Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The democrat way. Buy 'em, steal 'em or raise the dead!
Apparently you have to sign in or sign up to watch the video.
You are correct. Cramer was always coming up with a plan to get money! Harris is desperately trying to reel in some of the black voters that the dems have lost.
Another Government Lie: FBI Revises Numbers and Finds 1,699 Murders they ‘Missed’ in Their 2022 Count – They Missed Over ONE THOUSAND Murders!??
by Jim Hoft Oct. 16, 2024 10:00 am
Another Government Lie: FBI Revises Numbers and Finds 1,699 Murders they ‘Missed’ in Their 2022 Count – They Missed Over ONE THOUSAND Murders!??
by Jim Hoft Oct. 16, 2024 10:00 am
The New York Times downplays Kamala's plagiarism, in line with the media's history of dishonest acts
By Jack Hellner
The New York Times downplays Kamala's plagiarism, in line with the media's history of dishonest acts
By Jack Hellner
How it was presented in the picture was meant to be humorous but she actually proposed it.
Harris proposes 1 million forgivable loans to Black entrepreneurs, as Trump makes inroads
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/14/harris-forgivable-loans-legal-marijuana-trump-black-voters.html
I can't see this happening. Imagine if it were just white folks receiving the freebees.
9 Signs A Man May Be Voting For Kamala Harris
The Harris/Walz campaign is working hard to target male voters, from releasing a super manly video of super manly men doing super manly things to setting a photo op with Tim Walz loading a gun in a totally sensible way. With all this male outreach, it's amazing the campaign is facing any sort of uphill battle with men at all!
If you're wondering how to spot a male Kamala voter, here are a few tell-tale signs a dude is probably planning on voting for America's favorite Vice President.
He sits daintily on a truck tailgate in a Kamala ad: This one is a dead giveaway.
Frequently seen waving with both hands simultaneously: It's a secret sign only recognized by other Kamala fans.
He attempts to load a shotgun through the butt: That's not how shotguns work.
Thinks Amazon's Rings of Power is an artistic masterpiece: He's really hoping for Sauron and Galadriel to get together.
He says "I eat my steak rare" but when he says it he sticks out his hip and snaps his finger and then he says "You better believe it, big boy": This is a sure sign he's probably gonna pull the lever for Harris.
He's only been a man for 6 months and wants to thank Kamala for the surgery he got in prison to make it happen: He owes a lot to Kamala.
Dallas Cowboys fan: This one's easy.
He uses a fork to eat sushi: Also pizza.
He is dead: Kamala has already secured approximately 98% of the dead vote.
There you go! Now get out there and figure out which of the men in your life are voting for Kamala Harris!
https://babylonbee.com/news/9-signs-a-man-may-be-voting-for-kamala-harris
9 Signs A Man May Be Voting For Kamala Harris
The Harris/Walz campaign is working hard to target male voters, from releasing a super manly video of super manly men doing super manly things to setting a photo op with Tim Walz loading a gun in a totally sensible way. With all this male outreach, it's amazing the campaign is facing any sort of uphill battle with men at all!
If you're wondering how to spot a male Kamala voter, here are a few tell-tale signs a dude is probably planning on voting for America's favorite Vice President.
He sits daintily on a truck tailgate in a Kamala ad: This one is a dead giveaway.
Frequently seen waving with both hands simultaneously: It's a secret sign only recognized by other Kamala fans.
He attempts to load a shotgun through the butt: That's not how shotguns work.
Thinks Amazon's Rings of Power is an artistic masterpiece: He's really hoping for Sauron and Galadriel to get together.
He says "I eat my steak rare" but when he says it he sticks out his hip and snaps his finger and then he says "You better believe it, big boy": This is a sure sign he's probably gonna pull the lever for Harris.
He's only been a man for 6 months and wants to thank Kamala for the surgery he got in prison to make it happen: He owes a lot to Kamala.
Dallas Cowboys fan: This one's easy.
He uses a fork to eat sushi: Also pizza.
He is dead: Kamala has already secured approximately 98% of the dead vote.
There you go! Now get out there and figure out which of the men in your life are voting for Kamala Harris!
https://babylonbee.com/news/9-signs-a-man-may-be-voting-for-kamala-harris
From Babylon Bee:
NASA Baffled At How Elon Managed To Succeed Without As Many Gay Non-Binary Muslim Dwarfs Of Color As They Have
HOUSTON, TX — As the world still celebrated the astonishing accomplishment of SpaceX catching its returning Starship, NASA officials were baffled at how Elon Musk managed to succeed without as many gay non-binary Muslim dwarfs of color as they have.
SpaceX's historic achievement occurred despite not making diversity and inclusion its top priority, leaving NASA in awe that such a feat could be pulled off without the mandated involvement of underrepresented people groups.
"Not a single transgender dwarf of color on the team! How does this guy do it?" one high-ranking NASA official marveled. "We devote all of our time and spend billions upon billions of dollars to put together the most intersectional and diverse team, but we can't even come close to the stuff Musk is pulling off at SpaceX. They caught a rocket, for crying out loud! And they didn't have any non-binary Hindu furries working on the project! How is that possible?"
Decision-makers at NASA reportedly held emergency closed-door meetings this week to discuss the widening gap between their work and the things being done at SpaceX. "It doesn't matter what we do, he just keeps pulling further ahead," a NASA insider said. "We're going to keep trying to incorporate more diversity, equity, and inclusion to everything we do, but it's like this guy has cracked some code where he just puts the most brilliant and qualified minds to work on his projects. That sounds crazy, but I guess it's working out for them."
At publishing time, NASA sources still expressed skepticism that Musk would be able to successfully land a human being on Mars without the help of any gender-fluid atheist amputees of mixed racial descent.
https://babylonbee.com/news/nasa-baffled-at-how-elon-managed-to-succeed-without-as-many-gay-non-binary-muslim-dwarfs-of-color-as-they-have?utm_source=The%20Babylon%20Bee%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email
NASA Baffled At How Elon Managed To Succeed Without As Many Gay Non-Binary Muslim Dwarfs Of Color As They Have
HOUSTON, TX — As the world still celebrated the astonishing accomplishment of SpaceX catching its returning Starship, NASA officials were baffled at how Elon Musk managed to succeed without as many gay non-binary Muslim dwarfs of color as they have.
SpaceX's historic achievement occurred despite not making diversity and inclusion its top priority, leaving NASA in awe that such a feat could be pulled off without the mandated involvement of underrepresented people groups.
"Not a single transgender dwarf of color on the team! How does this guy do it?" one high-ranking NASA official marveled. "We devote all of our time and spend billions upon billions of dollars to put together the most intersectional and diverse team, but we can't even come close to the stuff Musk is pulling off at SpaceX. They caught a rocket, for crying out loud! And they didn't have any non-binary Hindu furries working on the project! How is that possible?"
Decision-makers at NASA reportedly held emergency closed-door meetings this week to discuss the widening gap between their work and the things being done at SpaceX. "It doesn't matter what we do, he just keeps pulling further ahead," a NASA insider said. "We're going to keep trying to incorporate more diversity, equity, and inclusion to everything we do, but it's like this guy has cracked some code where he just puts the most brilliant and qualified minds to work on his projects. That sounds crazy, but I guess it's working out for them."
At publishing time, NASA sources still expressed skepticism that Musk would be able to successfully land a human being on Mars without the help of any gender-fluid atheist amputees of mixed racial descent.
https://babylonbee.com/news/nasa-baffled-at-how-elon-managed-to-succeed-without-as-many-gay-non-binary-muslim-dwarfs-of-color-as-they-have?utm_source=The%20Babylon%20Bee%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email
NASA Baffled At How Elon Managed To Succeed Without As Many Gay Non-Binary Muslim Dwarfs Of Color As They Have
HOUSTON, TX — As the world still celebrated the astonishing accomplishment of SpaceX catching its returning Starship, NASA officials were baffled at how Elon Musk managed to succeed without as many gay non-binary Muslim dwarfs of color as they have.
SpaceX's historic achievement occurred despite not making diversity and inclusion its top priority, leaving NASA in awe that such a feat could be pulled off without the mandated involvement of underrepresented people groups.
"Not a single transgender dwarf of color on the team! How does this guy do it?" one high-ranking NASA official marveled. "We devote all of our time and spend billions upon billions of dollars to put together the most intersectional and diverse team, but we can't even come close to the stuff Musk is pulling off at SpaceX. They caught a rocket, for crying out loud! And they didn't have any non-binary Hindu furries working on the project! How is that possible?"
Decision-makers at NASA reportedly held emergency closed-door meetings this week to discuss the widening gap between their work and the things being done at SpaceX. "It doesn't matter what we do, he just keeps pulling further ahead," a NASA insider said. "We're going to keep trying to incorporate more diversity, equity, and inclusion to everything we do, but it's like this guy has cracked some code where he just puts the most brilliant and qualified minds to work on his projects. That sounds crazy, but I guess it's working out for them."
At publishing time, NASA sources still expressed skepticism that Musk would be able to successfully land a human being on Mars without the help of any gender-fluid atheist amputees of mixed racial descent.
https://babylonbee.com/news/nasa-baffled-at-how-elon-managed-to-succeed-without-as-many-gay-non-binary-muslim-dwarfs-of-color-as-they-have?utm_source=The%20Babylon%20Bee%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email
Climate narrative falls apart as the cooler-than-average La Niña expected to appear
By Jack Hellner
Climate narrative falls apart as the cooler-than-average La Niña expected to appear
By Jack Hellner
Article below the tweet:
President Trump is going to work the fryer at McDonald’s for 10 minutes this weekend, which will be 10 minutes more than Kamala has ever worked there.
— Monica Crowley (@MonicaCrowley) October 15, 2024
The most epic troll of all time 🐐 pic.twitter.com/zgr6pMMhQn
Article below the tweet:
President Trump is going to work the fryer at McDonald’s for 10 minutes this weekend, which will be 10 minutes more than Kamala has ever worked there.
— Monica Crowley (@MonicaCrowley) October 15, 2024
The most epic troll of all time 🐐 pic.twitter.com/zgr6pMMhQn
This is all politically driven to garner more black votes. She knows that it would be DOA because you can't give black entrepreneurs a hand out and exclude all other races. The courts would shoot this down in a ball of flames!
And all the people on the government free and easy street!!!
Gee ... Go figure! There's no accounting for stupid!!!
A follow-up to the boat video from yesterday
Paid actors pretending to be Trump supporters and then the video of actual Trump supporters splashing them pic.twitter.com/g6OX2nEpb7
— J Hans (@blackhawkce457) October 14, 2024
A follow-up to the boat video from yesterday
Paid actors pretending to be Trump supporters and then the video of actual Trump supporters splashing them pic.twitter.com/g6OX2nEpb7
— J Hans (@blackhawkce457) October 14, 2024
Top campaign official with Harris-Walz: Haitians in Springfield, OH aren’t the ‘problem’
By Olivia Murray
Top campaign official with Harris-Walz: Haitians in Springfield, OH aren’t the ‘problem’
By Olivia Murray
The impenetrable arrogance of the left media
By Patricia McCarthy
Raddatz: "The incidents were limited to a handful of apartment complexes... A handful."
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) October 13, 2024
Vance: "Do you hear yourself? Only a HANDFUL of apartment complexes were taken over by Venezuelan gangs and Donald Trump is the problem??"pic.twitter.com/6PlNAPur8y
The impenetrable arrogance of the left media
By Patricia McCarthy
Raddatz: "The incidents were limited to a handful of apartment complexes... A handful."
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) October 13, 2024
Vance: "Do you hear yourself? Only a HANDFUL of apartment complexes were taken over by Venezuelan gangs and Donald Trump is the problem??"pic.twitter.com/6PlNAPur8y
The National Border Patrol Council publicly endorses Donald J. Trump for president
By Ethel C. Fenig
On behalf of the 16,000 men and women represented by the National Border Patrol Council, we strongly support and endorse Donald J. Trump for President of the United States.
— Border Patrol Union - NBPC (@BPUnion) October 14, 2024
The National Border Patrol Council publicly endorses Donald J. Trump for president
By Ethel C. Fenig
On behalf of the 16,000 men and women represented by the National Border Patrol Council, we strongly support and endorse Donald J. Trump for President of the United States.
— Border Patrol Union - NBPC (@BPUnion) October 14, 2024
Hollywood's hit-job film on Trump bombs at the box office
By Rajan Laad
When individuals bury themselves deeply in an echo chamber for a prolonged period of time, they begin to assume that not only their world but the entire world is the echo chamber.
This is probably what happened to those who greenlit the hateful anti-Trump propaganda picture, The Apprentice.
Trump-hating studio executives were approached by Trump-hating filmmakers and the project was instantly approved.
Everyone they know is a rabid and baseless Trump-hater, so they assume that each of these individuals will be a willing and eager viewer.
They probably thought at the very least the film would become a sensation in liberal coastal states.
I can just hear them speaking to each other.
"I tell you what, let's release it a few weeks before the elections," is probably what the topmost executive suggested when the release schedule was discussed.
"That's brilliant," is probably how the room reacted.
"Our film will be a game changer for the elections," is probably what the makers said.
"This is the October Surprise Trump had been dreading," as another might have said as $16 million was approved for the film.
"We'll celebrate the success of our film on election night," is probably what was the makers told the executives as they all had a hearty laugh.
The film contains all the falsehoods and anti-Trump cliches that appear in the mainstream media on a daily basis.
But even that didn't help the makers.
The first bad sign for the picture was the Rotten Tomatoes ratings by film critics.
Film critics are part of the liberal echo chambers, so one would have assumed the film would be awarded 100 percent ratings, i.e., every critic would give the film a resounding thumbs up. But instead, the film scored 79%, which is not bad, but certainly not the consensus.
Finally, the film was released on Oct. 11.
What happened after that?
Was the police force deployed where the film was playing as berserk anti-Trump mobs were trying desperately to get tickets?
Was office attendance poor on Oct. 11 in New York or California and other liberals states because they were queued outside the cinema for tickets?
Did the length of queues outside the cinemas exceed the length of queues waiting for the latest iPhone?
To quote Mrs. Thatcher:
No!
No!
No!
The film made an estimated $1.58 million.
Yes, you read it right, just $1.58 million.
Let's dig deeper.
The film was playing in 1,740 cinemas, which means the average earning per theatre is roughly $927.
The average movie ticket price in the U.S. is roughly 10 dollars. In blue cities, the average is closer to $20.
But for the sake of argument, let's take the $10 figure. That means every cinema had under only nine to 10 humans in the audience, i.e., the percentage of occupancy was in single digits.
Only 158 thousand people watched the film over the weekend.
Perhaps the audience of the film comprised exclusively of the cast and crew members and their families.
The film is an unmitigated disaster.
To put this in perspective, MSNBC, which is the foremost bastion for Trump haters in primetime and total day had 1.430 million and 921,000 viewers, respectively in September.
This means not even a small percentage of MSNBC viewers watched the film.
One reason probably is they get high on a daily dose of Trump hate every night at home, so why would they leave their homes and travel to the cinema?
The other possible reason is that the Trump hate is no longer so intense that they consider it worth a trip to the cinema.
The makers were probably hoping the Trump campaign or Trump himself would viciously attack the film before its release and that would lead to a feud that would be covered by the media.
They probably thought it would generate publicity for the film.
But both Trump and his proxies didn't take the bait and wisely remained mum about the film.
President Trump did slam the movie but only after the film crashed at the box office. Perhaps he should have waited a few weeks more till the film was pulled out of cinemas.
How will Hollywood react to this?
Don't be too surprised if the Oscar trophies are tossed in the direction of the film.
But beyond these hateful echo chambers, the flopping of this vile propaganda film is another triumph for President Trump, which is great, considering the election is just a few weeks away.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/10/hollywood_s_hit_job_film_on_trump_bombs_at_the_box_office.html
Hollywood's hit-job film on Trump bombs at the box office
By Rajan Laad
When individuals bury themselves deeply in an echo chamber for a prolonged period of time, they begin to assume that not only their world but the entire world is the echo chamber.
This is probably what happened to those who greenlit the hateful anti-Trump propaganda picture, The Apprentice.
Trump-hating studio executives were approached by Trump-hating filmmakers and the project was instantly approved.
Everyone they know is a rabid and baseless Trump-hater, so they assume that each of these individuals will be a willing and eager viewer.
They probably thought at the very least the film would become a sensation in liberal coastal states.
I can just hear them speaking to each other.
"I tell you what, let's release it a few weeks before the elections," is probably what the topmost executive suggested when the release schedule was discussed.
"That's brilliant," is probably how the room reacted.
"Our film will be a game changer for the elections," is probably what the makers said.
"This is the October Surprise Trump had been dreading," as another might have said as $16 million was approved for the film.
"We'll celebrate the success of our film on election night," is probably what was the makers told the executives as they all had a hearty laugh.
The film contains all the falsehoods and anti-Trump cliches that appear in the mainstream media on a daily basis.
But even that didn't help the makers.
The first bad sign for the picture was the Rotten Tomatoes ratings by film critics.
Film critics are part of the liberal echo chambers, so one would have assumed the film would be awarded 100 percent ratings, i.e., every critic would give the film a resounding thumbs up. But instead, the film scored 79%, which is not bad, but certainly not the consensus.
Finally, the film was released on Oct. 11.
What happened after that?
Was the police force deployed where the film was playing as berserk anti-Trump mobs were trying desperately to get tickets?
Was office attendance poor on Oct. 11 in New York or California and other liberals states because they were queued outside the cinema for tickets?
Did the length of queues outside the cinemas exceed the length of queues waiting for the latest iPhone?
To quote Mrs. Thatcher:
No!
No!
No!
The film made an estimated $1.58 million.
Yes, you read it right, just $1.58 million.
Let's dig deeper.
The film was playing in 1,740 cinemas, which means the average earning per theatre is roughly $927.
The average movie ticket price in the U.S. is roughly 10 dollars. In blue cities, the average is closer to $20.
But for the sake of argument, let's take the $10 figure. That means every cinema had under only nine to 10 humans in the audience, i.e., the percentage of occupancy was in single digits.
Only 158 thousand people watched the film over the weekend.
Perhaps the audience of the film comprised exclusively of the cast and crew members and their families.
The film is an unmitigated disaster.
To put this in perspective, MSNBC, which is the foremost bastion for Trump haters in primetime and total day had 1.430 million and 921,000 viewers, respectively in September.
This means not even a small percentage of MSNBC viewers watched the film.
One reason probably is they get high on a daily dose of Trump hate every night at home, so why would they leave their homes and travel to the cinema?
The other possible reason is that the Trump hate is no longer so intense that they consider it worth a trip to the cinema.
The makers were probably hoping the Trump campaign or Trump himself would viciously attack the film before its release and that would lead to a feud that would be covered by the media.
They probably thought it would generate publicity for the film.
But both Trump and his proxies didn't take the bait and wisely remained mum about the film.
President Trump did slam the movie but only after the film crashed at the box office. Perhaps he should have waited a few weeks more till the film was pulled out of cinemas.
How will Hollywood react to this?
Don't be too surprised if the Oscar trophies are tossed in the direction of the film.
But beyond these hateful echo chambers, the flopping of this vile propaganda film is another triumph for President Trump, which is great, considering the election is just a few weeks away.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2024/10/hollywood_s_hit_job_film_on_trump_bombs_at_the_box_office.html
Managing Initial Mass Deportation
By Anony Mee
Managing Initial Mass Deportation
By Anony Mee
How a Federal District Court Judge Weaponized Secret Algorithms to Stop Election Fraud Hidden in State Voter Rolls
By Jerome R. Corsi
On September 27, 2024, Federal District Court Judge Michael T. Liburdi rendered a decision in American Encore v. Adrian Fontes that weaponized algorithms surreptitiously embedded in various state boards of elections official voter registration database, turning them into a tool to block elections that bear the modus operandi of mail-in ballot election fraud from being certified.
In his decision, Judge Liburdi referenced a provision in the Elections Procedures Manual (EPM) that Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, had issued. That provision required the Secretary of State to certify an election by excluding the votes of any county that refused to certify an election. Justice Liburdi quoted the EPM language that became known in Arizona as the “Canvass Provision.” The quoted EPM language, including the parenthetical remark included in the original EPM document, reads as follows:
If the official canvass of any county has not been received by this deadline, the Secretary of State may proceed with the state canvass without including the votes of the missing county (i.e., the Secretary of State is not permitted to use an unofficial vote count in lieu of the county’s official canvass).
Judge Liburdi characterized the rule as “probably unprecedented in the history of the United States” because it “gives the Secretary of State nearly carte blanche authority to disenfranchise the ballots of potentially millions of Americans.”
Image: Adrian Fontes. YouTube screen grab.
Therefore, he ruled that the Canvass Provision was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment:
The right to vote is fundamental. Harper v. Va. State Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 667 (1966). “A state law or practice that unduly burdens or restricts that fundamental right violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Election Integrity Project Cal., Inc. v. Weber, 113 F.4th 1072, 1082 (9th Cir. 2024). Plaintiffs agree that the plain terms of the Canvass Provision require the Secretary to nullify a county’s votes if the county board of supervisors fail to timely canvass. Courts have routinely recognized that disenfranchisement is a severe burden on the right to vote. See, Fla. Democratic Party v. Detzner, No. 16-CV607, 2016 WL 6090943, at *6 (N.D. Fla. October 16, 2016) (“If disenfranchising thousands of eligible voters does not amount to a severe burden on the right to vote, then this Court is at a loss as to what does.”).
Judge Liburdi’s ruling is a bulwark against secret algorithms in the state voter databases that create a pool of hidden “non-existent voters.” Beyond just creating “non-existent voters,” the cryptographic algorithms assign legitimate state voter IDs to the “non-existent voters.” This last step enables the criminal perpetrators to vote these “non-existent voters” as apparently “legal” mail-in votes in what could be sufficient quantities to steal otherwise losing elections.
State election boards do not conduct field canvassing efforts to verify that mail-in voters exist, confirm that they live at the registered addresses, or verify that they are legally qualified to vote. This failure allows criminal perpetrators to interject a cryptographic algorithm scheme into the database that allows the perpetrators to create “non-existent voters.”
The only way to address the problem of these phantom voters is to halt certification and analyze the database. However, Fontes’s “rush-rush” EPM made doing so impossible. It forced Arizona counties to hustle out certifications even if they believed they were invalid or else risk disenfranchising every voter in the county.
Nor is this a hypothetical risk. To date, as reported on GodsFiveStones.com, computer graphics expert Andrew Paquette, Ph.D. has found algorithms in the boards of elections’ official voter registration lists of the following states: New York, Ohio, and Wisconsin, with reports on algorithms found in Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Jersey in progress. Dr. Paquette is now examining the state voter rolls in Arizona and Georgia.
Judge Liburdi’s ruling means that a county where an algorithm is found may safely refuse to certify its results on the suspicion that phantom voter fraud affected election outcomes in that county.
Likewise, a candidate who lost a close election after a late surge in mail-in ballots for the candidate’s opponent may have a legitimate argument that an algorithm was used in an election fraud scheme designed to benefit the opponent’s political party.
By analogy, if an investigation finds a casino has been using marked cards at the “21” tables, it would be impossible to prove that any gambler ever had legitimately lost a hand. In the same way, if an algorithm that can be used to cheat is present in a voter registration database, it is impossible to determine an honest outcome for that election.
However, with the decision in American Encore v. Fontes, the algorithms are no longer a weapon for cheating. Instead, their presence becomes a shield by which honest county supervisors can impede a rush to judgment to certify a possibly stolen election.
The point of embedding secret algorithms in state boards of election voter registration databases appears to be to create and certify votes cast by fictitious voters. If the goal of the algorithms is to certify election fraud, then American Encore v. Fontes provides the antidote, provided one county in a given state refuses to certify that county’s election results.
In conclusion, all it may take to expose election fraud should the voting counting patterns seen in the 2020 election be repeated in the 2024 election is for one county in a battleground state to refuse to certify the election. The rush to certify a fraudulent election is a necessary part of the algorithm/mail-in ballot scheme. Slowing down certification, even in one county, may gain the time needed to conduct a forensic examination to determine if the algorithm was used to trigger the mail-in votes in the objecting county and how many of the mail-in ballots cast in that county were fraudulent. Validation that a cryptographic algorithm permitted decisive mail-in ballots in one county would then lend credence to all states where similar cryptographic algorithms were found.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/10/how_a_federal_district_court_judge_weaponized_secret_algorithms_to_stop_election_fraud_hidden_in_state_voter_rolls.html
How a Federal District Court Judge Weaponized Secret Algorithms to Stop Election Fraud Hidden in State Voter Rolls
By Jerome R. Corsi
On September 27, 2024, Federal District Court Judge Michael T. Liburdi rendered a decision in American Encore v. Adrian Fontes that weaponized algorithms surreptitiously embedded in various state boards of elections official voter registration database, turning them into a tool to block elections that bear the modus operandi of mail-in ballot election fraud from being certified.
In his decision, Judge Liburdi referenced a provision in the Elections Procedures Manual (EPM) that Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes, a Democrat, had issued. That provision required the Secretary of State to certify an election by excluding the votes of any county that refused to certify an election. Justice Liburdi quoted the EPM language that became known in Arizona as the “Canvass Provision.” The quoted EPM language, including the parenthetical remark included in the original EPM document, reads as follows:
If the official canvass of any county has not been received by this deadline, the Secretary of State may proceed with the state canvass without including the votes of the missing county (i.e., the Secretary of State is not permitted to use an unofficial vote count in lieu of the county’s official canvass).
Judge Liburdi characterized the rule as “probably unprecedented in the history of the United States” because it “gives the Secretary of State nearly carte blanche authority to disenfranchise the ballots of potentially millions of Americans.”
Image: Adrian Fontes. YouTube screen grab.
Therefore, he ruled that the Canvass Provision was unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment:
The right to vote is fundamental. Harper v. Va. State Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663, 667 (1966). “A state law or practice that unduly burdens or restricts that fundamental right violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Election Integrity Project Cal., Inc. v. Weber, 113 F.4th 1072, 1082 (9th Cir. 2024). Plaintiffs agree that the plain terms of the Canvass Provision require the Secretary to nullify a county’s votes if the county board of supervisors fail to timely canvass. Courts have routinely recognized that disenfranchisement is a severe burden on the right to vote. See, Fla. Democratic Party v. Detzner, No. 16-CV607, 2016 WL 6090943, at *6 (N.D. Fla. October 16, 2016) (“If disenfranchising thousands of eligible voters does not amount to a severe burden on the right to vote, then this Court is at a loss as to what does.”).
Judge Liburdi’s ruling is a bulwark against secret algorithms in the state voter databases that create a pool of hidden “non-existent voters.” Beyond just creating “non-existent voters,” the cryptographic algorithms assign legitimate state voter IDs to the “non-existent voters.” This last step enables the criminal perpetrators to vote these “non-existent voters” as apparently “legal” mail-in votes in what could be sufficient quantities to steal otherwise losing elections.
State election boards do not conduct field canvassing efforts to verify that mail-in voters exist, confirm that they live at the registered addresses, or verify that they are legally qualified to vote. This failure allows criminal perpetrators to interject a cryptographic algorithm scheme into the database that allows the perpetrators to create “non-existent voters.”
The only way to address the problem of these phantom voters is to halt certification and analyze the database. However, Fontes’s “rush-rush” EPM made doing so impossible. It forced Arizona counties to hustle out certifications even if they believed they were invalid or else risk disenfranchising every voter in the county.
Nor is this a hypothetical risk. To date, as reported on GodsFiveStones.com, computer graphics expert Andrew Paquette, Ph.D. has found algorithms in the boards of elections’ official voter registration lists of the following states: New York, Ohio, and Wisconsin, with reports on algorithms found in Pennsylvania, Texas, and New Jersey in progress. Dr. Paquette is now examining the state voter rolls in Arizona and Georgia.
Judge Liburdi’s ruling means that a county where an algorithm is found may safely refuse to certify its results on the suspicion that phantom voter fraud affected election outcomes in that county.
Likewise, a candidate who lost a close election after a late surge in mail-in ballots for the candidate’s opponent may have a legitimate argument that an algorithm was used in an election fraud scheme designed to benefit the opponent’s political party.
By analogy, if an investigation finds a casino has been using marked cards at the “21” tables, it would be impossible to prove that any gambler ever had legitimately lost a hand. In the same way, if an algorithm that can be used to cheat is present in a voter registration database, it is impossible to determine an honest outcome for that election.
However, with the decision in American Encore v. Fontes, the algorithms are no longer a weapon for cheating. Instead, their presence becomes a shield by which honest county supervisors can impede a rush to judgment to certify a possibly stolen election.
The point of embedding secret algorithms in state boards of election voter registration databases appears to be to create and certify votes cast by fictitious voters. If the goal of the algorithms is to certify election fraud, then American Encore v. Fontes provides the antidote, provided one county in a given state refuses to certify that county’s election results.
In conclusion, all it may take to expose election fraud should the voting counting patterns seen in the 2020 election be repeated in the 2024 election is for one county in a battleground state to refuse to certify the election. The rush to certify a fraudulent election is a necessary part of the algorithm/mail-in ballot scheme. Slowing down certification, even in one county, may gain the time needed to conduct a forensic examination to determine if the algorithm was used to trigger the mail-in votes in the objecting county and how many of the mail-in ballots cast in that county were fraudulent. Validation that a cryptographic algorithm permitted decisive mail-in ballots in one county would then lend credence to all states where similar cryptographic algorithms were found.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/10/how_a_federal_district_court_judge_weaponized_secret_algorithms_to_stop_election_fraud_hidden_in_state_voter_rolls.html
Supreme Court weighs case that could aid Trump’s mass deportation agenda
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/supreme-court-weighs-case-that-could-aid-trump-s-mass-deportation-agenda/ar-AA1shZf5?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=1ef153ba90664edd8a8fa457ec203d67&ei=34