Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Cut off her nose! Not his…she’s the messenger!
Key phrase…”REVIEW DENIED”
Straight from the NSC docket:
LOCKSMITH FINANCIAL CORPORATION, A S u p r e m e Court No. 84267 District Court Case No. A807745 BRITISH COLUMBIA CORPORATION,
Appellant,
VS.
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC., ANEVADA CORPORATION; AND NEW HORIZON TRANSFER, INC., A BRITISH COLUMBIA BUSINESSENTITY,
Respondents.
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF NEVADA, ss.
I, Elizabeth A. Brown, the duly appointed and qualified Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Nevada, do hereby certify that the following is a full, true and correct copy of the Judgment in this matter.
JUDGMENT
The court being fully advised in the premises and the law, ti is now ordered, adjudged and decreed, as follows:
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order "
Judgment, as quoted above, entered this 25th day of January, 2023. JUDGMENT
The court being fully advised in the premises and the law, it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed, as follows:
"Review Denied"
Judgment, as quoted above, entered this 8l day of June, 2023.
NI WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed my name and affixed the seal of the Supreme
Court at my Office in Carson City, Nevada this June 08, 2023.
Elizabeth A. Brown, Supreme Court
Overturned? Weird…the Nevada Supreme Court ruling says upheld in part and remanded in part back to lower court.
How does upheld in part correlate with being overturned?
Read & follow the court documents! They’re public info and anyone can download them.
Lol…feels like deja vu.
Totally agree bird. Especially be gone with the “Johnny come lately” experts
Point?
Tell us we never read the legal docs without telling us we never read the legal docs!
The word deny is not anywhere in my previous post.
WOW…16 new filings in the Verizon & T-Mobile cases in 2 days. Defendants are slinging all kind of stinky stuff to see if they can get Albright to bite. Never once in all the filings do they ever say they never infringed or the VPLM damage estimates are wrong. Instead they try diversion tactics to attack the process and the expert witnesses. Just more desperate Hail Mary attempts. Hudnell gutted them like a fish with his responses!
Or 7.5 followed by the word “cents” but 7.5 alone can mean a lot of things without context.
Many are brave posting crap but afraid to clarify when asked for receipts!
Not trying anything. Asking for clarification…so you saying you meant $ 7.50 per share? Just trying to understand your cryptic post…or was that just another opinion?
Help us understand. Are you implying that Emil & company settled & walked away at 7.5 cents per share?
Same…so what you’re saying is an infringing company wouldn’t want to go to trial because they might be found liable for patent infringement?
Hmmm…Maybe I should say that a bit louder for those in the back wondering why cases are being dismissed!
#SMFH
Well are the court cases done yet?
There are dismissed cases and cases still going to trial later this year.
It’s also true that non-infringement hasn’t been proven yet!
Exactly my point!
Sure…and Las Vegas was built on all winners. Ever heard anyone say they lost their a$$ when they come home from Vegas?
Got it…so they’re suing WHG. I don’t see that happening with VPLM. Thanks.
My questions were related to comments about the Workman Group settlement not VPLM.
Settlement talks with their investors as if their investors were suing them???
Usually settlement talks are between a defendant or plaintiff.
I must have missed something along the way because something doesn’t make sense.
What does Workhorse Group settlement have to do with VPLM and their current lawsuits?
Appreciate the tidbits, DB! Always VERY interesting stuff!!
Patience is a virtue!
People seem to be exiting positions & running. Why so? I predict many will be very, very sorry if they’re panic selling & not re-entering at a lower price.
I’d rather have the price of a Coke at $ 1.69
Lol. She could be a cougar with all the cash!
And BTW, should have asked…
Ginger or Marianne?
Ding ding ding! Give that man a cigar!
How are these 2 issues even remotely related? Educate us.
Your guess is as good a mine BUT think of all the cases that had pending IPRs. I think dumping Google & Samsung makes sense strategically…especially if those cases weren’t going anywhere in the near term.
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), Plaintiff VoIP-Pal.com, Inc. (“VoIP-Pal”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) hereby stipulate to dismissal of all claims by VoIP-Pal with prejudice and dismissal of all counterclaims by Samsung without prejudice as moot, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees.
Stipulation of joint dismissal just hit Samsung case in Waco. Looks like VPLM’s and Samsung came to some sort of agreement to Dismiss cases.
Only a win when Judge Albright signs the proposed order but he can’t sign any order if they don’t fight the BS Tmus is trying to play!
Who does Google use?
What would be the reason to suppress PPS?
Agreed! Thanks again for posting!
Hope you’re right. I’d love to see the transcript from an actual meeting/hearing rather than just a read court filing as well.
And Albright did make the comment at the end of the zoom call on Monday tgat he was “…looking forward to seeing them (Hudnell/Schvodian) in person real soon.”
Confirmed…case record status shows “Terminated-Settled” on 6/15/23
LL…if I’m not mistaken, I don’t think we’re waiting on any kind of hearing or conference that would be on Albright’s schedule. Of course that would be awesome but I think the only requirement at the end of the stay was for the parties to file a status report with the court so it most likely will just hit the docket when filed.
Excellent post. Those that have been here 10+ years and still support Emil & Co understand this history. Thanks for the reminder.