Nothing false or misleading in my post. Discuss amongst yourselves.

CRGS CEO Dick Kaplan placing his money directly into the company (as opposed to that money being used to buy common) benefits the company, as we wait on the sale of the pump and Cura. Nothing nefarious about this. He already owns both common and preferred shares of CRGS.

Dino
“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.”

CRGS CEO Dick Kaplan placing his money directly into the company (as opposed to that money being used to buy common) benefits the company, as we wait on the sale of the pump and Cura. Nothing nefarious about this. He already owns both common and preferred shares of CRGS.

SULAX
Tuesday, 09/24/19 07:42:44 PM
Re: fadeaway post# 33574
0
Post # of 33585

If he had any faith IMO he would be buying common stock. IMO he knows it’s soon to be worthless. Maybe the truth will all come out in Oakies report.

My apologies to CRGS Board of Director Lance F. Drummond for inadvertently omitting the d in his surname.

I got it right in this post anyway.
Dino1717
Friday, 09/06/19 01:47:25 AM
Re: Leitrim post# 33547
0
Post # of 33553

UGH Reading this post/"POINT" reminds me of the old saying: So this is the hill you want to die on?

Lance F. Drummond is a director of CRGS.
While not a BOD: Kathleen A. Browne is the Chief Financial Officer of CRGS.

I am not interested in a discussion, just wish more due diligence was done before posting false info regarding CRGS.
Good night all,
Dino

Leitrim, just because you post it, it does not make it true.

"you were congratulating folks for the "fantastic buys" they were making at $8 ,then $7, then $6 etc etc on the way down last time around"


Check your facts before you decide to post false information.

UGH Reading this post/"POINT" reminds me of the old saying: So this is the hill you want to die on?

Lance F. Drummond is a director of CRGS.
While not a BOD: Kathleen A. Browne is the Chief Financial Officer of CRGS.

I am not interested in a discussion, just wish more due diligence was done before posting false info regarding CRGS.
Good night all,
Dino

Not a Doctor, nor a psychiatrist who would care why a shareholder proclaims/ believes CRGS common shareholders will get nothing/its over,

yet would not sell CRGS common shares.

I do not know if Cura will have revenue in 2019. I expect to hear more on Cura from DK October 15th at the stockholders meeting.

So far anything CRGS has said about Cura revenue has been as reliable as a rubber crutch.

Your friend always,
Dino

Post the 2007 TOVC post then. Other wise it is off topic.

Did this really get posted?sulax "lets all try and sell and see what happens to the price".

I have no interest in selling CRGS at this time.

Your Off-topic post. Provide the post stating:
"Doctor Dino's diagnosis is that the smart money is starting to move in (48,000 shares traded) while the dumb money is just dumb for moving out.
Dino" December 2007. Is this a partial post?

Your friend always,
Dino

Approaching September 5th 2019.CRGS is still listed. What is the status of "It's over and everyone knows it."? sulax August 12, 2019. Anyone know why CRGS is listed?

Your friend always,
Dino

Of course I am correct. It is stated in the 8-K. Posts promoting the short side of the CRGS trade whether inadvertently or intentional, (it's over/commons will get nothing/bankruptcy) are all inbounds. Factually false statements are out of bounds.

Your friend always,
Life is good Dino

CRGS Lease information posted falsely here:

SULAX
Wednesday, 08/28/19 04:05:01 PM
Re: Dino1717 post# 33529
0
Post # of 33532

LMAO, $.13 is good news? That's how far we have fallen. 5 year SUB lease? You think it can be enforced in bankruptcy? Per the last 10-Q we still owe $1.4 million for inventory but we signed a 5 year sublease so things look great? Wonder how the vendor for the watch is feeling?

Talk about the eternal optimist......"breathe in, breathe out...."

On August 23, 2019, Richard A. Kaplan, the Chief Executive Officer of CurAegis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) reported the relocation of the Company’s principal executive offices from 1999 Mt. Read Blvd, Bldg. 3, Rochester, New York 14615, to 350 Linden Oaks Rochester New York 14625, effective September 1, 2019.

This new location provides 5,608 square feet of office space subleased through December 30, 2022. In addition to the base monthly rent, the Company will be responsible for its proportionate share of utilities and building services.

CRGS Recent New Lease/Bid/Ask does not jive with this post.

fadeaway Thursday, 07/25/19 07:51:20 PM
Re: Zendo 2 post# 33463
Post # of 33528
The next report will be bankruptcy imo. Donnelly is just another JG.


I would never hold shares (long) of a stock I felt was going bankrupt.
Each to his own.
Your friend always.
Dino

DK has always/has never stopped seeing a future for Curaegis.
He just has not executed, which is the disappointment for CRGS shareholders.

Dino

I guess it may be a case of which is more stupid. Thanks for the invitation but I will not call anyone stupid for the decision to hold CRGS at this time.

1.) Holding
While CRGS is in a process to sell($$$)the pump technology.

2.) Holding CRGS and maintaining the position common CRGS shareholders will "get nothing" if Paramax sells the pump technology.

Your friend always,
Life is good. Dino

As maintained by the reply to the mailbox from sulax.
"Commons will get nothing." Too early for that prediction IMO. Let Paramax finish their job.

SULAX
Tuesday, 07/16/19 04:17:36 PM
Re: 4toSchool post# 33446

Post # of 33520

I love the optimism but any money raised by a sale of the pump will fund the repayment of the equity raises and the preferred shareholders as it should be. Frankly, without them we are out of business anyways. Commons will get nothing. Circle of life.

Flip side of that 100,000 share bid is the opportunity for the two who TRULY crow that common shares will have next to no value after a sale of the pump to get out of CRGS. A far better price than "the smartest guy in town" received.

Dino

Insider Activity: Centene Corp (CNC) Board Member Buys $151k in Stock

Jessica L. Blume, a member of the board of directors at Centene Corp (CNC), bought 2,850 shares of the company’s common stock on Jul 26. At $52.99 per share, Blume paid a total of $151,022 for the new shares.

WCG reports earnings before the bell 7-30-19. Will move CNC one direction or the other.
Dino

Anyone who owns 90,000 shares or less choosing to take fadeaway advice ("The next report will be bankruptcy") can get out right now and never look back. A tremendously wiser/better trade than the "smartest guy in town" made .
Bid 90,000 at .111 ask .20.

Your friend always,
Dino

Shout out to the (.0505) "smartest guy in town"

Bid 80,000 shares at .124 ask 5,000 shares at .20

It is not over for common until and if Paramax announces it cannot sell CRGS Pump Tech.
Dino

How utterly stupid.....

1.)"The smartest guy in town" sold at .05 when .11 is available today and yesterday.
2.) It's over..

It is not over for common until and if Paramax announces it cannot sell CRGS Pump Tech.

Thank you Tula and Longtimer for posts worth the click.
Dino

I did not neglect his preferred. The preferred are in the same 10k I referred to in my the post. It is well known TG holds preferred shares. I posted the common shares TG owns because I wanted to.

Laughing out loud "Why would anyone post his common ownership while neglecting his preferred?"

Fun fact: B. Thomas Golisano holds
46 million-three hundred fifty six thousand-seven hundred fifty common
shares of CRGS per the latest 10 k.

Dino

s I did not try to deceive anyone.
Rejecting the inference made that the preferred will screw the common.

I stand by my post.
Fun fact: B. Thomas Golisano holds
46 million-three hundred fifty six thousand-seven hundred fifty common
shares of CRGS per the latest 10 k.

Discuss amongst yourselves
Dino

Fun fact: B. Thomas Golisano holds

46 million-three hundred fifty six thousand-seven hundred fifty common
shares of CRGS per the latest 10 k.

Dino

One would be hard pressed to find a CRGS shareholder who could or would disagree with "Just sucks" describing the Kaplan era to date. A lot easier to find an 'it's over". The alternative to selling and moving on IMO is to wait to see how Paramax makes out.

Life is good your friend,
Dino

For CRGS to sell the pump or get a deal is going to
take some time. Until then the "it's over" chant will repeatedly be 95% of the "discussion" here.
I notice anyone who posts a belief that CRGS is not done yet typically gets their mailbox stuffed with babble.

Dino

Lance Drummond/"one large company" ????

rap·port
/ra'pôr,r?'pôr/
noun
noun: rapport; plural noun: rapports
a close and harmonious relationship in which the people or groups concerned understand each other's feelings or ideas and communicate well.
"she was able to establish a good rapport with the children"
synonyms:
affinity, close/special relationship, (mutual) understanding, bond, empathy, harmony, sympathy, link, accord
"the gift of quiet spiritual rapport with an audience"

Hence my posting: IF he were to resign, or more to my point be asked to resign I would see that as an issue. Not Asher Flaum.

We are all entitled to our thoughts ("we don't need Lance") as to the value and to why Lance Drummond was appointed. Of course if one is of the opinion that "we gambled and it looks like we lost" this also is a non issue. LOL....

Dino

Thank you sulax for the ever so informative CRGS info reply to my mailbox. Lance Drummond is considered a welcome addition to the board by many.

Dino

Non issue for me. Lance Drummond was added as an extra board member during talks with the "one large company" IF he were to resign, or more to my point be asked to resign I would see that as an issue. Not Asher Flaum.

Dino

Thanks for that information BMT387 eom...

We didn't. Remember "it was Bosch"
No public or private acknowledgement to me from CRGS. Just my own investigating. Hard to keep that a secret for so long of a time.

Dino1717
Thursday, 03/21/19 12:36:50 PM
Re: Jay Arr post# 32977
0
Post # of 33205

Using todays technology Facebook ect. ect./ Parker Hannifin(Fortune 500 Company) EMPLOYEES and offices in Lancaster and Fairport N.Y. Parker Hannifin are the "big boys"
Jay, if you follow me publicly on I-Hub, I receive insane idiotic useless discussion information replies to just about every CRGS post. As of late I rarely post publicly. Private messaging on I-Hub is a better way for me to discuss CRGS. Private Message me anytime.

Life is good,
Your friend always,
Dino

I have highlighted a part of the Aegis Pump and Motor CEO Report March 18, 2019 as only a part of my reasoning that: 1.) it is not over for common shareholders and 2.) Parker Hannifin cannot be excluded as a Paramax focus.

Dear CurAegis Technologies Shareholders,
This is a short CEO update for CurAegis Technologies, Inc. as of March 18, 2019.

I am sorry it has been so long since my last CEO report but I felt I had to wait for our negotiations regarding our hydraulic technology to progress to the point when I could give out information.

AEGIS Pump and Motor: As you know, we have been working with one large company to license or sell our hydraulic technologies. As of now we have not been able to reach an agreement. Although we are not stopping those negotiations, we now believe it is in the Company’s best interests to open them up to other prospects. We have started conversations with investment bankers and companies that we believe will be interested in these technologies. We believe we have valuable assets and want to make sure we receive fair value for them. I will keep you informed of our progress.

Ok sulax I get it, you "believe that Paramax will complete a deal in a number of years and also "expect the preferred's to get repaid and the commons left with little to nothing" Thank you for spending the time to refute and reply to my beliefs on CRGS moving forward.

Live and let live
Dino

I believe Paramax completes a transaction of the pump technology. But that will take time. Until then I expect constant criticizism of CRGS/my thoughts portraying that belief.

fadeaway
Wednesday, 04/10/19 08:17:59 PM
Re: jfs post# 33104
0
Post # of 33196

Exactly. Commons should never expect more than $.20 cents. The big boys might get lucky but not the long term shareholders. Let's face the facts.

Fadeaway list the "Let's face the facts" why "commons should never expect more than 20 cents"
I am sincerely interested to see those facts.
Thank you.
Dino

Now that you have cheered me up. I certainly respect your thoughts. Comparing a CRGS shareholder to the fiddler on the Titanic did not fit with my hope awaiting to see how Paramax fares with the pump technology. Perhaps I need to revisit my thoughts. Although I do get it, the downward pressure on the share price that is.

Dino

Too bad your question could not be posed to someone who knows the answer. I
would like to know where things stood with Parker Hannifin before the decision to call in Paramax was made. Paramax for sure is calling on Parker Hannifin, amongst others IMO.

Dino

Gee laughing out loud over 60,000 "basically worthless" shares traded yesterday. People were able to sell shares. So much false narrative provided on this board, expect it to continue while Paramax brokers a deal.

Dino

The stock is NOT basically worthless. It is not known how much cash Paramax could secure for the pump technology or further that it would all go to pay preferred shareholders. It's NOT over for the common shareholders as long as CRGS is hello still available to trade current Bid 5000 shares .13 Ask 6600 shares .17.

The perplexing question (if one cares about the answer, and I do not) is why would anyone who does feel it is over for common shareholders continue to hold shares.

Dino