Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Another example of you misleading. Sure there was a jump from 6 to 12. Where was the pps weeks ago? Did you forget that this dropped from the 20's to hit 6? There has been a steady down trend since the announcement of the RS. A little volatility between a couple of days doesn't make this the winner you're suggesting.
$150K in future revs. It had not been collected at the time.
That doesn't seem feasible to me.
Why would Kristul give up control and add transparency to his private company?
The structure and similar names are all strategic moves. It would be foolish to change.
Where's the sec filing?
I haven't seen the form 4. Have you?
More blind pumping.
First, let's point out that the article you referenced is from 2010.
What does that say for this deal?
Second, I'm on my phone and didn't see the button to expand the page. That's irrelevant, though, because your information is 6 years old.
I'm only interested in the facts, not the insults you wish to engage in.
Fair enough. I'm on mobile and didn't expand the one page.
I read the door page. No mention of hcti. They say no urea or formaldehyde and no voc. Hardly what your post claims and no mention of hcti. Your other link is to an overview of hcti from what I see.
No mention of an interview. No story. No mention of any of the deals or numbers you cite.
Do you have a link to any of what you posted?
How do you have this information when nobody else does?
How did a "wall street reporter" see a press release?
Where is a link to the story or interview that you mention?
In two trading sessions we have nearly 37 million shares dumped for around $22,315.
How many shares have people been saying were left to dilute....around 40 million?
Well, I guess they have 3 million more before they do the RS. Maybe that's why they were waiting so long. Had to squeeze as much blood from this stone as possible.
If I'm not mistaken, the Q1 shows the $155k as future revenues and not yet collected. We can still count that though. Here's the thing, $4M to keep this exclusive doesn't mean $4M in revenue. If the product isn't selling, then $155k is where that revenue stream ends.
As for the multiple F500 deals and $20M that has been thrown around, it would be nice to see something come of that.
There are no patents that are co-owned that I can see. Granted applications and pending patents can take many months to be published, but it's been many months since a PR saying that products developed will share IP rights.
I still maintain that anyone here should be cautious going forward because of the nature of the company structure. HCTI, NTI, and Nanotech are tangled together in a way that common shareholders could easily be left holding the bill while another branch that is privately held reaps all of the benefits. A quick google search of Kristul reveals several previous business dealings where investors felt they were severely misled and ultimately lost their loans or investments depending on how you want to look at it.
Also, what has Kristul's German company done to earn the money that HCTI has been sending their way?
Is this a cash cow for the investors here or for Kristul and a few of his business partners? I can't be sure, and don't want to risk it.
Must be the same people manipulating management to go silent for months with no updates and a looming RS with no AS reduction.
The same kind that bought at 14, 20, and higher.
They're just trying to get out without a 100% loss.
So you've confirmed that ppg is using hcti tech?
No. More speculation presented as fact. You should work for IR.
I focused on the company and not ad hominem attacks. The company has put out a lot forward looking statements. None that can be substantiated. The distributor deal doesn't mean anything if companies aren't buying it.
The way management and IR have purposely mislead investors should also be a huge red flag.
You should be able to support a company and still recognize the flaws. That's not the case on this board though.
You know what you own?
Name one f500 partner.
How about telling us the difference between Nanotech Industries and Nanotech Industries International.
If you knew what you owned, you would have jumped ship with most everyone else months ago.
Has nothing to do with ihub. The sec allows 10 to file if you acquire more than 5% ownership.
Believe it when it's filed.
Nanotech industries international and nanotech industries are two separate entities.
One is owned by hcti and one is private.
Guess which one owns the patents.
Except nanotech industries international is owned by hcti but the separate entity that owns the patents nanotech industries is a different company.
This is more work by the management to obscure what's really going on.
I do agree with finding iso alternatives and regulating their use.
I think we would be in trouble if we decided to ban silicon dioxide without discrimination since in some forms it is known to be carcinogenic. No more days at the beach, no more silicate glass or windows, no more sand boxes. But we'd be safe. Lol.
My questions are elementary but you don't have answers for them.
As for health and safety. You're being dramatic and alarmist. How many billions is the urethane market per year? How many deaths were linked to isocyanate exposure from those products last year?
Keep in mind that these regulations are coming from a state that requires a cancer warning to be put on sand that is being sold.
I've read Dr Figovsky's papers and patents. I was simply making a point that claiming this will be an industry standard is a stretch.
There will be no one size fits all.
You seem like a pretty solid person. You've supported the company without being an @ss to an opposing opinion.
I appreciate that.
I hope this works out for you. I don't think this will be as disruptive as everyone here hopes, but there is a place in the market if HCTI actually gets into gear though. I'm not sold in their abilities yet. Time will tell.
How does the hardener work?
What is the composition of the hardener?
What chemical components are necessary for this hardener to be compatible with other urethane formulations?
Guaranteed?
Did you write the legislation?
Did you lobby the people who did write it?
Do you work in a compliance department?
Does this apply to import from outside of the state?
Your guarantee is worth as much as this stock after a billion shares were dumped into a gagged ta.
So what level of detactable isocyanates is considered iso free.
Also, you claim you know of no competition. Either you haven't done the dd you want everyone else to do or you're ignoring it.
Either way, let's pretend there is no competition. Hcti can't afford and isn't ready to ramp up production in a way that could in any way accommodate the state of California's urethane needs.
What do you suppose will happen?
Why don't you tell us when the ruling including the grandfathering of older products will be. Also, what detectable level of isocyanates will be enough to declare a product iso free?
I sold my shares. I've been watching. I truly want the company to prove me wrong. I would consider reinvesting, but it just seems to be more of the same.
You mean a common theme of not allowing people to exaggerate when speaking about chemistry they don't understand?
Then after a billion shares were diluted while the ta was gagged with ir saying everything is great, I voiced my displeasure.
There have been instances where I have stated something before completely reading a filing, but for the most part I stand by my comments.
I encourage you to read my posts where I list concerns and either prove them wrong or show how the company has addressed them.
If your objective, I think you'll find that there are a lot of issues with this company.
Duke University
And there's your answer. Pinky land.
This is supposed to be a big board company, but they keep operating like a pinky land company. Why are they suddenly going to change? You should be outraged when the best answer you can come up with to a legitimate criticism of the company is pinky land.
I have talked with people at several universities. I'll be at a conference next week and will make sure to ask around. Right now, the chemistry people I know at Stanford have never heard of the company.
Have you seen a form 3, 4, or 5 for this insider?
I haven't.
Shake out the weak traders?
Do you really think that the management has considered the common shareholder at all?
This is a garbage line that people repeat over and over to feel better about a company that is garbage for the shareholder. Pick any otc stock that you feel is a scam. Then look at the boards for it. You'll see, oh it's just MM's playing games or they're just flushing out weak hands so this really runs.
Management has shown their incompetence over and over again. Most recently by not being able to properly execute their RS. If you're trusting them to manipulate the pps for your gain instead of theirs, I'm afraid you're in trouble.
Update news?
That means nothing new, just fluff to try to put inaction and ridiculous financials behind you.
The distributor that needs a distributor to get a product on shelves.
I guess you missed the t trade.
1,004 Shareholders.
1,001 of those shareholders are upset that they have lost 99% value since Sept. 2014.
There was bid support at 0.0014, 0.0011, 0.0008, and 0.0004.
Somehow, the pps found a way to break through all of that support and creep lower and lower. Perhaps, the bidders realized that throwing good money after bad wasn't so smart.
There are a lot of costs that go into a company. They have traveled quite a bit (DC, Michigan, Israel), done trade shows, tested product (read this as given away or at a huge discount), bought raw materials, paid staff or IR, paid for lab, manufacturing, and office space.
I don't think it has all just gone into management's pocket, but these are costs that all recur whether or not they have sold a single unit. This is on top of quite a bit of accrued debt.
I think the most worrisome part is the lack of communication and the way management seems to stay in the mindset of a penny stock company. For example, releasing news after hours on long weekends or releasing a form and then releasing the real intentions later and hoping no one notices.
Transparency and communication would allow me to trust that an investment here is wise. Without that, it makes me question a lot of the news they have released. The EPA award is great. Industrial finishes is great (even though being partnered doesn't guarantee a single sold unit, just that there is a distributor). The rest, I don't believe until I see it from a third party source.
The $160,000 is significant when compared to previous years, but it's not enough to sustain the company.
How are they paying for ramping up production?
How are they paying salaries?
How are they paying for office space?
How are they paying IR?
How are they paying for anything when the burn rate far exceeds they incoming cash currently?
What's the easiest way to get fast cash since they have put in writing to the SEC that they can issue more shares without even mentioning it anymore?
So you don't see a problem when the company that diluted nearly a billion shares in a matter of 5 months suddenly has another billion shares that are available to dump into the market?
That's why people are worried that the pps will drop drastically, not because the zealots that blindly support this company will sell.
Imagine what the pps would be today if the company had maintained the share structure without dilution.
My info comes directly from the last shot website with a link provided.
While the guy running the company you mention says that he's launching a billion dollar campaign in Nigeria. That sounds legit.
http://www.edliner.com/us-beverage-firm-invest-1bn-nigeria/14085
Either way, doesn't seem to be related to our involving EQLB.