Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Well, perhaps they'll run out of steam at some point. GLTA.
We do know what the o/s is and we do understand about diluation as well. We've discussed it extensively before you came along. Thanks.
Company has wiped out 4.1 billion of convertible debt. It has been withdrawn. You choose to look at it differently, like you did with the 10K saying the Humphries was making 350K. You were wrong there and even admitted it.
Well, we're all entitled to my opinion. GLTA.
There's really nothing I can do about it. I am only the moderator. This is Matt and Shelly's site, so you really need to take it up with them, not on the board. Thanks.
As a reminder folks, please stay on topic and keep it civil.
Any ban requests should be sent directly to Matt or Shelly (admins), not to me. Much apprecaited. GLTA.
You have to take your issue directly to the admin, not on the board. Thanks.
Who is him? Who are you referring to, pray tell? Pretty transparent.
Well, the only people that seem to have an agenda is you and printmail01. Wonder why you came out of nowhere right after the company wiped out 4.1 billion of debt.
Don't like a company doing all the right things? All the filings you and printmail01 keep reposting have been viewed many times by us. Over the last month.
You assume that we don't know how to read or how to invest for that matter. Why do we matter so much to you. If you don't like the stock you should perhaps spend your energy on one that you like. Don't worry about, we'll get by. Thanks. GLTA.
People do know how to read. Please stop making personal attacks on people. All TOU violations will be removed.
Just poking your head back in? Hmmm, brought reinforcements I see.
LOL, they are a tag team.
Perhaps institutional investors accumulating.
Accumulation.
That's actually not the case. There has been dilution since the last 10Q and we have been already been made aware of that but certainly nowhere to that extent. Not sure what you are basing your commments on, but they are not facts.
Don't agree with any of your reasoning. It's like saying if one CEO does it at one company, all CEOs will do it at every company. Doesn't make sense. You're entitled to your opinion, and everyone else is entitled to theirs. No matter how many times you keep posting the same thoughts over and over, its not going to change our minds, or at least mine.
Hmmm, yeah right. That was certainly interesting indeed. Perhaps one of many things you have conveniently overlooked.
Oh no! Now you're backing off now that you've realized we know how to read a 10Q?? Classic!
Well, the attack is incorrect information. It's in the 2006 10K:
Name & Principal Position Year Salary ($)
Steven E. Humphries 2006 100,000
The 350K compensation he speaks of is for Christopher J. Carey in 2005, who was the previous CEO of Stronghold Technologies. So, looks like he conveniently skipped a year for some reason.
Name & Principal Position Year Salary ($)
Christopher J. Carey 2005 350,000
It's a different company with a different CEO. Thanks. GLTA.
http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FileName=0001144204%2D07%2D019206%2Etxt&FilePath=%5C2007%5C04%5C17%5C&CoName=STRONGHOLD+TECHNOLOGIES+INC&FormType=10KSB&RcvdDate=4%2F17%2F2007&pdf=
Nope, I go by the filings. Believe it or not, some of us know how to read them. From the 2006 10K filing:
Name & Principal Position Year Salary ($)
Steven E. Humphries 2006 100,000
The 350K compensation you speak of is for Christopher J. Carey in 2005, who was the previous CEO of Stronghold Technologies. So, looks like you conveniently skipped a year for some reason.
It's a different company with a different CEO. Thanks. GLTA.
http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/filingFrameset.asp?FileName=0001144204%2D07%2D019206%2Etxt&FilePath=%5C2007%5C04%5C17%5C&CoName=STRONGHOLD+TECHNOLOGIES+INC&FormType=10KSB&RcvdDate=4%2F17%2F2007&pdf=
Once again, you've got your facts wrong. Humphries made 100K in 2006.
Your arguments are getting shakier and shakier :)
I agree. They have hit the ground running and continue to move forward with their business plan.
I've gotten into stocks before where they were under a dollar and got much bashing on the boards, etc and I rode them to the multi dollar range while the bashing continued. I believe this could be one of those companies.
Each investor should make their own decisions based on their own dd, not what some anonymous poster says on a message board, whether positive or negative. I'm sure there are many posters around looking to 'save' us, and usually have their own agenda, but it's your money and your choice.
JMHO. GLTA.
Exactly. A little twisting of the facts for some I guess.
Anyway, to the point of the filings, most of that info about CDs, etc has been in the filings for nearly two years. We know what they say, they've been there for quite a while.
They've used their money very wisely by developing a new software product and have gone to market with it. They are developing products, gaining market traction, marketing the product, closing deals. They are doing all the right things to make this company a success. JMHO. GLTA.
I think that there are people on this board that present different sides of the coin. As in all stocks, some are positive, some are negative.
We've discussed the filings in earnest, especially since the 10Q was released last month. I could be wrong, but you just arrived two days ago and assume we know nothing about the filings. We've done our DD, it is really not necessary to keep posting and reposting the same info that has been discussed exhaustively. You've made your point many times. Not sure if its necessary to keep reposting. I think we've got it. Just a thought. Thanks. GLTA.
Yes, some of us have read them. It is not necessary to use your valuable time educating us. Many of us can read and are pretty acquainted with filings.
Of course not :) GLTA.
It's 100K for 2006. That was Humphries salary for last year, 2006.
If you look at the 2006 year end 10K filing, Humphries salary was 100K.
Not sure where this rumor popped up. But there are no plans whatsoever for a forward split.
Yes, I believe that is only speculation. Best to just let them do what they are going to do. Seems like they've done some pretty good things over the last few weeks to increase shareholder value. I would imagine they will continue on that path. GLTA.
Yes, but I think that's only true for retail investors and ihubbers. I think there are instituional investors who have gotten on board or will get on board shortly and are long term holders. JMHO. GLTA.
Thanks for the update. Much appreciated.
Please stay on topic folks and please keep it civil. Let's stay focused. Much appreciated. It's the evening, enjoy yourself :) Thanks.
Excellent. Rumnog sounds a lot better than eggnog :)
Yes, I use that tool as well. It's not anything new really. But thanks for that. Much appreciated.
So is the rumnog a christmas reference? :)
You seem adept at reading. I'm sure you can have a look yourself at the latest filing withdrawing 4.1 billion of convertible debt. Not sure what your issue is. You've made your point. Is it really necessary to repost the same info over and over every evening? I think we are all able to read and I think you've made your point. No need to save us. We're doing fine.
However, you may want to spend your time more productively on a stock you like instead of posting non-stop about a stock you don't like. Just a suggestion.
They have wiped out a considerable amount, 4.1 billion, of convertible debt yesterday. They are moving in the right direction. It is not necessary to post and repost from the filings. We have read and re-read them and discussed them exhaustively over the last few weeks.
If anyone has an issue with investing in the stock, one should move on. It is not necessary to save us from ourselves. I've done very well investing and don't need anonymous posters telling me how to invest.
I do find it interesting that posters who've never posted here before have suddenly appeared right after they wiped out 4.1 billion of a convertible debt. Quite amazing news. I wonder why some don't like it? GLTA.
Folks, let's stay on topic and keep it civil. All off topic posts and any other TOU violations will be removed. Much appreciated.
Agreed. As I said earlier, companies don't do PRs on SEC filings. The filings speak for themselves. They cancelled the 4.1 billion convertible debt yesterday. That's it. There's no reason for them to say, hey we did an SEC filing cancelling the 4.1 billion CDs, its already there in black and white. A PR would be duplicative.
I don't think any company releases a PR for every filing they do. Anyway, we ended up today on decent volume. Can't complain about that :) GLTA.