Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OT On the track you're very, very wrong. But if you "live life a quarter mile at a time"....lol
I guess that we all know that he's been on the phone with those entities, I made the assumption that it may have come up as part of BHUB's plan to address this situation, no?
Art - you may have missed my question earlier - has this move been run by (and blessed by) the NASD and other regulatory bodies that have been involved here? Thanks.
Art - did he already run this scenario by the DTCC etc?
nope, had it streaming before
that's the new angle, eh, ignored
That's what it seems like to me?
nice spread...
He will know more than we do not having read one post from today....
you also know it's done from the TELA action
1.5B / 100
What I'm excited about is that there's no way they'd be covering through TELA unless they KNEW the deal is done
freaking unbelievable
he's was right ten monures ago, now very, very wrong - we're up from where we were halted if it happens
they're covering 100 shares for ever 1 though
covering bhub through tela right now...right all?
tela 27x28
your getting 1/100th of what tela is worth this second - you want it climb
this is crazy, this is covering right now - has to be a done deal and some shorts are trying to get a jump
wonder if there's covering through TELA?...????
wow tela's gonna run? wtf
nah, that was just 52 wk high
TELA 52 wk high $4
If covering would still have to take place on the grays, then the TA may as well let up and let it trade on the pinks to make their life easier. But to be completely honest, I'm pretty sure I'm screwed...
Wonder, would BHUB also sue in addition to the TA being forced to cover? Probably wouldn't make sense, although you'd presume there are damages from this?
I can't believe I'm trapped in this stock. What a GD piss poor decision maker I am...
Thanks Art - have they given any indication that if he is able to show the approiate documentation which states the shares were unauthorized, that they will allow it to trade and the burden will fall on select to make good?
Art - how does Darrell see this playing out?
Well I bought Tuesday and it seems to be settled, I was actually hoping they'd reverse it.
gotcha, maybe we trade today... ?
That's alot more pleasant response than "wrong" though, no?
I'm pretty sure that this is not the time that they will be uplisting...but if it trades I'm thrilled.
Reason code still T1...
While I'm not sure what you're talking about, I do find it interesting that :
1. He knew/assumed the discussion would last 1 hour and
2. He agreed beforehand to do another interview afterwards.
how can they keep up?
Or why would the company put one out yest futher incriminating THEMSELVES? Gimme a braek, you have no idea so just wait.
Yah, and we hope never T12...
didn't mean to be a dick, tell you what - show me some companies that have been halted with that reason code, I'm curious.
When was the last time you saw a discrepancy of 1.5B shares? Are you going to hang out here all day and do this crap? Let me know so I can put you on ignore...