Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
HPNN hasn't had one pull back since .0019.
One more good PR and you can forget a pull back until 12 cents.
good luck here!
First there were the MOASS plays now we get HPNN the MOAGUS play
Mother
Of
All
Gap
Up
Stocks
Three straight days we gapped up at the open
Look at these dates paints a great picture.
First on May 4 2005 Hop-on files for their two patents, the thin phone and the MP3 phone.
United States Patent D536,320 Thin Phone
Michaels February 6, 2007
Thin mobile telephone
Claims
CLAIM I claim the ornamental design for the thin mobile telephone, as shown and described.
Inventors: Michaels; Peter (Irvine, CA)
Appl. No.: D/229,220
Filed: May 4, 2005
United States Patent D536,685
Feng , et al. February 13, 2007
MP3 phone
Claims
CLAIM We claim the ornamental design for the MP3 phone, as shown and described.
Inventors: Feng; Han Jiu, N/A (Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN)
Appl. No.: D/229,221
Filed: May 4, 2005
United States Patent D536,685
Feng , et al. February 13, 2007
MP3 phone
Claims
CLAIM We claim the ornamental design for the MP3 phone, as shown and described.
Inventors: Feng; Han Jiu, N/A (Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN)
Appl. No.: D/229,221
Filed: May 4, 2005
Then on May 18 2005 two weeks later
Current Capital Change:
shs decreased by 1 for 2000 split
Ex-Date:
Record Date:
Pay Date: 2005-05-18
Stock was .40 right after the reverse. MM's walked stock price down to nothing. Now we are running right back to the .40 post split price.
Then this almost two years to the day later
HOP-ON's Shareholders Meeting on Expansion 5/21/2007
IRVINE, Calif., Mar 23, 2007 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- HOP-ON, INC. (OTC:HPNN) announced today that the Board of Directors selected Monday, May 21, 2007 as the date of the annual shareholders meeting. The meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites Hotel, 2120 Main Street, Irvine, California at 8:00 a.m.
This mega rally has been two years in the making and is just beginning. I would expect 5-10 more great press releases between now and the shareholder meeting in 6 weeks.
You need to make up your mind.
First you tell everyone this
Posted by: billytbone
In reply to: FinancialAdvisor who wrote msg# 5875
Date:4/11/2007 8:02:48 PM
Post #of 5895
Michaels doesn't work for HPNN, he is HPNN.
He is the only officer.
Then you try to tell everyone this
Posted by: billytbone
In reply to: avinanyc who wrote msg# 5809 Date:4/11/2007 3:18:34 PM
Post #of 5891
You people need to learn how to read.
The patent is in Michaels name not hopons.
But Billy you just said Peter Michaels is Hop-on then you say if it's in PM's name it's not hop-ons patent. Like you said Peter Michaels is hop-on so the patents are hop-ons as well. Peter Michaels also put out PR's saying the patents belong to HPNN, if he was going to hijack the patent he wouldn't have put out those PR's.
HPNN's two patents DD
Look at HPNN's patents for the thin phone and mp3 phone.
1) Both patent applications were filed the same day 5/4/05.
2) Both patent applications were filed by the same patent attorney. (Robert T Braun)
3)If you go to hop-on's website under contact us they list two addresses. The new office in Irvine and a China Office
2/F, R2-A Bldg, Shenzhen High-Tech
Industrial Park (South)
Nanshan District, Shenzhen, 518057
China.
3b) Guess what address is on HPNN's MP3 patent see below, you guessed it Shenzhen China.
4) Guess what address was on the application for the thin phone, you guessed it again Hop-on's old Irvine office address.
United States Patent D536,320 Thin Phone
Michaels February 6, 2007
Thin mobile telephone
Claims
CLAIM I claim the ornamental design for the thin mobile telephone, as shown and described.
Inventors: Michaels; Peter (Irvine, CA)
Appl. No.: D/229,220
Filed: May 4, 2005
Attorney, Agent or Firm: The Law Office of Robert T. Braun Braun; Robert T. Gaetje; Clay E.
United States Patent D536,685
Feng , et al. February 13, 2007
MP3 phone
Claims
CLAIM We claim the ornamental design for the MP3 phone, as shown and described.
Inventors: Feng; Han Jiu, N/A (Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN)
Appl. No.: D/229,221
Filed: May 4, 2005
Attorney, Agent or Firm: The Law Office of Robert T. Braun Braun; Robert T. Gaetje; Clay E.
Here's more buzz on HPNN, this link was way too long to post.
But this one says HPNN is going to be suing the four major carriers—Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, T-Mobile—as well.
How much money could this be?
You may not be familiar with Hop-on, a company based in both Irvine, CA, and China, but you're going to hear a lot about them soon. Why? Because they've just been granted a patent for an "MP3 phone with speakers on the side, in addition to front and side buttons to activate its camera/video features." Doesn't that describe just about every phone that plays MP3s? Yes. Yes it does.
Hop-on is now saying they are going to seek payment from all cellphone manufacturers that are within their patent's scope. Which to us, sounds like just about everybody. Plus, they're going to be suing the four major carriers—Verizon, Sprint, AT&T, T-Mobile—as well. Fantastic.
They are talking about HPNN's patents on several electronics websites. Here is one from engadget.com.
Start ringing up the cash registers...
http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/05/hop-on-promises-aggressive-defense-of-mp3-phone-patent/
Hop On promises aggressive defense of MP3 phone patent
Posted Apr 5th 2007 2:39PM by Evan Blass
Filed under: Cellphones, Portable Audio
If you've already got yourself a music phone, you might wanna hold onto it for awhile, because some forthcoming patent "extortion" promises to jack up prices on any model with side-mounted speakers. You probably remember handset manufacturer Hop On from some of its low end wares that we've covered, and now the company has just received a design patent on an "MP3 Phone with speakers on the side, in addition to front and side buttons to activate its camera/video features." No big deal, except for the fact that Hop On plans to seek royalties for all past and future cellphones that it considers to be infringing on its IP -- in other words, millions upon millions of units. So keep your eyes open, because if the Moto's, Nokia's, and LG's of the world aren't down with Hop On's licensing proposals, it's likely we'll see a whole slew of lawsuits in an industry that already has more than its fair share of squabbling players.
Check this out. Cell phone patent info.
Gives you some idea of how much money HPNN's patents might be worth. Nokia paying 20 million per quarter to Qualcom.
Nokia to pay Qualcomm $20M, but the fight continues
By Mike Dano
Story posted: April 5, 2007 - 1:28 pm EDT
Nokia Corp. announced it will pay Qualcomm Inc. $20 million in patent royalties for the second quarter of this year, a move that stands as yet another thrust in the face-off between the two wireless giants. At the heart of the issue is a cross-licensing agreement for wireless patents that is set to expire Monday.
In announcing the $20 million payment, Nokia offered fiery rhetoric uncharacteristic of the usually staid Finnish vendor.
“Nokia believes that Qualcomm's patent portfolio is concentrated in the United States, and that it has few or no alleged UMTS patents in many of the countries in which Nokia has substantial UMTS handset sales. When Qualcomm's early patents become paid-up and royalty-free on April 9, 2007, Qualcomm's share of all patents relevant to Nokia UMTS handsets will significantly decrease,” said Rick Simonson, Nokia’s CFO. "It is important to note that as of April 9, 2007, Qualcomm's entire chipset business becomes exposed to Nokia's extensive GSM, W-CDMA and CDMA patent portfolios and Nokia will use all rights from those portfolios when defending itself against any new Qualcomm litigation.”
Interestingly, Nokia said that, until this year, it has paid less than 3 percent in license fees for all of its patent license agreements involving W-CDMA products.
According to Maynard Um at UBS, Nokia’s $20 million payment for second-quarter royalties implies Nokia is now paying a rate of 0.55 percent.
“While Nokia can now likely argue that Qualcomm is unwilling to come to a renegotiation, the question is whether Nokia technically would still be infringing without an official deal from Qualcomm,” Um wrote in a note to investors. “While Nokia indicates payment has been made, it is unclear whether Qualcomm has accepted the payment.”
Qualcomm did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Um said Nokia’s $20 million payment is part of the companies’ negotiating process, and that UBS does believe that the two parties ultimately will come to some kind of agreement.
Nokia’s announcement comes just a few days after Qualcomm filed a patent-infringement suit against Nokia
Thanks for your answers, one more thing from your post...
You wrote "Don't believe everything a convicted felon says in a PR"
Guess I shouldn't have listened to Martha Stuart and her Spring Fashion tips. Gosh darn and I wasted all that money at nordstroms..
On March 23rd you posted this about HPNN share price.
"Posted by: billytbone
In reply to: avinanyc who wrote msg# 5676 Date:3/23/2007 1:40:52 PM
Post #of 5757
I don't think this thing is going anywheres "
That day HPNN closed at .0021.
Today it went up to .022.
Three questions for you?
1)Didn't HPNN Stock go up 1000% since you posted that?
2)Would it make you angry if HPNN stock went up 1000% and you didn't buy any?
3)Were you a shareholder when the company did that reverse split back in 2005?
"Posted by: billytbone
In reply to: mthus who wrote msg# 5750 Date:4/10/2007 6:19:29 PM
Post #of 5755
As provided by the company.
Can you really believe 1 thing Michaels says?
I dont."
Do you think you are the right person to be moderator here with that mind set. Moderators should be objective imo.
Do you believe the Nevada Secretary of State and the US Patent and Trademark offices?
I did check the Nevada Secretary of State site, HPNN hasn't increased the authorized shares since January 2006. That's 15 months and no increases in authorized shares, still 400 million shares authorized. I don't think they need to sell shares since they got their expenses under control.
O/S Info From Pinksheets.com
Outstanding Shares: 370,000,000 as of 2007-03-26
Authorized Shares: 400,000,000 as of 2007-03-26
Float: 20,793,342 as of 2005-07-30
Number of Shareholders of Record: 10,000 as of 2007-03-26
Like I've been saying the float on this is gone, runs with gap ups. That float number on pinksheets seems low and probably needs to be updated.
How many stocks do you know that list 10,000 shareholders of record?? Most stocks have 400-500 shareholders. ETIM has billions of shares and they only have 1800 shareholders of record. This stock will be on a lot of peoples radars after today.
Could someone please post todays PR on the breaking stock news board. Art and his crew missed it.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1508
We're up 100% today on only 13 million shares traded.
When the momo players figure out how tight the float is and the volume hits 60 million in a day it will really start to gap up.
HPNN now .017 new HOD shattered 52 week high.
No one posted the release on the breaking news board yet. When it gets posted there it really runs.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1508
People are moving money around trying to buy more.
Still very early in HPNN's run.
Big shareholder meeting scheduled for May 21. I would expect another 5 to 10 solid releases before 5/21.
We could see a little consolidation as the people who bought last week at .007 get churned out. But volume was light last week, nothing major coming over the top imo.
Last call for HPNN. .013X.014 (+44%). Huge news!!!
Hop-on Awarded Second U.S. Design Patent Design and Infringement Rights Belong to Hop-on
BusinessWire - April 10, 2007 10:57 AM ET
Related Quotes
Symbol Last Chg
HPNN Trade 0.014 +0.005
Real time quote.
Hop-on, Inc. (Pink Sheets:HPNN) announced today that it has received notification of U.S. Patent Office approval for their innovative flip phone design pending since 2005. The news comes just days after Hop-on secured patent approval for their MP3 phone, resolving past uncertainty as to the innovator of this market-leading cell phone. (Citing ref.US-D536,320-S).
Peter Michaels, President of Hop-on, considers this a major victory for those who actually design these products, and not simply infringe on smaller companies' ideas. "The utilization by market leaders dedicating billions in vast resources developed my product at record speed. The visual appearance test set forth in other recent court decisions could prove evidence my design reaped millions for those who infringed. Based on almost three years of extensive research, it appears Hop-on's design predates all existing patents and will finally allow shareholders of THIS company to reap the benefits of their invention. We have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders to ensure appropriate returns on their significant investment of our new designs. This patent reflects the recognition our designs deserve and enables protection of our intellectual property portfolio."
Hop-on's patent "Thin Mobile Telephone" was published in 2005 when every cell phone manufacturer appeared caught in the frenzy to manufacture new products. The technology-crazed era caused intense competition, reducing industry standards to a level where mass production replaced true invention. This came at a time when no one seemed to pay attention to the details of which company actually owned the design, but instead focused solely on the demand for new product releases. As mobile communications has developed, the vast number of companies whose products infringed on this patent can be seen market wide. In addition, this frenzy compromised the due diligence process in determining the origination of new designs, resulting in patent infringement by larger corporations.
The second patent was released on the day Qualcomm and Nokia faced expired licensing agreements and is certain to raise more legal questions of who will bear the cost of these violations. Past and future royalties could result in significant monetary damages and will serve to deter industry leaders' future misuse of smaller companies' designs. Preliminary negotiations are continuing with several carriers and manufacturers to reach licensing agreements. The market will ultimately determine the fate of those companies whose improvements on Michaels' product may result in the company seeking injunctive relief against future sales.
Although no law suits have been filed at this time, those in violation have been formally noticed of the infringement. Basically, all we ask is that companies who use our design compensate us for the use of the design; bottom line, says Michaels, "If they wish to continue making my phone, they will need a license." For more information, visit http://www.Hop-on.com.
This news release includes forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, the Company's business and financial plans, strategies and prospects. Although the Company believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot provide assurance that it will achieve or realize these plans, intentions or expectations. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this news release may be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as: believe, expect, anticipate, should, planned, will, may, intend, estimated, and potential, among others. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made in this news release include market conditions and those set forth in any reports or documents that the Company may publicly file from time to time. All forward-looking statements attributable to the company or a person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary language.
SOURCE: Hop-on, Inc.
Hop-on, Inc.
Danny Coleman, (949) 756-9008
"Preliminary negotiations are continuing with several carriers and manufacturers to reach licensing agreements. The market will ultimately determine the fate of those companies whose improvements on Michaels' product may result in the company seeking injunctive relief against future sales.
Although no law suits have been filed at this time, those in violation have been formally noticed of the infringement. Basically, all we ask is that companies who use our design compensate us for the use of the design; bottom line, says Michaels, "If they wish to continue making my phone, they will need a license.""
HPNN News!!!
Hop-on Awarded Second U.S. Design Patent Design and Infringement Rights Belong to Hop-on
Apr 10, 2007 10:57:10 (ET)
IRVINE, Calif., Apr 10, 2007 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Hop-on, Inc. (Pink Sheets:HPNN) announced today that it has received notification of U.S. Patent Office approval for their innovative flip phone design pending since 2005. The news comes just days after Hop-on secured patent approval for their MP3 phone, resolving past uncertainty as to the innovator of this market-leading cell phone. (Citing ref.US-D536,320-S).
Peter Michaels, President of Hop-on, considers this a major victory for those who actually design these products, and not simply infringe on smaller companies' ideas. "The utilization by market leaders dedicating billions in vast resources developed my product at record speed. The visual appearance test set forth in other recent court decisions could prove evidence my design reaped millions for those who infringed. Based on almost three years of extensive research, it appears Hop-on's design predates all existing patents and will finally allow shareholders of THIS company to reap the benefits of their invention. We have a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders to ensure appropriate returns on their significant investment of our new designs. This patent reflects the recognition our designs deserve and enables protection of our intellectual property portfolio."
Hop-on's patent "Thin Mobile Telephone" was published in 2005 when every cell phone manufacturer appeared caught in the frenzy to manufacture new products. The technology-crazed era caused intense competition, reducing industry standards to a level where mass production replaced true invention. This came at a time when no one seemed to pay attention to the details of which company actually owned the design, but instead focused solely on the demand for new product releases. As mobile communications has developed, the vast number of companies whose products infringed on this patent can be seen market wide. In addition, this frenzy compromised the due diligence process in determining the origination of new designs, resulting in patent infringement by larger corporations.
The second patent was released on the day Qualcomm and Nokia faced expired licensing agreements and is certain to raise more legal questions of who will bear the cost of these violations. Past and future royalties could result in significant monetary damages and will serve to deter industry leaders' future misuse of smaller companies' designs. Preliminary negotiations are continuing with several carriers and manufacturers to reach licensing agreements. The market will ultimately determine the fate of those companies whose improvements on Michaels' product may result in the company seeking injunctive relief against future sales.
Although no law suits have been filed at this time, those in violation have been formally noticed of the infringement. Basically, all we ask is that companies who use our design compensate us for the use of the design; bottom line, says Michaels, "If they wish to continue making my phone, they will need a license." For more information, visit http://www.Hop-on.com .
This news release includes forward-looking statements regarding, among other things, the Company's business and financial plans, strategies and prospects. Although the Company believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot provide assurance that it will achieve or realize these plans, intentions or expectations. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this news release may be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as: believe, expect, anticipate, should, planned, will, may, intend, estimated, and potential, among others. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made in this news release include market conditions and those set forth in any reports or documents that the Company may publicly file from time to time. All forward-looking statements attributable to the company or a person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary language.
SOURCE: Hop-on, Inc.
Hop-on, Inc.
Danny Coleman, (949) 756-9008
That's because the floats almost gone. Spread keeps opening up like a low floater.
What if....moving to a smaller office and closing the Texas facility lowered HPNN's burn rate. Maybe they don't need to issue shares like last time.
Remember last time this stock had 10 billion shares now post reverse split there is only 370 million shares, huge difference imo.
part 2 of 2-floorless convertible debentures
This the part i don't like, if they don't register the shares by 6/30/07 they lose all of the companies assets it appears.
"Per the original agreement, in the event the Registration Statement is not filed by December 6, 2006 or is not declared effective within ninety days of the filing date, the Company will pay liquidated damages, to the Holder, a cash amount equal to two percent per month of the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture outstanding. The holder has verbally agreed to extend the registration filing requirement date to June 30, 2007.
The debenture is secured by all of the assets and property of the Company including the investment in Worthington. "
Also,
"The Company is the issuer of a $6,225,000 Secured Convertible Debenture.
The Debenture is convertible, at the option of the Holder, into common stock of the Company at a price per share equal to the lower of (i) $.50 (the “Fixed Price”) or (ii) eighty percent (80%) of the lowest closing bid price for the five (5) trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion."
6 million dollars worth of TRNP stock at 80% of bid price of .012 means TRNP needs to issue and register 600 million new free trading shares if I'm reading their filings correctly.
Here's the link
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1009802/000114420406049356/v058492_10qsb.htm
Debenture Payable from the acquisition
The Company is the issuer of a $6,225,000 Secured Convertible Debenture (“the Debenture”) payable to Highgate House Funds, Ltd (“Holder”), dated December 2, 2005. The Debenture bears interest at the rate of 7%, which is accrued until maturity. The Debenture is due and payable in full, including accrued interest from inception, on December 1, 2010. Associated deferred debenture costs in the amount of $43,725, net of $7,288 amortization as of September 30, 2006, has been recorded as a non-current asset.
The Debenture is convertible, at the option of the Holder, into common stock of the Company at a price per share equal to the lower of (i) $.50 (the “Fixed Price”) or (ii) eighty percent (80%) of the lowest closing bid price for the five (5) trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion or, if a special event of default occurs, at a price per share equal to eighty percent (80%) of the lowest closing bid price for the thirty (30) trading days immediately preceding the date of conversion. The shares of common stock issuable by the Company to the investor upon conversion of shares of the Debentures will not be registered initially under the Securities Act of 1933. The Company is obligated to register the resale of the conversion shares under the Securities and Exchange Act, pursuant to the terms of the Investor Registration Rights Agreement dated December 2, 2005. The Registration Rights Agreement called for the Company to register the underlying securities no later than 180 after the execution of the Debenture agreement (this requirement has been extended to December 6, 2006) and use its best efforts to have the Initial Registration statement declared effective by the SEC no later than ninety days after the date filed.
Per the original agreement, in the event the Registration Statement is not filed by December 6, 2006 or is not declared effective within ninety days of the filing date, the Company will pay liquidated damages, to the Holder, a cash amount equal to two percent per month of the outstanding principal amount of the Debenture outstanding. The holder has verbally agreed to extend the registration filing requirement date to June 30, 2007.
The debenture is secured by all of the assets and property of the Company including the investment in Worthington. Also, the Company will issue and deposit 500,000 shares of common stock (security stock) which are held by an escrow agent for distribution to the holder of the debenture when a conversion notice is received to convert all or a part of the convertible debenture plus accrued interest. The Company agrees that at any time the conversion price of the convertible debenture is such that the number of escrow shares for the convertible debenture is less than two times the number of shares of common stock that would be needed to satisfy full conversion of the convertible debenture then outstanding given the then current conversion price, the Company shall issue additional share certificates to the escrow agent so that the new number of escrow shares is equal to two times the full conversion shares.
Your welcome, did you see this filing? part 1 of 2
Cornell Capital partners, the death spiral financing specialists own 5% of TRNP. The lower the pps goes the more shares Cornell gets, my guess is Gatorpussy works for Cornell.
<DOCUMENT>
<TYPE>SC 13G
<SEQUENCE>1
<FILENAME>v062089_sc13g.txt
<TEXT>
Page 1
--------------------------
OMB APROVAL
--------------------------
OMB Number: 3235-0145
--------------------------
Expires: February 28, 2009
--------------------------
Estimated average burden
hours per response...10/4
--------------------------
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 13G
Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )*
Turnaround Partners, Inc.
-------------------------
(Name of Issuer)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
---------------------------------------
(Title of Class of Securities)
90021610
--------
(CUSIP Number)
January 5 2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Date of Event, which Requires Filing of this Statement)
Check the appropriate box to designate the rule pursuant to which this Schedule
is filed:
|_| Rule 13d-1(b)
|X| Rule 13d-1(c)
|_| Rule 13d-1(d)
*The remainder of this cover page shall be filled out for a reporting person's
initial filing on this form with respect to the subject class of securities, and
for any subsequent amendment containing information, which would alter the
disclosures provided in a prior cover page.
The information required in the remainder of this cover page shall not be deemed
to be "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934 ("Act") or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section of the
Act out shall be subject to all other provisions of the Act, (however, see the
Notes).
<PAGE>
Page 2
Cusip No. 90021610
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Names of Reporting Persons.
I.R.S. Identification Nos. of above persons (entities only)
Cornell Capital Partners, LP
(13-4150836)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Check the Appropriate Box if a Member of a Group (See
Instructions)
(a) |_|
(b) |_|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. SEC Use Only
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Citizenship or Place of Organization: USA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Sole Voting Power: 1,603,642
Number of -----------------------------------------------------------------
Shares 6. Shared Voting Power: 0
Beneficially -----------------------------------------------------------------
Owned by 7. Sole Dispositive Power: 1,603,642
Each Reporting -----------------------------------------------------------------
Person With 8. Shared Dispositive Power: 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Aggregate Amount Beneficially Owned
by Each Reporting Person: 1,603,642
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. Check if the Aggregate Amount in Row (9)
Excludes Certain Shares (See Instructions)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. Percentage of Class Represented by Amount in Row (9): 5.45%
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12. Type of Reporting Person (See Instructions): PN
<PAGE>
Page 3
Item 1.
(a) Name of Issuer: Turnaround Partners, Inc.
(b) Address of Issuer's Principal Executive Offices:
109 North Post Oak Lane
Suite 422
Houston, TX 77024
Item 2. Identity and Background.
(a) Name of Person Filing: Cornell Capital Partners, LP
(b) Address of Principal Executive Office or, if none, Residence of
Reporting Persons:
101 Hudson Street, Suite 3700
Jersey City, NJ 07302
(c) Citizenship: USA
(d) Title of Class of Securities: Common Stock, par value $0.01 per
share
(e) Cusip Number: 90021610
Item 3. If the statement is filed pursuant to ss.ss. 240.13d-1(b) or
240.13d-2(b) or (c), check whether the person filing is:
(a) |_| Broker or dealer registered under section 15 of the Act (15
U.S.C. 78o);
(b) |_| Bank as defined in section 3(a)(6) of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78c);
(c) |_| Insurance company as defined in section 3(a)(19) of the Act
(15 U.S.C. 78c);
(d) |_| Investment company registered under section 8 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 of the Act (15 U.S.C. 78o);
(e) |_| An investment adviser in accordance with
ss.240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(E);
(f) |_| An employee benefit plan or endowment fund in accordance with
ss.240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(F);
(g) |_| A parent holding company or control person in accordance with
ss.240.13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G);
(h) |_| A savings associations as defined in Section 3(b) of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813);
(i) |_| A church plan that is excluded from the definition of an
investment company under section 3(c)(14) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-3); or
(j) |_| Group, in accordance with 240.13d(b)(1)(ii)(J).
Item 4. Ownership
Provide the following information regarding the aggregate number and percentage
of the class of securities of the issuer identified in Item 1.
(a) Amount beneficially owned: 1,603,642
(b) Percentage of Class: 5.45%
(c) Number of shares as to which the person has:
(i) Sole Power to vote or to direct the vote: 1,603,642
(ii) Shared power to vote or to direct the vote: 0
<PAGE>
Page 4
(iii) Sole power to dispose or to direct the disposition: 1,603,642
(iv) Shared power to dispose or to direct the disposition: 0
Item 5. Ownership of Five Percent or Less of a Class:
If this statement is being filed to report the fact that as of the date hereof
the reporting person has ceased to be the beneficial owner of more than five
percent of the class of securities, check the following |_|.
Item 6. Ownership of more than five percent on Behalf of Another Person.
Not Applicable
Item 7. Identification and Classification of the Subsidiary Which Acquired the
Security Being Reported on By the Parent Holding Company or Control
Person.
Not Applicable
Item 8. Identification and Classification of Member Group
Not Applicable
Item 9. Notice of Dissolution of Group
Not Applicable
Item 10. Certification
By signing below, I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the
securities referred to above were not acquired and are not held for the purpose
of or with the effect of changing or influencing the control of the issuer of
the securities and were not acquired and are not held in connection with or as
participant in any transaction having that purpose or effect.
<PAGE>
Page 5
SIGNATURE
After reasonable inquiry and to the best of my knowledge and belief, I certify
that the information set forth in this statement in true, complete and correct.
Dated: January 8, 2007 REPORTING PERSON:
CORNELL CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP
By: Yorkville Advisors, LLC
Its: General Partner
By: /s/ Steven S. Goldstein
----------------------------------
Name: Steven S. Goldstein, Esq.
Its: Chief Compliance Officer
People talk a big game on the phone but when the phone call comes offering them 5 mil in cash it's hard to say no.
Pink sheet stocks use rule 504 I believe to get around 1 million dollar private placement limit.
All they have to do is file ammended share count authorization with the State, their preferred shares are equal to controlling interest for any shareholder vote.
GMSC just raised their authorized share count to 5 billion this exact way.
The way Yucatan can profit is to sell enough shares to the old TA to cover the short position. The old transfer agent calls up Yucatan and says I need to buy 3 billion shares to fix this mess. So Yucatan How much do you want for the shares. Yucatan then has two choices: they tell the TA to cover in the open market and Yuatan never see's a dime but all you players get rich. Or they sell them the 3 bil shares for let's say 5 million dollars. Short gets covered all of you become bagholders for a shell with 5 mil in cash and 3 billion shares. If you were Yucatan which choice would you pick??
See Below, they have an extra 42 days to file. Not surprising with the change from Emerge to Turnaround. They probably have a lot of things to pull together on their first K filing since name change etc. Nothing sinister here just normal cleanup.
NT 10-K 1 v070720_nt-10k.htm
UNITED STATES
OMB APPROVAL
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
OMB Number:
3235-0058
Expires:
April 30, 2009
FORM 12b-25
Estimated average burden hours per response:……………….
2.50
SEC FILE NUMBER
NOTIFICATION OF LATE FILING
CUSIP NUMBER
(Check one):
x
Form 10-K
o
Form 20-F
o
Form 11-K
o
Form 10-Q
o
Form 10-D
o
Form N-SAR
o
Form N-CSR
For Period Ended: December 31, 2006
o
Transition Report on Form 10-K
o
Transition Report on Form 20-F
o
Transition Report on Form 11-K
o
Transition Report on Form 10-Q
o
Transition Report on Form N-SAR
For the Transition Period Ended: ______________________________________________________
Read Instruction (on back page) Before Preparing Form. Please Print or Type.
Nothing in this form shall be construed to imply that the Commission has verified any information contained herein.
If the notification relates to a portion of the filing checked above, identify the Item(s) to which the notification relates:
PART I — REGISTRANT INFORMATION
Turnaround Partners, Inc.
Full Name of Registrant
Emerge Capital Corp.
Former Name if Applicable
109 North Post Oak Lane, Suite 422
Address of Principal Executive Office (Street and Number)
Houston, Texas 77024
City, State and Zip Code
PART II — RULES 12b-25(b) AND (c)
If the subject report could not be filed without unreasonable effort or expense and the registrant seeks relief pursuant to Rule 12b-25(b), the following should be completed. (Check box if appropriate)
x
(a)
The reason described in reasonable detail in Part III of this form could not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense
x
(b)
The subject annual report, semi-annual report, transition report on Form 10-K, Form 20-F, Form 11-K, Form N-SAR or Form N-CSR, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before the fifteenth calendar day following the prescribed due date; or the subject quarterly report or transition report on Form 10-Q or subject distribution report on Form 10-D, or portion thereof, will be filed on or before the fifth calendar day following the prescribed due date; and
o
(c)
The accountant’s statement or other exhibit required by Rule 12b-25(c) has been attached if applicable.
PART III — NARRATIVE
State below in reasonable detail why Forms 10-K, 20-F, 11-K, 10-Q,10-D, N-SAR, N-CSR, or the transition report or portion thereof, could not be filed within the prescribed time period.
Due to unforeseeable circumstances which caused a delay in preparing the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, the Registrant respectfully requests an extension of the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006.
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information contained in this form are
note required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid OMB control number.
PART IV — OTHER INFORMATION
(1)
Name and telephone number of person to contact in regard to this notification
Timothy J. Connolly
(713)
621-2737
(Name)
(Area Code)
(Telephone Number)
(2)
Have all other periodic reports required under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s) been filed ? If answer is no, identify report(s).
Yes
x
No
o
(3)
Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements to be included in the subject report or portion thereof ?
Yes
o
No
x
If so, attach an explanation of the anticipated change, both narratively and quantitatively, and, if appropriate, state the reasons why a reasonable estimate of the results cannot be made.
NATURAL NUTRITION, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
Date
April 3, 2007
By
/s/ Timothy J. Connolly
INSTRUCTION: The form may be signed by an executive officer of the registrant or by any other duly authorized representative. The name and title of the person signing the form shall be typed or printed beneath the signature. If the statement is signed on behalf of the registrant by an authorized representative (other than an executive officer), evidence of the representative’s authority to sign on behalf of the registrant shall be filed with the form.
ATTENTION
Intentional misstatements or omissions of fact constitute Federal Criminal Violations (See 18 U.S.C. 1001).
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
1.
This form is required by Rule 12b-25 (17 CFR 240.12b-25) of the General Rules and Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
2.
One signed original and four conformed copies of this form and amendments thereto must be completed and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington, D.C. 20549, in accordance with Rule 0-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Act. The information contained in or filed with the form will be made a matter of public record in the Commission files.
3.
A manually signed copy of the form and amendments thereto shall be filed with each national securities exchange on which any class of securities of the registrant is registered.
4.
Amendments to the notifications must also be filed on Form 12b-25 but need not restate information that has been correctly furnished. The form shall be clearly identified as an amended notification.
5.
Electronic Filers: This form shall not be used by electronic filers unable to timely file a report solely due to electronic difficulties. Filers unable to submit reports within the time period prescribed due to difficulties in electronic filing should comply with either Rule 201 or Rule 202 of Regulation S-T (§232.201 or §232.202 of this chapter) or apply for an adjustment in filing date pursuant to Rule 13(b) of Regulation S-T (§232.13(b) of this chapter).
2
I just tried to call the CEO of Vonage to tell him not to worry. I wanted to tell him MG said patents were just useless pieces of paper.
Judge blocks Vonage from serving new customers
Friday April 6, 1:11 pm ET
By Rachelle Younglai
ALEXANDRIA, Va (Reuters) - Vonage Holdings Corp. (NYSE:VG - News) cannot service new customers while it appeals a finding that it infringed Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE:VZ - News) patents for making phone calls over the Internet, a federal judge ruled on Friday.
ADVERTISEMENT
Vonage plans to appeal U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton's order that allows Vonage only to service existing customers and requires the company to post a $66 million bond.
Roger Warin, a lawyer for Vonage, told the court the choice between a partial stay and a total prohibition on using the Verizon technology amounted to "cutting off oxygen or a bullet to the head" for Vonage.
Actually they filed an NT-10K meaning financials are late they asked for an extension from SEC.
Do you know what an oxymoron is?
In case you don't...
A paradox reduced to two words, usually in an adjective-noun ("eloquent silence") or adverb-adjective ("inertly strong") relationship, and is used for effect, to emphasize contrasts, incongruities, hypocrisy, or simply the complex nature of reality. Examples: wise fool, ignorantly learned.
Another example might be someone who offers legal opinions on the complex world of patent law but who has the spelling skills of a 2nd grade special ed student.
you wrote
"Posted by: mghamberlin
In reply to: icu812 who wrote msg# 5697 Date:4/5/2007 2:14:38 PM
Post #of 5700
It was issued this week. They are only eligable for patient royalties and infringement benifits from that day forward and only on the technology they can prove was mirrored by the other phone companies. Very slim odds there. I can get patient issued for a new sterio speaker.
With the recent TORT reform act in the US in any litigation proceedings"
Eligable should be spelled like this eligible not how you spelled it.
Patient should be spelled patent.
Sterio should be spelled stereo
Benifits should be spelled benefits
But I thank you for the lesson on patent law. You might want to spend more time on the Mavis Beacon teaches spelling website and less time on the Patent law for Dummies website. You don't want to sound like an ignorant bean farmer when you post do you??
AMPX went from 40 cents to over $40 per share, they had patents for thumbnail technologies used in digital cameras. They went after Sony etc and received over 400 million in patent infringement related royalties. Stock blew up!!
"We look forward to the four major carriers, manufactures selling products and major retailers in the US to cooperate with Hop-on's past and future royalties of its design patent. Most MP3 flip phones on the market today have speakers on the side of the phones. We will be seeking royalties from previous and future sales of this design; there have been millions of similar phones sold on the market."
What is up with ACAR .035 up 1066%, wow buys keep coming
Bar Charts likes HPNN (EOM)
http://quotes.barchart.com/texadv.asp?sym=hpnn
Short Term Indicators
7 Day Average Directional Indicator Buy Maximum Strengthening
10 - 8 Day Moving Average Hilo Channel Buy Maximum Strongest
20 Day Moving Average vs Price Buy Maximum Strongest
20 - 50 Day MACD Oscillator Buy Maximum Strongest
20 Day Bollinger Bands Buy Maximum Strengthening
Short Term Indicators Average: 100% - Buy
Medium Term Indicators
40 Day Commodity Channel Index Buy Strong Weakening
50 Day Moving Average vs Price Buy Maximum Strongest
20 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Buy Maximum Strongest
50 Day Parabolic Time/Price Buy Maximum Strongest
Medium Term Indicators Average: 100% - Buy
Long Term Indicators
60 Day Commodity Channel Index Buy Maximum Strengthening
100 Day Moving Average vs Price Buy Maximum Strongest
50 - 100 Day MACD Oscillator Buy Average Strongest
Long Term Indicators Average: 100% - Buy
Overall Average: 88% - Buy
More amazing will be the smoking gun!!!
Remember this press release Cyberhand put out.
Cyberhand Announces Its Robotics Division Enters Into Letter of Intent to Merge With Public Company.
CALGARY, ALBERTA--(MARKET WIRE)--Nov 22, 2006 -- Cyberhand Technologies International Inc. (Other OTC:CYHD.PK - News), a design, marketing and distribution company providing new consumer electronic technologies using innovative ergonomic designs, today announced its Cyberhand Robotics Division has entered into a Letter of Intent Agreement with an unnamed public company with respect to merging its operations with that company.
***Whose name was it that was listed as being from Bighub on the Letter of Intent Cyberhand said they had signed.
What if we were right about everything and this happens
NAME/SYMBOL CHANGES
Updated Date Old Symbol Old Name New Symbol New Name Comment
13:45 0X/XX/2007 BHUB Big Hub Inc Common Stock CYBR Cyberhandrobotics Inc. Common Stock 1/2000 RS
What if
1)yes they did a 2000 for 1 reverse split in 2006
2)yes they do complete and announce the merger with Cyberhand robotics
3)But what if BHUB issued another 3 billion shares over the last year. Anyone who traded this stock can see it trades like a stock with 3 billion shares OS.
4)What if they need to do another 2000 for 1 reverse split now to get the share count down for merger.
5)How will we do if 10 million shares turns into 5000 shares after the merger.
If Burke changed that web page to a link to LSMJ quote or simply took down that BHUB info he would get a million phone calls. He left himself an out to switch shells right there on the page you showed me. He said deal with BHUB was not a done deal things could change.