Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
All can be solved if the appraisal is released or even the date the appraisal took place. An appraisal done multiple years ago is also “ridiculous”
9 years ago.
Sorry, I don't think a LA News Article from 19 years ago is relevant.
They have not and can not go into details/specifics until the permission is obtained. “please note that according to USPAP rules I would need permission from the person that commissioned the appraisal to comment any further.”
We wait for David to follow through
“I will certainly ask El Dorado Family Group.”
We asked the parties involved and received the information we shared. Pretty simple.
All El Dorado has to do now is give permission for the appraisal to be made available and everyone can know all the details. It’s pretty simple if they want to be transparent.
Correct. We sent the filing and had a conversation with them. There is also on going email communication with us, Penelope A. Dixon and Associates, and David.
Hopefully shareholders are provided transparency in this matter. All that’s needed is cooperation from “ El Dorado Family Group, Ltd”.
Penelope A. Dixon and Associates.
“Beyond Dated” and “Misrepresentation of figures”
Appraisals have a “five year retention” and they don’t have them.
In order to view the document that is “Beyond Dated” and is being used to “Misrepresent figures”, Penelope A. Dixon and Associates would need permission from the person that commissioned the appraisal.
-We requested permission today
-We were denied it from David
Quite simply no you may not have a copy. We have a copy of the appraisal which was in fact completed by Penelope Dixon and Associates which we consider the property of The El Dorado Family Group. Given your intentions in the matter it may not be used properly or even
They did, today.
In order to view the appraisal, Tauatachrome/Red Alert (or whoever paid for an appraisal to occur) needs to provide permission to Penelope A. Dixon and Associates and it can be viewed.
That request has been made
-If an actual appraisal was done by “Penelope Dixon & Associates” what was the date of that (we are in the process of gathering that)
When was the supposed appraisal done?
Didn’t wait for the name change to officially happen
Something else to keep in mind. The filing also used specific wording "maximum insurable value"
That doesn't really help a business, unless the "IP" is severely damaged, stolen, or destroyed. What is more important is the Fair Market Value. John Rogers, link below, also used the appraised insurable value of assets and not appraised value.
https://www.arkansasbusiness.com/article/117142/house-of-cards-how-john-rogers-bilked-banks-conned-collectors
That’s how Accounting can work. There is also a lot of unknowns too
-If an actual appraisal was done by “Penelope Dixon & Associates” what was the date of that (we are in the process of gathering that)
- The current Outstanding Stock amount (OTC website is not accurate currently, still shows 6.4 billion for A/S when it’s 9.5 billion, so we don’t know if O/S is correct)
- What the Total Stockholder’s deficit was before this transaction took place. On the last 10-Q from 11/21/2022 it was $-4,894,772
- How the lien(s) effect the book value of the “IP Value”
At the end of the day though, the market should determine the price of a stock. Closed today at .00107, which would be .0535 post split.
In addition the Company has resolved to perform within 45 days a 50 for 1 reverse split in the Company’s shares.
From the 3/10/23 filing. “undiluted Per Share Book Value of approximately $0.08.”
And David’s tweet.
That .08 is our current value while we're trading at .0005.. post split value would be around $4.00
— David LaMountain (@xGratitude333) March 11, 2023
This is why everyone should do their own research and not rely on what is posted by others about the 8-K. If you read the whole document all the information is there.
“ El Dorado Family Group, Ltd., and its subsidiaries, doing business as “Regal Photo Archive” and “Red Alert Media Matrix”
What does the 8-K include and say?
“ El Dorado Family Group, Ltd….”
Nope, just a typo for questions
According to David, the Tweet below doesn’t mean the photos posted with the “Klickzie” watermark are part of the 8-K/press release information people were asked to go read.
Take another look at the latest @Tautachrome press release
— ARknet (@MyArKnet) December 28, 2022
Posting a photo with the “Klickzie” watermark wasn’t clear to us meant they didn’t own that photo. Not how watermarks normally work, but we were able to clear everything up.
Also when asked, “wow where are you guys finding these historic pics?” And answer “take another look at the latest @Tautachrome press release” means you don’t have rights to it either.
All very clear
We are just grateful that the people at Magnum Photos were able to provide copyright information.
We have reached out to PENELOPE DIXON
§ ASSOCIATES as well and hope to provide information.
We stand corrected.
Per Magnum Photos, “ We share the copyrights with ICP.”
But it doesn’t matter, because David stated they don’t own the photo with the “Klickzie” watermark posted on Twitter.
Per “David LaMountain” (info@tautachrome.com)
Those photos are only examples of the types of imagery and predate the 8K. They are not part of what was in the recent transaction collections.
It’s owned by “Magnum Photos”
This is a Magnum Photos image by Cornell Capa from 1961. (CAC1961005W00039/28)
USA. Washington DC. 1961. President John F. KENNEDY and Vice President Lyndon B. JOHNSON at the first meeting of President Kennedy's Cabinet.
© Cornell Capa © International Center of Photography/Magnum Photos
At least one photo so far being publish by ARknet has been confirmed to be owned by another company. The one in question is in this tweet.
Planning, development, and decisions coming together. A picture is worth a thousand words.
— ARknet (@MyArKnet) December 27, 2022
The ARknet platform with KlickZie technology will transform the social and digital asset space.
"Rising tide lifts all boats."#NFTCommunity #NFTs #digitalart $TTCM pic.twitter.com/4RpnGZd2ow
Yeah, we know. But, by April 24 the “naked short” excuse is over, right? This quote below will no longer exist as an excuse for the poor performance, right?
1:50 is a small r/s making the pps much more attractive, then value add $500mil into our assets, coupled with shorts to cover....because they did not stipulate a target date, just anytime in 45 days, means if ur short...better watch ur [butt] to cover before an r/s springs on ur [butt] that can happen anytime, genius! don't forget an name and ticker change coming, so much unfolding, I would be pissing my pants right now if Im short
By April 24 the “naked shorting” excuse should go away right?
"If" there has been naked shorting going on, we could see a run prior to the R/S as they try to cover cheap. If they wait and have to cover post R/S, I think a run could be of epic proportions. All still hypothetical, of course. It will be very interesting to watch all of this unfold nonetheless, imo.
- 50:1 Reverse Split to take place by April 24.
- “ El Dorado Family Group, Ltd” controls 55% of voting rights
- Series H Stock dividend will be 6% of the IP Value ($30,866,480.44), payable annually in arrears (the twelve months ending the 29th of each year hereinafter referred to as the “Dividend Period”). The Initial Dividend period will commence on and include the original issue date of the Preferred H Stock. (If board or dividend committee decides to pay dividends)
https://app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=90423&ref=117329371&type=PDF&symbol=TTCM&companyName=Tautachrome+Inc&formType=8-K&formDescription=Current+report+pursuant+to+Section+13+or+15%28d%29&dateFiled=2023-03-10&CK=1389067
https://app.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=90423&ref=117333656&type=PDF&symbol=TTCM&companyName=Tautachrome+Inc&formType=8-K&formDescription=Current+report+pursuant+to+Section+13+or+15%28d%29&dateFiled=2023-03-14&CK=1389067#page3
Parent company is Wussler Worldwide Media Company now (at least from what we have been able to track down)
https://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/efxapi/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHtmlSection1?SectionID=11850586-849-3522&SessionID=MP7aUrS3kdSDE78
The Grainster guys aren’t the only ones throwing around big, questionable numbers. As Senior Editor George Waldon reported, a company incorporated in Little Rock just six months ago has claimed that its stock is worth $1 billion. A billion isn’t a trillion, obviously, but for Red Alert Media Matrix to claim a current value of 10 figures is equally pie-in-the-sky.
When we first heard of Red Alert, led by Tim Holly of Atlanta, back in January, it was boldly bidding $59 million for the photographs and sports memorabilia amassed by John Rogers of North Little Rock. Unfortunately, Red Alert couldn’t prove that it actually had $59 million to spend. Not to get too mathematical, but it does seem like a company worth $1 billion should be able to come up with less than 6 percent of that in cash.
But it couldn’t, so now Red Alert has cut its offer by more than half — to $28 million — and pledged that $1 billion in stock. To back up that valuation, Red Alert points to a $1.4 billion “insurable value” of the Rogers assets. But if the photos and memorabilia are worth that much, why oh why is Rogers’ business in receivership? He owes “only” about $50 million, which, again, is a tiny fraction of the supposed value.
Rogers was suspected of helping orchestrate an unsuccessful one-two-three-strike effort to acquire his former business by Red Alert Media Matrix.
The asset-less venture made successive unsubstantiated cash offers of $59 million in January, $28 million in April and $18 million in June to buy the Rogers assets.
Without verified funds and questions about millions of shares of unregistered stock that were part of its last two offers, Red Alert was rejected by Pulaski County Circuit Judge Chris Piazza.
Red Alert placed an incredible paper value of $972 million on the stock. The number is tied to the astounding “insurable value” of $1.5 billion for the assets of the insolvent Rogers ventures.
Here’s the information about the Series H Stock
https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/1389067/000147793223001466/ttcm_8k.htm
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1389067/000147793223001466/ttcm_ex101.htm
We came across some interesting articles and photos. Those photos posted by the “@MyArKnet” twitter handle have been public for years. Still trying to find anything connecting the John Roger’s photo archive to Red Alert or Tim H. So far only seeing articles showing they dropped out and photos bought by another firm or given back.
http://www.schellemusic.com/11.html
Which digital asset "#NFT" would you rather own?
— ARknet (@MyArKnet) December 28, 2022
A 10 second pixel gorilla or an original of Al Capone fishing in a robe during the time of the Valentine's Day Massacre?$TTCM #digitalart #pixelart #digitalasset #NFTCommunity pic.twitter.com/xAGFleQDxi
Planning, development, and decisions coming together. A picture is worth a thousand words.
— ARknet (@MyArKnet) December 27, 2022
The ARknet platform with KlickZie technology will transform the social and digital asset space.
"Rising tide lifts all boats."#NFTCommunity #NFTs #digitalart $TTCM pic.twitter.com/4RpnGZd2ow
What gives a digital asset "#NFTs" true utility and value?
— ARknet (@MyArKnet) December 23, 2022
Our #KlickZie technology is building a new standard of verifiable ownership and authenticity for your digital imagery.
The real Mona Lisa Vs a copy from the gift shop.$TTCM #BoredApe #History#OpenSeaNFT pic.twitter.com/MXfiCrU3Xn
The “Per Share Book Value” was not .0006/.0007 before this 8-K information
It was negative
Mentioned on Sunday
In this deal he (David LaMountain) gave up overall say in order to progress the company forward.
El Dorado will have more than 30% of voting shares and will have final say
It’s been done before.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1673731/000106299317000495/form8k.htm
Not for us to explain. Those all came from your previous post.
And "it will come with massive benefits?" Seriously? Please do explain.
There is supposed to be a discussion tonight with David LaMountain (alleged former undisclosed promoter, turned Investor Relations, turned COO, and current CEO) in the ARknet app. 9:30 EST, room “00000”.
Only available to those in Australia, Canada, and United States. All other share holders don’t get the information being shared. In the last meeting David was discussing another stock ticker.
A Reverse Stock Split was once “mythical”, “a very bad idea”, and “horrible”, but now “it will come with massive benefits.”
Interesting