Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"I am sure Turner has reported tax issues under the Whistle Blower regulations of the IRS. For example, if an officer named Jason has received x number of shares, unrestricted, he must report the income for services performed on the valuation date that he received the unrestricted shares"
Im pretty sure tipping the IRS of a suspected non filing of income for a company and employee that you have nothing to do with in the time frame or any filings made in the time doesnt constitute whistle blowing.
I dont even think you need to file any forms. Awhile back I had a million shares of one that didnt have a buy for months and I finally just put a sell for all shares and put market value instead of limit. Trade went through for a penny for all and 7 dollar commission. month or so later it ran to .0015
go figure
i just re read the handwritten agreement. Quangs motion to enforce the judgement is trying to say they didnt fulfill their obligations by not making a typed version to be signed. Where in the agreement does it say PV is responsible for the creation of that document and to have it signed by both parties?
Think it was more with the share structure. The authorized always showed 15 bill it finally switched to 13 when it changed To current. Although the filings were sh*t
you left out a lot of that written settlement agreement.
interesting settlement agreement in texas
really?
This has said re opened for months. The hearing on the 24th if there is not a final judgement from the court by then the case is dismissed
Omg one of them got 25 million shares the other got 20 million. for 6 months. Yeah they were really making a killing there. And fins show their shares are still active
Chambers of JUDGE EMILY TOBOLOWSKY
10/21/2014
PEYTON J HEALEY
POWERS TAYLOR LLP
8150 N CENTRAL EXPWY
STE 1575
DALLAS TX 75206DALLAS
DC-13-02759
QUANG MERIDETH
vs.
PV ENTERPRISES INC, et al
All Counsel of Record:
The above cause reflects a docket entry of final disposition; however, no judgment has been furnished
For entry.
This case is now set for final disposition at 9:00 am on:
11/24/2014
Unless final judgment is furnished to the court prior to such date, an order of dismissal will be entered
With costs taxed against the party incurring same.
Sincerely,
EMILY TOBOLOWSKY
DISTRICT JUDGE
298TH DISTRICT COURT
Dallas County, Texas
the "either, or" in the statement makes it apply to both. Ive never received mine also. But to me I read it as if you havent received then email your info and everythign and shares owned. If have received send in your certificate number along with info for validation for whatever reason. I agree with the ones saying its a stall tactic, especially if two weeks before they are supposed to start taking bookings
"On or before November 15th"
"we will start taking bookings on Nov 3"
if delay tactic its to wait until money starts coming in
thats all public info already, one just has to go search for the case listed
How is that an attempt to hide the not so good stuff? Summary judgement set aside is what happened
Yes and one thing I noticed on the balance sheet filed is the statement in parentheses under name.
PV Enterprises International, Inc.
Balance Sheet
(Previously A Development Stage Enterprise)
The preferred B shares have no conversion rights
Those shares already give him the majority vote even before the R/S? And they have no dividend, conversion or liquidation rights. I saw you had said looks like the common shareholders get screwed becaue of the R/S announcement. I disagree. With all outstanding shares being in the float it sets it up alright. The report says the company anticipates doing the R/S "upon commencement of its operations". So not until they are making money meaning there wont be a need to sell shares into the newly split market. Mostly buys will come in. And if they do what theyre attempting to do with the business plan there will be plenty of buys.
A motion for her to decide to bring it to hearing at trial on 21st
No sh*t that doesnt apply to the majority I spoke of.
is that not just saying that the company may not be making material information public and if you know any of this nonpublic information then you shouldnt buy or sell the stock for now? So in another words no insiders can dump shares? Not really a warning to every shareholder. Majority only know the public information
yes that would be nice, but there is no way they can get that many shares bought at .0001
he got that money from a friend of his, Merideth. Texas Case.
Which that deal turner and quang tried to make up would give quang 45% control, Peter 45% control, Joe veltri (on quangs side) 5% control, Turner the other 5%. which he wouldve voted with joe and quang making it 55-45 sgiving them the majority
if the 50000 was already deposited to the port then would it not be their asset now?
The judgement in florida was approving stipulation which the two parties agreed to out of court. "The Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and has asked the court to set it
for hearing on Tuesday, October 21, 2014 at 9:00am in the 298th Judicial District Court, Dallas
County, Texas" that doesnt seem like a request without trial?
And if this is all about just the promissory note and that peter signed it for a set amount of money why can quang change the amount being asked for?
"TOTAL 161,008.51 Promissory Note was written for $156,000, actual total was $161,008.51"
There would have to be a share buyback or split to get that high really...I mean think about it...11 billion shares at a penny is 110 million dollars. I would be happy with .001-.003 without a split or anything
So is quang just hoping that PVE doesnt retain counsel by the 21st since corportations cant represent pro se, or whatever it is idk much about the terminology, and thats why they asked for the hearing to be set for trial the same time and day theres already a trial set?
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/fl-new-palm-beach-cruise-operator-20140930-story.html
you dont need the cached version
eh oh well i guess, PRs dont help anything
There was no proof saha ever said that but one persons post. We have no idea if he truly said that. I would think he didnt
Well Jackson Ritchie is the president of Bahama Seaways. He's a millionaire
that he hasnt filed yet. and quang hasnt won anything.
At least that proves they're still actually trying to follow through with their business plan and met with the port board of commissioners. I dont think they have to show 1 million in the bank by friday, just the good faith deposit
http://investing.businessweek.com/research/markets/news/article.asp?docKey=600-201409200001KRTRIB__BUSNEWS_36253_4858-1
little better article then the blog post
yes and looking at the public info peter has 2 judgement liens and pv shows 5 majority of which arent that large and very old. I cant seem to find a lot of the old liens and court cases anymore. Please link these current liens with creditors waiting to seize any assets seen. Please dont include the misspelt lauderdale "marfine" center and the 5k dockside one. Im not sure what has made you believe the texas case will result in a judgement on friday? Im guessing your 50k your talking about has to do with http://protectingyourpocket.blog.palmbeachpost.com/2014/09/18/new-cruise-ship-might-sail-out-of-the-port-of-palm-beach/
no real information just some blog post from about a weeek ago, maybe that has to do with bahamas seaways being a part of the meeting of board of commisioners of the port yesterday and the LOI?
I am yet to hear of anyone who was excluded?
whos most creditors? the ones that would be able to seize these assets once shown as you say
Ok so where's the second case then? And what are you talking about proof of 750k settlement, I never said there was one. As far as I know the case for 750k claim doesn't exist
I wont be too worried until I see it halted or a huge R/S.