Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
probably means: if you find some in the road, pick it up, but dot not pay for (BUY) it
actually i cannot remember, it was a very painful time...all that i recall was that it was late but that even later would have been worse
i sold most of what i had late and then started accumulating seriously in the $7 range and later in the $5 range and so on....
a Google meltdown was not presumed, though an intc meltdown could well occur
for intc maybe
intel leads in certain narrow areas of process technology; however, intel does not lead overall at all
BTW, if 45nm and 65nm is so all overshadowing, why does virtually everything that intel has suck next to what AMD has ???
yes i have many, many links, and unlike those that you have, mine actually go someplace that i want to go :)))))
BTW, i call what i do "scoping", i find it to be a far more powerful set of tools than the ANALytical extrapolation tools that those overpaid morons employ
i see $5-10/share earnings power within 5 years...some of the ANALysts should see this as well in about 2-3 years
AMD should not only pass intel but Google as well...not really a difficult trick
not the way that i do it...AMD has very ovbiously already traded technology leadership places with intel...it should trade market cap places next...allow for growth from where it is headed...then divide by about half of a billion shares...all in due course
i am actually not all that bullish on AMD...i do not BUY it...i rate it a HOLD...so i HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD and HOLD .... it
(edited)not at all odd given what intel just did to dull with eeeple...hint: eeple gets (eeple-core-duo) before dull...the eeple in intel's eye just up to eeple becoming the eeple in intel's eye
and now from ASHLEE: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01/31/dell_amd_march/
Cher suks at math
no and despite the story, not yet
i think that you will get them from AMD and you can count on intel to keep AMD in its toes
there is enough out there already...the next "STUFF" is not needed yet...why give intel any more than it has ? ...do want Hector to be more like Jerry ?
...good for another 9-12 months....
i have difficulty thinking that short term...i never buy anything that i do not intend to hold for at least five years...of course if developments indicate, i sell in a heartbeat....
i use what has worked for me...you should use what works for you
BTW, both AMD and intc are flirting with their respective 52 week end points...were you a fund manager constrained to buy one or the other, which one would you buy ? :)))))
BTW, the institutions are collectively realizing that AMD is under owned, try to imagine what will happen when AMD declares a one cent per quarter dividend.
notice that you are talking in terms of intel catching up (which is not likely) that, in itself, is a major victory that is not at all in AMD's price yet
sounds about right
more the chipdesigner's area of expertise than mine...i just suspect that you very much underestimate Hector's trump cards...though groo might recall that i guessed (or predicted) socket 1207
FWIW, i do not believe that i am at all relatively bullish though i am bullish on AMD. During the early eighties, when i made a brief career excursion into being a securities analyst (not an ANALyst) i was criticised for not liking most (actually almost all of them) stocks. My early report on Cray Research was the only SELL on the street. Cray advanced over 200% after my odd logic based report which did prove to be correct as history bore out much of what was in that report. Anthem Electronics, one of my few BUYs, grew over 2000% before it was acquired by Arrow. I remember that whenever iu tried to peddle its shares to my firms institutional clients, they would criticize the choice as not having a large enough market cap and that a meaningful position could not be taken. My only good response was that any position taken would eventually yurn out to be meaningful...HO HUM.
Several years ago, when AMD shares were trading for around $5 and below, i took the biggest chunks of my position and posted on SI that it seemed to me to be the best investment that i had recognized in over 30 years of investment experience. i posted that it appeared to have the potential to appreciate over 20,000% in five to ten years. i also posted that attempting to play the swings would probably prove to be folly as it held the risk of missing the biggest moves.
All that seems to have occurred since then is that some of what i was looking for is being born out.
ALSO, AMD may now be in transition from being a Wall Street "DOG" into becoming a Wall Street "DARLING". If i am correct, selling the stock because "IT IS GOING UP TOO MUCH !!!!" is going to prove to be EXTREMELY STUUUUUPID !
</B>yust my thoughts
re: your well-known long-term AMD bullish optimism ACTUALLY, this is pretty DAMN personal sounding SHIT for a "no tolerance" thread "MODERATOR"
somehow i feel no obligation to "prove" anything to you
you had said: "I admire your eternal optimism but that is all it is as regards H206 and not based on any proper analysis of the facts then." which, in my mind made you deserving of my response.
you have totally snowed me...you win...AMD is doomed...doomed...doomed...i say doomed
not based on any proper analysis of the facts then
naive and completely misinformed
if nominated, i will not run...if elected, i will not serve
i just had a really scarey thought: i nominate the chipdesigner for thread moderator...might make for an interesting thread....
of course it will...that is an OBVIOUS call...then, of course...it will resume going up
no...i am not...it is very odd what happens to some of you guys when you become thread moderators and it goes to your heads...BTW, my name is not DARbs...is that not a TOU violation ?
proof by "OBVIOUS"