Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/neurology/painmanagement/53498
FDA Panels Nix Avridi Reformulation
Panelists say safety concerns outweigh benefits of abuse-deterrent, immediate-release oxycodone
Pfizer Drug Adcom Votes
Drug Approval: 9 yes, 6 no
ADT Label Oral: 6 yes, 9 no
ADT Label Nasal: 11 yes, 4 no
ADT Label IV: 9 yes, 6 no
Gets approved with a weak label?
Yup, that is all I could find as well.
Next Adcom is scheduled in September. Nothing in between.
If Elite were to be part of that the PDUFA would need to be extended and I would think we would know that by now.
Thanks, much appreciated.
Getting desperate. You don't think that folks invested in ELTP know the difference between IP and ER? Geez....
I looked , couldn't find. Can you supply link?
0.353!
Draft Questions for TEVA drug:
DRAFT QUESTIONS
Page 1 of 1
1. DISCUSSION: Please discuss whether there are sufficient data to support a finding that Vantrela ER (hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets) has properties that can be expected to deter abuse, commenting on support for abuse-deterrent effects for each of the
three possible routes of abuse:
a. Oral
b. Nasal
c. Intravenous
2. VOTE: Should Vantrela ER be approved for the proposed indication, management of pain severe enough to require daily, around-the-clock, long-term opioid treatment and for which alternative treatment options are inadequate?
3. VOTE: If approved, should Vantrela ER be labeled as an abuse-deterrent product by the oral route of abuse?
4. VOTE: If approved, should Vantrela ER be labeled as an abuse-deterrent product by the nasal route of abuse?
5. VOTE: If approved, should Vantrela ER be labeled as an abuse-deterrent product by the intravenous route of abuse?
Among the remaining 96 percent of opioid prescribers, prescriptions of the drugs fell just 0.7 percent after the new measures were introduced, the study showed.
"But our report also shows that programs like PDMPs must be complemented by many other measures to combat the epidemic of addiction and non-medical opioid use," added Chang.
About going on 50 employees soon.
Sure, just keep moving those goalposts...
Notice Elite's logo as a member of the Abuse Deterrent Coalition.
http://abusedeterrent.org/About-Us/default.aspx
Tell that to the FDA, Congress and all the companies that make up the Abuse Deterrent Coalition that are pouring millions of dollars into the development of AD opioids.
Quote from: http://abusedeterrent.org/Default.aspx
"Current abuse deterrent products have reduced abuse for snorting, injecting and chewing. Nothing has yet come to the market that reduces abuse by swallowing. No abuse deterrent technology provides 100% protection."
"Abuse deterrent formulations can also play a positive role in combating the growing problem of Schedule II stimulant prescription drug abuse, such as ADD and ADHD medication, especially among college students. A comprehensive approach is needed to combat prescription pain medication abuse while still maintaining access for pain patients who need them and ADFs are another valuable tool in that effort."
So it is peer reviewed.
LOL LOL
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=122583423
In response to wether the posters submitted are peer reviewed, here is the response from the American Pain Society:
Dear ________
Thank you for contacting the American Pain Society (APS). In response to your inquiry, please find the most recent accepted abstracts here: http://americanpainsociety.org/annual-meeting/2016/poster-abstracts. All posters (accepted and rejected) go through a peer review process and each author is required to file a disclosure conflict of interest form.
Please let me know if you have futher questions or concerns.
Thank you,
Heather Payette
Member Services
American Pain Society
Translating research into relief.
8735 W. Higgins Road, Suite 300 * Chicago, IL 60631
(847) 375-4715 * fax (847) 375-6479 * hpayette@Connect2amc.com
http://www.ampainsoc.org/
Wow BOLD and in CAPS !
This "pump and dump scam" employs 45 people. Grow up.
So "The Journal of Pain" is an abstract? LOL!
You OK?
Is this what certain posters keep looking for?
A presentation of DATA in a PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL by a KEY OPINION LEADER ?
Rationale for acquisition of Epic Pharma by PuraCap?
11-04-2016
The news last week that China-based Humanwell Healthcare Group and PuraCap Pharmaceutical have entered into a definitive agreement to acquire 100% of privately-held US generic drugs marker Epic Pharma for $550 million (The Pharma Letter April 8), seems to have a sub-text: an unidentified product license asset.
In June 2015, Elite Pharmaceuticals (OTC: ELTP) licensed SequestOX (naltrexone and oxycodone hydrochloride), then known only as ELI-200, to Epic Pharma. This was Elite’s lead opioid abuse-deterrent candidate for the management of moderate to severe pain where the use of an opioid analgesic is appropriate. Under the terms of the deal, Epic was due to pay Elite non-refundable milestone payments totaling $15 million and a royalty based on net product sales. The term of the license is five years and the license is renewable upon mutual agreement at the end of the initial term.
According to a long-term investor in Elite and other pharmaceutical companies working to help solve the opioid abuse epidemic who contacted TPL, “PuraCap wants in on the opioid market, and Elite's proprietary technology and its licensing deal with Epic was their way of gaining that access.”
He noted that, in March this year, the US Food and Drug Administration had fast-tracked the review for SequestOX and a decision is to be rendered by July 14, target action date under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA). The FDA granted priority review of the drug.
At that time, Elite’s president and chief executive Nasrat Hakim said: “The FDA’s decision to grant Priority Review to the SequestOX submission is an important milestone for Elite and an important step toward providing a new treatment option for physicians and patients that may deter some of the common methods of opioid abuse.”
“The purchase of Epic gives Humanwell and PuraCap a front row seat to SequestOX being approved by the FDA in July. Great acquisition on their part,” the investor told TPL.
I'd do the job for shares!
She replied to two of my emails in the last week. She also left me a voicemail.
Maybe its all about what you ask and how you ask.
ELTP is looking awesome compared to "Big Pharma" in the last year...
Valeant:down 89% since August
Gilead: down 23% since June
Pfizer: down 17% since July
Amgen: down 17% since July
Elite: UP 50% since July
I am going to say yes you read it wrong.
Received in my email just now from Dianne:
FDA News
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today issued a draft guidance intended to support industry in their development of generic versions of approved opioids with abuse-deterrent formulations (ADF) while ensuring that generic ADF opioids are no less abuse-deterrent than the brand-name drug. Today’s actions are among a number of steps the agency recently outlined in an action plan to reassess its approach to opioid medications. The plan is focused on policies aimed at reversing the epidemic, while still providing patients in pain access to effective relief.
“For the millions of Americans who suffer from significant pain, and the health systems that serve them, generic opioids can be an appropriate and affordable option for patient care,” said FDA Commissioner Robert Califf, M.D. “We recognize that abuse-deterrent technology is still evolving and is only one piece of a much broader strategy to combat the problem of opioid abuse. But strongly encouraging innovation to increase access to generic forms of abuse-deterrent opioid medications is an important element in that strategy.”
In today’s guidance, the agency is encouraging industry efforts to develop pain medicines that are more difficult to abuse. Abuse-deterrent properties make certain types of abuse, such as crushing a tablet in order to snort the contents or dissolving a capsule in order to inject its contents, more difficult or less rewarding. It does not mean the product is impossible to abuse or that these properties necessarily prevent addiction, overdose or death – notably, the FDA has not approved an opioid product with properties that are expected to deter abuse if the product is swallowed whole.
To better understand the real-world impact of ADF therapies and continue to support innovation in this space, the FDA has required all sponsors of brand name products with approved abuse-deterrent labeling to conduct long-term epidemiological studies to assess their effectiveness in reducing abuse in practice. While the FDA recognizes that the ADFs are not failsafe and more data are needed, ADF opioids do have properties expected to deter abuse compared to non-ADFs. Given the lower cost, on average, of generic products, encouraging access to generic forms of ADF opioids is an important step toward balancing the need to reduce opioid abuse with helping to ensure access to appropriate treatment for patients in pain.
The draft guidance issued today (titled “General Principles for Evaluating the Abuse Deterrence of Generic Solid Oral Opioid Drug Products”) includes recommendations about the studies that should be conducted to demonstrate that a generic opioid is no less abuse-deterrent than the brand name product, with respect to all potential routes of abuse. Today’s draft guidance for generic abuse-deterrent opioids follows the agency’s final guidance for brand name opioids, “Abuse-Deterrent Opioids - Evaluation and Labeling,” which was issued April 2015 as the first step to provide a framework for what studies were needed to test a product’s ability to deter abuse.
To encourage additional input from outside experts and the public, the agency will also hold a public meeting later this year to discuss the draft guidance on generic ADF products and a broad range of issues related to the use of abuse-deterrent technology as one tool to reduce prescription opioid abuse. The FDA will take this feedback into consideration when developing the final guidance on this topic.
“Collaboration is critical in fostering innovation in the field of abuse deterrence,” said Douglas Throckmorton, M.D., deputy director for regulatory programs in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “It is essential that a generic product is no less abuse-deterrent than the brand name product. We look forward to actively engaging in discussions to help inform our thinking about the evaluation of abuse-deterrent technologies.”
The FDA encourages feedback from all stakeholders during the 60-day comment period on this draft guidance.
The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, promotes and protects the public health by, among other things, assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products.
http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm492237.htm
CDER New Drug Review Update 2015
http://www.lachmanconsultants.com/2015/12/cder-new-drug-review-update-2015/
By Bob Pollock | December 15, 2015 | FDA, Regulatory Affairs | Like |
FDA released a presentation by John Jenkins, M.D., Director, Office of New Drugs at CDER. The report is rather astounding and signals that the PDUFA program and the way FDA approached drug approval is not only collaborative but also thorough. One rather amazing piece of information is the first action approval rates for FY 2015. The overall first action approval rate for NDAs and BLA was reported at 95% with Priority Review NDA/BLA applications at 93% and Standard NDA/BLA first action approvals at 100%. That is some incredible work.
This begs the question- is FDA just rubberstamping NDA/BLA approvals? No, says Dr. Jenkins, and, in providing reasons why the first action approval rates are so high, he notes:
CDER has not changed its interpretation of the statutory standard for approval – we are not a “rubber stamp”
Factors that may be contributing FDA guidance/meetings during IND to clarify expectations for development programs – improves quality of NDAs/BLAs
NME Program – complete applications at time of filing and more time for interactions with sponsor to address deficiencies
Targeted therapies – greater benefit/less risk in selected patients
More orphan drugs – alters benefit/risk balance
BT designation – “all-hands on deck” for sponsor and FDA
Focus of sponsors away from “me too” drugs and diseases with available treatment options with less favorable B/R balance
Not necessarily a good outcome from a public health perspective
Another interesting observation is that the US was the first to launch about 60% of new active substances in the world in 2014.
Median review times were up slightly, but due to the 60-day filing review, that is now counted outside of the PDUFA goal date and is off the clock.
The presentation is well worth spending some time reviewing as it contains a lot of useful and important facts and figures. The presentation and can be accessed here. Enjoy!
Penny Stocks to Buy on St. Patrick's Day... If You So Choose
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/penny-stocks-buy-st-patricks-155400809.html
Slàinte!
counting their money!
Prioritizing abuse-deterrent formulations and overdose treatments: The FDA will encourage the development of more effective abuse-deterrent features and prioritize the issuance of guidance on generic opioid products in abuse-deterrent formulations.
http://www.medpagetoday.com/Washington-Watch/FDAGeneral/56502
FDA Science Advisors Talk Strategy on Opioids
Califf also recapitulated the agency's latest action on opioids, which included convening the current meeting, as well as changes to immediate-release opioid labeling; advisory committees for all opioids that don't have abuse-deterrent formulations; and additional post-marketing study requirements.
Be nice!
So a stock tripling in price is bad? Got it!
The team of accountants at Demetrius that worked with Elite all left and joined Buchbinder.
Elite wanted to continue working with that same team.
So in order to do so they had to follow them over to Buchbinder which necessitated the formal change in accounting company.
Nothing to get excited about.
They have to file by 2/9.
“Development of abuse-deterrent products is a priority for the FDA, and we hope this guidance will lead to more approved drugs with meaningful abuse-deterrent properties,” said Janet Woodcock, M.D., director of the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “While abuse-deterrent formulations do not make an opioid impossible to abuse and cannot wholly prevent overdose and death, they are an important part of the effort to reduce opioid misuse and abuse.”
While this final guidance does not address generic opioid products, the agency understands the importance of available generic options to ensure appropriate access to effective opioid drugs for patients who need them. The FDA is committed to supporting the development and use of generic drugs that have abuse-deterrent properties and is working on draft guidance in this area.