Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I guess so! Never thought of that.
As we all know, It is "relaxometry" rather than "reflexometry" as stated in the article but publicity is publicity!
"course"
Take a chill pill, ZM! The company is not in the news printing business. Press releases cost money. When there is significant material changes to the already known, they will be reported.
I share your hunger for answers to the question, "What's going on?" The MDA validation was to take until the end of the year. It may be until then before the next press release.
The company is required to disclose all "material" events. If (worst case scenario) MDA determined that the MRX technology has no place in modern medicine and returned the machine(s), This would be considered a "material" event and would have to be disclosed.
Since the technology is "broad spectrum" as far as its potential uses, it can't be thoroughly evaluated in "one pass"!
Cancer is a multi faced disease. It takes time to evaluate the process in relation to each type of cancer cell. I'm not a medical professional but I know that there are at least three types of breast cancers and four types of thyroid cancers and many others.
As long as there has been no announcement to the contrary, good things are happening and there will be news when there is a "material" event.
Sure. I have suggested regular progress reports but as you can see
those suggestions died in the box. Meanwhile we keep looking at the longer term time frames.
That's not true. They work harder than most people, Seldom with a day off even on weekends. The issue here is ability or inability to maintain momentum. After a successful information release that stimulates investor interest, the next bit of news is so far away that interest is allowed to fade.
OK it's 350%. But it's 4.5 times what it was. Roughly!
450% annualized.
I was just looking over a price chart when I realized that it was exactly one year ago that our pps was struggling to maintain 4 cents. With this last week's move to a new 52 week high of 18 cents....well you do the math!
It's only the beginning!!
The June 27th high of $.1795 is a key level of resistance. I believe if we can surpass that, then it's "off to the races"!
We've a higher trading volume than Google (GOOG) so far today but then GOOG is a tad more expensive!
I'm ok with that because I have more than enough shares. The big fundamental change is the Upham Upgrade. All we know about what she accomplished is, she set up her former company to be the exclusive marketing agent for the Nano MRX nano particles. To date they have not sold even one. I for one, am excited about the change because Falk is a respected and accomplished go-getter with actual important industry contacts!
More than $10 million in market cap increase since post #4408...
...just sayin'...
Why don't you pursue that and let us know what you find? Good luck.
You know, they recently changed accountants. Maybe should have kept the old guys?
They have (if we are talking about the same figures) to do with the Carpenter payments shifting from large lumps to minimum royalty payments and actual royalties. The unanticipated delay in getting the nano structured titanium (by CRS) to market is all I can think of that would account for the differences.
Well if you're that negative, maybe just steer clear.
At this point it is dependent on news in that the 10Q was nothing more than business as usual. The fact that the new directors options have a 13 cent strike instead of the old 5.5 cent valuation indicates that they see a higher value in the company than when Mason and company got on board. Therefore, displayed insider optimism is about all we've got going for us until news breaks. If you are looking for a re-entry price, unless a gradual decline allows you to scale in, I don't know where to send you.
There is income from operations in the report. It just seems like not mentioning it there is acting like it doesn't exist but that's just my impression. Anyway all that is looking back. I'm now looking forward!
In my opinion, the 10Q could have been made more interesting to outsiders with the inclusion of 3 words in the last sentence under
"Liquidity and Capital Resources". Where it says, "We intend to satisfy our capital requirements for the next twelve months from...(and then added)income from operations,.....
Still, the incredible potential is alive and well!
Lenny Friedman's Form 4 was amended to reflect warrants exercised at an undisclosed strike price to purchase 763k+ shares and to increase his recent option grant to a half million shares @ $.13 expiring in 10 years. This is yet another insider buy.
Temper tantrum
I'm not calling .09. What I'm saying is, by trading in and out of this thin volume issue, you could nearly single handedly ("your bid your ask") take it there. When you do this, you take the rest of us with you.
Yeah, and when it hits .11 put your bid at .09 and when it hits .09 put your bid at .07 etc.
I was scoffed at when I posted "buying pressure lowers the price". Yet you always confirm it.
Raise your bid.
That's plausible. I always find though, that there are at least two sides to the story and just when I have things completely figured out, another class at HKU (Hard Knocks University) opens tuition unpaid and usually unlimited!
Aren't we all and don't I know! I sometimes use SDS.
Thanks but stop holding back. Tell us what you really think!
In the ultra short term, if the S&P were to pull back below 1930 today I would look at a small long position to maybe pick 10 to 15 points or so...
Go figure
The S&P is riding right on it's 50DMA. Three times this year it actually dipped below the 50DMA only to recover a few days later.
We'll see if bargain hunters prevail again this time.
It could have been a feeler bid to see if someone had a higher ask order. A fill there may have at least momentarily raised the
ask but let's say the bid may have been for 1000 @ 14 cents, the fill at .138 confirmed no sell orders of at least 1000 @ .14.
This tells where traders might or might not have orders and might be useful in formulating a trading strategy.
After closely watching this stock price for a long time, I have observed small trades that usually sink the price followed by a much larger trade at the then lowered price.
Any bid higher than the ask will have to be larger than the ask
in order to raise it. Until then $.138 is the ceiling.
As long as certain "elements" keep shooting us in the foot, "hopping" seems unlikely!
Over what time frame?
The SPX July 3rd high of the day was 1985 plus. On July 24th it was 1991 plus. today's low of 1963ish is still approaching the 50 day moving average from above. A bounce off the 50dma and subsequent rally would confirm the bear market beginning call of July 8, a bit premature.
That's a knee slapper!
The guilty knows who he is.
What is preventing 18 cents?
A continual sub $.14 bid. It's getting tiresome.
At this point a retest of the 50 day moving average would be higher than .11