Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Cubic foot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The cubic foot (symbol ft3)[1] is an imperial and US customary (non-metric) unit of volume, used in the United States, and partially in Canada, and the United Kingdom. It is defined as the volume of a cube with sides of one foot (0.3048 m) in length. Its volume is 28.3168 liters or about ?1/35 of a cubic meter.
At 60 °F (16 °C), a cubic foot of water weighs 62.36630 pounds (28.28888 kg).
Square feet and Cubic feet are units of measurement for very different concepts. Square feet are units of area and cubic feet are units of volume. 16 + 4 16 = 80 square feet on liner. The volume of the pool is 4 4 4 = 64 cubic feet so I need 64 cubic feet of water.
The formula for Square feet is:
length × width
The formula for Cubic feet is:
length × width × height
ok, understood.. It would be good to see an actual break down of the POD, and maybe even Robles possibly just to get an idea. Im thinking Robles numbers could be staggering. lol.. LOTS of height to go in those buildings.
$LVVV
I have yet to see anyone else here break down anything on growing / earning potential with space other than McDaib.. If anyone else has anything to share, please do with break downs, etc.. so we all can get an idea of potential? I have posted this a few times already.. but this is all i have seen so far..
* McDaib Broke this down for us *
Here's a breakdown of square footage production estimates for clones. Been doing this for 15+ years in Oregon and have a fairly good handle on realistic projections:
1) Avg clone needs at least 4" X 4" to grow horizontally, 12" vertically and be ready for sale in 3-4 weeks (each cutting needs to take root and show signs of vigor which can take 3-4 weeks).
2) Grow platforms can reasonably have a height of 12' and be manageable (with moveable ladders). Each horizontal level of the grow will need about 12 inches in height to allow for lighting, container and plant. That means a pod with 12' ceilings can grow 108 clones per sq ft of floor space on 12 verticle levels. I think the current pods used by LVVV are 8' but that can be altered so I'm going to stick with the 12' verticle height. (Height, and therefore production can be adjusted to whatever it is).
3) With 12' ceilings there would be 12 levels of clones, lights, containers, etc. Each sq ft of floor space would produce 108 clones.
4) With a 4 week rotation that means 108 clones per sq ft X 5,000 sq ft = 540K clones per month. 540,000 X 12 (months) = 6,480,000 clones produced yearly.
5) If Colorado, Washington and Oregon are any indication then LVVV can expect to receive between $10.00 and $35.00 per clone on a wholesale basis. Clone value depends on strain (THC and CBD percentages, length of time to harvest, quality of end product, reliabilty of strain genetics, buzz surrounding strain, etc, etc.).
6) If we assume a conservative average wholesale price per clone of $10.00 then a 5000 sq ft area that is 12' high should return a gross revenue yearly to LVVV of $648 million. The 7X Pure platform of LVVV could raise this average to much more. Especially with the just approved distribution license and LVVV's ability to gain the confidence of the industry who know what they may be able to get per clone.
$LVVV
LOL.. Nice “Crop” Job
Huh? LOL... Lots of big things happening here.. Great time to get in and ride the wave. It’s coming imo.
$LVVV
What do you have invested here? You claim to have been in since 14, but yet in red.. When you could have EASILY sold MANY TIMES up in the .10 range back with the CHEWS even, and even last year MULTIPLE TIMES at 5, 6 and 8 cents.. If anything, anyone here that long should have made a TON OF MONEY off this stock by now.
It pays to do DD and actually follow what the company is doing, who they have surrounded themselves with, their actual Business Plan, and how they are progressing.. Which they are in process now of making some of the biggest strides yet imo!
$LVVV
LOL.. You could look at it that way as well, but i dont see him just laying around smoking ganja every day either. He really is busting his ass out there trying to take this big. You see the video of him at that last meeting? Look at him on that video, and then look at him from the one he did in 18.. His hair is turning GREY! LOL!! The guy really is a work horse trying to take this big time imo.
I wouldnt be surprised if he gets this built up going strong with REVS and then gets bought out by bigger company.
$LVVV
Yes, its great to see that. Only makes sense.. Now they have skin in the game to make this company succeed.. Why take a mil or two when you can get 10 times that?? LOL! Simple to see. Pretty obvious they are setting this up to do BIG things...
$LVVV
LiveWire is one of the few emerging, handful of leading-edge and well-managed companies with a solid business model and led by an experienced and credible management and development team.
The Company is conducting credible research, has secured the first production license, will develop high-quality products, is establishing a 7X Verification and Dosing System and expected to generate significant value moving forward. LiveWire’s model is driven by the increasing market demand for legal, high-quality products and reliable services that will allow the Company to remain viable long term. LiveWire believes that it can execute on its business plan in a timely manner and will be able to generate significant ROI for its investors, subject to the timely availability of the required working capital. While current efforts are focused on the legal sector of the cannabis market, the expected regulatory relaxation of the rules and regulations by the Federal Government and a removal of CBD from the Schedule 1 should accelerate the sector growth even further. The currently existing uncertainty combined with rapidly accelerating growth is creating an early investment opportunity, similar to the early investment opportunities generated by the now top of the charts pioneer internet companies.
$LVVV
Can you put something together? I was just using McDaibs calcuations for it all. He said he's been doing this for 15 years, so i figured he knew what he was talking about. : )
$LVVV
Sorry, I’m confused lol...where does it say 25k clones produced? I stated 25k square foot building in Robles...that was a repost of McDaibs break down per square foot that we can see... just putting things in perspective to the potential here... for all intensive purposes, once Robles is running, distribution, etc...those numbers are PEANUTS to what they really will see..
LVVV Will be seeing a BIL CAP IMO
$LVVV
LVVV Potential Put Into Perspective.. Seriously, TOP MJ PLAYER IN THE MAKING HERE. Focusing on CLONES ONLY.. Quick Turn Times, BIG MONEY.
5000 sq ft of grow = $millions annually.. and WE HAVE A 25k Square Foot Facility! Soon as they have this set up, contracts in place...This does NOT even count what we already have started Rocking in COACHELLA!
* McDaib Broke this down for us *
Here's a breakdown of square footage production estimates for clones. Been doing this for 15+ years in Oregon and have a fairly good handle on realistic projections:
1) Avg clone needs at least 4" X 4" to grow horizontally, 12" vertically and be ready for sale in 3-4 weeks (each cutting needs to take root and show signs of vigor which can take 3-4 weeks).
2) Grow platforms can reasonably have a height of 12' and be manageable (with moveable ladders). Each horizontal level of the grow will need about 12 inches in height to allow for lighting, container and plant. That means a pod with 12' ceilings can grow 108 clones per sq ft of floor space on 12 verticle levels. I think the current pods used by LVVV are 8' but that can be altered so I'm going to stick with the 12' verticle height. (Height, and therefore production can be adjusted to whatever it is).
3) With 12' ceilings there would be 12 levels of clones, lights, containers, etc. Each sq ft of floor space would produce 108 clones.
4) With a 4 week rotation that means 108 clones per sq ft X 5,000 sq ft = 540K clones per month. 540,000 X 12 (months) = 6,480,000 clones produced yearly.
5) If Colorado, Washington and Oregon are any indication then LVVV can expect to receive between $10.00 and $35.00 per clone on a wholesale basis. Clone value depends on strain (THC and CBD percentages, length of time to harvest, quality of end product, reliabilty of strain genetics, buzz surrounding strain, etc, etc.).
6) If we assume a conservative average wholesale price per clone of $10.00 then a 5000 sq ft area that is 12' high should return a gross revenue yearly to LVVV of $648 million. The 7X Pure platform of LVVV could raise this average to much more. Especially with the just approved distribution license and LVVV's ability to gain the confidence of the industry who know what they may be able to get per clone.
How many square feet does LVVV need under cultivation and with the 7X Pure seal of approval to make every long on this board considerably better off?
NO BRAINER!!!
$LVVV
AIMHO, of course
If anyone is interested in investing with a Start Up, LEGIT, FULLY COMPLIANT AND LEGAL MJ Company in CA, With a SOLID CEO that CARES, SOLID TEAM, TOP KNOTCH PLAYERS In the Industry.. We will NOT be seeing these 3s for much longer. This is the TIME TO LOAD LVVV!
WAY Cheap Here, we will be seeing NEW HIGHS here soon imo.
$LVVV
We have Coachella up and running now.. $$$$.. Robles is next, imagine the REVS coming out of this building??
LOL! Its that time of the year again! : )
$LVVV
There is no way for this sinking Titanic ship called ONCI to surive. It is sinking to the bottom of the ocean.....BIG TIME.....SELL SELL SELL
EXACTLY, this can be good news. Black Market is running rampant.. It always will im sure regardless. but it appears no loopholes any longer.. this will help curb that down a lot.
$LVVV
LVVV Research & Development - Tissue Cultivation
Research Partnerships
LiveWire is in the process of entering into partnerships with an experienced team of innovators, developers and institutions with the goal to develop and commercialize cannabinoid-based products for distribution and licensing to LiveWire clients, as soon as this is legally feasible.
The Company will soon begin with research studies to explore the application of cannabinoid-based products to target specific ailments or
conditions with a large “sufferer” population Growing Sophistication - Tissue Culture Cultivation
The industry and its customers have grown more sophisticated during the last two years. Companies have been struggling to provide top quality products that are based on credible research and can pass tests by a credible verification systems. Based on this experience, LiveWire
will explore and develop new advances in cloning techniques such as tissue culture cultivation. Since tissue cultures are not considered
cannabis plants, it will allow LiveWire to ship tissue cultures across state lines. This will create another competitive advantage for the Company and enable its customers to produce high-quality and organically clean cannabis on a consistent basis.
$LVVV FTW!!
Good News for LVVV and other MJ Licensed businesses.
COLLECTIVE AND COOPERATIVE DEFENSE TO SUNSET ON JAN. 9
January 7, 2019
By Omar Figueroa and Lauren Mendelsohn
You’ve probably heard that California’s medical cannabis collective and cooperative defense will end soon, on January 9, 2019. But what does that actually mean?
First, some history. In 1996, the voters of California passed a seminal initiative, Proposition 215, also known as the Compassionate Use Act. Proposition 215 gave medical cannabis patients and their designated primary caregivers limited immunity from prosecution for the possession and cultivation of cannabis. Back in those days, cultivation of a single cannabis plant, or the possession with the intent to sell any usable amount (even a smidgen), was a felony under California law, punishable by a sentence in the state prison.
In 2004, the California Legislature enacted the Medical Marijuana Program Act, also known as Senate Bill 420, which set up a system for state-issued medical identification cards which remains with us to this day. Senate Bill 420 also expanded protections for patients and designated primary caregivers “who associate within the State of California in order collectively or cooperatively to cultivate marijuana for medical purposes.” Here is the key provision in Senate Bill 420 which gave birth to collectives and cooperatives:
Health & Safety Code § 11362.775. Qualified patients, persons with valid identification cards, and the designated primary caregivers of qualified patients and persons with identification cards, who associate within the State of California in order collectively or cooperatively to cultivate cannabis for medicinal purposes, shall not solely on the basis of that fact be subject to state criminal sanctions under Section 11357, 11358, 11359, 11360, 11366, 11366.5, or 11570.
Because § 11362.775 is a creature of the Legislature (as opposed to a voter initiative), it can be rewritten by the Legislature without violating the principle enunciated by the California Supreme Court in People v. Kelly (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1008, that only the voters, not the Legislature, have the power under the California Constitution to amend Proposition 215. In other words, any amendment to § 11362.775 would amend Senate Bill 420, not Proposition 215.
There were two “loopholes” to Health and Safety Code Section 11362.775. (For ease of reference, the term collective is used hereafter, and denotes both collectives and cooperatives.) First, there was no limitation on how many patients or caregivers could join a collective, which eventually led to numerous collectives with thousands of members. Second, there was no limitation on how many collectives a patient or caregiver could join, which led to the same result. Over the years, this morphed into the “collective / co-op model” where practically anyone with a medical cannabis recommendation could sign up to be a member of a medical cannabis collective and would then provide medical cannabis in exchange for “reimbursement” for expenses, ostensibly on a not-for-profit basis.
Under this model, with no regulation whatsoever from state authorities, and minimal, if any, regulation at the local level, the medical cannabis industry in California grew, multiplied, and thrived. Before the current era of regulated “commercial cannabis activity” which officially commenced on January 1, 2018, the cannabis industry in California was a vibrant example of laissez faire capitalism.
Health and Safety Code § 11362.775 was subsequently amended in 2015 when the Legislature passed the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act, with the unfortunate acronym MMRSA, which sounds like the deadly superbug Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MMRSA introduced a convoluted regulatory framework for medical cannabis which did not allow cultivators direct access to consumers; all transactions were to be mediated by licensed distributors. In order to force medical cannabis operators into the regulated system, an expiration date was put on collectives and cooperatives (with a floating date of one year after the state started issuing state medical cannabis licenses), and thus a sunset clause was grafted onto § 11362.775.
According to the Los Angeles Times, retired alcohol distribution executive Ted Simpkins “happened to own a distribution company that was lobbying heavily in Sacramento to craft the law the way he wanted.” Indeed, Politico Magazine reported in August 2016 in an article with the attention-grabbing headline How Big Alcohol is About to Get Rich Off California Weed, that, “During the 2015-16 state legislative session, Simpkins’ company [River Distribution], paid out $134,500 for lobbying of medical marijuana distribution.”
MMRSA was quickly rebranded MCRSA, the Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act. After Proposition 64, known as the Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) passed resoundingly in late 2016 and established a similar, but different regulatory framework, regulators realized that they did not want to come up with two confusing sets of convoluted regulations, one for medical cannabis and one for adult-use cannabis. The Legislature ended up repealing the medical framework, and combining the two different regulatory frameworks into one unitary regulatory framework branded the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) which is currently in effect. Despite all of these changes, the sunset clause on collectives and cooperatives remained.
Health and Safety Code § 11362.775 currently reads, with emphasis added:
(a) Subject to subdivision (d), qualified patients, persons with valid identification cards, and the designated primary caregivers of qualified patients and persons with identification cards, who associate within the State of California in order collectively or cooperatively to cultivate cannabis for medicinal purposes, shall not solely on the basis of that fact be subject to state criminal sanctions under Section 11357, 11358, 11359, 11360, 11366, 11366.5, or 11570.
(b) A collective or cooperative that operates pursuant to this section and manufactures medicinal cannabis products shall not, solely on the basis of that fact, be subject to state criminal sanctions under Section 11379.6 if the collective or cooperative abides by all of the following requirements: […]
(c) For purposes of this section, “manufacturing” means compounding, converting, producing, deriving, processing, or preparing, either directly or indirectly by chemical extraction or independently by means of chemical synthesis, medicinal cannabis products.
(d) This section shall remain in effect only until one year after the Bureau of Cannabis Control posts a notice on its Internet Web site that the licensing authorities have commenced issuing licenses pursuant to the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (Division 10 (commencing with Section 26000) of the Business and Professions Code).
(e) This section is repealed one year after the date upon which the notice is posted pursuant to subdivision (d).
(Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 27, Sec. 140. (SB 94) Effective June 27, 2017. Repealed as of January 9, 2019, pursuant to its own provisions.)
The Bureau of Cannabis Control (BCC), the lead agency in charge of commercial cannabis licensing, issued a fact sheet about collectives and cooperatives in January of 2018 which included the following (with emphasis added):
MAUCRSA amended Health and Safety Code section 11362.775, the provision in SB 420 affording legal protection to cannabis collectives and cooperatives. This protection will end one year after the Bureau of Cannabis Control (Bureau) posts notice on its website that the state commercial cannabis licensing authorities have commenced issuing licenses. Once the one-year period tolls, all cannabis collectives and cooperatives that continue to engage in commercial business will need to be licensed, except for: (a) individual patients; and (b) caregiver gardens serving no more than five patients.
The Bureau posted the notice on its website on January 9, 2018. Thus, the protection against criminal sanctions for cannabis collectives and cooperatives ends January 9, 2019. At that time, cannabis collectives and cooperatives that seek to continue their operations will need to obtain a state license and comply with any local requirements.
January 9, 2019 is almost upon us, and soon, there will no longer be any medical collective or cooperative “defense” (technically a limited immunity from prosecution) to assert in criminal court in response to alleged violations of Health & Safety Code Sections 11357, 11358, 11359, 11360, 11366, 11366.5, or 11570. (Given enforcement trends, there are not many occasions to assert the defense in the criminal courts. After the passage of Proposition 64, there has been a drastic decrease in the number of felony marijuana arrests in California, from 13,300 felony arrests per year in 2014, to 2,086 in 2017, according to an analysis of the California Attorney General’s annual crime report for 2017 by California NORML.)
In theory, this leaves unlicensed cannabis businesses at risk of being raided and shut down by law enforcement, who could file criminal charges, including felony charges such as 11366.5 (Maintaining a Place) or conspiracy. Surprisingly, conspiracy to commit a misdemeanor can be prosecuted as a felony according to the California Court of Appeal decision in People v. Tatman (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 1, a fascinating opinion stemming from an abalone poaching case in Mendocino County. (According to Tatman, this is justified on the theory that collaborative criminal activities pose a greater potential threat to the public than individual acts. “The division of labor inherent in group association is seen to encourage the selection of more elaborate and ambitious goals and to increase the likelihood that the scheme will be successful.”)
Moreover, in addition to criminal charges, civil penalties could also be imposed. Section 26038 of the Business and Professions Code, which was originally in the Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) / Proposition 64 and was amended by MAUCRSA, states (with emphasis added):
(a) A person engaging in commercial cannabis activity without a license required by this division shall be subject to civil penalties of up to three times the amount of the license fee for each violation, and the court may order the destruction of cannabis associated with that violation in accordance with Section 11479 of the Health and Safety Code. Each day of operation shall constitute a separate violation of this section. All civil penalties imposed and collected pursuant to this section by a licensing authority shall be deposited into the General Fund except as provided in subdivision (b). A violator shall be responsible for the cost of the destruction of cannabis associated with his or her violation.
(b) If an action for civil penalties is brought against a person pursuant to this division by the Attorney General on behalf of the people, the penalty collected shall be deposited into the General Fund. If the action is brought by a district attorney or county counsel, the penalty shall first be used to reimburse the district attorney or county counsel for the costs of bringing the action for civil penalties, with the remainder, if any, to be deposited into the General Fund. If the action is brought by a city attorney or city prosecutor, the penalty collected shall first be used to reimburse the city attorney or city prosecutor for the costs of bringing the action for civil penalties, with the remainder, if any, to be deposited into the General Fund.
(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), criminal penalties shall continue to apply to an unlicensed person engaging in commercial cannabis activity in violation of this division.
Under MAUCRSA, being sanctioned by a cannabis licensing agency and receiving a criminal conviction could both result in not being able to obtain a cannabis license in the future. Business and Professions Code Section 26057 states, in relevant part (with emphasis added):
(b) The licensing authority may deny the application for licensure or renewal of a state license if any of the following conditions apply:
…
(2) Conduct that constitutes grounds for denial of licensure under Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 480) of Division 1.5, except as otherwise specified in this section and Section 26059.
…
(4) The applicant, owner, or licensee has been convicted of an offense that is substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of the business or profession for which the application is made, except that if the licensing authority determines that the applicant, owner, or licensee is otherwise suitable to be issued a license, and granting the license would not compromise public safety, the licensing authority shall conduct a thorough review of the nature of the crime, conviction, circumstances, and evidence of rehabilitation of the applicant or owner, and shall evaluate the suitability of the applicant, owner, or licensee to be issued a license based on the evidence found through the review. In determining which offenses are substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of the business or profession for which the application is made, the licensing authority shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(A) A violent felony conviction, as specified in subdivision (c) of Section 667.5 of the Penal Code.
(B) A serious felony conviction, as specified in subdivision (c) of Section 1192.7 of the Penal Code.
(C) A felony conviction involving fraud, deceit, or embezzlement.
(D) A felony conviction for hiring, employing, or using a minor in transporting, carrying, selling, giving away, preparing for sale, or peddling, any controlled substance to a minor; or selling, offering to sell, furnishing, offering to furnish, administering, or giving any controlled substance to a minor.
(E) A felony conviction for drug trafficking with enhancements pursuant to Section 11370.4 or 11379.8 of the Health and Safety Code.
…
(7) The applicant, or any of its officers, directors, or owners, has been sanctioned by a licensing authority or a city, county, or city and county for unauthorized commercial cannabis activities, has had a license suspended or revoked under this division in the three years immediately preceding the date the application is filed with the licensing authority.
…
(Amended by Stats. 2018, Ch. 92, Sec. 23. (SB 1289) Effective January 1, 2019. Note: This section was added on Nov. 8, 2016, by initiative Prop. 64.)
While moving towards a state-licensed commercial market is a positive achievement overall considering the drastic decrease in life-altering felony arrests and prosecutions, the unfortunate reality for many longtime California cannabis operators is that permits are not available in most parts of the state. Even in those cities or counties where local permits are available, suitable locations are limited, and competition is fierce.
Inevitably, many legacy businesses who were able to thrive in an unregulated market with minimal barriers to entry won’t be able to make it through the licensing process simply due to location, economic constraints, and lack of access to capital. Yet, those who want to do things legally and who don’t want to hurt their chances of obtaining a license in the future, including cannabis businesses that previously operated as collectives and cooperatives, must obtain the requisite local permits and necessary state licenses.
Does this mean that a crackdown on unlicensed operators could be on its way? Probably not, at least not according to Alex Traverso, spokesperson for the Bureau of Cannabis Control, who stated to Marijuana Business Daily that his agency “will continue to use a carrot-over stick approach and try to coax illegally operating collectives/co-ops into getting state licenses, instead of coming down hard on those without permits.” (Local jurisdictions also have enforcement authority and could in theory choose a far more aggressive enforcement posture than that reportedly telegraphed by the Bureau of Cannabis Control.)
How will the world end for most collectives and cooperatives? Not with a bang but a whimper. This was foreseen by immortal activist Mickey Martin, who predicted back in 2015 when the sunset clause was first unveiled that “the cannabis industry as you know it” would die a slow death.
As the midnight hour approaches, and medical cannabis collectives and cooperatives are about to turn from golden carriages into pumpkin coaches, it is worth recalling the many exhilarating, perilous, and unpredictable journeys travelled all across the Golden State by patients and caregivers aboard these soon-to-be-legendary transports.
This information is provided as a public service and is not intended as legal advice. For specific questions regarding cannabis licensing and regulatory compliance in California, please contact the Law Offices of Omar Figueroa at (707) 829-0215 or info@omarfigueroa.com to schedule a confidential legal consultation.
They have a Non for Profit location leased with a few Green Houses on that they have leased and been growing for Medical Research.. Not sure this is from where? But it is very possible. They have A LOT STOCK there im sure.. and now that they are LEGAL, they can pull from here easy.
$LVVV
I’m sure they will have,if not already getting TONS of order requests.. don’t think they would grow specific strain types just for fun, so naturally we could assume something is in the works...MJ is easy to sell, especially with the high quality strain types they have. Add 7X Pure to that? BAM!
Personally, I think they are gonna CRUSH it with tons of little sales to all the smaller growers in the area..and then we could see PRs on bigger deals with larger grow companies out there is what I’m thinking.
Bottom line is REVS are in motion and it’s gonna be a BANGIN year for LVVV imo...
LVVV THE PREMIER CLONE SUPPLIER FOR CA.
Load up on shares and enjoy the ride!
$LVVV
We can see things are really starting to move now.. Great update on some NICE CLONES, solid stalks, and white roots.. Those are some pretty plants! I bet we get some solid News here this week or next at the latest. Up List im hoping, but it can be anything at this point. Im sure we are in for a Fun Ride! LOAD UP THEM CHEAPIES, anyone selling into this is crazy imo.. Next Few Months are going to be a Huge imo! and maybe even longer! As the mojo picks up here, who knows how high we can go!!
$LVVV FTW
Im sure hoping we get it this week!! He said we were "All In" 12/31.. Attorney sending everything in for final review.
$LVVV
When selling between licensed manufactures, you need to show both the license and sellers permit.. We have them both. : ) Remember, we are NOT selling recreational, we are selling to other growers. Maybe thats the difference.. ? As for Coachella, we are ready to ROCK IT OUT
$LVVV
They have everything needed now to take off, sales, growing, distribution, revenues can be accepted from MJ.. Basically, they are FULLY COMPLIANT to operate their MJ Business in the state of CA now.
90% of the Cannabis Business is all about Compliance:
California State Distribution License-CHECK
California Cannabis Tax Permit-CHECK
City of Coachella Business License-CHECK
California Sellers Permit-CHECK
LiveWire has it all-CHECK
$LVVV
AND, with what they have? This should be like taking candy from a baby. lol
SOME OF LIVEWIRE STRAINS. Blueberry Kush , Girl Scout Cookies, Purple Diesel and a mix of Gorilla Glue #4 and White Widow Heavy hitting
high yield.
Introducing Charlotte the Gorilla-Widow. She’s a cross of Gorilla Glue #4 and White Widow. Heavy hitting high yield. Have a great weekend! pic.twitter.com/EDhtotRqKY
— LiveWire Ergogenics (@livewireLVVV) March 23, 2018
Strain mystery solved! Thanks to those meddling kids. “Violet”- Blueberry Kush. “Jane”- Girl Scout Cookies. “Belinda”- Purple Diesel. pic.twitter.com/QVoRnfFVTA
— LiveWire Ergogenics (@livewireLVVV) March 21, 2018
Super-Baby Gina is looking fabulous this morning. She’s happy, healthy and proud of her Pine Tar heritage. The genetics vault is growing... pic.twitter.com/WLzyzk22Si
— LiveWire Ergogenics (@livewireLVVV) April 11, 2018
Introducing Charlotte the Gorilla-Widow. She’s a cross of Gorilla Glue #4 and White Widow. Heavy hitting high yield. Have a great weekend! pic.twitter.com/EDhtotRqKY
— LiveWire Ergogenics (@livewireLVVV) March 23, 2018
I added a video to a @YouTube playlist https://t.co/Gd7mVQKjQh It Starts with the Clone
— LiveWire Ergogenics (@livewireLVVV) July 26, 2017
Im sure there are a lot of investors (like yourself) that have a good bit of experience with MJ, and knowledge.. So i think it would make sense to post it on twitter like that, and also elsewhere.. Who better to help sell the company than one of their own shareholders? no? Seems to make sense to me anyways. lol
$LVVV
Well, one thing is for sure, it isnt gonna be hard to sell MJ, especially their 7x Pure Clones! 160 strains in their genetics vault.. with some high end, high quality strains. Those clones looked SWEET.
Someone should reach out just to see what they are looking for specifically.. Job Description per say.. I sent an email earlier asking to get an idea..
$LVVV
driving around with ur clone sample kit. Think I’m gonna apply LOL. SALES TEAM = $$$ ..we are on our way!
There u go GCM!
We’re adding to the GHC sales team now that both Distribution and Nursery are State licensed out of Coachella. If you know someone qualified, aggressive, and ready to dominate California, send a private message. Strategic partnership inquiries are welcome too. Let’s GROW this!
$LVVV
This is NOT the time to Fiddle around, GET YOUR PIECE OF THE MJ PIE! No better entry point than now, CHEAP! CHEAP! Buy and Hold for the Ride to come. Lots of big things in the making here and IMMINENT!
$LVVV
The New Congress Just Started And There’s Already A Bipartisan Marijuana Bill Published 23 hours ago on January 3,
2019 By Kyle Jaeger
The 116th Congress went into session just hours ago and a bipartisan marijuana reform bill has already been introduced in the House.
Reps. Steve Cohen (D-TN) and Don Young (R-AK) re-introduced the Compassionate Access, Research Expansion and Respect States (CARERS) Act on Thursday as one of their first acts in the new session. The legislation would let states establish their own medical cannabis programs free of federal intervention and also allow physicians at the Department of Veterans Affairs to issue medical cannabis recommendations for veterans.
“The national consensus on medical marijuana is solid and bipartisan, but our federal drug laws continue to treat patients and their doctors like criminals,” Cohen said in a press release. “Our bill would bring federal medical marijuana policy in line with the views of the overwhelming majority of Americans by allowing states to set their own marijuana laws, allowing patients, including veterans, to receive the treatments they need from their doctors and improving opportunities for research on marijuana.”
Young said that the bill represents “the kind of bipartisan effort that doesn’t happen every day but should serve as an example of how we can solve the problems that our constituents have sent us here to do.”
“I’m hopeful that this is going to be a productive Congress regarding the debate over national cannabis policy.”
The CARERS Act was first introduced in 2015 and again in 2017—by Cohen in the House and Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) in the Senate. During the 114th Congress, Cohen’s bill received 43 cosponsors, and during the last session, it had 30 cosponsors. The Senate bill also saw a lower number of cosponsors last Congress than in the prior one, perhaps a reflection that its backers have in the intervening years focused more on building support for now-achievable broader marijuana reform instead of the narrowly tailored medical cannabis fix.
Asked for a copy of the new bill’s text, Cohen communication director Bartholomew Sullivan referred Marijuana Moment to the prior version. The spokesperson did not immediately respond to a follow up question about whether the pieces of legislation are identical or if this new version differs, as was the case for past versions; the 114th Congress’s bill included provisions touching on rescheduling and banking access for cannabis businesses, but those were removed last time.
Booker is also quoted in Cohen’s press release, saying that existing “federal marijuana laws are broken—they don’t make us safer, they waste taxpayer dollars, and they lack both common sense and compassion.”
The senator’s communications director told Marijuana Moment that the new version of the CARERS Act hasn’t yet been filed in the Senate but that it will be introduced “soon.”
This story was updated to note that Booker has not yet filed the medical marijuana bill in the Senate.
Medical Marijuana Protected Under Democrats’ Spending Bill, But DC Blocked From Legalizing
Now is NOT the time to sell LOL! Not as this company is on the way of making some of its biggest strides forward yet. UP Listing is any day now, IMO, i am thinking next week we see this.. We may be seeing weekly updates now on progress... THE MOVE IS ON for LVVV. Get what you can and hold for the ride! : )
$LVVV
The Company will soon be launching a dedicated website for sales and additional social media platforms to promote its Coachella products.
WE will be getting some additional exposure here for sure, and REVENUES! Thinking were going to be seeing some of these products go up for sale?
AND, if all these get the 7X Pure Tag on them, EVEN BETTER!!
BAM! $LVVV
LOL..funny...Doc called it, so obvious
Exactly, we can distribute our nursery products throughout the state of CA now. This is HUGE! All sorts of doors about to open, once revs start rolling in, we’re also gonna see things move a lot faster NOW IMO.. an LVVV STORM IS A BREWIN!
$LVVV
True, everyone has a different strategy. Long as you have some skin in the game you can only stand to benefit should the upward trend continue. Personally i think things are just starting to heat up now, If Bill plays this out like the first half of 18, we will be seeing new highs here shortly!
$LVVV
LOL..A desperate attempt for Cheap shares.. These 3s will not be here for much longer.
$LVVV