Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
There are 3 issues here :
1) There was no bid for over 2 weeks , we could not sell, only buy at 0.0001. I have the proove on paper with a sell order of 10.000.000 for over 1 week, nothing was sold.
2) The R/S was pre-announced 1/2 day before execution, nobody could sell
3 ) Brokers have a delay in R/S and symbol change
Leaving us currently with 90% or nothing.
Lots of people will load more and loaded 1-5K at 0.08, 0.1.
This stock can not go up anymore because they will sell for a 50-100% gain and quick.
It will end in the 0.01 - 0.1 range.
By next week it will trade in the 0.05 - 0.1 range, our original money is lost.
This needs a lawsuit and our dear CEO needs to pay for it.
He even doesn't have even the money to fight.
In Belgium such a companies would be suit and dissapear within a month and the CEO ends with nothing here.
What a shame :
I had 10.000.000 shares at 0.0001 , purchased 2 weeks ago
I will have 1000 shares left with a current value of 100$
it costs me 30$ to sell them ; makes 70$ left.
I don't worry , add me on the LAWSUIT, I add 10K$ to get this CEO out of business and we have a case here
LEVELII
BID
SBSH 0.1000 5000 11:08:17
NITE 0.0900 5000 10:31:36
SSGI 0.0850 5000 09:51:58
HILL 0.0800 5000 10:09:18
GLBT 0.0600 5000 09:39:54
VERT 0.0500 5000 08:38:07
UBSS 0.0500 5000 09:31:24
PERT 0.0200 5000 10:26:47
SALI 0.0060 5000 07:09:56
JEFF 0.0050 5000 07:09:57
VNDM 0.0010 5000 07:09:56
HDSN 0.0001 5000 07:09:56
DOMS 0.0001 5000 07:09:56
MM ID Ask Size Time
SBSH 0.1200 5000 11:08:17
GLBT 0.1250 5000 09:39:54
NITE 0.1300 5000 10:31:36
HILL 0.2000 5000 10:09:18
PERT 0.2000 5000 10:26:47
UBSS 1.2500 500 09:31:24
HDSN 2.0000 500 07:09:56
VNDM 101.0000 100 07:09:56
DOMS 1999.0000 5 07:09:56
I have to ADD money in order to be able to sell my shares, what a joke
WHO is selling for a 90% losss ????
IS there any change this stock goes back to 0.5 ( I have 50.000.000 shares from the original 0.0001 ) , so that I can get out for a 50% loss ?
This is the most pathetic and boring pink I ever had in my portfolio
Gravy, you leave my last message for 1 hour and then remove it !
Listen up Monkeys , gravy delete this in 1H
Swingtrading this stock is not possible. I had 8.000.0000, took me 2 weeks to get 2.000.000 out at higher prices then 0.0028. MM's don't allow buying or selling bigger blocks then 4-500K.
Well my friends. When a CEO tells that it is the chatboards that make stocks volatile sorry but ...
The only thing thing that makes this stock volatile
is that revenue and updates on what we need to know are not given. You don't keep a PPS up with forward looking statements , sorry !
That agreement still exists and is available to formally close at our discretion. We have delayed that closing in past weeks to focus on other key items, which were more time-critical. A recent closing date has been discussed and we intend to formally close and bring 100% of N'East Magazine into the company near term.
Sorry Jim but statements like this , we will, near term, it should make me thinking about my ex wife, eather you have the 51% or not, so you don't have it and thats 3 months overtime so something is wrong, be honest !!!
P
Mr. McGinley continues in regards to the previously announced closing of the remaining 51% of N'East Magazine:
"As we previously announced on February 2, 2007 -- we have reached an agreement with the current majority ownership. That agreement still exists and is available to formally close at our discretion. We have delayed that closing in past weeks to focus on other key items, which were more time-critical. A recent closing date has been discussed and we intend to formally close and bring 100% of N'East Magazine into the company near term."
HAPPT NOW , winers ?
http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/070510/0251143.html
MR The FIRM, I guess that your were talking with the object located at about 49% of the hight of your body ( starting from down ) , well if the other 51% is still all rigth pls. use 1% of it when you talk and pls. don't call Jim what you just called him. He is not like that !!!
I need one, because that FIRM guy makes me laughing.
unfortuanally there were other stocks trading billions of shares at 0.0001 without moving, I hope this will not become one of them ( CMKX, QBID, ... )
I wonder if we will ever be able to sell at 0.0002 ?
can I have a link to see those level II
need my money and I averaged down to 0.0018 so a double for the moment
Finally I can sell all my shares
I try to sell 2.000.0000 shares for over a week and the orders are filled per 100.000, bastards, I got 500K out in 5 days
#6 with 50.000.000 and biggest bagholder here
I can even not sell at 0.0001
I also smell something : Astrom that is planning his holidays with our money
What I see is a company that sputters PR's and keeps the bad news for last
If you put a buy order for 9.999.999 at 0.0001 you will have my shares!!!!!
Guys, I have all my shares for sale at 0.0001 so for the ones that want them, pls. buy them ( 10.000.000 )
What is the chance that this gem will hit 0.0002 anytime soon ?
Or do we have a new CMKX here. I got in at 0.0001 for 20.000.000 shares last Friday, just for a quick ... double
Pete
Christopher Astrom, ("Astrom"), is residing at 2921
NW 6th Avenue, Miami, Florida 33127.
May be we can send hime some 'printed' shares of CMKX at 0.0001
His brothers name is Richard
CHRISTOPHER ASTROM
has experience in the analysis of market areas and their resale ability. In addition, he has developed management systems to control costs of acquisition and rehab thereby helping to insure Company profitability
and
to take away investors money
Are you talking about Mark Astrom, the president of New Screen Television ? Don't tell me he is going to fight this one. That guy won more lawsuits then he had jobs
Astrom Shell and Dan -> Look at this PPRM Astrom Shell point 9
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/8/t/014621/p/1.html
What the hell ???
FROM::RB, believe or not:
Dan returned my phone call. Here's my post.
Dang, this post will rival anything the MountainMan has put out…in length that is.
We talked for about 40 minutes. I’ll start off by saying what everyone else has said: He talks fast and tosses information at you as if he were firing it from a machine gun. At times we were both talking at the same time. He was firing off law firm names, Accounting firm names, names of the lawyers, names involved in Skiershop, accountant names, etc. It’s safe to say my head is swimming. I couldn’t write fast enough to keep up.
Enough of that. Lets get to the reason you’re reading this post. What follows is a list of my questions and how Dan responded. I warn you, there’ll be material for pumpers and bashers….read at your own risk! LOL.
1) COMCAST LOI:
He expects this to close soon. (No definition of soon, he doesn’t want to fall into the same hot water he’s in with Skiershop. More on that later) He’s looking to secure channel 17, 18, or 19. He said the programming comes from RSN (Resort Sports Network) and will broadcast 24/7 on cable. Dan sees the benefit to PRRM in the areas of Marketing/Advertising, as it relates to all the companies in the PRRM “roll-up”; i.e. N’East magazine, Stockli, Skiershop, and other future entities they wish to market. Dan defined it as a “back-door entrance” opportunity for the Advertising and Marketing team.
2) N’EAST MAGAZINE:
Dan knows the issue is delayed. He says the issue is two weeks behind schedule and may be shipping now or very soon, but it will ship. No reason given for the delay. Concerning the website being down, Dan said it may have to do with the transition of the company. He said there is a lot going on in the company and the web site may be part of the changes. He said he’d look into it. At that point the conversation took an unexpected turn concerning N’East Magazine. I got the impression that N’East Magazine is a type of afterthought. An experiment. It appears to be another “back-door” Marketing/Advertising opportunity that presented itself, should the magazine become successful. To hear Dan describe it, the magazine owner was struggling and Dan saw an opportunity for marketing the PRRM entities in the Magazine. He gave me the impression that if N’East didn’t work out he’d not loose sleep over it. I doubt that revenues to PRRM are as much a concern as the marketing /advertising opportunities.
3) NAME AND SYMBOL CHANGE:
Dan stated these items are wrapped up in several events that are happening all at once. He claimed that recently two significant opportunities presented themselves, relating to Phase II, causing him to delay the name and symbol PR’s. Whatever the “opportunities” are it appears they are the type of opportunities that have to be acted on quickly. It was at this point in the conversation I thought he was telling me, in so many words, that he was building up to a string of PR’s for the future. Part of this “string” would include the name and symbol change. I expressed m my thoughts. Dan was quick to tell me that certain things he has to PR right away, indicating that a string of PR’s is not likely. The name and symbol change are the type that can be PR’d later, one would presume, at a more strategic time. He stated the property purchase as an example of a, “got to PR it now” kind of PR. The name has been chosen. He wouldn’t go into the specifics of the symbol change.
4) SKIERSHOP:
Dan acknowledged his frustration over the delays in closing Skiershop. He summed up the delay with the following:
- 5 Different attorney’s involved.
- Several financial institutions involved.
- Unexpected Phase II opportunities, listed in #3 above, required immediate attention, putting Skiershop on the back burner, so to speak. Rhetorically he asked, “Should we have let these opportunities go by to focus completely on Skiershop or should we look into them right now and delay Skiershop.”
- Property purchase. (This part is interesting. Dan stated the reason for the purchase was to “take a partner out.” I’m assuming the partner was throwing a monkey wrench into the works and added to the delay.)
- 4th of July weekend
- Required property/building appraisal for the purchase of said property.
Referring to my statement in #1, the reason Dan will not define “soon” is his inability to predict circumstances that can cause delay, resulting in investor anger. The Skiershop delay is an excellent example.
He says that Skiershop will close. His statement was, “Either you believe in what we are doing or you don’t.” I took it to mean that if I can’t handle the wait, then perhaps I shouldn’t be in PRRM. Fair enough.
At this point in the conversation I mentioned to Dan that there are some who post on the message boards, claiming they have talked with Dan and that Dan has stated Skiershop would close “soon.” To avoid confusion it would help to put information in a PR rather than to a few select investors. Many of us can’t make informed decisions except to call the CEO and hope he gives us honest information. He acknowledged frustration about how misinformation might occur on a pink sheet stock. Several times he admitted he could PR certain bits of information but purposely choose not to for his own reasons. He gave the number of his restricted shares as an example, or when certain restricted shares are eligible to be cashed in (OCT, 2006)
5) FINANCIALS:
There’s something you’re about to read that many of you are not going to like but I’ll get to that in a moment.
Dan says he’s still planning on financials. He would not go into details, but referred to the financials he’ll release as a “compilation.” He did not use the term unaudited or audited. He did list the name of the accounting firm and the accountant who would be handling it.
He added one thing I’ve not heard before. He said he was planning/considering (I don’t recall which) releasing an annual report in Jan/Feb of 2006.
Now the part many of you are not going to like. Dan outlined circumstances where he would consider a reverse split. In each instance the decision to R/S wrould revolve around a requirement for a specific PPS level in order to accomplish a specific objective. What follows are the examples he gave:
- In the instance where a debt had to be dealt with, requiring a certain price on the PPS to generate the needed cash.
- Financing an acquisition might require a R/S.
- Elevating PRRM to the OTCBB might require a certain price on the stock that may require a R/S to obtain that price.
So, while a R/S may not happen upon the name and symbol change, as outlined in the PR(s,)a R/S is a real possibility when it comes to growing the company in the absence of cash on hand.
SIDE NOTE: The reader decide the significance of this information on their own.
6) THOUGHTS ON ASCENDING TO THE OTCBB:
Perhaps after reading #5 you may not be so keen for this to happen! I got the impression from Dan that ascending to the OTCBB is in the back of his mind but other issues place this project near the bottom of the list.
7) STRATEGIES ON REDUCING THE OS:
I invited Dan to discuss any strategies toward reducing the OS. His reply was that he buys PRRM stock and the stock is restricted. He reminded me that he owns most of the restricted. No other strategies were presented by Dan.
8) PR OF REDUCTION IN THE AUTH. SHARES TO 80 BILLION.
He told me he will file the necessary paperwork, just not right now. Dan did not provide me with an explanation. Apparently that’s all I needed to know.
9) PURCHASE OF THE ASTROM SHELL:
Dan mentioned there were two outstanding convertibles involved with Astrom’s shell. When I asked Dan to quantify the cost of the shell. He said there was one “large share holder.” He then gave me a couple of figures. $150,000 and $600,000. This may have been the cost associated with the convertables. I don't think he was giving me a range of the cost of the shell. This part of the conversation was difficult on Dan's side. Dan was reluctant to tell me the total cost of the shell. I have no reason to believe that you can take the total of the two figures above as representing the total cost. Dan did say that the Annual Report would include all the information on the purchase of the Astrom shell.
Astrom Shell and Dan -> Look at this PPRM Astrom Shell point 9
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/8/t/014621/p/1.html
What the hell ???
2 PINK stories to remember ( investments I had ).
One day I had a pink which had potential and PR's all over the place. Hundreds of posts per week, value was 0.01.
One day It got silent and as I asked the neighbour of the company ( easy to DD and to find ) to phone me in case
'something happened', I got a call stating 'Sir, I don't know what is happening but the company is surrounded by tapes and they are loading the computers and furniture into lorries.
I asked to send a digital photo, got it and shared it on the message board. The average volume was 1.000.000 per day.
10 minutes later 100.000.000, next day the price was 0.0001.
Another time I owned a company with 5 employees ( CEO, secretary, CFO and 2 marketing managers ). The price was 0.005.
Got 500K shares. I waited 2 years before it moved , hoping on a mirical and then one day it changed business from music to ebay and flew to 1$ in 3 months. I sold the next day for a double at 0.01. I nearly killed myself looking the gain I missed
A lesson I learned, when you have a pink of 0.01, you always either whin it all or loose it all but be patient and get in contact with the neighbours close to the company ... their can be a time you will need them LOL
gdod, thanks for the appreciation. LOL I have enough shares to get all my email answered, sold some last week but still enough for a dream
Request from Jim to post this
Mr. Bodba,
If I intended to disseminate that on IHUB I would have. I answered you question as a prospective shareholder or one already. I will in the future be mindful of who honors private emails and who does not for the sake of the company and all its shareholders - please act accordingly or I will cease to communicate with you openly.
feel free to post this.
respectfully,
------------------------------------------------
Mr. Jim McGinley
Chairman / CEO
Podium Venture Group Inc
164 Middle Street, Suite 2 & 3
Portland, Maine 04101
207.772.3202
www.podiumventuregroup.com
symbol PDVP
A Delaware Corporation
Built From the Lifestyle Up.
-------------------------------------------------
gdog ; message 4688 well , in Belgium they put you in gail for that , even it's only a chatroom
Boardowners, since I'm suddenly not allowed with posting direct emails on a chatboard, feel free to ban my ID , ipaddress and family from IHUB. I just wanted to share relieve that's all.
I let my contacts stop phoning for Info. Jim is honest and we will get the answer at the rigth time and I'll have to wait to see it on yahoo finance. Patience is nice but I simply doesn't have it this time since I invested too much in this and I fell in love with this company and business approach.
This is a request from myself.
Peter
Boardowners may, I request to remove message 4862 ASAP.
Jim was not happy at all that I posted this. I appreceate him alot.
Additional to the lawsuit : It's JIM versus so it's not against PV but in favour. Conserning the 1% battle , I get no answers, no comments so that means for me that the battle is still going on. I'm going to question this matter with the other party, N'east magazine. If PV is major holder (51%) it must be visable on the Q1 balance sheet, somewhere we have to find out if it is 50 or 51. I think the 1% is not won yet, why would they wait in telling us ? I'm again in DD mood and my lawyer is making phonecalls to Portland ...
If I find out things that can not be found with a google search, I'll not post them, that's againt the law.
Nice evening
Peter
Message from the boss after I questioned him about the case :
"jim mcginley" <jmcginley@podiumventuregroup.com> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Subject: Re: Form Submission
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:09:04 -0400
To: ....
That is a case pending here in Maine of myself personally VS Wahoo funding - the first was filed on feb 23 here in maine court system which on Apr 3 I believe was motioned to federal court system - which frankly I would actually prefer given our position and strength of claim.
Until I issue a PR stating our course to aggressively pursue this claim, that is all I will say . You may certainly contact our counsel at Marcus, Clegg & Mistretta - attn: Kevin McCarthy attorney at 207.828.8000
Respectfully,
------------------------------------------------
Mr. Jim McGinley
Chairman / CEO
Podium Venture Group Inc
164 Middle Street, Suite 2 & 3
Portland, Maine 04101207.772.3202www.podiumventuregroup.com
symbol PDVP
A Delaware Corporation
Built From the Lifestyle Up.
-------------------------------------------------
makesumgravy, I'm not a trouble maker, I have to and will find out what is happening with PDVP and N'east + the lawsuit even if I have to phone 1000 people in Maine Portland, it's my right, I invested in Jim's company and until now I don't know what I want to know
Peter
We will get a PR tomorrow, after I found out what's happening
http://www.lawyers.com/Real-Estate/Maine/Portland/law-firms.html
I'll phone all of them ( I let my lawyer phone them for free )