Tell me, is this the CIA or old Soviet KGB such that secrecy must prevail? What's wrong with GZFX putting out a NR explaining why the extension came about? What's wrong with a NR that explained how subs are up 110% over last quarter and with greater than anticipated response to the pilot program at CC, a more gradual phase in than originally planned is deemed necessary?
Is it considered bad form to inform the shareholders generally what is transpiring with the company?
It seems ridiculous to have to make wild guesses at what is behind the extension. It could be for reasons I and others have hinted at. It could be because CC wants to accumulate a lot more shares at a cheaper price, now they know for sure this thing will fly ( and was flying already). He who controls the rollout controls the PPS at this point. This morning is brutal proof of that. Handy turn of events, if you were CC and wanted to buy more of the company at cheaper prices. How many shares did CC pick up today, anyhow? Anybody know?
Why create a situation where specualtion, rumor and inuendo run rampant? Is this any way to treat valued shareholders. I've been impressed with the way the CEO is handling the devlopment of the company. But I think the way they handle NRs sucks big time.
It's great they don't hype every little thing they can to pump the stock. But perhaps they err in the other direction--not bothering to explain, even generally, what is going on.
If the delayed rollout is actually due to positive reasons, we shareholders deserve to know. We shouldn't have to pay the freight for GZFX failing to deliver--adequate news on the goings on of the company.
A little truth would have gone a long ways today.