Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
So, there is a lot you don't know from what you say but you can take position in favor of CT and Serbin. Questionable!!!
you knew that for a while. Why you kept your shares?
Alias, I think you and CT spent too much time talking and attacking people and you forgot most important thing: DELIVER. Even though you bring back everybody were incompetent, at the end of the day, the current CEO who failed to deliver is CT. When she stepped in as the CEO, the situation was exactly the same, no matter what you say and I really but really don't believe you when you say we were at one week close to a deal. This is bullshit*.
well this is what you say. Past prove you wrong. What happened before octobre 2013? There is a reason why SH wanted CT out. If she had a great plan I can't buy SH would have asked her to leave
Let's say you are right, Gingras is an incompetent. It's been 21 months since july 2012. What have she done during this period.
15 months between july 2012 and october 2013. She did not deliver either.
You can attack everyboy, but the real facts are: She did not deliver one thing while she was the CEO. Undinding stuff is too easy
Nice volume
your the one who brought the value of 15M$. Appraisal or not, you confirm this has a good value. Exact fair value, we'll never know and not of any importance at the current moment
You say it's because of lawsuit but on december 22th you said it was underway. 18 days after the lawsuit was filed
my concern is having been told financials were underway while it was not true
If she had delivered only ONE deal, maybe it would be different. Base on waht we now know, I don't see why we should trust her more than the other team. I really don't appreciate what we were told about financials
the problem is this became a personnal affair for you and CT. You should take one or two steps back and look at it diffrently. Life is not a matter of "black or white". For you, outside CT and Serbin, we are all morrons. Can't be that. Shade of grey...
I'd like Alias to answer my question. He said 250K$ financing deal was on the table until the lawsuit and this is why we don't have audited financials. BUT, end of december, he posted he received an email from CT stating financials were underway.
Somewhere, someone is lying
exactly like the judge said. No evidence both side.
An evidence is you Alias said audited financials were going well way after the lawsuit which supposedly killed a financing deal and postponed financials
this is what you retained from yesterday hearing. I understand it went bad?
Alias on 12/22/13 you posted:
Cynthia also sent me this note,"the auditor is giving the to do list every day to the accountant." It was also noted that estimated time for audit was still about 6 weeks; but auditor didn't start work for first 3 weeks as other jobs to finish. Some things just need people's signatures for work they did to be complete.
Who is lying? You or CT
it the transcript it says march 20th and 27th. Maybe the hearing is not over yet.
Answer?
you bought?
okay! This time the problem is the SEC... Really not lucky how all the planet is against CT
I read the february court transcript. Either way, let's say CT wins, she will be under spotlight after that. She alleged lot of stuff she will have to deliver. On the other side, if CT leaves, SH will have to show they work for other shareholders. So, either way we will win
the hearing started at 10h I think
I think the problem we're facing has started with CT lawsuit against Sorensen and Peake. If they were not in the board anymore, why the lawsuit? There is the real problem.
If they could first answer how many oustanding shares we now have
this is far from being financials. I want to see unaudited financials. We should learn a lot
totally agree. CT seems to try to only cover her a.s. Sorensen out too.
You're telling me CT cannot pick up the phone and call SH? If it's so clear what you bring, I can't believe there is a lawsuit. Something is wrong in what you say. Just one call and everything is ok if I get it
let's assume your right, explain me why an investment fund would leave 100M$ on the table if it's so evident? They are there to make money not politic
I understand no plan. Why is CT not leaving if she can't make anything
I understand that but now, again what is the plan? I suppose you and CT have a plan if you stay
Alan, now let's assume we are convinced old management are crooks, what do you propose as the plan? You depend on the lawsuit?
I guess Alan and CT dont't have much to prove what they bring. In that case the only remaining strategy is to attack people without facts. I don't see CT getting in credibility with that strategy. Saying it's other,s fault everytime does not show much leadership
So Alan, if I understand, CT delevered nothing over time and magic, when she was ready to delivered, here come the lawsuit and everything collapsed. Are you already preparing the next reason to fail delevering?
but you knew we would not have audited financials cause of the lawsuit and keep it for you as well as the sell of BPD.
Questions about main actors of this war:
How much can SH lose in this? They own many hundred million shares
How much can Peake lose in this? She owns many million shares
Gingras? Many million shares
Sorensen? Many million shares
Cynthia Tsai? I don't know. Is she the only one that won't lose anything in this battle and that's why we are there?
No I'm not. Panic selling but it's only 0,2% of the float. Just hope someone will realize maintaining his/her position won't help and will lose
What is your plan???
Ok, but now, what is your plan Alias. Now that we know that everybody around Viropro were stupid, what are you gonna do? If nothing can be done, GET OUT!
I see your only interest is to blame others. Start delivering you and CT
Don't you think Alias if CT had delivered something there wouldn't be any lawsuit? SH wants to replace her for what? I don't buy your reason. If deal with Therapix could not stand after lawsuit, this is not what I call a strong deal. Another non binding deal meaning nothing. Instead of only saying it's other's fault, why dont you just deliver you and CT?
Just read some exhibits and clearly decision from CT to kick out Sorensen was a good one. This guy was playing for too many teams