Broken record.

Wrong.

Anyone opens themself up to be THE topic (and objective criticism) if they make predictions and prognostications and also constantly refer to them.

Amnesia now?

ROFL

And you've been repeating your narrative the same.

Stalemate.

Participation trophies all around.

"I said over a year ago the company would run out of money and need to raise funds. Many on this board called me out as a paid shill and other derogatory names were tossed my way. The last quarterly report proved I was right"

> Do you want a plastic trophy?
> Just so you're aware, it wasn't rocket science to assume they might need to raise funds.

"Not sure why people hate on (in my opinion) the more realistic evaluations of RDGL that myself and a few others post on here"

> Here's two samples why: The utter hubris displayed and the few others are not realistic as they proclaim.

"it simply means we see it failing and we are calling it out!!"

> Then let's apply your standard here: What's your reasoning on the proclamation that RDGL is currently failing?
> Is bankruptcy imminent? No. They have the option to raise more funds. Is it a great option? No. But this stock is not on the cliff's edge--yet.
> To your own admissions in the past, there is progress (albeit slow) towards submitting the IDE. That is actually, realistically, called forward progress.
> If this stock were failing, I'd have sold already.
> Still here for the potential gains. DYODD.
> Has Mayo defected its partnership? No.
> What other KPIs exhibit "failure"? I'll hold your beer while you type.

The hypocrisy.

Who made you arbiter for making forecasts/projections?

Please.

Comedy club.

Self-proclaimed Nostradamuses who can't hit the side of a barn.

Copy paste bot postings with no added value.

Echo chamber with no effect.

1) Nobody asked.

2) More word salad.

3) Just hedge language to cover every scenario that's translated as:
a. RDGL failed: see, I was right after all.
b. RDGL succeeded: see, I "always" believed in the product (despite throwing shade everyday)

There's no conviction here except the obvious.

IDE either happens or it doesn't.

And so what happens?

What's the next speculation?

A. Some dilution
B. Lower PPS floor
C. IDE in '24

Know what you own. Or what you don't own.

"I'm far less repetitive than RDGL's downdates and Tweets. Nothing has changed in years."

Nothing coincidental about these two statements being adjacent to one another.

There are clearly higher intelligent forms of life that can be more reflexive with analysis instead of hammering the same drivel.

This is the lowest order of AI in the market.

In practically any sensical business environment, the reviewing party provides a full checklist of deliverables. They may even cite some additional items they would like to receive.

No one knows if RDGL requested this or not. Occam's Razor says they did ask the FDA.

The fact that the FDA keeps adding another deliverable to their so-called list at nearly every juncture speaks to a true objective factor in the delays. Not the only factor, but a significant one here.

So, no, it hasn't all been on RDGL.

Time will tell how this pans out.

Ultra

No hate. No malice. No objectivity. No problem.

Best objective, keep it real, comment so far in 2023 related to RDGL.

"Just pointing out fact, contrary to ongoing multiple bogus statements, there was no July meeting with FDA. RDGL got caught editing the July 6 update, with no posted indication the update was edited after release, nor is a date of editing posted. That's dishonest."

- Nothing grievous and meriting an SEC complaint. Yawn.

"A meeting is only anticipated at some unknown future date. Fact is we don't even have confirmation the genotoxicity protocol has been submitted yet.'

- Ground level tree view. Still working towards it albeit not great pace. Meh.

"F-up after f-up. Enough is enough. MK needs to go."

- You can vote with your shares and sell. Still minority opinion.

"That's keeping it real."

- Be real: You're just speaking to one side of the coin.

This is what keeping it real looks more like:

- Posts here and in the collective multiverse won't impact PPS, FDA, etc.

- Biased conjecture won't impact intelligent investors or prospective ones (except the likes of a tiny, unmerry band of disciples)

- Focusing on the trees, while blind to the forest, is akin to minutiae and navel lint-gazing

- RDGL still moving forward: step by step

Real Flags & Plausible Impact:

- Slow progress > PPS downtrend > sooner funding required
- More funding required > not bankruptcy > but some dilution

Fake Flags & Actual Impact:

- Constant dumping comments > trolling
- Barrage of RDGL "history" comments > grooming

It's all good Nancy.

If you're not in his shoes, over-indexed criticism is just smoke.

At least he's the only one here who's not another armchair QB.

He has credentials that matter.

Yours?

He's not sweating. He's not raising at moment. Must know something.

Neither.

We need IDE.

MK not expressing any concern about funding.

Only you.

I'll side with MK.

Apparently MK and the BoD beg to differ.

Not seeing any “distress” calls at the moment. Therefore, cool pillow.

Wrong facts. Wrong person. Never said that.

Try again.

Wrong facts.

Try again.

MK really "shaking in his boots" right now--all concerned about the short runway and his vacation ending that he's still investing some energy into ISOPET.

Need a new poster.

We're well past suspect now going on Year 2.

Same ole diatribe, speculations, misinterpretations.

"FDA can only approve or reject what they're asked to."

No sh!t Sherlock.

Start your own biotech and get it FDA approved in less than two years and then we'll talk.

Only armchair QBs and keyboard warriors. SMH.

Your opinion is sound. The other two are merde.

If RDGL has legitimate funding issues, then why would MK also spend time on Isopet? Chew on that bone.

Any recent calls for fundraising? No.

They're not sweating. Only you.

Feel free to vote him out with your free shares. Oh wait…

No, MK doesn't need to go.

MK needs to finish the job.

While we sit here and scuttle over rabbits. SMH.

Yeah, RDGL BOD going to fire the CEO in process of submitting IDE.

- Said no one ever

Get real.

Unlikely.

But we don't see you here posting everyday.

Apparently, free shares pronouns are very tight with MK and know all the companies business strategies and PR protocols and are the de facto PR team.

That's better--future RDGL focused.

I thought RDGL was all about the future, not the past.

Can't have it both ways, Steve.

If I had free shares......

I wouldn't be on this board frequently.

If I had real skin in the game, which I do......

I would be tracking my weighty investment.