Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Cdft CC business growing with high volume merchants.
Cdft meeting all uplisting requirement.
Cdft assets growing just like CEO said it would , 700 million +.
Received restricted commons exactly as explained in the uplist plan .
Money making preferred shares just like CEO said would happen .
Cdft increasing BOD to meet altinex uplisting requirement .
Wonder what great uplisting news will be around 11/15/13 ?
More great uplist news in pipeline .
cdft Over 700 million in assets , CEO has not "dumped shares" how long has he had to do so ?
Just checked , Gary did not "dump shares" how long has it been ? Gary was suppose to dump
& run , just upset me when he dose not listen.
Time getting closer to uplist .
Gary sill has not "dumped" shares, oops.
How Riad got involved with the company is still a mystery. no not a mystery to me i know.do some DD its out here .
More great news from cdft soon , will be another step toward uplist .
ceo in hiding
see when you know where to look court manuscripts will give all the answer, keep reading & it shows how treasury failed to prove bonds fake. keep reading.
forensic experts already stated in court manuscript that bonds are real. treasury failed.
yep judge ruling case dismissed case because treasury failed to prove under oath that bonds where fake,at least now you know where to look keep reading & court manuscript will explain how bonds are real & how treasury failed.
conspiracy theories! none here i read the court manuscript & yes the judge ruling was treasury did not prove there case that bonds are fake & if under oath they do have to prove authenticity of bonds that why there is a court system & treasury is not above the law.
Wrong wrong read the court manuscript . All correct answer are there . Judge did not agree with treasury. Bonds real
Well let see Riad found bonds in safe deposit box , did not buy bonds & as far as treasury not under oath then there statement that bonds are fake is not creditable.can't have it both way either under oath saying bonds are fake or not under oath not being creditable.
What did Riad do forge bonds or buy forged bonds or own real bonds that treasury could not prove fake under oath .
U.S. Treasury Archive Office as being legitimate, high-denomination bond numbers that were all issued and/or assigned to government bonds by legitimate representatives of the U.S. Government
treasury under oath could not prove bonds fake.
U.S. Treasury Archive Office as being legitimate, high-denomination bond numbers that were all issued and/or assigned to government bonds by legitimate representatives of the U.S. Government at or around the time Plaintiff believes his bonds were printed. bonds where printed by gov.
read court manuscript is proof that treasury failed under oath, but here is more info, oh judge did not agree with treasury while under oath.
Plaintiff’s bonds and based upon his knowledge and expertise, Mr. Harmon concluded that Plaintiff’s bonds met a wide and specific variety of test requirements and in fact are authentic, government-issued Federal Reserve Bonds. Mr. Harmon’s report addressing the authenticity of the Bonds and his and Dr. Colburn’s credentials are attached hereto as “Exhibit B: Harmon Report”
NOTE the following:
After reviewing the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) document records, Mr. Harmon also confirmed that the serial numbers of Plaintiff’s bonds referred to in Paragraph 7 hereinabove can all be verified at the U.S. Treasury Archive Office as being legitimate, high-denomination bond numbers that were all issued and/or assigned to government bonds by legitimate representatives of the U.S. Government at or around the time Plaintiff believes his bonds were printed.
See “Exhibit B: Harmon Report”
Plaintiff’s bonds all possess the same physical qualities, characteristics, and construction as all other BEP and U.S. Treasury documents. The paper used in Plaintiff’s bonds is identical to the currency paper used by the U.S. Treasury for printing currency and bonds, and the bonds possess the identical security features that were in use by the BEP during the time period that Plaintiff’s bonds were believed to have been printed.
See, “Exhibit B: Harmon Report” attached hereto.
Find link showing they were printed. As is customary on thus board: read court manuscript all info there, treasury failed if under oath. many experts proved bonds real under oath
where is proof gov did not print real bonds, of course the treasury would have to under oath to be creditable.
1 mans opinion, 1 statement made by treasury speculation if not under oath.
bonds them selves are proof they where printed, with experts saying bonds are real, treasury has no proof that what they say is true if under oath .
the thoughts about bonds being fake very weak at best. all though entertaining.
Gov never issued in that denomination, many experts disagree with proof of there findings all in court manuscripts, treasury proved nothing if under oath.
Govt didnt print Riads bonds, again read court manuscript DNA of paper was correct, ink was correct, treasury/gov plate # was correct, bond # are correct. proven in court by many experts,along with the ss man that stole real bonds, treasury proved nothing if under oath, if not under oath then its just a opinion. bonds real
oh by the way treasure never proved that they never printed that size bonds,unless of coarse they where not under oath to prove then what was stated is opinion.bonds real
Plaintiff’s bonds and based upon his knowledge and expertise, Mr. Harmon concluded that Plaintiff’s bonds met a wide and specific variety of test requirements and in fact are authentic, government-issued Federal Reserve Bonds. Mr. Harmon’s report addressing the authenticity of the Bonds and his and Dr. Colburn’s credentials are attached hereto as “Exhibit B: Harmon Report”
NOTE the following:
After reviewing the Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP) document records, Mr. Harmon also confirmed that the serial numbers of Plaintiff’s bonds referred to in Paragraph 7 hereinabove can all be verified at the U.S. Treasury Archive Office as being legitimate, high-denomination bond numbers that were all issued and/or assigned to government bonds by legitimate representatives of the U.S. Government at or around the time Plaintiff believes his bonds were printed.
See “Exhibit B: Harmon Report”
Plaintiff’s bonds all possess the same physical qualities, characteristics, and construction as all other BEP and U.S. Treasury documents. The paper used in Plaintiff’s bonds is identical to the currency paper used by the U.S. Treasury for printing currency and bonds, and the bonds possess the identical security features that were in use by the BEP during the time period that Plaintiff’s bonds were believed to have been printed.
See, “Exhibit B: Harmon Report” attached hereto.
No place to look except court manuscripts. Treasury failed if under oath , if not under oath then statement bonds fake is just a opinion, speculation on treasury statement .
Question still remains if bonds are in fact fake why could treasure under oath not prove bonds are fake .
Treasury did not steal bonds why sue them ? Treasury if under oath could not prove bonds fake , if not under oath then there statement has nothing to do with case there fore the bonds real
If treasury was not part of court case then there comment that bonds fake is not creditable, but if under oath then they failed to prove bonds fake .
Well if court was not to find if bonds fake /real then why was treasury brought in to say but not prove bonds fake? Treasury did say in court transcript that bonds where fake but had no proof .