Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Exactly it feeds them!
I sent this email today, I don't think I'll get a response but we'll see.
To: Jim Plant CEO
Jim,
As a concerned investor in Cyberkey Solutions I am requesting that you please update the current share count. I know this is on the investor information page with an estimate count as of 1/22/07, but in light of the recent SEC suspension, I believe the company could and should provide exact share count from today as no shares would have been traded for 5 days.
Many investors do want to continue to believe in Cyberkey and your leadership but it has certainly been strained with the suspension. History of these events are not with us here so any information that can be provided to shareholders without increase risk to the investigation, in my opinion should be presented and the exact share count would go along way with all investors.
Respectfully,
XXXX XXXXXX
Concerned Investor
I'd say another option is not all are being on the up and up with thier reported share count.
I'm thinking the same thing and smiling...Can he be that clever?
Oh don't you worried They'll be here to tell us all why this doesn't mean anything and that ADC is just a web page.
And a mark from me, also Todd I'll be adding one to you Great FInd. I see some hope again!
Bravo to the both of you and thanks again...
Moderator should post this link on board.
Phisherman excellent DD, thanks for sharing.
Amost time for the witching hour..They'll be here soon for the feeding...They need some more blood...em
What PR?
You got a good point there: old list of top 100 Utah companies:
http://www.amxinc.com/pdfs/articles/dnews_article_100.PDF
Sent mine out...Thanks
No Charlie, we need bright people like you to tell us what a fool we've been after the fact.
Thanks, very impressive lady...
Thank you.
I guess what I don't understand is why are you guys still here. You've already told us how much smarter you are, I believe all have had a good tasting of our blood. So why?
DO you truly take pleasure in someone else's pain? That's my friend is sad, for if I'm wrong I just lost some money but still have my soul. You all on the other hand, have lost your souls long before this event.
Who are the 2 Shareholders that are going to Cyberkey's office?
Posted by: Pennypicks
In reply to: Danno123 who wrote msg# 56297 Date:2/7/2007 2:05:12 PM
Post #of 56542
(Exchange Act) Rule 15c2-11 governs the submission and publication of quotations by brokers and dealers for certain non-Nasdaq over-the-counter equity securities.
More below
http://beta.pinksheets.com/otcguide/brokers_211.jsp
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) Rule 15c2-11 governs the submission and publication of quotations by brokers and dealers for certain non-Nasdaq over-the-counter equity securities. Specifically, the rule applies to a broker/dealer's initiation or resumption of quotations for such securities in any inter-dealer quotation medium, including the OTC Bulletin Board and the Pink Sheets. Pursuant to the rule, brokers and dealers are required to review and maintain specified information about the issuer of the security before publishing a quotation for that security.
SEC Rule 15c2-11. Click this link to see the complete rule.
http://www.law.uc.edu/CCL/34ActRls/rule15c2-11.html
The following are selected from a compilation of questions and answers relative to SEC Rule 15c2-11 and Schedule H of the NASD By-Laws. The complete Q&A can be found in the NASD Notice to Members 92-50.
RULE 15C2-11 INFORMATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Question #1: What degree of scrutiny must a broker/dealer give the required Rule 15c2-11 documentation prior to submitting the information to the NASD seeking clearance to publish a quotation?
Answer: Prior to submitting the information to the NASD, a broker/dealer must have a reasonable basis for believing that the information is accurate in all material respects and is obtained from a reliable source.
Question #2: What steps should a broker/dealer take to have a reasonable basis to believe that the information is accurate in all material respects?
Answer: A broker/dealer must review the material for obvious errors, internal inconsistencies, and questionable disclosures. This review must be in the context of all other information about the issuer in the broker/dealer's knowledge or possession, including the information required by paragraph (b).
Questions #3: What are the requirements of Rule 15c2-11 paragraph (b)?
Answer: Paragraph (b) requires a broker/dealer to have in its possession:
(1) A record of the circumstances surrounding the quotation request, including the identity of the person for whom the quotation is being submitted,
(2) a copy of the trading suspension order or the Commission release announcing the suspension if the security has been suspended by the Commission during the last 12 months, and
(3) a copy or written record of other material information, including adverse information, that the broker/dealer becomes aware of prior to publishing a quotation.
Question #4: What steps should a broker/dealer take to have a reasonable basis to believe that the information is obtained from a reliable source?
Answer: Generally, a broker/dealer can be satisfied that information is obtained from a reliable source if it is received from the issuer or its agents, or was obtained from an independent information service such as the Commission's public reference room. If a broker/dealer receives information about an issuer from another market maker or someone other than an agent of the issuer, the broker/dealer should verify the validity of the information with the issuer. Agents do not include promoters or others outside the issuer that may have a personal or an indirect interest in the security.
Questions #5: Under what circumstances would a broker/dealer be required to take further steps to have a reasonable basis to believe that the information is accurate in all material respects and the sources of the information are reliable?
Answer: Ordinarily the broker/dealer need not do any further review unless a potential material deficiency has been detected. Examples of potential material deficiencies are material inconsistencies in the information or between the information and other information in the broker/dealer's possession, a qualified auditor's report, a recently acquired asset that materially enhances the financial condition of the issuer, or a material asset listed on the balance sheet that is unrelated to the issuer's business.
Question #6: What should a broker/dealer do if a potential material deficiency is detected in the documents?
Answer: A broker/dealer's specific efforts to satisfy itself with respect to the accuracy of the information if a potential material deficiency has been detected will vary with the circumstances, and may require the broker/dealer to obtain additional information or seek to verify existing information. For example, the broker/dealer may be satisfied that the information is correct after questioning the issuer, or the broker/dealer may need to consult an independent source, such as an attorney or accountant. Regardless of the methodology used to review a potential material deficiency, members are required to maintain in their records any other material information (including adverse information) regarding the issuer which comes to the member's knowledge or possession before the publication or submission of the quotation. Members are also strongly urged to document the manner in which the material deficiencies are resolved.
Question #7: May a broker/dealer satisfy its obligation to review the required information and have a reasonable belief as to its accuracy and the reliability of its source solely because its documentation has been reviewed by the NASD?
Answer: No. A broker/dealer must independently satisfy the requirements of Rule 15c2-11. Clearance by the NASD to initiate quotations in a quotation medium is not a substitute for this review.
Questions #8: Are a wholesale market's obligations under Rule 15c2-11 any different than a retail market maker's obligations?
Answer: No. Commission Release No. 34-29094 states that the rule is directed at the fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative potential of a broker/dealer's quotations, and does not focus on whether the broker/dealer also engages in retail activity.
Question #9: Can a supplemental prospectus satisfy Rule 15c2-11(a)(1)?
Answer: Yes. As long as the supplemental prospectus is filed pursuant to Section 10(a) of the Securities Act and includes sufficient information about the issuer to enable the broker/dealer to satisfy its obligation under Rule 15c2-11, i.e., it contains the types of information described in Rule 15c2-11(a)(5). However, if the issuer meets the requirements of Rule 15c2-11(a)(3), the broker/dealer must obtain the documents required by Rule 15c2-11(a)(3).
Question #10: Is the issuer required to be current in its filings with the Commission in order for the broker/dealer to utilize Rule 15c2-11(a)(3)?
Answer: Yes. Issuers that meet the requirements of Rule 15c2-11(a)(3) are those issuers that report to the Commission and are current in their reports. The broker/dealer must have the issuer's latest form 10-K and all subsequent form 10-Qs and those Form 8-Ks filed within five business days prior to publication or submission of the quotation. If the issuer has not filed a Form 10-K, the broker/dealer must have a copy of the prospectus, which has been in effect less than 16 months, and all subsequent Form 10-Qs and Form 8-Ks. If a filing is due at the Commission prior to the NASD's clearance of the Form 211 application, that filing must also be submitted with the application.
Question #11: What happens if an issuer is not current in its filings with the Commission?
Answer: If the issuer is not current in its filings with the Commission, the broker/dealer can seek to satisfy another subsection of the rule. Usually this would be Rule 15c2-11(a)(5). However, the fact that the issuer is not current in its filings may bear upon the determination of whether the available information is materially accurate.
Questions #12: Can banks that file Form 10-Ks and Form 10-Qs with the Office of Thrift Supervision or other bank regulators satisfy Rule 15c2-11(a)(3)?
Answer: If the reports are filed pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with bank regulators, the reports will satisfy Rule 15c2-11(a)(3).
Questions #13: What information is required to be submitted under Rule 15c2-11(a)(4) relating to certain foreign issuers which are exempt from the periodic reporting requirements of Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act?
Answer: The broker/dealer is required to submit all the information that the issuer has furnished during its past fiscal year to the Commission in order for the issuer to maintain its Rule 12g3-2(b) exemption.
Question #14: Must the financial information required under Rule 15c2-11(a)(5) be independently audited?
Answer: No. rule 15c2-11(a)(5) does not require audited financials. However, a broker/dealer would ordinarily be required to review unaudited financial statements more closely than if the statements were independently audited. Nevertheless, simply because the statements have been audited, a broker/dealer cannot avoid its responsibility to review the financial statements in order to have a reasonable basis to believe that the information is accurate.
Questions #15: If an issuer has filed a Form 10-K or a prospectus with the Commission and the issuer is current in its reports to the Commission, can the broker rely on Rule 15c2-11(a)(5)?
Answer: No. If an issuer has filed a 10-K or prospectus with the Commission and is current in its reports, the broker must file under, and have in its possession the information required by, rule 15c2-11(a)(3).
Questions #16: What are the requirements for a broker/dealer if the issuer or its predecessor has been the subject of a Commission trading suspension during the preceding year?
Answer: An SEC trading suspension should alert the broker/dealer to the possibility that information in its possession concerning the issuer may no longer be current or accurate. The broker/dealer must be particularly cautious when seeking to reinstate quotations following an SEC trading suspension. The member must obtain a copy of the Commission trading suspension order or the Commission release announcing the trading suspension. A broker/dealer should, at a minimum, receive assurances or additional information with respect to matters cited in the suspension order or with respect to other matters affecting the broker/dealer's reasonable belief as to the accuracy of the information. Reliance on new information or assurances from prior sources of information in these circumstances, however, requires caution. In exceptional cases, where the source is unable to provide reasonable assurances about the reliability of the information, consultation with an independent accountant or attorney may be warranted. All information gathered in the broker/dealer's investigation of the issues must accompany the Form 211 application.
RULE 15c2-11 EXCEPTIONS
Question #17: Are there any exceptions from the informational requirements of Rule 15c2-11?
Answer: Yes. If a broker/dealer can meet one of the exceptions of Rule 15c2-11, it is not required to maintain or submit to the NASD any documents required by Rule 15c2-11. These exceptions primarily relate to instances where a broker/dealer wishes to quote a security that: is traded on a national securities exchange in the United States; represents unsolicited customer interest; has been the subject of regular and continuous quotations for the past 30 days; or is traded on Nasdaq.
Question #18: When does the Rule 15c2-11(f)(1) "exchange" exception apply?
Answer: The exchange exception applies to securities that are traded on a United States national securities exchange on the same day or the business day prior to the day the application is made to the quotation medium.
Question #19: If the common stock of an issuer trades on the New York Stock Exchange, are the warrants of the same issuer exempt from Rule 15c2-11?
Answer: No. The exception relates only to specific securities and not to the issuer. Each security must independently meet the requirements of the exception.
Question #21: If the broker/dealer is claiming the Rule 15c2-11(f)(2) "unsolicited customer interest" exception of Rule 15c2-11, can the broker/dealer publish quotations for the security in a quotation medium for its own account?
Answer: No. If the broker/dealer claims the unsolicited customer interest exception, it can only publish or submit a quotation for that customer account. If the broker/dealer wishes to publish or submit a quotation for its own account or any other accounts, it must comply with Rule 15c2-11. Paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 15c2-11 does not apply to a quotation consisting of both a bid and an offer, each at a specified price, unless the quotation medium specifically identifies the quotation as representing a customer's unsolicited indication of interest.
Questions #22: Will the NASD be monitoring the broker/dealer's compliance with the unsolicited customer interest exception?
Answer: Yes. The NASD monitors all aspects of broker/dealer compliance with Rule 15c2-11, including a quotation utilizing the unsolicited customer interest exception. The NASD may require the broker/dealer to produce its trading records and other documents to determine whether the broker/dealer traded for any account other than the indicated customer.
Question #23: What are the requirements of Rule 15c2-11(f)(3), the "piggyback" exception?
Answer: If a broker/dealer is relying on the Rule 15c2-11(f)(3) exception, the security must be quoted in the same interdealer quotation medium as the intended quotation during the past 30 calendar days, and that during those 30 days the security had to be quoted on at least 12 days without more than four consecutive business days without quotations.
Question #24: Do "name only" quotations satisfy the piggyback exception requirement that the security be quoted in the quotation medium?
Answer: Yes. The information requirements of Rule 15c2-11 apply to name only as well as priced quotations. Both types of quotations can be used to satisfy the piggyback exception. If should be noted, however, that each broker/dealer submitting a quotation must satisfy the informational requirements of Rule 15c2-11 until all of the requirements of the piggyback exception, including the 30-day quotation period, have been satisfied.
Question #25: What happens when a security is no longer quoted by a broker/dealer in the quotation medium?
Answer: If a security is not quoted by any broker/dealer for a period of more than 4 business days, the security no longer qualifies for the piggyback exception. A broker/dealer would be required to comply with Rule 15c2-11 before it could initiate or resume quotation of the security.
Question #26: What constitutes a "business day" for purposes of Rule 15c2-11?
Answer: For purposes of Rule 15c2-11, a "business day" is defined by reference to the quotation medium to which a broker/dealer submits the quotation. Any day that the quotation medium accepts and disseminates quotations would constitute a "business day" under Rule 15c2-11.
Question #27: Must a broker/dealer quote a security for an entire "business day" to qualify for the "piggyback" exception contained in paragraph (f)(3) of Rule 15c2-11?
Answer: Under the "piggyback" exception, a security will be deemed to have been quoted on a business day where a broker/dealer has continuously quoted a security for all or a substantial portion of that day. The existence of closing quotations on the OTC Bulletin Board may be used by the NASD to create a rebuttable presumption that the broker/dealer continuously quoted a security for a substantial portion of the business day.
Question #28: If a security qualifies for the piggyback exception in one quotation medium, does it meet the piggyback exception for other quotation mediums? For example, if a security is quoted in the OTC Bulletin Board, can a market maker quote the security in the "pink sheets" without filing a Form 211 application?
Answer: No. The staff of the SEC takes the position that the piggyback exception does not transfer from one quotation medium to another. Thus, quotations for a security in the OTC Bulletin Board may not be used to satisfy the piggyback requirements for the "pink sheets." [See GlobeNet Exemption, which provides that under certain conditions a market maker quoting a security in the OTCBB may submit a quote in the Pink Sheets for that same security without filing a Form 211.]
Question #29: What are the requirements of Rule 15c2-11(f)(5), the "Nasdaq" exception?
Answer: In order for a broker/dealer to rely on the Nasdaq exception, the security must be authorized for quotation on Nasdaq and the authorization must not be suspended, terminated, or prohibited.
Question #31: If the common stock and units of an issuer are already quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board [or Pink Sheets ], does a Form 211 application need to be submitted for the warrants of the same issuer?
Answer: Yes. Rule 15c2-11 applies to securities, not issuers. Quotations for the common stock and units may be in compliance with Rule 15c2-11, but that does not qualify any other securities of the issuer. Accordingly, a completed Form 211 and the Rule 15c2-11 information would have to be submitted for the warrants. However, if the broker/dealer has previously submitted documents relating to the issuer that continue to meet the requirements of Rule 15c2-11, it need not refile identical documents. The broker/dealer need only submit a completed Form 211 alone or with any additional documents needed to comply with Rule 15c2-11.
SCHEDULE H QUESTIONS
Question #32: What must be included in the basis and factors for a broker/dealer's initial priced entry?
Answer: A broker/dealer's basis and factors should relate to the price that the broker/dealer is proposing. The statement on the Form 211 must be concise and directly related to the proposed bid and/or offer. The basis and factors should not be broad generalized statements but should articulate how the priced quotation was determined, including the factors taken into consideration. The NASD is not conducting merit review but must be able to clearly understand the basis for the initial priced entry.
Question #33: If a broker/dealer's Rule 15c2-11 documentation has been cleared by the NASD, but the broker/dealer did not request clearance for a priced quotation, is the broker/dealer required to file anything additional when it changes its unpriced quotation to a priced quotation?
Answer: Yes. The broker/dealer must supplement its original application with the Form 211 indicating the intended priced entry and the basis and factors even if other broker/dealers are publishing priced quotations for the security or a piggyback exception has become available.
Question #34: Can Form 211 applications be faxed to the NASD?
Answer: No. The original Form 211 must be mailed and requires original signatures.
Question #36: What are the filing requirements of Schedule H if another security of the issuer is trading on Nasdaq, i.e., if a broker/dealer wishes to quote the warrants of an issuer that has a common stock listed on Nasdaq?
Answer: Since an issuer that has a security trading on Nasdaq will be a reporting company, the broker/dealer need only submit the Form 211 and indicate on the Form 211, under Rule 15c2-11(a)(3), the reports that the broker/dealer has in its possession. These reports would include the issuer's latest Form 10-K and all subsequent Form 10-Qs and Form 8-Ks. In this case the Form 211 can be faxed to the NASD.
Question #37: Is there an expedited procedure for listing recently delisted Nasdaq securities on the OTC Bulletin Board [or Pink Sheets ]?
Answer: Yes. On February 28, 1992, the SEC granted an exemption from Rule 15c2-11 for securities that will be delisted from Nasdaq due to the revised listing and maintenance requirements for the Nasdaq Small-Cap Market. When these securities are delisted, they will automatically be eligible to quote on the OTC Bulletin Board or any other quotation medium the next business day without the filing of a Form 211, as long as the following requirements are met:
(1) The security must have been traded on Nasdaq for the past 30 days;
(2) The issuer must not be subject to bankruptcy proceedings;
(3) The issuer must be current in its SEC reporting requirements; and
(4) The broker/dealer relying on this exception must have been a market maker in the subject security during the 30 days prior to delisting.
Question #38: Can more than one security of an issuer be included on a Form 211?
Answer: Yes. More than one security for a single issuer may be requested on a single Form 211.
Question #39: Can a broker/dealer accept payment to make a market in an issuer's securities?
Answer: No. A market maker cannot accept any form of compensation, including cash, securities, products, or services, for the purposes of making a market, to cover out-of-pocket expenses for making a market, or for submitting an application to make a market in an issuer's securities. This activity was addressed in Notice to Members 75-16 in 1975.
Question #45: Does Rule 15c2-11 and Schedule H apply to secondary market transactions in direct participation program securities?
Answer: Yes. Both Rule 15c2-11 and all of the sections of Schedule H apply. Pursuant to Schedule H, Section 4, members are required to submit their Rule 15c2-11 information to the NASD prior to publishing quotations. Moreover, members must report their volume in secondary market transactions, and certain pricing information in direct participation program trading as required by Schedule H, Section 2 of the NASD By-Laws. For more information on trade reporting for these securities, please call Automated Reports at (301) 590-6887. In addition, a separate Notice will be issued addressing this subject.
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON SEC RULE 15C2-11:
All interested broker/dealers should read Rule 15c2-11, Commission Release No. 34-29094, Schedule H, Section 4 of the NASD By-Laws, and Notice to Members 90-40. Additionally, the Compliance Division's OTC Compliance Unit (240)386-5100 is available throughout the business day and by voice mail during non-business hours to respond to inquiries or to direct the caller to the appropriate party. Also, broker/dealers with questions regarding Rule 15c2-11 may contact the Office of Trading Practices, Division of Market Regulation, Securities and Exchange Commission at (202) 272-2848.
All Posts are IMO and Do your own DD.
News/ Info is always changing -
What is New is Old real fast
GL
Pennypicks
That's what I'm hoping for. Just from listening to the responses by some with apparent accounting background there were certainly issues with the UAF.
The wound will heal very quickly if Mr. Plant truely has the cards to play. (Contract and A/F) and than as Cowboy states we come out with a bang.
Even as a shareholder who believed they been doing a great job prior to this, this has certainly affect my view. Knowing for sure with A/F and contract will cure everyone, or we'll all be deal a hard lesson from a pink sheet stock. I hope this will not be the case.
Thanks picks
1,002,561
add 1 mill here...em
Unfortunately I'm sure they will be back to suck some more blood...em
Well after re-looking at some cases are odds are some what better than I first thought. Some come out ok , Though I only found one MCNJ that traded higher.
Not through all of 2005 and didn’t touch 2006, I’ll continue for my own peace of mind. I didn’t account for any dilution or such, nor is this scientific. Only pulled one's that I thought were common issues., but not perfect. Just thought I'd share.
2004 - Of 11 suspended, 6 are out completely, the 5 below are still trading at lower levels, one seems to be doing OK (BOCX) still at lower levels
VAPH – still trading on the pinks at a much lower level
BOCX – Is still trading on OTC , than when to pinks now back on OTC.
GDLS – still trading at lower volume and PPS
USCA – Still trading at very low levels
ATKJ – Still trading at low levels
2005 – Of the 10 suspended, 4 were not trading, 6 were though half were not after the first year or so.
MCNJ – This shot up a large amount the first 4 month after being suspended, after which moved to very low level and volume
TFCY - same hear traded up after suspension for the first 4 -5 months, though very volatile than down from there.
MXDY – dropped after suspension but was dropping prior low volume and volatile
HSYN – Drop hard at the start than recovered some volatile for a year or more.
BHLL –Same here dropped hard at the start than recovered some volatile for a year or more, no real volume after this
WDAC - Same here dropped hard at the start than recovered some volatile for a year or more, no real volume after this
SSLV - Same here dropped hard at the start than recovered some volatile for a year or more, no real volume after this
Guest at this point I'm planning for the worst, and hoping for the best. The odds are not on our side but I've hit 99 to 1's odds before. Hopefully it will happen again. Good luck all.
Still don't understand how that got to be the topic, the SEC did not halt trading because someone was shorting this, they stopped it because of a reported contract that the SEC found no proof of. (again I hope in a few days Jim will be my hero again but not today.
Seems to me that the company could clear this up very quickly. Show the contract Jim, why does the SEC have doubts, Show the contract. First for me its was disbelief this happened, then the feeling of a SUCKER, now just pissed. Show the Contract JIM. I hope in the next few days I can again be in shock by some very positive news but it ain't lookin good.
Massimo I hope you're right also!
Cowboy I hope you're right...but I have not been able to find one good time happen to a company once halted. These are some that did continue to trade but no where near the level they were trading at prior to the halt.
RDYF
AROR
GAPJ
LSWJ
So CKYS will have to pull a rabbit out of their hat in the form of a 25 mil contract with the DOD.
Posted by: going-for-it
In reply to: imamazed who wrote msg# 53899 Date:2/5/2007 3:15:02 PM
Post #of 53918
____________________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
February 5, 2007
IN THE MATTER OF
:
CYBERKEY SOLUTIONS, INC.
:
:
ORDER OF SUSPENSION
:
OF TRADING
:
File No. 500-1
:
____________________________________:
It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of CyberKey Solutions, Inc. ("CyberKey") because of questions regarding the accuracy of assertions made by CyberKey, and others, in press releases and other public statements to investors, concerning among other things: (1) contracts with the Department of Homeland Security and/or other government agencies, (2) revenues received pursuant to those contracts, and
(3) accounts receivable generated by those contracts.
The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30
a.m. EST February 5, 2007 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on February 16, 2007.
By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris Secretary
The sky just fell..em
____________________________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Before the
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
February 5, 2007
IN THE MATTER OF
:
CYBERKEY SOLUTIONS, INC.
:
:
ORDER OF SUSPENSION
:
OF TRADING
:
File No. 500-1
:
____________________________________:
It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of CyberKey Solutions, Inc. ("CyberKey") because of questions regarding the accuracy of assertions made by CyberKey, and others, in press releases and other public statements to investors, concerning among other things: (1) contracts with the Department of Homeland Security and/or other government agencies, (2) revenues received pursuant to those contracts, and
(3) accounts receivable generated by those contracts.
The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.
Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30
a.m. EST February 5, 2007 through 11:59 p.m. EST, on February 16, 2007.
By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris Secretary
Sec.gov
SEC HALTED Trading
If this one turns out the way its looking, it will be my last one.
Dog,
I want to Believe.hoping and praying!