Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Afraid not - mmtc has pretty much nothing but an expensive Chia Pet holder. USDA admits it. mmtc sucks
The truth is the mit 1000 has very limited capabilities. The USDA referenced testing ratios and it proves mmtc sucks big time!!!!!!!!! the mit 1000 is worse than I thought. mmtc sucks
mit 1000 has a 100% accuracy in 1 of 6 organisms. One other cannot be recognized at all and another only 10%. One E Coli had a 50% accracy rate. And one other Listeria had a 50% accuracy rate. This is a quote from their reference: With further development, the MIT 1000 appears to hold promise for use by food producers and regulatory agencies in the microbial testing of foods. Hilarious. No endorsement or approval, but an insult.
All mmtc has to do is pick out the organism they can accurately identify 100% of the time and test only it. mmtc sucks
explain that. sounds interesting. LOL
Try this chart. http://scharts.co/UnXdg9 mmtc sucks
OSIS denies mmtc involvement. USDA never tested mmtc devices..... only commented on their certification and stated therein With further development, the MIT 1000 appears to hold promise for use by food producers and regulatory agencies in the microbial testing of foods. mmtc sucks
again, cited AOAC material reference. it is their opinion of the AOAC cert. go to main page, enter mit 1000.
here is a quote from that exact reference With further development, the MIT 1000 appears to hold promise for use by food producers and regulatory agencies in the microbial testing of foods. In other words, mit 1000 ain't fit for anything but a Chia Pet holder.
btw..... there are 6 or more listeria organisms. mmtc addresses one. mmtc sucks
mmtc = scam. mmtc sucks
Call OSIS. They will tell you they are not involved with mmtc.
Go to the USDA page and search for mit 1000. The USDA never worked with mmtc or the device. The USDA only cites the AOAC relationship with mmtc. mmtc sucks
Volume has been declining for a while, but especially since mmtc showed off the grocery scanner at the exhibit.
True volume declined. True dilution continues. mmtc dilution is obvious. They are just selling fewer shares because no one wants to buy the stock. LOL mmtc sucks
daily mmtc chart.........
http://scharts.co/UnXdg9
Lower highs and lower lows are a bad sign. Ask anyone who knows about charts.
adi and obv in the mmtc charts show strong divergence. L2 and time and sales reports confirm systematic selling of mmtc shares. These shares are in the hundreds and hundreds of millions of shares when considering the length of time it has been going on and still continues. mmtc sucks
Per Larry Williams and other contemporary mathematicians the upper mmtc trend line is genuine and requires a close beyond it of 3% or more...... making the breakout price approximately .0075. Add there are no mmtc cci data points in your slope and that shows absolutely nothing to base encouraging news on. mmtc sucks
mmtc with declining volume, breaking out? Hilarious. mmtc sucks
OSIS themself has told me and others not to believe they are involved with mmtc unless they release a pr stating such. Call them and see. It will not take but a couple minutes. btw..... dear ol' dan said he did not see the device work in his original post. I bet I can get a plastic box and put stickers all over it with an OSIS board inside and claim it does anything I want if you do not see it work. mmtc sucks
cci in mmtc charts are somewhat misleading. A synchronous approach will prove a winner time after time. The mmtc chart I posted has incorporated that phenomenon. Using cci alone can prove to be a mistake.
Use my link in my profile for stockcharts info or read posts from me in the futures contract board to learn much better ways to use cci in your trading.
My mathematical research has wandered from minute charts to tick charts and back many times and I've found minute charts are probably the more reliable (overall). And the five minute variety is superior in money making in the ES and NQ.
Accepting this next came the quest of what to look at in those charts. %r has proved an exceptional tool but few others offer the advanced movements Williams affords in this study. So, I was reduced to fighting other study variables and elevations to determine a winning combination..... as I am a strong proponenet of synchronous technical events. Even my Slope Tag creation relies on that phenomenon while incorporating conic algebra as its central jest.
With my adjusting other study variables and elevations I found cci was a better leader in advanced notification than %r but not having the better of reliabilities. But there were variables capable of synchronizing the best %r had to offer. Up until this discovery, mathematical ribbons using Fibonacci numbers offerd some of the best confirming logic.
For now, set up a 5 minute chart, especially the NQ, with %r(21) and cci(34) and monitor synchronous crossovers of their cardinals. I will add techniques to enhance what you find therein in other posts.
Absolutely no proof of that. Call OSIS and ask. Report their answer. mmtc sucks
The point is/was, mmtc is approaching a mathematical crossroads where repair may be impossible. Copernicus and Einstien said for each noteable action there is a noteable reaction. If the change in mmtc volume is a noteable action a noteable reaction may be near. If a coming surge in volume is positive in price activity I would sell my mmtc position quickly. All the signs are mmtc has nothing of value. Those holding on too long will find regret. On the other hand the coming surge could be negative on price as current volume suggests. mmtc sucks
If this chart appears as I hope, everything is visible:
http://scharts.co/N6AWmx
I do not know the mmtc history timeline, afterall...... someone somewhere has more time than 6 years in the magical grocery scanner while mmtc has only that. But in that time there have been only two buy signals identified in vertical green lines and three sell signals identified in vertical red lines...... the last being in November 2011. As far as May 2012 goes, the stock was already under negative pressure and has remained there.
The orange box around volume shows when volume exponentially increased relative to prior history. It is my guess this is when mmtc became involved with Alpine, Dutchess, Nunez, Newhuis and other loan sharks and story lines elevated to sell all of the new shares being distributed.
In all this there is one good thing..... This weekly chart has put in a higher low during May 2012. However, volume has been decreasing with weaker story lines given by mmtc. From April, volume has decreased from an 8,000,000 share daily average to less than half that. At the same time a static mathematical condition as seen in recent weeks often affords a lengthy lateral price activity..... failure to bounce leads to an escalating chance of dramatic price decline. In other words...... it's showtime. mmtc sucks
Here is the time and sales report for mmtc on Friday, August 31.
08/31/12 10:38:52 0.0034 0.0034 0.0034 161274
08/31/12 10:39:08 0.0034 0.0034 0.0034 139000
08/31/12 11:57:30 0.0034 0.0034 0.0034 29000
08/31/12 12:10:51 0.0034 0.0034 0.0034 28503
08/31/12 14:40:15 0.0034 0.0034 0.0034 200000
08/31/12 15:56:02 0.003 0.003 0.003 500000
08/31/12 15:56:15 0.003 0.003 0.003 500000
Noticed how the price dropped when the larger pieces came in? Even then those transactions were not but $1500 each. Wow! But the real story to this is the bid volume is greater than in-between or even ask volume. So, remember..... when mmtc is selling new shares the genuine price activity is at the bid because everything else is skewed by in-between activity...... In other words, the reality is..... most everyone is selling.
mmtc = pathetic. mmtc sucks
Everyone have a safe and great holiday!
Alpine, Dutchess, Newhuis, Nunez, etc., are all the same. They trade cash for mmtc stock at a discount, knowing the value of the transaction is the distribution of the stock, whether by piping, shorting or outright selling it. To them some magical grocery scanner has no real meaning. They know if the grocery scanner was valuable, conventional financing or venture capital would have found it long before they did. So they buy millions and millions and millions of mmtc shares at .001 and feed some silly story to the public that the grocery scanner performs miracles in a science few know about. The greed of the unknowing line up to buy mmtc while the financier unloads his new position at a premium through an arrangement with one or two marketmakers who sell those positions between the bid and ask.... sometimes at bid. The miracle story unfolds with twists and turns.... with the mmtc share price retreating overall through months and months, even years, of promises and vague storylines that greed can support with its hope. Once the authorized shares are exhausted it is determined if a reverse split can sustain another run of further dilution and stretch the story out again with new financier deals....... maybe change the company name, or ticker symbol or sell it to another group of scammers and create another magical device.
The truth is, Nunez, Newhuis and the likes cannot make a living anywhere else like they can with selling mmtc stock. So, they steal the equity of all those shareholders who wanted to believe their lies. One has been found in fraud before, the other leases automobiles. What a mmtc management team!!!!!! They receive a salary while they rape shareholders and triple the money traded for the stock. Sign me up, baby!!!!!! (in best Dick Vital voice)
Go back and read the mmtc pr's again and paraphrase them into simple sentences...... circle dates, numbers, names and concrete facts. Highlight stuff that actually happened without reserve. I bet you cannot circle much and there ain't much to highlight. mmtc sucks
I have traded crap companies like mmtc for almost 25 years. The pr's most release are designed for people to read between the lines incorrectly. They allow for greed to fill in between the lines..... no facts at all. mmtc is a scam and at best has a marginal value device that a high school science student would be proud of. mmtc sucks
No proof of that whatsoever. mmtc sucks
Gonna devote a little time to this board:
Recently I switched from trading the S&P 500 Emini (ES) to the Nasdaq 100 Emini (NQ). Here is a 5 minute chart for Thursday and Friday where 59 points were captured in one account. If this displays well I will put up another template using a 3 minute chart.
Here a three minute template captures over 85 points for the same period. Unfortunately, I have not mastered using the two together and only realized a 64 point capture during Thursday and Friday.
Odd that Jeffery the "stock fraud" Nunez ordered silence after most everyone on this board was given inside tracks on events. Maybe that was his covert way of explaining the pathetic volume and aftermath of mmtc's last exhibit and public debut. Too funny. mmtc sucks
A tentative agreement over thirty months old????? Hilarious. mmtc sucks
Call OSIS. They will tell you. No one admits calling them because they tell you they are not involved. LOL mmtc sucks
There are. mmtc and transfer agents announce os and share distributions to insiders. mmtc releases Q and K reports proving their failure on a somewhat regular basis. OSIS states they are not involved with mmtc. AOAC admits certification will likely be February 2013. The list goes on. mmtc sucks
Nonsense. mmtc has one 12 year old patent. Certainly there were many enhancements and advanced technological finds to do what mmtc claims. There are no advanced or progressive patents. Months ago mmtc was touting OSIS was the device manufacturer and suddenly the name disappeared in subsequent pr's after OSIS stated they were not involved. That alone proves mmtc is a con. mmtc sucks
Kinda odd mmtc is said to be telling associate builders to be quiet and themself not be involved in International exhibits when you are on the cusp of greatness, huh? mmtc must have told software developers, packaging designers, marketers, distributors, universities, peer reviews and all endorsements to be quiet too, huh? mmtc sucks
mmtc not present in AOAC International Exhibition at Vegas. mmtc sucks http://www.aoac.org/meetings1/126th_annual_mtg/exhibit.htm
The Genedisc system tests for all these and more:
STEC: Shiga Toxic Escherichia coli
Pathogenic E. coli O157
Top 6 non-O157 STEC
Salmonella
Listeria
The Pall device is exponentially superior to mmtc Chia Pet display box and grocery scanner. Pall also sub identifies many of these organisms. mmtc sucks
LOL That is funny. mmtc is struggling for recognition to create a product and they are telling others to be quiet??????? mmtc sucks
maybe there is something to the mit 1000 and space farming. mmtc sucks
I hear the mit 1000 makes a great Chia Pet holder. mmtc sucks
but OSIS will not admit it. Funny. mmtc sucks
Yeah. But they are real and work where mmtc does not. Your premise should prove superior, right? mmtc will outperform PLL because mmtc is cheaper. But mmtc takes 10 to 12 hours for results. Let's see. mmtc sucks
Any mmtc filing will be generating a loss. Any additional statements are forward looking where mmtc is not responsible in the outcome (how convenient). It will all be vague as possible and reliant on misinterpretation. mmtc sucks
Let's have some fun. Let's compare mmtc's newest competitor, Pall Corporation, stock for stock - PLL versus mmtc.
Here is the PLL web page. http://www.pall.com/main/Food-and-Beverage/food-compliance-genedisc.page They recently got AOAC certified.
People around here say mmtc will get certified and save the world to boot. WOW!!!!! So, this would be a relatively fair comparison being that both technologies do the same thing and are entering the marketplace at the same time.
I will put up charts later on. mmtc sucks
I believe you need to study how the mmtc grocery scanner is said to work. Gather cultures. Prepare cultures. Wait 10 to 12 hours. Test. mmtc sucks
mit 1000 would not make a good lunch box, much less something important. low mmtc volume and declining share prices say it all. mmtc sucks