you, Joker.....
You got it, Tex!
She deserves a break now. It's hard to top what she's accomplished. This series was her calling and has become something so phenominal........like the star trek series to my youth- came back years later.....
oh and like the Grease series............lolololol....nahhhh
Right and her baby napped at that time for her to write, i believe in the infant carrier next to her. Really cool, imho.
The world gives us gifts- it's up to us to use them.
She got a napping kid and a great idea. Whammo.
You did see it here, yes. Just not me. Those are big big bucks, Tiki. Wish I could write a series like that.
Her beginning of her famous writing is a wonderful story in itself. She earned it, big time.
Here, try this link. Take out the http:// part
http://stockcharts.com/c-sc/sc?s=MMRSF&p=DAILY&b=5&g=0&i=0&r=7484
nope. I'm not getting it either. Let me try something else.
SCHL? Nope. That was polkamatic and serfie.
Hmmmmmmmmm.........i tried getting that one for you......perhaps you didn't copy the link all the way?
but there is spam. Isn't spam a great way to pick stocks?
Bad, Your ability to pick stocks is only second to your generous nature of sharing top notch information with this board.
Thank you for your help here, and for your recent picks.
Really? Why don't you tell 6 boards about it? Did you miss the note to the right before you posted? Odd if you did.
Surely you don't need a refresher do you?
READ:
TOU Refresher
Off-topic: Any off-topic discussion is a violation of TOU. If your post is not about the stock for the board you're posting to, do not post it. Use email, private message, or post it to a board where it is on-topic.
Spam: Do not post the same or similar message on more than TWO boards. More than that is considered spam. Spam posts will be removed and repeated and/or egregious offenses may result in suspension of your posting privileges.
OMCL: Thurs, reports of profits surge. Friday they got the upgrade. Seems the upgrade holds more water in choppy markets
(up 12.6%!):
This is silly. I didn't even post and my marks are going up.
Not joking, this is embarrassing. Thanks but they aren't marks of merit.
She knows now. omg
AAAAGH OMG!! I see what you're doing! Please, I'm happy with earning my marks.
BCLI: Is this chart to "toppy" now? I ask because it ended high on a decreased vol. Not sure if it was just a Friday Vol decrease- or it's just time to come back a bit. RSI past 86 though....
tia....
hold the lettuce, extra tomato? Drive thu, sir. Pay at the first window. ;)
Down, nice to see you posting this evening. As always, great work.
Thanks Veritas. Nice board here. I've marked it and am looking forward to spending some time reading your ibox this weekend
and opening the video links.
Take care :)
Verita, on the subject of "eternity"......have you read "90 Minutes in Heaven?"
Curious on your take on it. I picked it up last month at Borders. It was on the Best Seller list for Non Fiction.
I was surprised by it's listing and the book gave me a lot to think about.
Here is the books website..........if you haven't heard of it
you might give it a look..............
http://www.90minutesinheaven.com/
hey now, Vvvveritas
LOL
“there ought to be a rule that says that a broker cannot be paid a commission on a short sale until the shares are delivered.”
That might have gotten a few ears perked there........
"...and will begin deleting posts that seek to spread wild ass rumors on our board. This is NOT the place for that..."
Could you please give me a link to the WAR board?
tia
A must read for the board: Posted by: rrufff
In reply to: Creede Bighorns who wrote msg# 5071 Date:7/21/2007 6:26:17 PM
Post #of 5088
READ CAREFULLY - THIS IS MAJOR NEWS FOR ALL INVESTORS AND TRADERS!!!!
Sen. Bennett Renews Call for Hearing into Stock Market Fraud
by Mark Faulk
In a speech on the floor of the U.S. Senate today, Senator Bob Bennett (R-UT) called for Senate Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd to conduct a hearing into stock market fraud, <bspecifically addressing the issue of naked short selling. Sen. Bennett has been a long time proponent of stock market reform, and was instrumental in proposing a Senate Banking Committee hearing into naked short selling as early as late 2004, which were eventually shelved by then Banking Committee Chairman Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL). He said that Sen. Dodd, who has entered the 2008 Presidential election, was willing to conduct a hearing into the issue:
“I think it is serious enough that we ought to have a hearing about this in the Banking Committee, and I have spoken to the Chairman of the Banking Committee, Senator Dodd, and asked him if it wouldn’t be possible for us to have much of a hearing at some point in the future, and he’s expressed a willingness to do that. I can understand, we can’t set a time for that right now. There are too many other things going on in the Banking Committee, but I’m delighted to know that he’s willing to cooperate with us in examining this. And I would like to suggest several things that I would like to discuss at that hearing.”
A source close to the issue said, “Senator Bennett has spent an enormous amount of time studying this problem, he’s intimately familiar with the abuses in the stock market. This speech is his opening salvo.” He went on to say that “We need an avalanche of letters and emails from every state in the Union going to every member of the U.S. Senate, urging Sen. Dodd, the chairman of the Banking Committee, to hold the hearing on Sen. Bennett’s recommendations.”
After first explaining the basic issue of naked short selling to his fellow Senators, Sen. Bennett then addressed the SEC and the creation of the DTCC, and their role in trade settlement, and how the need for a system to facilitate trade settlement led to the creation of the DTCC, or the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation. He said that the while the DTCC is regulated by the S.E.C. that” I don’t think that last statement is true. I’m not sure that the S.E.C. has control over the DTCC. He then quoted from a Wall Street Journal article that said, “Almost all stock is now kept at the company central depository and never leaves there. Instead, a stock buyers’ brokerage account is electronically credited with the securities entitlement. This credit can, in turn, be sold to someone else.”
Then Sen. Bennett described how electronic settlement, which he called “replacing paper with electrons,” can “provide cover for naked shorting of the stock” because shareholders are given an electronic credit for the purchase instead of physical delivery of the shares. From there, he described how electronic trading, and the DTCC’s practice of keeping shares in what has become known as the “DTCC Borrow Pool,” invites manipulation of the system:
“So this happens: a short seller enters the market and says, “I want to short—I want to sell 1,000 shares of XYZ stock so at some point he has to produce 1,000 shares to cover his sale. How do you do that? You borrow the shares. And then you buy them back at some future time. All right. From whom do you borrow them? The DTCC. They have all of the shares on deposit. So you go to the DTCC and you say, I want to borrow 1,000 shares of XYZ stock. They say, fine, we have them on deposit and will lend them to you so you can use them for your ‘short’ sale. All right, everything’s fine. Except that, in this electronic age, it is possible for you to keep shuffling around the electronic impulses that represent the stock and never, ever, have to buy it back. Stop and think about that, Mr. President. That’s a pretty good business plan. You can sell as much as you want and never, ever, have to pay for it. You could go in, the stock trading at $5 a share. You go in and sell 1,000 shares. You paid $5,000 for selling 1,000 shares and you never have to buy them. Because you are constantly moving around the electronic impulses that represent those shares. You never have to cover.
Now, when you talk to the DTCC people they say ‘No, we always make sure that there is a delivery and if there’s not, it’s not our fault. It’s not our responsibility to police this, it is up to the brokerage house to do this.’ The S.E.C. has spent enough time looking at this and enough time talking to me that they issued to me a three-page letter outlining the steps they have taken to stop the practice of ‘naked short selling.’”
After talking about recent rules implemented by the S.E.C. in an effort to deal with the problem of naked short selling, he talked about another method of circumventing the rules, a scheme that is commonly referred to as “stock kiting,” where two brokers pass shares back and forth between themselves, with each one holding the shares for thirteen days, the limit before forced settlement of the trade, and then passing it back to the other broker, where, according to Sen. Bennett, “they ping-pong these back and forth as long as they want. So you can have a situation where people are selling shares that don’t exist, taking commissions on the sale, and the profits of the sale, and never ever having to produce the shares.”
Bennett also said “I think a Congressional hearing is a good place for those who are running the DTCC to explain to us how it really works. And I would like the S.E.C. to come in and give us their background and information as to how their rules are working to try to stop the naked short selling.”
He laid out a number of proposals in his speech, including “a rule that says that brokers cannot borrow for short sales more stock than is on deposit with the DTCC. I think that’s just obvious. If there are 3 million shares of XYZ company on deposit at the DTCC, people should not be able to short sell 4 million shares…So my first recommendation would be that the DTCC cannot make available loans for short sellers more stock than they have on deposit. Once they have reached the point that 100% of the shares they have on deposit have been loaned out, they can’t loan out anymore. I think that’s just an obvious, commonsense recommendation, but it doesn’t apply now.” He also said, “there ought to be a rule that says that a broker cannot be paid a commission on a short sale until the shares are delivered.”
"It does not involve very many people, but for the people—to the people who are involved, it, frankly, can be a matter of life and death. And there are enough of them starting businesses and creating entrepreneurial activities in the United States that we owe it to them to find out exactly what is going on with respect to this.
That’s why I’ve asked Chairman Dodd to consider a hearing on this matter, to let us hear from the S.E.C., to let us hear from the DTCC, to let us hear from those in the marketplace who have actual experience with this and see if the present S.E.C. rules are sufficient or if we need to do additional things around the lines of the two items that I have suggested.”
Our anonymous source, who has spent years behind the scenes working for stock market reform, stressed that the hearing could hinge on the level of response from those who have been affected by stock market fraud, saying, “There’s been no bill introduced, but Senator Bennett is prepared to introduce a bill if these issues are not resolved. We need a nationwide campaign to get people to write their senators urging them to tell Sen. Dodd to hold hearings into the issues that Sen. Bennett addressed in the U.S. Senate today.”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAKE ACTION NOW!!! WITHOUT YOUR HELP, WE WOULD NOT BE TALKING ABOUT THIS IN THE U.S. SENATE....WITH YOUR HELP, WE CAN FIX OUR STOCK MARKETS!!!
To contact your Senator, go to:
http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
To contact Senator Chris Dodd, go to:
http://dodd.senate.gov/index.php?q=node/3128&cat=Opinion
or write him at:
U.S. Senator Chris Dodd
448 Russell Building
Washington D.C., 20510
or:
U.S. Senator Chris Dodd
30 Lewis St Suite 101
Hartford, CT 06103
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=21445429