Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You actually said 50,000 coins one week......
and 500 the next.
And yes, it was a reference to shallow water wrecks. But when has that happened, even with Timmy's Toy?
You can't find jack waiting on a permit.
The industry hasn't been changed by the Timmy Toy, and GME's recent loss shows SFRX's business model has always been a joke.
BTW, this is also what you claimed the same time you were opining about shallow water wrecks.
You claimed SFRX would salvage 5000 coins……
one week, and 500 the next at Melbourne back in 2013, when the share price was over 4 cents.
There was no wreck at Melbourne, and the share price is down 85% since.
But hey, at least SFRX trades, huh? With a (ahem) tiny, tiny 4B+ float.
Your regurgitated list is bullshit, just like Kyle claiming they were on a wreck when no wreck was there.
You’re a real good fit with SFRX.
FYI, someone purchased about 3% of EXPL’s……
float on Wednesday, so I am not sure where you’re getting your misinformation.
Check my math, but 3% of SFRX’s float would be about 120MM shares. When’s the last time that many SFRX shares changed hands in one day?
Again, your focus on EXPL is amusing. SFRX’s is losing about $9K a day. You can rent a 150ft flat back for twice that, but SFRX has a couple of dinghy’s for their (ahem) research vessels, and are supposedly waiting on a permit. 20 of SFRX’s boats at least could fit on the deck of a 150ft flat back. Maybe 30.
Does it cost that much to make YouTube videos and pretend you’re on the verge of salvaging the most valuable cargo of all time?
Kyle said 3 years ago they had a big time media contract, but they’ve never disclosed any terms.
Isn’t that required?
Regardless, I don’t look to sell my EXPL shares in the market. I believe the possibility exist that EXPL could find enough treasure and no longer need funding.
The Connaught and Black Marlin projects could be that catalyst. From there the “Primary Target” would be a game changer.
Title has been obtained in 2 of the 3 projects, and the other would just be a formality. I’m not saying EXPL is the best and we’re all happy with the progress. To the contrary.
Deep Ocean Search is probably the best salvage company in the world, and they generally don’t announce a find for several years. And guess what……they don’t have a ticker symbol, yet they have found tonnage. How would a shareholder make money there?
GL getting the permit SFRX says they may never obtain.
I guess Juno is the only wreck SFRX has title to. They’ve not disclosed any others.
I can assure you, EXPL resources aren’t……
being used to pay me to post mean ole things about KK and SFRX, nor have they ever been for used for that purpose.
EXPL wouldn’t even spend money to obtain a rights to a wreck from a dead man because they thought he had them looking in the wrong place, as Kyle once claimed.
They possibly would have gone and tried to confirm their suspicions first before seeking such, but not after.
Just because SFRX has pissed away over $25MM doesn’t mean EXPL would be careless with their funds.
If they did, they would be defunct, as you claim they already are.
SFRX has been losing over $2.5MM a year lately.
BWVI ventures billed the Pulaski project less than 1/10th of that for 2021, and they salvaged well over 3 times what they billed.
Ending 6/30 SFRX reported loses of $1.6MM, but they say they are waiting on a permit. But you’re CONcerned about how EXPL is supposedly spending their money?
That’s freakin’ hilarious.
I suppose the questions I asked are……
over your head, so let me try logic in a little simpler way.
How does a company that doesn’t exist, according to you, pay someone?
What crew are you referring to?
I supposedly lost all money in EXPL,……
but EXPL, who you claim is defunct, pays me to argue salvage law with you, therefore you don’t care to have a meaningful conversation about salvage law?
I wonder if I’ll get a bonus for that…..in your fairy tale?
BTW, dinner was really good. They had several of us come and join the crew at the marina and hired a professional chef to cook for us onboard in the full kitchen. Man did he throw down.
Amazing how a company you claim no longer exists can do all that, huh?
Does Kyle invite shareholders on the dinghy’s for gatherings like that?
Maybe pull bolognas sandwiches out the cooler, along with a bottle of water?
The last time you were here you were…….
wanting me to name my price and come work for SFRX. That was funny.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172552857
Plus, you were touting SFRX’s legal team for getting the rights to Juno from a dead man. You even “alleged” they wrote the Admiralty claim, but that was done back in 1988.
BTW, did you happen to see the ruling against GME? It’s a dagger in the heart of SFRX’s stated businesses plan, though I’m sure Kyle and affiliates will keep talking about the 1715 fleet and Spanish galleons to novices. Notice The Baer is mentioned in the ruling.
GME contends that la Trinité was a cargo ship, not a military ship, and that Ribault’s mission to reinforce Fort Caroline was one of civilian resupply. It cites the verified statements of Dr. Robert Baer and Dr. Lubos Kordac, which say as much. Dr. Kordac writes, “[la Trinité] was not any military ship, [it] was a cargo ship, bringing supplies, civilians and money to the new French colony.” But for SMCA purposes, whether la Trinité was a cargo ship or a “military ship” is of no consequence. The Act covers “any sunken warship, naval, auxiliary, or other vessel that was owned or operated by a government on military noncommercial service when it sank.”
One of SFRX’s attorneys has with consulted with Bobby (GME) about projects for BLIS. The ruling is a dagger in the heart of those projects too.
Earlier, Bobby had won a salvage award, but the ruling over turned that. The Judge stated that France didn’t ask GME to locate the wreck so no award was granted. GME undertook that mission on their own without first discussing it with France.
Sounds just like Melbourne, huh? And aren’t they supposedly thinking the wreck is further out at sea? If so, when are they going to talk to Spain? Or the better question is, why didn’t they discuss the Concepcion years ago with Spain? Did the legal team tell them……don’t worry about it?
Regardless, good to have you back. Your always such a joy to converse with.
Also, I’m not concerned about my ownership in Endurance, nor am I interested in taking hot air ballon rides.
GL
Let’s go with your premise that I’m just…..
trying to convince myself I’m the good guy.
Isn’t that better than trying to convince people you’re on “the wreck” when a wreck isn’t even there?
Or that you project $100MM in sales annually within 5 years, and when the 5 years come it doesn’t look like you’ll even have $100K in sales?
Who cares what CEO’s claim or project, right?
We know what really matters is if a poster is trying to convince himself he’s the good guy.
That’s the real scandal.
Enjoy the hot air balloon ride and have a great weekend.
While I appreciate you admitting he attacks……
those who don’t get along with his idol, no one
could follow in his footsteps, though some try.
I could never idolize someone who claimed they were on “the wreck” when there was no wreck at all.
Or someone who claimed the pps could go to $10, while he sells shares at 1/4 of a cent so he can get a paycheck.
It’s akin to idolizing someone who claimed they completed an acquisition when that wasn’t true, or that they had sales of $1.8MM in Q1 2021, only to see the $1.8MM disappear from the Fins with no explanation.
To each their own.
That’s another reason I think SFRX is a good fit for ya.
I don't care who you respond to. Knock yourself......
out.
It was just amusing that you posted this earlier.
So you responded to an affiliate who regurgitates…..
the same lie he told you on a regulate basis, but I need to look inward, eh?
You’re a good fit with SFRX.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173060923
#weneedaboogeyman
No, your support of a company that isn’t……
properly registered is noted. It would be impossible for them to obtain insurance, and they would have no legal standing in a lawsuit.
Similarly, SFRX has a business model that seeks to violate state, federal, and international law. It’s illegal to disturb a Spanish shipwreck without their permission.
That’s what make you a good fit. You seem to enjoy hot air balloon rides.
Please note: Juno is exempt as Spain never made a claim to the worm poop. It legally belongs to SFRX, but right now they haven’t obtained a permit to scoop it up. Plus, SFRX admits they may never obtain the permit affiliates are claiming is imminent.
GL
As I have explained before, I’m not……
interested in selling my shares. I had plenty of time and notice if I had wanted to, as did the others.
Besides, I made up most of my investment with BWVI, which was their partner, though I’m still down a few thousand.
Unlike a certain beverage company you tout, we’re properly registered, even as a foreign entity.
There’s no preferred shares that restrict common shareholders rights.
Enjoy the balloon ride, but know it goes up and it goes down.
#youreagoodfitwithsfrx
Good luck with the 1/10 of 1%……
It might be slightly more, but not much.
Actually the Judge ruled no laws were…..
broken and REJECTED Kyle’s claims. He also advised take one claim to another venue, but Kyle never did.
So what did Kyle do? He just made up more bullshit and Micah realized Kyle was simply going to keep spending shareholder money to keep the lawsuit alive.
John Grimm will come that realization at some point, even if SFRX has to cough up the money for damages to his boat.
I’m glad Micah fired Kyle after Kyle lost his brokerage license.
1MM shares of EXPL is almost 2% ownership……
2% ownership of SFRX is about 164MM shares.
If you looking to sell stock, SFRX has its moments with hot air balloon rides.
About 2 dozen people own 90% of EXPL. Not many mouths to feed.
The SFRX beach party will need to feed 5000 plus.
I responded to him and explained common…..
shareholders don’t have the voting rights to fire Tony. I need to look, but I don’t think they could even call for a vote.
Regardless, one would think common shareholders would know what they own and not go along with a false premise.
One would think……
You actually thought common shareholders could fire Tony?.......
Who was going to call for the vote?
What are the voting rights common shareholders have vs preferred?
Tony doesn't even hold annual meetings with common shareholders.
Common shareholders can’t fire Tony. Preferred shareholders…….
have superior voting rights.
And whoever owns the A’s has Tony by his acorns.
SFRX’s losses are over $25MM. EXPL lost less…..
than 1/10th of that the entire time they accessed the capital markets.
8.190B OS vs 55MM OS. SFRX issues in one day more shares than EXPL’s entire float.
SFRX loses in a year what EXPL lost the entire time they tried to raise money on the OTC. Micah wasn’t interested in selling shares at a discount like SFRX must in order to keep the lights on, pay Kyle, and making YouTube videos pretending to be salvors.
Micah forgave around $500K owed to him, and is still owed nearly $1MM.
EXPL has forgotten about more wrecks than SFRX can even name. SFRX has never found a wreck or identified the origins of the debris they’ve dove on for 16 years.
But boy just you wait, right?
Do you know why Timmy has never proclaimed……
that his Toy worked?
Now I have never proclaimed to be a tech expert, but even if it works, it can’t find what isn’t there.
Even a fifth grader can understand that.
As long as they have to wait, either on the state or the Corp, they always have an excuse.
For over 4 years affiliates have said the Toy works, but Timmy never has.
Over $25MM in losses and SFRX has never found a trinket, not even one.
Perhaps the armchair salvage experts can explain why. I’m sure they have an excuse or two on the tips of their tongues.
4. Between June 2000 and December 2000, Old Dominion, aided and abetted and caused by Kennedy, unlawfully permitted Magnan to become associated with the firm in violation of the Commission's 1995 Order. During that time period, Kennedy operated Old Dominion's Tampa office from Investment Recovery's headquarters and met with Magnan daily to discuss the Investment Recovery offering. Further, Magnan paid all of Old Dominion's expenses related to the Investment Recovery offering, including rent and secretarial services, and referred potential investors to Kennedy. With Kennedy's knowledge, Magnan also conducted a one to three hour sales presentation to potential investors, effectively making the sale of Investment Recovery stock to these investors.
5. As a result of the conduct described above, Kennedy willfully aided and abetted and caused Old Dominion's violation of Section 15(b)(6)(B)(ii) of the Exchange Act, which prohibits a broker or dealer to permit a person barred by the Commission to become or remain associated with the broker or dealer without the consent of the Commission.
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/34-47403
If Mel Fisher’s Treasure had given a valuation……
on Juno, as Kyle claimed, which would be the largest find EVER, they wouldn’t be running from it.
They would not only acknowledge it, their Director of Operations would have seen their research file.
BTW, the Corp permit application was considered federally complete 2 years ago today.
Kyle should have NEVER let the Corp permit expire. And the last one they had said it was only valid as long as the state permit was valid.
But now the state says they can’t issue a permit for Juno.
If folks believe these bureaucrats have an agenda against commercial salvors……well, there you go.
One other thing, the Juno treasure was……
supposedly 5 miles from the ballast pile. Remember that claim?
That was before they pulled the worm shyt theory out of their asses.
FYI, there’s 8.190B OS. SFRX has issued…….
over 1B this year alone, while supposedly waiting on a permit. Plus the share price is up YTD.
The share price increased and dilution increased as well.
Dilution is rising faster than McDonald’s burgers served count.
Also, Torres got the share price to .0192, which I believe is the decade high.
Good luck Gman. Hope you find a profitable exit.
If I’m wrong about Juno, I’ll be the first to congratulate longs.
Years ago when they first got the recovery permit for Juno, they would say in the filings that without the ID of the wreck there was no way to determine the value of the wreck. That had to be AFTER they “allegedly” got the $15B valuation from the Fishers.
Congrats longs. I made a little coin flipping……
the last couple of weeks. I should have held for the FDA news.
Hope y’all make a ton.
It wasn't positive, it was just bullshit.......
Decent volume today. Almost $200 in one trade…….
And folks claim she never trades.
The Black Swan Project vs The Worm Poop......
theory is a complete joke. But I guess that's the best SFRX can do. They have never proven they even know how to find a wreck.
Odyssey went after known cargos and didn't have to make up bullshit claims such as, Mel Fisher's org gave a valuation without knowing the origins of the wreck, which is a claim they emphatically denied.
A $15B wreck would be the largest find ever, but only SFRX knows about it, right? They just can't name a ship that sank with that much treasure. Why is that?
If failed means finding over a dozen wrecks......
and having non-dilutive funding, then I'll take it.
SFRX has issued more shares on average daily for 2023 than EXPL has in its entire float.
Some call that a HUGE success.
You're a good fit with SFRX.
It would probably be more reliable than Tony........
Remember the 2023 game plan he announced?
*2022 has been a solid R&D year for Apple Rush Co., Inc. We created several of the most innovative products within the Kratom category and plan to expand that technology to additional botanical products including Hemp and Kava in the first half of 2023.
*Ross Vehmeier will continue to operate Lena and will lead our expansion to additional markets.
*Ross’ talents will allow us to do some of the products that we have talked about and committed to in the past, such as Hard Rush.
*The transaction will be paid for in cash, non-convertible debt, and preferred shares of APRU. This acquisition provides us with the cycle closing capability of our seed to sale initiative.
*Look for gummies, powders, shots, beverages, teas, hot chocolates, pre-rolls, and raw flower products in 2023.
*We have a total of just over 300 pounds of high-quality organic hemp flower that we are putting into retail packaging to begin distributing to retail stores.
*We also have nearly 700 liters of hep crude oil that we are going to use to purify and convert into other cannabinoids for our CPG lines. Pursuit Hemp Farms and Wildly Organic Ancient Horticulture give us a stable of four brands of our own products that we can use to promote and sell off each other. The niches we can create will give us a stronger Hemp business in the future.
*To better fit the Company as a whole, Apple Rush is looking to do a name and symbol change to align with all its current and future business. Our proposed name change to Botanical United Life Sciences, Inc. will put us into a new business classification, such as Biotech. We are in the process of working with our attorney do get all documents filed to make this possible. The new name will create a more ubiquitous umbrella that will better align with the multiple acquisitions and brands that we continue to add to our fast-growing company.
*I'm going to continue to keep in close contact with our stockholders. Future news announcements will provide specifics on the progress we have made and are making, and they will be followed up by, at the very least, monthly CEO videos or letters.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/355800/content
When the FBAR suspended Seafarer’s because of……..
the blatant violations at the Ring Area, critics asked, why are they waiting for the FBAR? Go somewhere else and prove the tech works. But you said, no, no, just wait on the FBAR to lift the suspension. Let the tech be proven at Melbourne, but how’d that work out?
Any idea what the sales figures will be…….
for 2023? I recall the claim that the $1.8MM (that somehow disappeared) was in line with Tweets Tony had made in early 2021.
Think APRU can get it to $100K for the year or is that too optimistic?
He still needs to get the registration straightened out in Illinois, among other things.
With the sales decline, zero progress on corporate actions, and failure to complete the Lena deal on multiple occasions, all make it appear as if Tony has hit some sort of snag.
Not sayin he has, just sayin.
Maybe he should post another video of a contract he signed without reading.
I asked for the Cert numbers or where……
Tony mentioned them in the filings. You claimed I bought shares directly from the company, and I asked you prove it.
Crickets bro.
You’re all talk, much like Tony.
$100MM projected, but $100K is more likely.
I supposedly owned shares, but you have provided ZERO proof.
#shortbuslife
#alternativereality
Yeah, let’s don’t talk sales. Gotcha bro…….
APRU really attracts quite the crowd, huh? Any……
estimates on Q3 sales?
Reckon they’ll increase to 3 figures a day?
It's comments like this that make this board.....
so much fun.
You claim the permit is imminent, yet SFRX says.....
it may never be issued. Not sure where you get your information. Based on your track record, it is obvious that you're pulling this out of your ass.
Thursday is the 2-year mark of the permit application being federally complete.
Go figure.
"Allegedly" they're waiting on a permit, but even with the recent rise in share price, dilution is accelerated.
Not many Nasdaq shares left.