Alan .. RE: the Patent-ability Review ..
Isnt that Addressed in the top part of the 2nd link ?..
Waco patent BLOG ..
www.wacopatentblog.com/
Paragraph 4 ..
<As indicated below, the PTAB has basically stated that if the invalidity challenges are the same in the IPR request and parallel patent litigation, then if a court has a reasonable chance of adjudicating the issue first, the Board will use its discretion and not even institute a review. In essence, the PTAB is saying, "yes, we believe that courts can move more quickly than we can, and if the issues are the same, then any IPR would be moot and should not be instituted.">
With the Few Facts we Know as Shareholders over the Years ..
I dont think Intel wants to go in front of a Jury and Say ..
Yeah we tried to patent it our-self ..
have fought for years to keep it .. and Failed ..
But NOW we say it is Unpatentable ..
Doesn't Pass My Smell Test...
Doubt it will a Jury ..
As you Say "a Game of Chance" for a Big Company staring at Triple Damages .. imo
Agree with your other Points ..
Year and a Half Isnt Bad for this type of thing ..
The Bills are Paid till Just about then ..
Keep the Share Price above .04 and a Golden Cross is Possible on the Chart in about 2 weeks ..
That 2 Day Volume Spike the Stock had .. has a Name ..
It Evades me right now .. but the General Lesson Was ..
Rising Prices usually Follow a Volume Spike like that ..