Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
somewhat bullish candle on support eom
mac..........
using scan results from stockcharts........ engulfing, parabolic, hammers...... then flipping to 60 min. chart if not too far along in the daily
e
looks nice eom
you'd think that, maybe more eom
yep.......
I think that channel should break upward somewhere. Need babysit it, I guess.
e
low, TXCC 60 min aroon........
low, SFE 60 min aroon (better)........
low, JDSU 60 min. aroon.........
a little more timely than previous
low, CPWR 60 minute aroon........
and at the golf course eom
one note here.........
Then I'll shut up.
I say my "candle template" picked ATML. If I'm not mistaken, I have only introduced one of six setups using the template and the one I demo'd here was the hammer/hammer-like setup. The ATML candle was an "inside candle" on the Thursday close.
Like I said, I create and discover technical stuff very often. I have a knack, I reckon. I have a kazillion things I could share. Should you not get too sick of me or die first, you might see most of 'em (eventually).
easy
low........
Now that it has shaken out some, 3.3x appears the more likely. Had I actually been shopping, I would have bought the candle template on Friday, or the 60 min. aroon template first thing today. Of course, I have the luxury of not being attached or not seeking attachment. But I did mention ATML before today, as did you.
Being able to locate 60 minute aroon setups would make a world of difference.
If I believe strong enough in my setup, I'll dive in without much contemplation of a prime execution point for entry. But that's me. Luckily, fingers grow back, don't they? Seeing that synchronous events promote the greatest of trends, it affords wrecklessness to some degree.
Good luck
easy
75.........
ain't tradin' 'em, but signals have been good
easy <---itchin' to get in
they can be dangerous eom
okay, it's back and........
i'm feeling better about what i said. it's spooky when you lose yer periscope like that.
e
ya might get lucky boy.......
what made you believe you could hold any contract over the weekend?
e
bad advice.........
My StockCharts ATML and others are not updating. My bad. Last real-time chart was 10:34 - stuck there.
Sorry.
e
low, mac.......
The setup is on, but one near term negative is visible in the 60 minute: The current period is over 50% outside bb. This often results in a stall, consolidation, or reverse. I don't believe it will reverse. So, I'd determine a price around 3.23 or higher I thought I could get and go for it.
3.23 is the top of the previous wave.
easy
mac....... this one?.........
Sure, if you were askin' 'bout the mini's.
It's a different world. A lonely world. A lucrative world. But someone's gotta do it. Watch the Stac Pack board. Most posters trade E-Mini's there. A few ideas surface on ocassion.
I also have a page that studies those markets. Unfortunately, it was hacked in August. They made a mess of it. Only parts of three pages are up right now. I will eventually get it running again. The url is under my local profile.
I missed the question. Sorry.
easy
What if............
Not that we don't have enough to look at each day........ But this is something I keep coming back to. Consider the direction each time the ema crosses midline. Too simple? Contemplate the ema displaced 4 positions and the bb volatility increased............. That'll get a bald spot goin'.
geepers.... spot gold 439.20 eom
mac.........
In looking at your list..........
Most gold miners I like right now - GBN, ALMI, etc. GBN is underway in my candle template as is ALMI.
URIX is another miner on your list with potential, although an otcbb. Those issues have a way of distributing new shares when you prefer otherwise. There are technical means in determining if this is occurring. I'll share that somewhere down the road. URIX fits my candle template.
I like SCLN, and DSCM. These have technical geography I often look for - some that has been shared here. DSCM appears to be at an end of a bull flag. SCLN fits my candle template.
easy
ya reckon we otta go..........
post bail fer cappy? (lol)
easy
kgood.......
spank 'em
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4561313
no..........
I posted it at 19:12. The quote was 19:11. Spot prices have lengthy operations.
The link is http://trending123.com/gold/ or http://www.kitco.com/
Futures markets don't open until later
easy
spot ny gold 438.50 eom
ah-hah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! eom
speaking of gaps...........
Each time GTIV has a meaningful gap, up or down (marked in blue), adi suggests players are going the opposite direction as it gaps. Got balls?
playa........
My last E-Mini data provider was DTN. I had no problems with them. I had trouble using the software I had. Subsequent pulling of hair solved the problems I had with that.
Reading the instructions fully and slowly is not my strong suit.
easy
playa.......
At TradeStation? The in-house supplier - fscn.
It was not so much the data, as told to me, but rather the server which was being used. They determined that the four of us were often connected to different servers at any one time. Most servers experienced a varying degree of lag from multiple data servers feeding each of the TradeStation servers. I disagree, but who am I?
Once we recognized varying data, our trading all but stopped. I, and perhaps one other would experience a signal using identical templates, while two or three of us would not. We were communicating by voice real-time. Plus, we compared charts at the end of each day. Sure enough, there were several erroneous signals realized depending on which server you were connected to. It sucked bad. They offered no solution after admitting there was an obvious problem.
Fortunately, the fella from Virginia and I had the best luck connecting to the best data. Eventually distrust took its toll and other applications were sought by everyone. I hate it that it took a while to discover what the underlying problems were. For a while we were focused on our disatisfaction with the new in-house broker - O'Brien. It took a short while to find it was the data more so than a broker.
Live and learn, I guess. But I feel crappy about it.
e
c'mon mac.......
yer a great straight man......... we could be a team! (rimshot)
In short thought, I do like that cup 'n' handle one. Do you largely focus on cheapies? I do.
easy <---- gonna check these out
testing, testing...........
1.... 2..... 3
you suck
1.... 2..... 3
(LOL)
e
test...................................
e
another article concurring........
http://www.321gold.com/editorials/maund/maund111504.html
Too many boards, and I'm........
so lazy. I love this crap. Another example of the general principle but using radical study parameters.
btw....... A $430 margin yields $33 a point captured (approximately) in this particular market. Potentially, the risk/reward ratio can approach 100% on a daily basis.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4564016
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4564085
Here the idea is identical.........
and using the same market and chart duration. The only difference is the stochastics parameters have markedly changed. The concept and principles remain the same - intersection elevations are crucial.
Changing cci parameters will do the same. On this particular day and market cci yields nothing while another day stochastics produce null. This is why I use both in concert.
same principle applied to 8 min ny gold........
you guys play gold
I don't like the 4 minute chart in this market because low volume makes individual prints appear nemic. Note only accepted signals arrive after 7 or 8 o'clock Eastern and during regular market hours. A signal at approximately 7:24 could have been executed. Again, the synchronous model points to the greatest of trends in relative measurement.
Interesting, in my belief.............
I spend a great deal of time researching and developing technical tools, technique, and other premise to conquer the world of E-Mini trading. Many of these discoveries are applicable to stock trading.
I have been sharing a major quest in my life with kgood. I am proud of this particular accomplishment to date. Below are links to an ongoing demonstration of this limited sharing of my work. I hope you find them useful.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4560008
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4563558
easy
mark........
Last I heard is he went back to the highway department. TradeStation left a bad taste with him in their inability to resolve our data conflicts. He told me he intended to return one day.
easy
kgood..........
My sole aim is to quickly locate the greatest of trends in E-Mini markets. I want to make these decisions in a few seconds time to capitalize in a very fast market, thus maximizing rewards in an environment where seconds count. If executed correctly, scalps can easily become swings using a 4 minute chart.
Synchronicity is a complex phenomenon visible at multiple levels. I suppose this is why it is overlooked sometimes or discounted by some technicians. We tend to adhere to more simple and less time consuming technique. And again, synchronous events point to only the greater of trend opportunities. They do not afford rapid-fire setups filling up a chart. These finds are few and far between.
It has been my quest to locate these technical geography using the fewest of studies and saving time in the process. True synchronicity incorporates a wide collection of studies. I have decided to concentrate largely on cci and ss. The previous post introduced my discoveries in determining a shorthand technique in attempt to identify a genuine synchronous technical event.
The chart below has the previous chart imposed with vertical lines identifying other technical geography at the time of the shorthand technique. You can see there is a common and powerful undercurrent in the chart at these particular points in time.
I have suggestions if macd is wanted to be added in this scheme. As you can see, it is lagging by one period or more in the vertical identifier.
Of course, nothing is perfect. But it is my estimation this technique is greater than 85% correct.
More later.
easy