Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Matt, who manipulated member ranking system?
I just saw it. I haven't been keeping up with this board. Did someone get a few user names and mark someone? You don't say.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
who just said this?
"I ADVISE, PLEASE, NO LINKS ON THE FIRST LINE. PLEASE SHOW SOME CONSIDERATION TOWARDS OTHERS."
consideration towards others?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
They will draw from existing toxic financing
They will be forced to settle with tk in order to get funds. With the TK lawsuit, they sure can't get funds from any other source. When they do this, price tanks again. Either bankruptcy or toxic funding. Which is worse? Paul will take the toxic funds, for the third time with npct and umpteenth time with all of his companies
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
bullrider, if you say npct is a bad investment,
sara will go out and buy more. I said astn was a bad investment and she bought MORE at .86 she bragged. They're at .20 now. Maybe she's a short
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Just because bull isn't hot on npct
does not mean that we are the same person.
If you were to show npct to 1000 regular investors, 99.9% would go "that's a lousy company." The other .01% would be someone who thinks they can do a little momo jobbie on the small company and maybe steal a penny or two from some unsuspecting fool. That is how a regular investor would look at it. I know that rubber, danny, hollen, sara are into momo jobbies. For instance, sara invested in astn, lfza, and npct. They are all otcbb companies with basically no income and definitely no profits. She's obviously not in those companies as real investments as they make no sense as real investments. She's looking for momo, that's all. That's all npct is at best, a momo play.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Vegas even is CEO begging for investors
that's all the event is. He'll be there with his crew begging for money. Remember he went to New York and begged for money and no one gave him any. Yes, he's desperate. Time to take more toxic funds. Watch the share price dump.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Fantastic analysis, bullrider
My estimate was that they'd make it max to May 5, 2002 IF burn rate, income the same. Actually burn rate is higher and income is lower so your d-day is probably more accurate.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Bull, keep in mind that...
they hired new CFO and other people besides "expanding" and "going into production" since 12/31/01 so expenses are up. I personally don't believe they're really producing anything because they have no orders and need to spare their cash. Paul also once said he had an antenna technology that was ready for production instantly. They never made one. He later admitted it was worthless and that was the end of that.
Expenses have gone up. Income is down.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
They will run out of cash around June
at burn rate as of 12/31/01 which is actually lower than actual, based on COH 12/31/01 IF htey don't access the remaining toxic funds. I believe they will settle wtih the toxic funders like mbpt did and take the funds then the price will tank again.
Yes, everyone should look at the last report.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Bob Z: Westergaard offered same services
Westergaard the stock promoter also offered his clients an added service if you recall. He offered a $5,000 bounty for the name, address of any "basher." He said he even caught one when he didn't. Remember Pluvia turning himself in and Westy never paid him?
West offered the same exact services as board patrol plus they send legal letters to the message boards about posters besides threatening to sue any negative poster, even if you just asked a negative question. That's actually how I got dragged into this whole thing. I asked a question which turned out to have a negative answer. He bashed me to hades and back, threatened to sue me, said the lawsuit's in the mail. It made me suspicious so I did tons more dd and found out what a con man he was. Then I outed him on every board he covered. He still blames me for his bankruptcy and the end of his public company WSYS. WSYS was just stock promotion and boardpatrol to the umpteenth degree.
I don't know those two people actually.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Matt: Definition of spam please
jmhollen and rubberworm are on npct posting every single POSITIVE article, company press release and paid DD ever written about npct item for item. It's all in the ibox already in the one summary dd post. I was told I cannot do this. I believe this is spam. If I post every single item in my honest DD, I can fill up the board. jmhollen likes to fill up the board in order to increase positive posts and flood out any negative posts. There are now six pump and dumpers against one honest negative poster, ME. They outnumber me as it is. I don't believe they should be allowed to do this. If they are allowed to do this, please let me do the same. This is jmhollen's tactic exactly.
http://www.boardpatrol.com/services.html
Our service speaks for itself, and typically results in the following statistics:
Increased message board traffic by more than 20%.
Increased number of positive messages by at least 50%.
Increased percentage of positive messages by more than 30%.
Reduction in the percentage of negative messages by at least 20%.
Increase in the ratio of positive messages to negative messages by at least 50%.
These results mean you'll get more exposure, greater investor confidence, less "bashing," less misinformation, and an improved online image. Every day thousands of investors visit your company's message boards, and they can not be ignored. When these investors leave your board, we'll be sure that they leave with a great feeling about your company, have more interest than before they came, and that they come back!
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
insight from someone else
From: ChrisJP Monday, Feb 18, 2002 9:14 AM
View Replies (1) / Respond to of 7
Hi mmmary, the premise for the naked short position (which conveniently cannot be verified) is flawed.
If JNOT recapitalizes, and makes its existing shares worthless -- then the short interest gets to claim (for tax reporting purposes) that they covered for $0.00.
Only MMs can short without borrowing shares. And they have to settle up once per month. And if anyone is stupid enough to think they are able to "squeeze the house", lololol, welllllllllllll they get what they deserve.
4 and a half years ago, there was a stock called OVIS. The first "naked short" scam. I still remember when the "OVIS Cult" members did a roll call on SI and posted how many shares they each owned. The total exceeded the supposed number of outstanding shares, let alone to supposed float. For some reason this didn't register on the cult members as suspicious ......
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
The are running the biz out of CEO home
They no longer have jagfn the tv show. They just have the jagnotes.com site. Their new plan is to do live video of shareholder meetings. Yeah, pretty lame, like any company can't do this themselves. They have no real future in my opinion. They only have toxic funding. They will probably go bankrupt when the toxic funds run out. That is why they are hyping this squeeze story.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Welcome to JNOT, home of the short squeeze story
The vote to capitalize the shares is 2/21. The company analyst has projected that the squeeze will show up two weeks ago, a week ago, right now, and now they've changed their projection to after the vote. It still hasn't show up yet. We have no idea if the story of the huge short position is even true. Ask the CEO in email and he will say there is no way to tell how many shares are short. Talk to him on the phone and there are jillions of shares short which he states are Valentine's. Who's conning whom? Who is short if anyone? Maybe it's the new toxic funder? Only a few more days to see if this pans out. I don't think it will as they projected the squeeze two weeks ago and still no show, just tons of hype. The company analyst is spamming the squeeze story all over Raging Bull. It's really pretty sad. We shall see soon enough.
What do you think? Is this jive talk or not?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Interview is total stock promotion bull
Any time I've ever seen a company state "we will not run out of money," they run out of money quickly. End of June out of money at present burn rate and COH as of 12/31/01 if they don't access the toxic funds. They will have to then the share price will dump again. Maybe paul will even short it himself.
Honest dd on npct in the ibox under MMMARY
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Note receivable - $275,410
Note receivable - related party (Intercell) - $127,500
Deferred revenue - $48,043
The German Government Grant of 100,000 euros (approx. $87,340 by today’s conversion rate)
These total $538,293 added to $1,810,461 = $2,348,754
If the notes receivable are as good as cash, why weren't htey paid off on time? They were due earlier. Also, can npct really use the grant money for their own personal expenses? I don't think so. Deferred revenue, like they will be seeing that also. Why not just add $10M stating that paul could win the lotto and that could be considered cash for npct.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
What if the CEO is lying?
What if what kathy posted was all a lie? Why would someone believe what the ceo supposedly said to a company paid stock promoter over what was in the SEC filing? If that's the truth, why wasn't it in the filing that way? Did the ceo lie to the SEC?
If the loan, accounts due....were all cash, why weren't they listed as cash in the SEC documents? If the loan will be paid back, why wasn't it just paid off so it could be listed as cash instead?
If I release a PR tomorrow or post on another person's site that npct is flat broke, would you believe it just because it was a PR or posted on someone else's site? Why do you instantly believe all positive news, no matter how tainted, unknown the source, yet all negative items, even SEC and news items, are not to be believed?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
thanks rubber. I sent that to the SEC
Talk about securities fraud. Paul has just violated a few securities regulations. Fair disclosure, fraudulent reporting in SEC documents, basic securities fraud for releasing incorrect and incredibly misleading information to the public... He's such a crook. I hope the SEC also goes after anyone who posts this stuff.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
CEO said Intercell would be successful also
He guaranteed it even. Intercell was a failure.
go here and read his past unfulfilled promises to shareholders. Paul lies and doesn't keep promises.
http://www.mary.cc/npct
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Sorry, haven't been reading replies
I have no idea who that poster is. I haven't been following things much.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
I don't know Rockard
you still here?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Is this true Matt?
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=243293
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
What's amazing is that I still get these emails
Probably once every two weeks. I always instantly forward it to the SEC and make sure to send it to yahoo or hotmail or wherever they have their free account to get it terminated. Once I turned them into yahoo and they lost their account and the next day they emailed me again something like "there was a problem with my email account. Please email this account instead." Of course I killed that account as well. I just hope I kept a few people from being swindled.
I actually had an email exchange with this guy when I saw the first one. I emailed some stuff like "You are a horrible person and a con man and I'm turning you into all the authorities." He emailed back "I'm just running a business here, darling." Then I emailed some obscenities and he responded with "now there's a bit of a tongue" or something. He was polite yet in your face about the scam. I'm glad I'm on his list so I can keep turning him in.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Infineon response
Subj: WG: Infineon and Nanopierce?
Date: 11/5/01 9:31:09 AM Pacific Standard Time
From: Investor.Relations@infineon.com
To: MMMARYinLA@aol.com
Dear sender,
Thank you very much for being interested in Infineon.
Up to now no negotiations about a licence between Infineon Technologies AG and Nanopierce Technologies Inc. are done or started. The naming of Infineon in the article is meant by Nanopierce as a "generalized" public reference.
If you have further questions, please feel free to contact us again.
Best regards,
Infineon Investor Relations,
Verena Raab
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
I predicted price decrease today, it happened
ceo promised they would be profitable by now and htey're still losing tons of money. Who is more believable?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
As per emails with mentioned companies
they are not in business talks with nanopierce. Please everyone email all those mentioned companies and verify it for yourself.
Just because the company puts something in a PR does not make it true, especially when it's coming from paul metzinger. He was sued three times by the SEC for lying in PRs besides lying in his SEC filings and books.
If tomorrow I plunk down $350 for internetwire.com release and state that the companies told me they weren't in business talks with npct, would you then believe it as the word of god and post it all over the internet?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
CEO was wrong, can't break even end of june
if htey're making less money and expenses are higher. Their burn rate is $1.4M a month. They have $1.8M. Do the math. That was the last real pump and dump, before a bad report, as always.
Sure big companies are talking to them about doing deals.
I wrote to that journalist and he may be retracting that story and taking it off the web.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
They lost more $, don't have enough $ for next quarter
Cash on hand $1.8M
$ spent during quarter $1.4M
They lost $1.3M in the quarter.
They barely have enough to make it to end of March and expenses have gone even higher this quarter.
Loaning more money to Intercell, not calling in note
isn't global capital just a stock promotion company?
During the year ended June 30, 2001, the Company loaned $500,000 to an unrelated third party - Global Capital Partners, Inc. ("Global") in exchange for a 12% note receivable due in November 2001. At June 30, 2001, the note balance was $375,000, of which an additional $100,000 was received in August 2001. The note was not paid in November 2001; and therefore, in January 2002, the Company agreed to the assignment of the note, and related accrued interest, by Global, to an entity represented by a shareholder of the Company. The terms of note were changed at the date of assignment, whereby the note now bears interest at 5% per annum and is unsecured, and is due in October 2002. A $32,000 principle payment, along with accrued interest of $18,000, was made in January 2002.
5. Financing Agreement Suit:
In connection with a financing obtained in October 2000, the Company filed various actions in both the United States District Court for the District of Colorado and in the District Court in and for the City and County of Denver, Colorado against, among others, Harvest Court, Southridge Capital Investments, LLC, Daniel Pickett, Patricia Singer and Thomson Kernaghan, Ltd. for violations of federal and state securities laws, conspiracy, aiding and abetting and common law fraud among other claims. The Company is seeking various forms of relief including actual exemplary and treble damages. As a result of various procedural rulings in January 2002, the United States District Court transferred all cases pending before it to the United States District Court for the southern District of New York, New York City, New York.
On May 7, 2001, Harvest Court, LLC filed suit against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York. The suit alleges that the Company has breached the October 20, 2000 Purchase Agreement, by not issuing 7,418,895 free trading shares of the Company's common stock in connection with the reset provisions of the Purchase Agreement due on the second reset date and approximately 4,545,303 shares due in connection with the third reset date. Harvest Court is seeking the delivery of such shares or damages in the alternative. On August 1, 2001, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York issued a preliminary injunction ordering the Company to reserve and not transfer the shares allegedly due to Harvest Court.
In September 2001, a suit was filed by Thomson Kernaghan & Co., Ltd. against the Company and certain officers/directors of the Company seeking general damages for defamation and punitive, aggravated and exemplary damages that aggregate in excess of $3,000,000.
The Company intends to vigorously defend against these claims and does not believe the outcome of these claims will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company. However, it is too early at this time to determine the ultimate outcome of these matters.
The Company recognized revenues of $60,163 for the six months ended December 31, 2001 ($36,097 for the three months ended December 2001) compared to $79,429 for the six months ended December 31, 2000 ($64,487 for the three months ended December 31, 2000). The revenues were from work on various contracts to provide consulting services and software development assistance to third parties by the Company's German subsidiary, Nanocard Technologies, GmbH ("Nanocard").
Research and development expense was $202,348 for the six months ended December 31, 2001 compared to $87,664 for the six months ended December 31, 2000. Research and development expense also increased from $20,363 for the three months ended December 31, 2000 to $94,896 for the three months ended December 31, 2001. The increases are primarily attributable to additional salaries and expansion of research activities for the Company's technology.
General and administrative expenses increased to $2,236,010 for the six months ended December 31, 2001, from $1,319,215 for the six months ended December 31, 2000, and increased to $1,291,106 for the three months ended December 31, 2001 from $678,884 for the three months ended December 31, 2000. The increases are attributable to increases in salaries, depreciation and general expenses resulting from the increased activities and expansion of Nanocard and the Colorado Springs technology group. Further, legal expenses were significantly higher due to amortized legal fees of $500,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2001 ($250,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2001) in connection with litigation research for the Harvest Court Litigation.
The Company and Louis DiFrancesco, the inventor of the PI Technology are involved in litigation relating to the Company's ownership of its intellectual property and the rights as to who should receive royalty payments from licenses, which were outstanding as of September 3, 1996. On November 30, 1999, the Company obtained a Court Order of Declaratory Judgment that it has incontestable and exclusive ownership of all patents, patent applications, licenses, trade names, trademarks, trade secrets and other intellectual properties relating to the PI Technology. Mr. DiFrancesco filed an Appeal on March 28, 2000 with the Colorado Court of Appeals regarding the Declaratory Judgment. On December 6, 2001 the Colorado Court of Appeals rendered an opinion of Judgment Reversed and Case Remanded with Directions. The Colorado Court of Appeals found that there was not a settlement agreement and has ordered the case continue to be heard by the District Court, City and County of Denver. The Company believes that the resolution of this litigation will not have a material adverse impact on either results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.
The Company made the following unregistered sales of its securities from October 1, 2001 to December 31, 2001.
Date Title of Amount of
of Sale Securities Securities Consideration Purchaser
-------- ------------ ---------- --------------- -----------
11/14/01 Common Stock 36,000 Public relation James Stock
services
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Matt, I'll be clear
just enforce the rules nondiscriminately. I have a lot of deleted posts because there are a lot of promoters here who will report every post of mine. I don't report all of theirs. They are like 10 to 1 against me.
Rubberworm here is spamming. He is posting every item from the DD in the ibox. Can I do the same? Let me know and I will or suspend him for spamming.
Sara here knows that npct is not in business talks with those big companies yet she is posting it as if it's true. If I must back up my every statement with links to verify things, then she should also. How about I just release a PR with my DD or post it on someone else's site. Are my words then utter truth?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
La Verne, astn does not look good
They just announced that htey're going from 100M to 1Billion shares. Extreme dilution and they still may not survive.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
NPCT is down today
as I projected. It will go even lower when the report comes out that is due today.
rubber, you are spamming. Posting everything from the DD in the ibox is spamming.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
The report will show the cash position
and current burn rate. Expenses have gone up. They were to run out of funds end of June. I now believe it could be sooner if they don't take the toxic funds. They hired new people and supposedly opened new offices. Those new expenses won't even be in teh quarterly so we must figure cash on hand is much lower and burn rate is even higher.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
I gave sara the ability to verify it
I'm sure she emailed them and got the same exact answer. Midman got almost identical answers to mine. If she is not willing to try and verify it when she knows it's probably untrue, she should not be hyping it as the god's honest truth. I believe she was intentionally posting something which she knew was probably very untrue. No one posted on the board an email where the companies said "yeah, it's true." Not one. The journalists email address is even in the article.
If someone wrote in a PR that they were in talks with you and you're gay, should I just go and post "Whoa, matt is gay!" No, I shouldn't, especially as I know that you probably aren't based on a whole lot of factors. I should try and verify it first. If I just posted it, I could hurt you, Matt, and the gay dudes that might have wanted to meet you. How's that for an analogy?
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Muell, a bad report is coming out
do you still feel the chart will turn up? I believe it will go down. That is why they have been hyping so hard. Even willy came out of the woodwork. They always hype hard before bad news. Four press releases within a month's time, all basically fluff.
If they do get a contract, it won't be for money. There will be a lot of if's in there as in if the product can be built as per specs, if it can cost way under .01 each, if it can easily integrated into their existing assembly process, if pigs fly out of Paul's....
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Matt, I posted this all before
The SEC states we should verify PRs. This ceo was sued by the SEC three times for releasing misleading PRs. He dropped big names into PRs when he had nothing to do with them.
Then they release the PR about the big companies. I called the journalist who posted the PR, cut paste on the nanotech site. He told me he just cut/pasted it and wrote whatever paul told him to say. He said he didn't research anything.
Then I emailed all those companies and posted their responses. I believe Boeing even said they were getting their legal department after npct. Infineon clearly stated NO they are not in talks with them. I posted the rest of the response. Sara read them. I asked others to verify them also. Others tried and could not. She saw all of that.
Then the ceo releases a letter to shareholders stating that because of one person, me, he will no longer be able to share information with the shareholders. He doesn't want to jeopardize deals. What happened was he probably got a cease and desist letter from Boeing.
Then, as I wasn't on this board, she starts posting paraphrased "talks with ibm, motorola, great!" when she knew by then it wasn't the case. She saw the email addresses of the people contacted and could have contacted them. I believe she did and she got the same answer. She emails everyone to try and verify things about me and to complain to CEOs of scammy companies.
I think it is wrong for her to be validating those talks when she knew they probably weren't real. I believe she is doing it because she posted that she just bought back in. A bad report is about to come out and she is saying "whoa, npct is in talks with big companies, yeah!" That is misleading and illegal. That is securities fraud. She's trying to hype the price up. I am totally against people who cheat others like this. They should be in jail and have to pay for the losses of others.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
posting company PR, big deal, CEO is a liar
that doesn't carry much weight. The share price will go down when the report comes out if not sooner. They don't have much cash to survive. They may be forced to take the toxic money then share price will really decline.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
letter of intent is not a contract, revenue or profits
it's almost nothing. I see no money that has come of this. As paul has been known to lie adn mislead in PRs, I don't believe it until I see money
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
Please then post his responses
you post everyone else's posts.
Please post your verification that NPCT is indeed talks with those big companies. I've asked you to do this many times yet you have not.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
NPCT prediction: price to go down
upon release of report, actually right before release. Keep in mind the quarterly is not independently audited. Things could be worse than they seem
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!
I emailed those entities
They said NO they are not in talks with NPCT. I posted this along with the email addresses so everyone could verify it. On RB midman verified the responses. Please contact all of those companies and get written verification that they are indeed in business talks with NPCT or you are helping the company mislead investors by posting something you have been told is incorrect and even given the ability to confirm it for yourself. The SEC site states that we must verify PRs on our own before we invest. I would think you would try and verify the PRs as I did. I honestly could go to busineswire.com and send out a PR stating I'm in business with Jesus Christ, Mother Theresa, Bill Gates and a little green alien named Bubba. Would that be any reason to give me money? I would hope not.
___________________________
Just say NO to stock fraud!