Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
That's some priceless DD.
Vote for Pedro!
In other words, stay away all you newbies while I stock up! LOL
I wonder if their protection covers the possible gains if this shoots up to 2 cents?
What kind of "investor" protects other investors? I thought this was dog eat dog....nice to see we got some nice shepards looking out for us stupid sheep.
So he had an arrangement where he worked for money for them? I thought a lot of people did volunteer stuff (testing). I understood he wanted to do more, but they decided not to use him.
Midas hasn't been paid for what?
Did he perform services for them?
Why? Is it like watching a train wreck or something?
This is getting pretty funny, I'm starting to hope they can come out with a new web page everyday!
Nah, you guys are right, they should have left all the poor mispelled words and grammer out there.
In fact, they should just roll over and say you guys win, afterall, once Ihub superheroes have spoken then what's left.
DIYD-DIYD
How many times are you going to post the same thing? Are you really sure it's dead....seems you're still trying to convince someone.
Janice, why would they place themselves in a box with the gaurantee, if they were only appealing to greed. They have opened themselves wide open, if that falls through.
They got until June or really, a bit prior to June. I guess we shall see!
I mean, the way I see it, not to offend, is we must have some pretty dumb people here to fall for such a thing. Isn't that the bottom line.
And OA, you feel it is your duty to protect us or save us from it.
I mean, if what you say is true, why aren't they being taken in? Have they really broken any law? What law, why aren't they arrested? Are they really that dumb? I mean, lets cut to the chase, why keep posting? Would you post about a guy that stole a purse or go chase after him? If they are so dumb, it should be easy?
Sincerely, what is the hold up? Why sit here and post about scams and not REALLY do anything about it? I mean, what kind of superhero are you? Put your money where your mouth is and do it.
Don't you really mean how dumb we are....
Janice, I know the answer...you don't have to post it. LOL
Well, if they are so dumb....what are all these posts all about?
It's quite amazing when it comes to conspiracy people.
For instance, on the one hand they think George Bush is a complete idiot who couldn't punch his way out of a paper sack. On the other hand, he was able to master mind 911 with one of the most incompetant Governments that ever existed.
With PNMS, they are master mind scammers, brilliant and have been doing it for ages. Yet they can't even spell correctly. It would seem they are one of the worst scam outfits I have ever seen. You can see right though it. But then, THAT IS BRILLIANT! LOL
Have a great evening everyone.
LOL, I did that on purpose and then fixed it, what, I can't update things? I was hoping someone would catch it!
You don't know what you are talking about....because you mispelled the word authorities. LOL
I know, they need to correct things, but mispelled words don't logically allow one to conclude a scam. Perhaps in need, but I know some pretty dumb people with a lot of money! LOL
OT Mike, thanks for your kind words.
OA, I think the idea is you can call the company and they can say #1. We don't have a license....because... or #2 we carry our license in this state and you can verify that by contacting this organization or whatever.
You can then go verify and call them back and say, I am having trouble verifying this or that or whatever.
What's wrong with that?
You guys resemble a wild wild west lynch mob.
Did you even read at all what I posted?
Lets take an example step by step for you.
Lets say I invest $1000 in this fund. Year one we get 34%. I remove $ 300 to throw a party. I leave the rest in the fund. I leave it for 5 years and we get on average 34% each year, then I remove $2500 for a car.
What is my ending balance? Did I not get 34% on average?
Your wonderful formula does not take into account any deductions?
To take your formula and apply it like you say is rediculous.
That's rediculous. I disagree with you, so you say your opinion is fact. I'm glad you have yourself.
Yes, but I think you are taking it to literally.
It says nothing about how gains where removed or anything of the sort. You're assuming by using that formula that someone made all this money and left it there to keep compunding.
Not real.
well, according to CIDD this was an average return. Are you sure that is the correct formula? Not to mention, the portfolio would probably be changing constantly. I mean, most 401ks will state the average stock return over the years is 10%. I'm not sure what you are trying to prove here by the formula.
The truth will be known. It's early in the game. Place yourbets.
You obvioulsy have misunderstood how to apply the rate of return. He is NOT saying he started with a 2.6 Billion portfolio. This is what it has grown too.
Do you mean the second time you called them? LOL
You know, in that one movie, I believe I-Robot, he was actually trying to return a purse.
Not sure if I got that right.
My point is the PPS is already in the cellar, how is he basing what anyone is doing or not doing? In other words, it's not like DD wasn't done and so a big sell of hasn't occurred.
I just had this vision of MT hanging out in a mail box...LOL
Not sure what you're driving at, did you expect the PPS to plumett today? Hello, been there done that.
Besides, your DD comment goes both ways. I think even OA would admit that.
One thing that bothers me, is how you guys take delight in all this. If what you say is true, a lot of harm has occurred and none of you should be so cavelier. It's one thing to serve and protect, it's another to pile on and destroy.
who has gone to jail? How long is quicktime?
Why would they say a word? No one can place a rational thought here any more with out some sarcastic biased slam on PNMS.
No, this board is done until PNMS turns the light on.
And yet one more "fact" to throw on the pile.
refutation...I don't recall providing anything of the sort.
Acutally, I don't think you are qualified for Panamersa. If you do, then OA might have something to really speak out on. LOL
LOL, that is funny. Wow, you must be a tech wizard since your servers and electronics only go down for financial reasons!
If I get a stock certificate today, will that prove ownership two weeks ago?
Look, you can blame MT and friends all you want. I'm not willing to fuel your fire. Talk to OA or whomever else you want.
My point is aimed at TDAmeritrade and the entire stock industry. Doesn't matter what company. A consumer should be able to get a certified document stating he owned whatever shares for whatever company on whatever date. If this was possible, then in theory, NSS could possibly be exposed.
Why would that be so difficult? In my opinon, it's like asking for a receipt. If you want to make it part of an account statement then fine, but you should be able to produce this document without personal information and/or other portions of your portfolio.
In other words, I could go to my Scottrade account and say send me a certified document on the amount of PNMS shares I owned on August 23. They should say no problem, that will cost you $10 and you should have it in three days.
Isn't that like saying it's OK to steal from people if no one likes them? What kind of logic is that?
I didn't buy it on that date. I owned it on that date.
The thing is, why do I have to use monthly statements to try an dprove ownership. They should be able to verify ownership easily.
What's the big deal?