Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
You are spot on with your doomsday scenario. Lets hope it does not come to that.
You and I must read the bylaws in a completely different perspective. If the majority of shareholders support Williams as you say I don't see it. If you can point me directly to the law that supports your claim it would be appreciated. I'm not making excuses for management failures, but am trying to figure out how you think things are going to be better with Williams.
I hope you don't mind me responding to your comments. I totally agree. If the court does not rule in one way or other for the removal of the company officers or one director, this whole fiasco will revert right back to where we were before. I will accept whatever verdict does not result in a deadlocked BOD. I will reluctantly support Williams if I have to.
I think the term election of director and removal of director are completely different in applying company bylaw terminology. The latter being an executive decision that was allowed to be brought before the shareholders for vote.
Was the company that Williams owns and runs in California suspended and what does that mean?
I did not like the outcome either but, this continuos, useless and self- serving rants and raves that you offer don't help a thing.
WE. Includes you and I.
Let me ask you. Have you got a plan to reverse the Diac settlement? If not I suggest you stop lamenting what should have happened and quit questioning peoples integrity who accept what has happened.
No, I don't miss the point. I'm very aware of what the present state of CLYW is. This is the best it gets. Once this case in Delaware is dispatched, we need to resume to what was being done to secure law firms that will go after all infringers that have been using the technology within the US.
Somehow I've got to coax you out of the past and into the present. I, like you did not like the agreement and settlement with Diac but this company is going to have to play the hand they were dealt. It could still be a bonanza for all shareholders if we can get past all this litigation that is keeping us in a deep hole.
Well I'll tell you pilgrim, I just got to keep kicking that dead horse because I relish the role of engaging people like downsideup in a way that gets useful information in helping throw my support behind the current management Thinking about changing my alias to upsidedown.
Very good perspective on your views, but I don't think either of us knows what is going on behind the scene and I think a stable company is paramount.
I will defer to you again. Is it possible that our deadlocked BOD has scared away potential suitors?
Thanks for the correction.
Until the Diac settlement was over with they really could not negotiate a deal not knowing the company's future. Just an outsider looking in objectively.
That is unless there is going to be future litigation challenging the settlement.
Sorry to butt in but what is the purpose of that? The settlement just happened.
I guess I'm one of the newbies to who you refer, but I was reading this message board a good two years before I posted my first comments about a month ago. It seems to me you went through a transformation during that time also. The conspiracy theory of Diac and management teaming up to steal the patent and destroy the company and the shareholders is something I have trouble wrapping my thoughts around. If the court rules for Williams, as I've stated before I will apologize to you and all his supporters for being so stupid and naive. You can count on that.
I can agree with a change of management if judge rules in favor of Williams.
Alright, I asked for it! Please elaborate on the finding of funds that have nothing to do with advancing the business and everything to do with destroying it. I want to try and find something, anything that I can agree with you on.
Has it ever occurred to you that financially this company is broke? The only thing that is even an asset is the possibility of future infringement lawsuits and licensing fees for your and my company. It is way past time for you to stop all this useless conspiracy rhetoric and stand with the company that obviously does not have the way, means or the will to meet your high expectations. A whole bunch of the blame for this company's failure can be directly pointed at a director that you so ardently support. If that is my blind faith, so be it. Instead of lecturing people to see things in your obscured view, get out of the past and offer solutions to move forward, not backward.
Thank you for saying what I wanted to say but, I heard everything second hand so I wanted someone who was there to verify what was said by Pierce.
Thank you, as I said I'm no legal expert. What is your input?
I'm no legal expert by any means, so you got me there. The only thing I disagree with you on is that the litigation that will happen on Feb. 1 is cut and dried in Williams' favor. To many underlying issues.
Having not heard anything might be because of this lawsuit mess., If my memory is correct Williams filed suit on the fourth or fifth of January.
This is just my opinion but I think that document states that CLYW gets US patents and Diac gets the foreign patents. Don't think its a smoking gun.
If you had been fired from your job would you keep working? I think there is a possibility that they still are working on them.
I don't see the point about the Diac interference unless the court renders the Diac settlement null and void.
I found it interesting that when sosa took us back to Sept. 22 2010 that so many were so giddy about this stock, even the most pessimistic of recent. I was one too! In fact I purchased the majority of the shares I own during that time. I did'nt want the train to leave without me. My timing really sucks, but as I've said before if you cannot afford to lose don't play.
I can only hope in spite of lawsuit that auditing of financials is continuing.
This lawsuit in Delaware could very well restore everything just like it was before or remove the two officers or remove the one Dave Williams. I ask which one of these do you like best?
Is this a covert operation? I'm not a spy for the enemy, whomever that might be, but my pps is crap and I'm a turd in the hole right now. If your covert operation helps the shareholders, I say thanks in advance.
Who are the other certain individuals?
Since I know that you and kangajoe were at Dec 15 meeting, can I get a verification that Kyle Pierce stated whether in the formal meeting or just mingling with attendees that the financials to get us in compliance with SEC would be completed in six to eight weeks? This is an important issue and I'm a third party recipient of this information. Would you or kangajoe care to elaborate on this for the benefit of posters on this board? Don't worry about a negative backlash, you should be used to it.
I would also like to inform everyone that if we ever do get to the point that we go to trial in T Mobile case that Marshall Tx. is an hours drive for me and I will take vacation to attend and try to post updates, but that's a big if.
I went back to look at what my PPS average has been since I've been invested and it appears it is about .09 with no sells. I would like to know that after litigation is over in Delaware that one way or the other we will not have a deadlocked BOD. I still remain positive about this stock's potential but, not without a fifth director or minus one or two directors. If judge's ruling does not address this I feel its back to where we were before this lawsuit.
Seems like several posters here finally got their long awaited law degrees.
I have been a shareholder in this company for only two years, so I'm not as long as some of you, but I follow this board nearly daily. If the court finds in favor of Dave Williams and it is revealed that Turrini committed a felony with company funds and is collaborating with Diac to steal the patent plus if it is determined that Pierce lied in her declaration about the financials,I will write an apology to all Williams' supporters and post it on this board. I am not to proud to admit if I am wrong and I am a man with integrity.
I have to wonder why anyone would think Williams has their interest when he held financials hostage and caused us the SEC sanctions.
Pending status of company and since he was working on contingency, I seriously doubt it. If court ruling goes in favor of company I will say yes. Have to wait to see.