Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Norman Brodeur collection dead lady social security proof?
By the way, any evidence yet that Brodeur actually collected the SS payments of a deceased person ??
Also, any evidence that "Belmont Partners, LLC sues" Vidshadow and/or Norman Brodeur ???
If you really believed that, why did the company write off the entire $3.7 million as an expense from their financials?
236T568 ... Well, ...
"ADTM forced to pay $3.7 million to founder of OneScreen and consultant to ADTM"
looks to me like the warrant to purchase 1,500,000 ADTM shares @ $3.00 means if Templeton wants those shares, he's gunna have to pony up $4.5 million to get them ... look that way to you, too ???
Welcome back Newelong! Thought I scared you off after revealing the OneScreen/Brodeur/Adaptive playbook of how to commit fraud against clients.
To be honest, I don't really understand it myself, and can admit that 236t568 is more educated on how it works than I. But when discussing the stock with legal, the person was 100% positive that no ordinary trader -- aka, non-board member or small investor -- is able to sell the stock even if they wanted to. Even when attempting to go slightly under market price. So being granted 100K stock at market rate of whatever it's fallen to you might be able to finally get it off your hands for way less.
Like the company, the stock is sort of toxic. :)
Lol, just a throwback to 236t568 on that term.
Owners gaming the stock should create last-minute recovery of price. At least, stop the drop.
This is how the company used to do, in my opinion, fraudulent conveyance. They would just pretend a new company is working on a technology so valuable, they have to give every dollar they have to that company.
"Supafli agrees to pay Vidshadow, Inc. $150,000.00 at the start of work, follow by five (5) monthly installments of $100,000.00 and (1) one final payment of $100,000.00 upon acceptance of the website prior to the site going live.
Total project Compensation $750,000.00"
Drain your company by giving the cash to your other company, so don't have to pay liabilities with first company.
They tried a similar thing with Ember, explaining that Ember is so good, they just have to give it all the earnings they make with it. Remember that announcement? The service is so amazing that it will receive 80% of revenues PLUS fees. That is like Amazon saying they are going to give USPS all their revenues because shipping is so important. #dumb
Again, playbook that gets replayed.
But, when all else fails, you can just sue yourself to ensure the court considers those assets now awarded and yours.
Lol. I might just do that.
As long as investors on this board, which I believe there are actually none, are forewarned that this company has a history of cheating well, everybody (clients, employees, contracted workers), out of money that's owed to them, a signature move of Norman Brodeur, I'll be here to serve up constant reminders.
Remember, it was I that foretold that Norman Brodeur would be named to Board of Directors a long time back -- it's the MO of every company that "acquires" him.
Remember, that Supafli was CEO'd by Norman Brodeur, and then they were so excited about another technology a company had, VidShadow, that they gave VidShadow all their money, only to see Supafli hit with Breach of Contracts, but all their money was VidShadow.
It looked somewhat legitimate with Mark Gaeta as the President of the company, but right after the assets transfer wait, what, Vidshadow Partners, Inc., owns approximately 54.2% of Vidshadow? Who is that? Wait, an alter ego for Norman Brodeur? That's strange. So, transfer of assets with Breach of Contract complaints. Fraudulent Conveyance. Belmont Partners, LLC sues.
See the playbook in effect? Pretend there is an asset to invest in or an acquisition taking place to run from creditors. Then only later name yourself as a significant partner in the new company, which is the same as the old company, just without the liabilities.
OneScreen gets "acquired" by AdaptiveMedias. The only problem is that the office OneScreen reports they are using is fake -- it was empty, no furniture, no staff -- as they were already sharing offices with AdaptiveMedias; according to Atul Patel's current lawsuit. And I can confirm the fake address provided by OneScreen was definitely an empty office. This is where they were send creditors.
AdaptiveMedias says that Norman Brodeur has no involvement with Norman Brodeur. Oh, except for this part...
Common Stock 1,228,500 I Through OneScreen Partners, Inc.
Common Stock 1,217,500 I Through OneScreen Partners B, Inc.
Common Stock 1,000,000 I Through OneScreen, Inc.
Common Stock 407,000 I Through VSIP, Inc.
Common Stock 403,000 I Through Vidshadow Partners, Inc.
Common Stock 272,223 I Through WNA Technologies, Inc.
Oh, and the $16,000/mo for Brodeur successfully hosing people. I consider it the con artist fee, but that's just my opinion and not proven. Maybe he really is "advising."
It's only a matter of time before a title, and almost $100K stock bonus, and it happened. All as planned.
It's the only playbook they know.
The good news is that there is a lot more coming out shortly, and you will see that on blogs.
More cash means more ability to sue ADTM.
I'm with you Newelong. Really hoping ADTM can get more cash into their bank accounts. The cash is so low it doesn't make sense for numerous creditors and ex-clients to sue; I've been discussing this issue with some of them.
But with more cash, the option goes back on the table.
But then again, when the company sues itself (Adaptive vs OneScreen) and one of its very owners, Gregg Templeton, sues it to get a bonus without questions asked, maybe lawsuits are only for people who own the company. It sounds weird, but even you have to admit that it's true.
We'll see how things play out in long run. But definitely support you guys going ahead with that merger.
And at least one more legal proceeding coming this month I believe.
$1M spent to earn revenues, $2M spent on "executives"
You can't tell me that's not a sign of a problem. The company is only willing to spent $1M on earnings, and talk about a diminished value in that investment over 2014 -- Newelong will explain that traffic arb just isn't the same anymore -- they are almost spending as much to earn the money.
What happens is, you spend so much on traffic and the traffic is so cheap, sometimes fake, it doesn't convert that well.
But hey, let's still give the executives and board of directors $2m for the success of this failure.
Long before the Stock Compensation Expense.... The report looks like shit long before Gregg Templeton got his latest kickback.
Gregg Templeton getting an insider settlement agreement in a lump sum, while the company refuses to settle with any outside lawsuits also claiming their own breach of contracts?
You can't tell me this isn't a conspiracy to push funds/assets into the hands of a few. Oh, and what do you know, it's the OneScreen execs still coming out ahead.
Glad Gregg has money, since he's included on an upcoming lawsuit.
Newelong's yahoo partner must be failing to perform.
Yahoo must be struggling with those ADTM ad tags... lol
I was talking to legal counsel about the value of accepting this stock as form of payment and the discussion that came up was that it looked like the stock was being "gamed" by those owning large shares and it would be near impossible to sell at anywhere close to market rate for a private holder.
I don't know all the ways you can game a stock, but it certainly feels gamed today.
And is anybody surprised -- besides the various plants and newelong -- that they report an even larger loss?
They haven't even done an amendment yet, so expect it to only get worse in the next week or two.
I believe him....
:)
Norman Brodeur's Birthday....
Is today. He's got to be feeling pretty good. Don't forget that his stock lockup period ends mid July. He's almost there.
Happy Mother's Day Everyone
That shows Norman Brodeur's felony history. Let me see if I can find it. I'm sure I can, might need a day. Also, sorry for thinking you were OneScreen boardmember carry over, now that it's been shown you were with MIMVI. All my theories about who you could be just shot out the window. lol
Irish62, you have your facts wrong.
newelong for a while pretended that Brodeur was insignificant to the company, while I promised readers he'd show up as CEO -- thought definitely after Qayeed started playing with little boys -- or on the board of directors.
low and behold -- what's Brodeur's current title with the company? He's one of a couple listed board of directors, and the largest owner of the company. The problem is that the scams these guys use are from a playbook they've yet to update, so they just run the same thing over and over again.
Let's not forget that, according to the internet and a PI report, Brodeur recently got busted collecting social security on a dead lady. This guy's salt of the earth. Let's attach an "LOL" to that.
I haven't gone back to old posts to quote, but if you like I can find my post promising that Brodeur would be sitting in the seat he is now; all while ADTM denied it. This was a while ago, so might just google search it.
Old Newelong posts:
Irish62, no, I wasn't browsing on old posts. I came upon it by accident.
An attorney reached out to me asking if I had some documented evidence for a claim that I or someone else supposedly said on this thread -- yes, a lot of people are looking into Brodeur and ADTM -- and I couldn't remember the exact details and wasn't sure if it was even I who said it.
So I went to google and searched a couple keywords targeting investorshub subdomain and of the couple threads that popped up, two were old posts from newelong, where he was still strictly an Mimvi/ADTM plant making up nonsense and pointing to press releases with absolutely no bearing while also explaining he was an outsider with no idea. He was trying to give his outsider "theories" on the merge between OneScreen and ADTM.
It was just more proof on how shady this company is. I understand newelong's position, and only give him grief over the lies he posts on the thread. But at least he only strengthens my view of this company. And I'm sure he's a high up and not just a simple employee. He's been with it for a while now.
cb
As strange as this sounds, I actually respect the fact that you admit that you were first part of the ADTM boards on InvestorsHub solely to be a PLANT for ADTM. I could copy and paste some of your old comments where you pretend to have little but some knowledge about what the company may/perhaps be up to during the early phases of acquisition. You even give your own predictions as an outsider. How scripted is this company? They are pretty embarrassing, considering, but a waste of time to repost on this thread.
Props, though, seriously. You could have just kept denying it, forcing users to take time to pull up old posts showing that at one time you were just a simple investor trying to keep up to date with the company. Maybe you were hired after acquisition? That would actually make sense seeing that you became a rep all of a sudden, or maybe you are on the board of directors? I'm thinking the latter.
Newelong... ADTM Rep?
Newelong, I've been going through old posts on this thread and noticed early on you pretended to know little about ADTM and acquisitions in progress to now act as a representative of the company. Which one is it? Looks like you went from a plant by the company to a possible boardmember.
Also, I'm still waiting on your proof that Yahoo is just loving their service with ADTM.
Norman Brodeur ... lol
Google's 3 of top 5 pages looking up 'Norman Brodeur' call him a fraud. That's awesome.
Almost perfectly sums it up....
Except it's not just OneScreen. AdaptiveMedias has done a fine job creating a couple unpaid creditors of their won already.
This news should come out in the near future (I hope).
???????
Don't know what this is or why they would do that.
"tells us how little you know about Adaptive Medias !!"
I know (ex)employees there, who still know employess. To sum up the difference between OneScreen and AdaptiveMedias, I was told by the employee "pretty much the same thing, except publishers have to use their own ad networks now."
So that's that. And you're right, the ad side is not handled by AdaptiveMedia like it was OneScreen. Just collecting the same portal fees.
And Patel claims Brodeur was always pulling the strings and controlling the actions of OneScreen. The revenue strategy of bad traffic to portals was created by Brodeur, or so I've been told (and legally claimed). But maybe that will have to wait on how the lawsuit plays out.
"... nor did Adaptive acquire any cash from OneScreen, as you are wont to believe. "
Not true. You are lying or ignorant or forgetful. I have been alerted to the OneScreen bank statements with the CASH TRANSFERS listed on them. Not only did they send cash directly over with a bounce on MediaGraph, which Atul Patel has said was used as a vehicle for Fraudulent Conveyance, repeated in 3 lawsuits, they went to accounts in Bangkok (suspicious?), MediaGraph before assets acquisition, and directly to Gregg Templeton. This is confirmed by official bank statements. It's not a press release, just fact. Turns out Chase Bank is great at record keeping.
"Also, the Company more recently announced some newer clients such as Reuters, Yahoo, cars.com, and partnerships with Vipio/petproducts.com and LinkVehicle."
You love posting pointless press releases that carry no weight, but didn't have anything to back this outlandish statement? I'm calling BS. Show me a PR statement from cars.com or Yahoo explaining that they are running an AdaptiveMedia portal.
"By the way, followers on the Company's Twitter account have now increased nearly 230% from 280 to 637 just within the last week or so ... someone must be interested !! "
Not this counts for anything. But you have almost double the tweets as followers. Might as well just scream at an empty room. And yes, it has not been "the last week or so", you've increased nearly 100% in the past two weeks. Congrats on that, but again, more proof that you can't help but SPIN even the most pointless of information.
You forget that I'm talking with people directly about AdaptiveM, not just this thread. People who work or worked there. People suing them. People contemplating suing them. People who feel cheated by them, they say stolen from, and have yet to take any course of action.
I just sit on the info and wait to see what comes up next. Watching AdaptiveMedia working is like watching Investigation Discovery. A new episode involving this company (or it's founders) on a weekly basis. lol
Totally understand. Just warnings anyway. Save for the lawsuits that are coming at AdaptiveMedia because of this guy, the guy isn't really that important... save for the lawsuits that are because of his decisions.
If you want to know how MediaGraph works. What they do is create a subdomain on a known domain and purchase cheap -- usually called "suspicious" or "fraudulent" traffic -- to it. They drive traffic to the subdomain, what they call a "portal", where the MediaGraph video platform resides and delivers paying pre-rolls to this bad sort of traffic.
At least, that's based entirely on OneScreen's revenue model, since Adaptive is OneScreen, and I can assume not much has changed. So, that's the company revenue-generating secret.
Why else do you think they owe AdOn ~$500,000?
The big revenue generator for OneScreen and possibly Adaptive was some of these brands:
http://www.bonniercorp.com/brands/
If you can find some DNS zone files on these listed publication domains you are likely to find one weird subdomain that isn't for the public. Instead its meant entirely for traffic arb.
As an investor, this information could prove at least informative to you. How things operate.
I'll check back in when things begin to happen, thanks all who have reached out directly. Lot of interesting stuff in the works.
Norman J. Brodeur?
Besides the many lawsuits against Mimvi, which became AdaptiveMedias, AdaptiveMedia, all the rest of the ploys and cons come from him. Whether it's with Supafli, VidShadow, OneScreen, or AdaptiveMedia.
You have figured out that these are all pretty much the same company, the same technology, with just with a different name, but same primary owner named Norman J. Brodeur. He keeps getting acquired and keeps ending up owner. And odd, some would say illegal, behavior follows each of these corporations, aka Norman Brodeur, as they change from one name to the next. He's now the only constant variable.
Most the lawsuits discussed, save the Mimvi ones, were from actions spawning from his lead. And, to draw back to two points...
1. I've been contacted recently by new clients or businesses that have worked with AdaptiveMedia that have what we'd call issues with the company to put it broadly. I can't say much as I was alerted privately, but from what these people say it is bad news for investors. I'm keeping watch on what some are going to do next, but can't say anything until whatever is done is done.
2. The good news for investors is that one lawyer who attempted to sue Norman Brodeur described hims as a master of avoiding collections. So that could be a good thing from an investor standpoint. If the business you support is ripping people off and stealing money, you'd want them to get away with it.
fingers crossed.
Why does it forget to mention Norman J. Brodeur as a defendant? He is listed as second entity in the lawsuit, but they leave his name off the 10K and the amended 10K. And his name is referenced the most in the lawsuit itself. I find this oversight to not be coincidental.
Thanks for the confirmation, however.
Cross Complaint Lawsuit Against Norman Brodeur, Shareef, ADTM and Media Graph Inc.
http://www.filedropper.com/pateladaptive
There it is. Atul Patel, the OneScreen CEO that stepped down for Norman J. Brodeur to take his place for acquisition, had some of this to say.
13. On or about December 2, 2013, the cross-defendants breached the employment agreement by terminating Patel's services based up false allegations of wrongdoing when in fact his termination was a pretext to financially enhance cross-defendants OneScreen, Inc, MediaGraph Inc, Adaptive Media and Norman J. Brodeur to the financial detriment of Patel.
Remember how often I've mentioned the fact that I believe OneScreen (repeatedly) broke the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act through the conspiracy with AdaptiveMedias? Well, here comes Fourth Cause of Action stated in the lawsuit:
Fourth Cause of Action: Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act
35. Jointly and as co-conspirators, defendants Norman Brodeur and Qayed Shareef transferred OneScreen's assets, customer contracts, intellectual property, computers and employees to MediaGraph, Inc, which was later acquired by AdaptiveMedias, Inc, around or about March/June 2014 for $16.5 million dollars....
Goes onto explain that OneScreen and AdaptiveMedias were really the same company, using the same employees in the same office long before actual acquisition. By moving all assets from OneScreen to AdaptiveMedias, OneScreen can now claim to be unable to make payments to liabilities since all assets and cash have been moved over to a new name.
39. That Norman J. Brodeur transffered the aforementioned property to defendant Media Graph and Adaptive Media and incurred obligations therewith.
And, this has already been brought up (repeatedly) by other lawsuits and claims mentioned here:
41. That the transfer of said assets, customer contracts, intellectual property, computers, and employees to AdaptiveMedia, Inc., was done with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud Patel and other creditors from payment due and rightfully owed.
42. The transferring of said property and employees was designed to conceal assets to make it more difficult for Patel to ever receive payment or to be able to satisfy a civil monetary judgment against OneScreen.
Concludes this fits the definition of fraudulent transfer of assets.
And let's not forget the bank records showing direct bank transfers to Gregg Templeton shortly before the acquisition along with cash transfers directly into MediaGraph, Inc, bank accounts shortly before passing these accounts into AdaptiveMedias. Other fraudulent transfers that could be discussed.
So, that makes another person, the top insider in fact, claiming that AdaptiveMedia has debts to liabilities that were never closed by OneScreen.
This is definitely true, as shown by the numerous lawsuits and accusations. Where there's smoke, there's fire. Where there's fire, there is definitely fire. Enjoy the read.
Now, has AdaptiveMedias mentioned this lawsuit, which wants over $1 million dollars mind you, in any of their earnings reports? If not, aren't they required to?
You are right, my posts are more of a warning.
And, sure, companies have lawsuits, but you need to be wary when lawsuits all claim they've been ripped off in a very similar fashion by the same company or the same Owner/CEO/Director.
And this is just those willing to come forward, I GUARANTEE your more people have been ripped off by this company and more importantly its largest owner Norman J. Brodeur.
I have been contacted by individuals/companies directly of recent acknowledging they've been ripped off by this same group of individuals that hide behind their corporate veil as of very recently. So the rips are still happening.
By the way, pay attention, as I'm about to post ANOTHER LAWSUIT that AdaptiveMedia has forgot to mention. Who is suing them? Only the company's last CEO.
You guys picked up 70 followers?! So wait, Adaptivem was following (424) people while less than 400 followed them?
Maybe that's one press release you don't want to write. Or at least end it with #pathetic
And another lawsuit against ADTM, Norman Brodeur and Qayeed.
Was shown a lawsuit filed against ADTM by a company insider. It's a fantastic read and I'm trying to find another accessible copy that's already online.
Everybody accuses this company, and Norman Brodeur, of the same thing.
Fraudulent Transfer to Adaptive Media and board members.
Conspiracy
Hiding funds.
Breach of Contract
Interesting accusations:
PR statement for "Letter of Intent" on acquisition of OneScreen/MediaGraph by AdaptiveMedia. Though no internal letter of intent ever created.
AdaptiveMedia and OneScreen SHARED the same office before acquisition, with employees of OneScreen already working for AdaptiveMedia.
AdaptiveMedia is strictly a new identity/name for OneScreen. Other than that, not much has changed, with the "Acquisition" as a cover to run from liabilities and reputation.
Of course, we've heard this already repeatedly before from accusations by AdOn, NormanBrodeur.com, and Yelp.
Will update once I can link an accessible copy of the lawsuit.
Wow,
So if having a signed court-backed legal document by your company's largest shareholder and recent board member (that was left unfulfilled) is considered silly, molesting children just must be a gas to you.
The legal fees ADTM will face matching the challenge vs AdOn, who has enough money to pump into this lawsuit as a functioning business entity, is alone another expense this cash-burning company can't afford; forget about the half million AdaptiveMedia still owes. I'm sure AdaptiveMedia is regretting those PR statements where they acknowledge that they were collecting on OneScreen revenues, revenues that were owed elsewhere.
And I FULLY BELIEVE that AdOn got screwed by AdaptiveMedias in unpaid liabilities, since they are one of MANY people who have been left unpaid by Norman Brodeur.
And, I already answered those other questions, you forgot... again.
There were direct transfers from OneScreen, Inc into MediaGraph, which was then transferred over to AdaptiveMedias. The proof is banking documents. But again, you already know this.
newelong,
I figured it out. You have amnesia. Lol. I've been backing up those claims with proof the last two weeks. You just seem to forget.
So you think the AdOn lawsuit has no grounds, though OneScreen openly admitted to clients, and had clients use, their credit line for buying traffic from AdOn?
This was common knowledge.
Because, as stated repeatedly, it's a company headed by fraudsters.
AdaptiveMedias is just OneScreen 2.0. After getting blasted for fraudulent traffic by the likes of AdWeek (and many others), OneScreen tucked tail and ran to continue operations under a brand new name. They do the same operation at ADTM now, while claiming they have new technology to prevent bad traffic. Whether that's true... I doubt.
This is not a new strategy, however, if you look at the evolution of Supafli Entertainment until now.
I predicted early on that Norman J. Brodeur would end up being listed as a Board Member or CEO (especially with the pedophile) soon enough, and here he is. I also predicted that this company will do what OneScreen did, burn people out of their money while directly transferring cash into MediaGraph to forward along as an asset acquisition with AdaptiveMedia.
The two biggest winners out of THAT scam were Norman Brodeur and Gregg Templeton, who, low and behold, are the first and third largest shareholders in AdaptiveMedias. Again, this comes as no surprise. Even with creditors knocking at OneScreen's door, this happened:
During OneScreen's exodus to quickly get their funds over to Adaptive Media, Gregg Templeton is noted as getting a kickback during that period.
Going between January 2014 to June of 2014, OneScreen is shown to have transferred $241,666.66 to Adaptive Medias, Inc. OneScreen also paid Media Graph, Inc. the sum of $10,000 on June 1, 2014, just before kicking it over to Adaptive as well. And just to add a dash of shady, there were are also a number of transfers that were made to Bangkok Bank Public Co Ltd., in Thailand.
Gregg Templeton faired pretty well, having received a kickback on his investment (before receiving AdaptiveMedia shares) in two payments of $115,000 on January 17, 2014 and another $10,000 on March 6, 2014. Maybe we should ask what those were for...
No,
But I'm sure you work at the company and can guess who they are. If you were with them at OneScreen there might just be too many to count.
Keep smirking though. lol
Two have already been commented on repeatedly on this forum. And I can add a few more, if I ever got permission (or if the lawsuits end up taking place). Trust me, if I ever got permission I'll add them.
But you already know of them, so why do you ask?
I'm guessing the AdOn lawsuit was a surprise to you a well on April 3rd. Shocker, right? Your credibility is shot. I only wonder that you keep commenting to push the facts against ADTM off the page.
Seriously though. In the next year you will either be proving your case or pretending "newelong" was never your account.
Yeah - Self proclaimed rhetoric from the company itself is REAL confidence booster. lol
It'll come down to this...
We have executives and board members fleeing or being let go; maybe a morality issue? Lawsuit(s) that AdaptiveMedia claims can be ignored, though it's obvious the lawsuit(s) have real grounds.
All this is near identical to what took place at OneScreen -- even the sudden arrival of Norman J. Brodeur -- before they left accounts and settlement agreements unpaid.
digger22 and newelong and kaeamrjs, While I think it's a long shot, all the shadiness and past offenses of this company (or acquired company) and its boardmembers might not end up reflecting the actions of AdaptiveMedia. But the only problem is that it's already reflecting their actions, such as the boardmember dismissal or them "forgetting" to mention a lawsuit that they knew about for a month and already responded to (repeatedly). Or amending down their earnings later on.
I'm not saying who they are as I promised privacy, victims who have yet to speak up, but everything so far has me confident that people are going to get hosed by Norman Brodeur and whoever follows his lead. And it seems like everybody who has been willing to stay on and compromise their ethics are the followers. This, of course, is only an assumption at this point.
Again, I could be wrong and digger22 and newelong and kaeamrjs can tell me later "told you so." But, if I'm right, I'm sure newelong will be laughing his way to the bank while others grasp at straws at trying to get their money back or, worse, what's due to them.
... or more future victims.
It looked like he was charged with two felonies, plea bargained one into a misdemeanor and was charged/sentenced on the other, according to the Florida court documents.
In short, fighting a cop is a BAD IDEA. So is public intoxication, but fighting cop moreso.
James Batmasian in trouble for fraud (again)... and hookers.
This article is just too funny. Same James Batmasian? All evidence says yes.
http://www.browardpalmbeach.com/news/james-batmasian-boca-raton-developer-has-voracious-sexual-appetite-for-latin-women-according-to-lawsuit-6450455
Don't worry, newelong considers SEC filings as NOT being evidence. Or Press Releases straight from the company -- since AdaptiveMedia lies, yes, Press Releases straight from the company might not be evidence.
Neither are official lawsuit filings, those aren't evidence either. Or postings of documents with AdaptiveMedia executive signatures. Those aren't evidence either.
Or legal criminal records. Those definitely don't count as evidence.
Are Batmasian and Brodeur felons? Yes. It's been proven repeatedly on this board, though newelong seems to forget. Just like ADTM "forgot" to mention they had a lawsuit filed against them by AdOn network for the sum of almost half a million plus lawyer fees. Or how they tried to announce the loss of their outside directors on a holiday while also amending their yearly report.
The only one throwing rhetoric, propaganda, and not evidence, is newelong.