Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
YIELD SIGN STILL UP!!!
Also, no excuse for not having an attorney opinion letter. QEDN had one but its not on OTC Markets anymore. The fact she hasn't addressed this to the shareholders is troubling.
YIELD SIGN STILL UP. NO ATTORNEY OPINION LETTER YET.
I like posting here because it amazes me how easily people can be manipulated. QEDN makes a post here about having a $12 Million Loan (which they did actually post a few years' ago). Then buy, buy, buy. QEDN posts about projected revenues of almost $200 Million (which they did actually post a few years' ago). Then buy, buy, buy. None of QEDN's posts are verifiable and literally none of them have come to fruition in the time I have been here.
Still there is volume on this board and volume in the stock, despite nothing ever said by Bahnsen ever having been supported by third party documents.
The stock is not near as volatile and there is much less volume since Lattuca obtained the order prohibiting QEDN from issuing shares.
The only source to verify anything is a lawsuit (which resulted in a judgment against QEDN) in which nothing has been filed for a long time.
I enjoy seeing whether people care about the truth that can be verified in a lawsuit or if they only car about a post that is not going to come true (like QEDN obtaining $200 Million in revenues).
It also has dropped significantly and without notice when promises about QEDN turned out not to come true. Hollow price increases never last.
YEILD SIGN STILL UP. BAHNSEN PROMISED IT WOULD BE CURRENT OVER A WEEK AGO.
The best predictor of future performance is past performance. QEDN has not shown any ability to accomplish anything. It can't even obtain an attorney letter.
Time has already told that nothing has been sold since 2014. I am not sure why QEDN would need more than 7 years to sell product.
QEDN has never sold a bean. As you know the stock hit pretty much exactly the point it is at now in 2017 and then the bottom fell out of it and it went to trips because none of what Bahnsen said panned out and the company never accomplished anything. Now we are right where we were before...people claiming that it doesn't matter whether this is a real company or a fake company, it doesn't matter if QEDN produces a product or not, that people should buy QEDN mindlessly without any regard to the fact it has no product. Pumping the stock without backing it up may result in some short term gains but it will crash again and last time it crashed at pretty much this price point. Pair that with the new SEC rule and that QEDN is not current in its financials there is nothing to cheer about for QEDN. Everyone smart will be out by September 26.
She doesn't answer any questions on calls. Every once in a while she will post what she calls an interview. The last one was from about two weeks ago but no thought provoking questions, like how does a deal from GMS benefit GEGI, was asked. Useless interview and useless interviewer.
She has nothing worth announcing? She has no problems announcing preliminary matters that have to do with GMS. If she is in control of GMS and GEGI then there is no reason for there not to be a contract between the two...unless Bahnsen wants to keep options open and not bind GMS to anything.
Refusing to bind GMS to GEGI is of no benefit to GEGI.
So GEGI is supposed to buy Inchi from GMS? Is there a contract between GEGI and GMS? Is any contract exclusive? Who owns GMS? To the extent GMS is owned by Bahnsen is there an independent committee making sure that GEGI is paying market price to GMS? What rights does GEGI have against GMS if it can't provide the nuts?
Does GEGI have any distribution contracts? What if GMS can't satisfy demand?
The post says nothing about any of this and all Bahnsen has done is imply that GEGI will be buying from GMS. About as clear as mud and it appears to be intentionally non-transparent.
Nothing in this link makes reference to GEGI. The article makes allegations that a Colombian company, Green Mind Solutions, has an agreement to manufacture Sacha Inchi. Nothing in the article states that GEGI has any contracts with Green Mind Solutions. I am not sure what this has to do with GEGI.
Can you point to anything that QEDN has accomplished over the last five years that can be verified with a third party? The press release (if you can call it that) issued by GEGI and QEDN yesterday didn't even claim QEDN or GEGI has accomplished anything.
Years and years and years and years and years of failure is all QEDN has to show for itself. If I am wrong point me to something that QEDN accomplished.
You should listen to her 45 minute interview. She makes it sound as if GEGI and QEDN have been doing business for years. All of this when QEDN and GEGI just filed financials showing no machinery and no revenue.
YIELD SIGN STILL UP. STILL NO ATTORNEY OPINION LETTER.
SEPTEMBER 26 IS AROUND THE CORNER.
That doesn't say anything about QEDN. It references a Colombian company, Green Mind Solutions, SAS.
I don't care what Bahnsen is building. I care what QEDN is building. She has not announced anything that relates to QEDN. If there is some agreement between GMS and QEDN she needs to say what obligations GMS has to QEDN.
Nothing in that article says QEDN or GEGI have accomplished anything. It says Green Mind Solutions SAS has a contract and Green Mind Solutions SAS is producing Sacha Inchi. Perhaps QEDN or GEGI might like to announce a contract it has???
Has Bahnsen ever come through on anything? Betting on a dice is a 1 in 6 chance right? How many times has Bahnsen promised something that didn't happen? The answer is more than 6.
Just build what??? You mean pump up the stock when there is no good reason to buy it?
The last time QEDN was at this price (2017) the bottom dropped out and it quickly went to trips. There is no reason to believe the price will rise, especially considering September 26 is around the corner.
So QEDN is no different from some backroom dice game?
GEGI is still not current!!!
Investors will care on September 26, 2021.
If QEDN isn't current then OTC Markets is prohibited from quoting them.
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2020-212
The yield sign is still up. Was Bahnsen being truthful in the interview about only needing to fill out a simple form. Perhaps she can post a copy of the simple form she filled out to ease our minds. Not good the yield sign is still up.
I agree. She still hasn't explained why the attorney letter was removed.
Yield sign still up. Bahnsen said it should be full reporting by now but it is not. Not even an attorney opinion letter on file.
Per Bahnsen QEDN should be current by today. QEDN is not current and doesn't even have an attorney opinion letter on file.
They aren't necessarily meaningless but you would expect what Bahnsen says in an interview to reconcile with the financials. If the financials show no assets but Bahnsen references a ton of assets in an interview the interview potentially has negative value.
Why would Bahnsen claim all of these assets when the financials show $0.00 in assets? Maybe there is an explanation but it looks really bad. Bahnsen really needs to explain herself here as her reputation for truthfulness has been questioned on this message board.
I can't get past the fact that QEDN claims to have a processing plant/manufacturing facility.
According to the financials Bahnsen just submitted, QEDN does NOT have a processing plant/manufacturing facility.
In the interview Bahnsen said QEDN is Pink Limited simply because she had to complete two forms with OTC and she has now completed the form.
Unfortunately, no question was asked about when QEDN's 2nd Quarter financials will be filed or why they are late. Also, no question was asked about why the attorney opinion letter was removed and when a new one will be filed.
Without an attorney opinion letter QEDN won't show current and will remain Pink Limited.
Accountability...how can Bahnsen make these claims when the financials show $0.00 in assets? Bahnsen needs to explain why QEDN has no assets but she claims it has machinery. Nothing she said in the interview reconciles with the financials.
How can the interviewer not ask her about why none of this are on the financials? A real interview would have asked her some questions about the financials.
Bahnsen claims BancoColombia is providing financing and already provided financing for equipment.
This is completely the opposite of what the financials say. No debt with BancoColombia is listed on the liabilities. No equipment is listed on assets so if there is no equipment there is no loan for the equipment.
The portion of the interview about BancoColombia makes no sense.
Thank you for providing the link. Its as if Bahnsen and the interviewer never reviewed the QEDN financials prior to the interview. Bahnsen is claiming dozens of contracts are already executed but not a single contract is available for review.
Not a single contract is listed on the balance sheet.
Bahnsen claims to own a bunch of machinery in the interview but non of the machinery is claimed as an asset on the balance sheet.
None of this reconciles. Bahnsen needs to explain why the alleged equipment and the alleged contracts are not on the balance sheet as assets.
Thanks for the update. That helps.
I appreciate the information. Sharing of this type of information is exactly why this board exists. Did the notice specify that QEDN was one of the impacted securities. Said another way, did the notice state that QEDN wouldn't be able to be purchased after today or did it use the more general term "impacted securities".
If the general term was used have you been able to confirm with ETrade that QEDN is an "impacted security"?
Doing a great job by having no revenue for years!!!
Don't forget to mention that the company had an opinion letter posted that was withdrawn and the CEO won't tell the shareholders why the opinion letter was withdrawn. Now a yield sign is up when a greenlight was up two weeks' ago.
She needs product to land a contract. QEDN has no product and it has no sales. She can't even get QEDN current on OTC Markets. Per Bahnsen, she has said unequivocally QEDN will be current by September 1, 2021. Looking forward to September 2, 2021. She told us QEDN would be current months' ago.
I don't get it. Why doesn't she post an opinion letter? If she is having some difficulty with this why doesn't she tell everyone what the difficulty is?