Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"It either matters or it doesn't. You have no solid explanation. "
It doesn't matter in the least. He simply realized he hadn't meant to blast that address out to the public in a tweet.
"The SOS information has been posted to socials for everyone to see because it's public information. "
Did George himself post the SOS address to socials? I'll bet you he did not.
Hokie is a lying sack of shit hoping people are dumb enough to fall for his lies and think something might be brewing.
He intentionally cropped out where it is quite clear the address has been in place since June 2022.
Before that it was in Arizona, as can be seen by ticking the historical data box.
He scratched out the address because it was in a tweet going out to anyone and everyone in the general public. The SOS information is something someone would have to search for actively.
"& GVSI" was not added to one version, it was simply truncated from the other version because it has a different zoom level. Hence the "..."
Maybe third time's the charm for quitting the board.
Your first two tries didn't last long.
George vetted Brian Foote too.
Congratulations on your claim of receiving email replies from her in the past.
Apparently she is no longer replying to email inquiries, however.
Trying to shift blame to being "afraid to call the company" as a distraction from the fact of no more email replies is bullshit.
Why is she no longer replying to emails?
It might not be a stretch to wonder if the deal has fallen apart just like Frank's others have.
"My point was that ONE reverse merger cannot be construed as creating an expectation (or "pattern") that all of his RM's will be startups"
A sample size of one does not create a pattern, but it does establish a precedent.
" I don't think you're here for the same reasons as Jayman,...'
You have already demonstrated that you are incapable of understanding others' motivations. Everything to you is "must be a Sharp hater there is no other possible explanation for posting here!"
Then explain why the vast majority of my ihub comments have nothing to do with George tickers whatsoever.
"Why did you go away after GS post?"
What post? When did I "go away"?
"you were wrong for months"
When was I wrong? Provide links. Oh, that's right you can't.
"Back on ignore."
Yes, yes the fake ignores and fake buying more claims are great, this board never fails to amuse.
"No time for fools without a life. "
The time you spent hounding me over a couple quotes belies that statement. And I wasn't even wrong in those quotes, your dumbass just wasn't even worth the time for a reply. Do you want to get into how much of a moron you were when you hounded me over that set of quotes?
Beware what you wish for. You are very much an idiot and trying to get at me with those quotes will very much prove it.
LMAO it took you TWO attempts to try to make a reply, wow you are such an idiot, I can't believe you know how to tie your shoelaces in the morning.
Oh shit, you only use slipons or Velcro shoes, don't you...
I still have not said what you pretend I did.
It would be so easy to prove it by just linking to the quote. But you can't.
Probably because you're a moron deluding your own tiny little brain into thinking I said something I didn't to try to feel better about yourself.
Why don't you go ahead and pull a bunch of quotes from my post history where I was wrong. Let's see them. Take your time, be real thorough. Really let me have it.
When should I check in with you? Would you like a couple hours? A couple days? If I haven't heard from you in a week with a bunch of my wrongs linked then I shall have no choice but to call out how much of an idiot you are. Again.
Nowhere in your quote did I say what you said I said.
You really do seem to be getting dumber by the minute.
Are you really getting dumber by the minute?
You said that I said "GS will never find away to complete the name change".
Then you produce this quote as proof that I did, I guess:
“I think your belief that George can find a work-around to them is based purely on Hopium.
What other information could he possibly produce that would satisfy those particular concerns? They have already had everything from the Transfer Agent since October, but that was obviously not enough.”
That quote does not say "GS will never find away to complete the name change", idiot.
And no, producing two years of just-now history does not satisfy the particular concerns of that conversation, which was the missing 6 years from the past.
Was it paint chips? Did you eat paint chips as a kid? Is that why you are such an idiot?
Holy shit, you're stupid as hell.
You said that I said "GS will never find away to complete the name change".
Then you produce this quote as proof that I did, I guess:
“I think your belief that George can find a work-around to them is based purely on Hopium.
What other information could he possibly produce that would satisfy those particular concerns? They have already had everything from the Transfer Agent since October, but that was obviously not enough.”
That quote does not say "GS will never find away to complete the name change", idiot.
I never said that, idiot.
GVSI has been pumped as "HMBL 2.0", so there's that.
Markets were closed, there was no trading today.
The offering states lots of things. Including how Frank gets to sell shares as part of it.
Share offering dropped overnight, welcome to 2024. https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=17153959&guid=ZtJ-kKBvVFdqJth
Quality cut and paste, oops, she's from JPEX.
It's "Trending For You" because you've searched the term before.
For everyone else on the planet it does not show up as "Trending".
No, I do not think George can produce them.
I think your belief that George can find a work-around to them is based purely on Hopium.
What other information could he possibly produce that would satisfy those particular concerns? They have already had everything from the Transfer Agent since October, but that was obviously not enough.
You really think they would express concern about them but elect not to ask to see them? That's ridiculous.
Tell that to Lanham and Cutler, the last group that spent resources to do some GVSI corporate actions. They failed, even after spending money. And the very reason they failed has been cited as a concern with George now too - the missing financials.
They should be scared of FINRA, not me.
If FINRA asked to see the missing financials then George has 90 days to produce them or the matter is "put to bed" and GVSI will be pretty much toast forever. No sane person would ever want the shell again if even George "effing Tesoro" Sharp can't get corporate actions processed.
https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/6490
I sure hope your Lambo deposits are refundable.
All these lofty price targets when it's very possible FINRA will deny the corporate actions when George can't come up with the requested missing financials. We're about 30 days in of the 90 allowed if that's what's going on.
Unless you have personally performed a Vulcan mind-meld with every single poster on this board then you cannot possibly know exactly what every single one of their motivations are.
So, have you personally performed a Vulcan mind-meld with every single poster on this board?
Well I know for a fact that you have not done one with me, so the answer is no, you have not personally performed a Vulcan mind-meld with every single poster on this board.
I like to call out liars. That was not one of your two possible explanations. That's because your limited little view of possible motivations does not actually encompass the entire world of possible motivations which actually exist.
I don't get people that argue on football boards that aren't even professional football players.
I also just don't worry about it. It's not like my whining about them would actually do anything. So I don't waste the time or energy.
But hey, you do you. But also don't think your myopic belief that there can only be two possible motivations to post here is correct. It's not.
People comment on NFL discussion boards who aren't even professional football players.
So what?
Imagine the absurdity of someone constantly whining about them posting just because that person themself may not have the inclination to do so.
It's like wasting time and energy complaining that rain is wet. Have fun with that, knock yourself out. But the rain will still be wet regardless.
You seem to be a bit confused as to what board you are posting on.
You've already established yourself as a liar, so I highly doubt it.
Yup. And both Fridays were before 8am.
George advised them to reverse split, don't forget that part.
You're lying. You couldn't prove it even if you tried.
You didn't personally observe shit, you're just making it up hoping that people won't know the difference and might fall for it. Just another lying scumbag.
You are lying. I've looked into that claim when it's been made before before. And it's bullshit.
Go ahead, show us a bunch of examples of late Friday GVSI news that George "likes" to issue.
Oops, you can't. Because he doesn't.
That's certainly possible. I am just giving George the benefit of the doubt as I think a new Notice of Deficiency and/or appealing it would be important enough of a Material Event that he would need to explicitly disclose it to the public within 4 days. We are certainly way beyond the 4 and 7 day marks. But the dude has been super vague with stuff just like you mention.
Assuming FINRA did not slap George with the pre-existing Notice of Deficiency and instead asked for the missing filings with a fresh request then George has 90 days to come up with them or the matter is closed - "denied". It doesn't just become a stalemate.
https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/finra-rules/6490 :
"(2) Lapsed Requests
Where a Requesting Party does not, in the reasonable determination of the Department, sufficiently respond to any request by the Department for additional information or documentation pursuant to paragraph (b)(3) above within 90 calendar days following such Department request, such party's request shall be deemed "lapsed" and be closed."